Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
super sweet best pal
Nov 18, 2009

oohhboy posted:

This had to happen as Vadar has been dragged through the mud so much by the prequels that you could build a mud hut out of him. You actually see Vadar gently caress poo poo up finally instead of throttling people once in a while. It was the fight he couldn't do in ANH.

That's as dumb as people who say TFA needed to be a boring retread of OT plot beats in order to restore peoples' faith in the series.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

CaptainFish
Mar 31, 2011

It's Psy-Crow my mortal Enemy! I swear my soily vengeance upon him and his fowl ilk!

super sweet best pal posted:

That's as dumb as people who say TFA needed to be a boring retread of OT plot beats in order to restore peoples' faith in the series.

I feel the same way as you. I didn't really appreciate the retread in TFA as much as others, and I felt pretty much nothing watching Vader gently caress poo poo up as some sort of proof that he's still cool. He felt pretty useless to the whole story, and watching him go nuts on completely faceless rebels after everyone died seemed so strange outside of the idea that they really wanted to tie it up directly to ANH. Also, I'd argue that showing him fail to get the plans from some cannon fodder is pretty uncool.

I don't think about the prequels that much in general (which is a weird thing to post in this thread, but I'm not really a RLM fan for the Plinkett stuff). They're pretty disappointing movies that I don't have any issue separating from the original good ones. I didn't go into TFA making sure they weren't gonna make the same prequel mistakes, I just wanted a good movie.

temple
Jul 29, 2006

I have actual skeletons in my closet

CaptainFish posted:

I feel the same way as you. I didn't really appreciate the retread in TFA as much as others, and I felt pretty much nothing watching Vader gently caress poo poo up as some sort of proof that he's still cool. He felt pretty useless to the whole story, and watching him go nuts on completely faceless rebels after everyone died seemed so strange outside of the idea that they really wanted to tie it up directly to ANH. Also, I'd argue that showing him fail to get the plans from some cannon fodder is pretty uncool.
Rogue One's premise is that the Empire had won years prior and Vadar had already earned his keep. Stealing the death star plans (the entire point of rogue one) was having the germ of hope.

oohhboy
Jun 8, 2013

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

super sweet best pal posted:

That's as dumb as people who say TFA needed to be a boring retread of OT plot beats in order to restore peoples' faith in the series.

It was for Vadar no doubt. In the OT it was physically impossible for a scene like this to happen at the time or else it would have been in the opening of ANH and this discussion would be moot. Plus it was 30 seconds max of screen time of something we haven't seen before done well and not a retread you make it out to be. It's the sort of the same strange complaint people have with Trakin and Leia who in no way dominate the screen time yet are plot and thematically critical characters that needed to be carried forward.

TFA did gently caress up because it was a retread of the OT that was blatantly done over the course of a whole movie. TFA didn't need to be the way it was, but JJ is a Hack Fraud who can't make good movies.

temple posted:

Rogue One's premise is that the Empire had won years prior and Vadar had already earned his keep. Stealing the death star plans (the entire point of rogue one) was having the germ of hope.

This. Someone earlier in the thread called it the baton passing or like the Olympic torch of hope. They could have used storm troopers like ANH but now you could use Vadar as intended all those years back so why not use him. Also villains are meant to fail if you want to have a happy ending.

Pinch Me Im Meming
Jun 26, 2005

oohhboy posted:

Vadar Vadar

I'm seething with rage.

Paladinus
Jan 11, 2014

heyHEYYYY!!!
It's a story about wars among stars, you loving idiots.

Pinch Me Im Meming
Jun 26, 2005
People want Star Wars to be a fun space adventure and fans want it to be a compendium of technical details filling every plot hole & also they want to be in the movie and kiss the princess :3

Ka0
Sep 16, 2002

:siren: :siren: :siren:
AS A PROUD GAMERGATER THE ONLY THING I HATE MORE THAN WOMEN ARE GAYS AND TRANS PEOPLE
:siren: :siren: :siren:
There's a very large fraction of fans who want 1.lightsaber twirling and 2.more original trilogy property shoved in for the sake of nostalgia and having a plot written around it.

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

Pinch Me Im Meming posted:

fans want it to be a compendium of technical details filling every plot hole

No, you're thinking of Star Trek. Fans did not want the Force explained as bacteria.

Bloody Hedgehog
Dec 12, 2003

💥💥🤯💥💥
Gotta nuke something

WampaLord posted:

No, you're thinking of Star Trek. Fans did not want the Force explained as bacteria.

No, but they want to know about the rivets on a TIE Bomber.

Woden
May 6, 2006

Pinch Me Im Meming posted:

People want Star Wars to be a fun space adventure and fans want it to be a compendium of technical details filling every plot hole & also they want to be in the movie and kiss the princess :3

Fans will eat any poo poo put in front of them, if the Lucas Arts shovel-ware and prequels didn't kill of their love of Star Wars then up nothing will.

oohhboy
Jun 8, 2013

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
Lightsaber twirling was one of the reason PT and TFA sucked.

WampaLord posted:

No, you're thinking of Star Trek. Fans did not want the Force explained as bacteria.
That's why Churrit the monk worked. You don't quite know if he was connected to the Force or is nothing but faith.

