|
Spot buys for LA probably aren't cheap.
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2017 20:08
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 09:20 |
|
|
Oh Snapple! posted:Spot buys for LA probably aren't cheap. lol
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2017 20:08
|
|
|
I seriously still can't get over that.
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2017 20:08
|
|
|
Error 404 posted:I love how RUSSIANS! has basically become liberal birtherism. I thought truthers were already a well known example of left wing lunacy. What is this shock and awe at the depths of liberal stupidity? Many inane new pastimes will be picked up by the left because, you're going to have to find something to pass the time for the next 8 years. Oh, and I promise you it's going to be a long winter.
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2017 20:12
|
|
|
Oh Snapple! posted:I seriously still can't get over that. I'm hungover, what are you referring to?
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2017 20:12
|
|
|
mugrim posted:I'm hungover, what are you referring to? The Clinton campaign spend millions of dollars for TV ad buys in California
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2017 20:13
|
|
|
Zikan posted:more epic Clinton campaign failure
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2017 20:15
|
|
|
etalian posted:The Clinton campaign spend millions of dollars for TV ad buys in California Now, isn't that just adorable? She targets where she wants to vacation, instead of where she needs to campaign. You can't beat the size of those brass balls, too bad they will forever be blue. Madame Secretary, coming is fun. Try it some time. You'll find that both partners have to invest a little work in the process; otherwise you'll find yourself sweaty, tired, and dateless. Just ask the chief.
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2017 20:19
|
|
|
Reminder that her very bad campaign almost lost Minnesota as well. It's like they completely overlooked Great Lakes states in terms of providing resources and campaign time.
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2017 20:19
|
|
|
don't get me wrong -- i'm dumber than poo poo but even the idea of spending money in los angeles in the general election was loving confounding
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2017 20:22
|
|
|
Baloogan posted:its a bit hilarious watching the left fall into the conspiracy theory hole just as alex jones has reached a whole new level of respectability I don't typically read liberal online talking heads but from what I've seen, the likes oh Eric Boehlert and Keith Olbermann literally say that people on the left who are skeptical of the Russians hacked everything narrative are just as bad as conservatives and are all Russia supporters who should be tried for treason.
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2017 20:26
|
|
|
jBrereton posted:remember when they said Iraq had WMDs? who cares what they say, it isn't important to anyone but stuck rear end loser dems That was mostly the Bush administration's work. They exaggerated intelligence. No doubt Iraq was trying to obtain WMDs but the idea that they were succeeding in any way that the rest of the world should worry about was a result of Rummy and Cheney et al pushing that narrative. I'm not going to pretend that the intelligence community is a bunch of saints but they don't play well together so if they are agreeing on Russian interference, then I'm inclined to lend it more credibility than some loving literally crazy person screaming about a fake birth certificate or jet fuel and steel beams. I also think the hacks aren't what the dems should point to in regards to their loss but the idea that it's just some complete fabrication from the illuminati who really control our government is absurd.
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2017 20:31
|
|
|
Top 10 Dem Disadvantage Markets Top 10 Dem Advantage Markets 
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2017 20:38
|
|
|
If Hillary is a True Progressive why is she not organizing any efforts agaisnt Trump and also spending so much time with her wealthy campaign donors?
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2017 20:41
|
|
|
logikv9 posted:Top 10 Dem Disadvantage Markets Oh, Hillary. Well, nothing to be done but- 
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2017 20:41
|
|
|
They also spend campaign time and ad money on states like AZ since Hillary was desperate to show she could do better than Obama's accomplishments in the GE.
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2017 20:42
|
|
|
etalian posted:If Hillary is a True Progressive why is she not organizing any efforts agaisnt Trump and also spending so much time with her wealthy campaign donors? No true Scotsman...
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2017 20:43
|
|
|
logikv9 posted:Top 10 Dem Disadvantage Markets What the gently caress were they doing advertising in half those places?  Goddammit this is incompetent.
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2017 20:45
|
|
|
Actually it might be more accurate to sort by raw # of ads vs ad difference Top 20 Dem Ad Buys  Top 20 Rep Ad Buys 
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2017 20:50
|
|
|
Wait, is it actually this thread's opinion that the Russians didn't hack the DNC?
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2017 20:51
|
|
|
well, when somebody falls for phishing bullshit, technically it's hacking, but saying they got hacked disguises the fact that they fell for phishing bullshit.
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2017 20:52
|
|
|
I thought that was Podesta's e-mails within the Clinton campaign? Is that the same leak as the DNC?
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2017 20:54
|
|
|
they're blaming the russians for everything, so you'll understand if i get a little confused sometimes.Gene Hackman Fan posted:don't get me wrong -- i'm dumber than poo poo
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2017 20:57
|
|
|
It's mostly that it's just really hard to take the Russia blaming seriously when it's primarily from the mouths of folks who spent the past year defending every lovely thing the US does and has done internationally, election interference included.
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2017 20:59
|
|
|
i still think going "lol craaaazy conspiracy" and brushing off the russia thing is dumb, but more dumb is thinking russia somehow made people vote trump with their amazing mind-control rayguns
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2017 21:01
|
|
|
Like I'm pretty sure Russia did/tried to do some stuff, but going all in on them as if they actually accomplished anything through it is both lol and democrats as gently caress.
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2017 21:03
|
|
|
Fidel Castronaut posted:That was mostly the Bush administration's work. It wasn't just them though. The CIA put out a public statement saying they believed SH was a few years into a ten year attempt to build nuclear missiles. Seriously, the same "Intelligence reports confirm from all these agencies!" Nonsense was trotted out at the time too, and it turned out it was all these agencies reading a lovely report and not them all coming to the same conclusion separately. mugrim has issued a correction as of 21:07 on Jan 1, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2017 21:03
|
|
|
Yinlock posted:i still think going "lol craaaazy conspiracy" and brushing off the russia thing is dumb, but more dumb is thinking russia somehow made people vote trump with their amazing mind-control rayguns Hill Folk need something to blame for her failed presidential bid.
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2017 21:04
|
|
|
Pollyanna posted:Bernie would have won.
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2017 21:05
|
|
|
etalian posted:Hill Folk need something to blame for her failed presidential bid. why do they need to invent one, there's a ton of reasons and a lot of them are hillary herself
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2017 21:06
|
|
|
you have never been more spoiled for choice as to reasons for losing
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2017 21:07
|
|
|
Yinlock posted:why do they need to invent one, there's a ton of reasons and a lot of them are hillary herself she can't be the/a reason, is the thing
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2017 21:07
|
|
|
Yinlock posted:why do they need to invent one, there's a ton of reasons and a lot of them are hillary herself Because she might run in 2020
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2017 21:07
|
|
|
Oh Snapple! posted:she can't be the/a reason, is the thing Yes it's all about blame shifting to external factors and not admitting Hillary's bad leadership led to her own defeat.
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2017 21:09
|
|
|
I remember reading some pundit saying "Hillary would have won but Bernie dragged her too far left" and the next thing I remember was waking up 12 hours later covered in blood.
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2017 21:13
|
|
|
etalian posted:Yes it's all about blame shifting to external factors and not admitting Hillary's bad leadership led to her own defeat. Bad leadership implies she is one. She's not. She's a nepotism case without an ounce of personal responsibility or Charisma. Kind of like a robot Kennedy but without the history of accomplishing real important poo poo or humor.
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2017 21:14
|
|
|
Show me more Bernie sleeper agent conspiracy theorists, those were the funniest thing in the last couple days e: you ever get a rage title and not even know what someone got mad about
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2017 21:17
|
|
|
Hey now, she successfully carpetbagged her way into an extremely safe senate seat that probably any dem would have won!
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2017 21:18
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/daveweigel/status/815432074698035200
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2017 21:20
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 09:20 |
|
|
loquacius posted:Show me more Bernie sleeper agent conspiracy theorists, those were the funniest thing in the last couple days did you touch some klurf's gummy gum guts without their permission?
|
|
#
?
Jan 1, 2017 21:22
|
|