Bloody Hedgehog posted:

No, but they want to know about the rivets on a TIE Bomber.

I heard there are books for that.

But I don't look forward to the rest of the SW movies and I am not going to the theatre for it. I was pleasantly surprised by R1 but I went to see it out of social obligation when I otherwise wouldn't have. I didn't see TFA in the theatre either and I was please I didn't as it burned SW again.

Bloody Hedgehog
Dec 12, 2003

💥💥🤯💥💥
Gotta nuke something

oohhboy posted:

I heard there are books for that.

Soup du Journey
Mar 20, 2006

by FactsAreUseless
The naysayers are p. nuts!! It was a fun movie and I had no prob caring about the cast or figuring out what their personalities were. I do agree with the hack frauds about vader not aging well AT ALL and Forrest needing a boulder to smoosh his legs or something. Tarkin looked fine except for like 2 shots.

Paladinus
Jan 11, 2014

heyHEYYYY!!!
There are things that I agree with, but some things, let me tell you, with some things I just disagree outright.

Pinch Me Im Meming
Jun 26, 2005

Paladinus posted:

There are things that I agree with, but some things, let me tell you, with some things I just disagree outright.

You're tearing this thread apart!

Sheen Sheen
Nov 18, 2002

Ka0 posted:

There's a very large fraction of fans who want 1.lightsaber twirling and 2.more original trilogy property shoved in for the sake of nostalgia and having a plot written around it.

I'm beginning to think that it's not so much a "very large fraction of fans" so much as "99% of fans" who feel that way

I haven't seen the movie yet, but I had a sneaking suspicion from the get go that the people who wrote the script did so while playing with their old Star Wars action figures and the RLM review seems to support that

temple
Jul 29, 2006

I have actual skeletons in my closet
I think Mike doesn't get that overreacting to stuff is what nerds/youtube personalities do. Star Wars fans are probably older than him and couldn't give a poo poo beyond curiosity. The people you see today crying over movie trailers are just acting so they get views and youtube money (thanks to peedeepie, avgn, markiplier) Its like people that love weed so they can be the weed guy and get invited to parties. Mike is tilting at windmills.

KakerMix
Apr 8, 2004

8.2 M.P.G.
:byetankie:

temple posted:

I think Mike doesn't get that overreacting to stuff is what nerds/youtube personalities do. Star Wars fans are probably older than him and couldn't give a poo poo beyond curiosity. The people you see today crying over movie trailers are just acting so they get views and youtube money (thanks to peedeepie, avgn, markiplier) Its like people that love weed so they can be the weed guy and get invited to parties. Mike is tilting at windmills.

It doesn't matter if they are acting for YouTube views or not they are the fans now.

DreadLlama
Jul 15, 2005
Not just for breakfast anymore
A guy didn't want to do his job so he did it crappy on purpose to get back at his boss. Isn't that the story?

Dylan McKay
Oct 20, 2011

I will not shut up about the Mighty Morphin Power Rangers. I talk about them all the time and work them into every conversation. I refuse to see Black Panther because they didn't ask the Black Ranger to be in it.
i wish mads mikkelsen had been the main character and not the lovely leads we got. felicity jones is loving terrible

Soup du Journey
Mar 20, 2006

by FactsAreUseless

DreadLlama posted:

A guy didn't want to do his job so he did it crappy on purpose to get back at his boss. Isn't that the story?

you mean the guy who designed the slippery landing platform on the rainy research planet to make it so that everyone had to hang around outside for the benefit of covert infiltrators and sniper teams instead of nesting the whole shebang inside of the cliff like where the tie fighters were kept? yeah

Nutsngum
Oct 9, 2004

I don't think it's nice, you laughing.

ashpanash posted:

It's definitely a "Star Wars" something but the only adjective that should be applied to the "movie" part is "bad."

If you like Star Wars poo poo to the point where you enjoy making up your own backstory ideas to filling in the gaping holes and like reading between imaginary lines that aren't actually told or shown then I guess it's entertaining for you. And if that's the case, great! I'm glad you enjoyed it. It was made for you, and that's awesome.

As a movie made for the general moviegoing audience it's just plain bad. None of the things that people actually enjoy about good movies or even *good stories* are there. And gently caress if I'm going to make up backstories and justify these non-characters. I don't care about Star Wars at all, so there was absolutely nothing there to grab me. That's why the whole first 2/3s were boring as gently caress, and the end only perked up because some poo poo was actually happening, even though it was absurd video game switch-pulling nonsense.

I mean, I go to watch these Star Wars movies more out of a sense of cultural obligation (everyone is going to be talking about them for a month so I should be informed), and I'm losing any hope that any of them might actually be an enjoyable experience for me.

The general movie going people have said its generally good though? Perhaps the issue is YOU mr internet reviewer man.

ashpanash
Apr 9, 2008

I can see when you are lying.

Nutsngum posted:

The general movie going people have said its generally good though? Perhaps the issue is YOU mr internet reviewer man.

I can't discount that possibility. But then again, everyone was praising poo poo like:
The prequel movies
the matrix sequels
jurassic world

for months in some sort of weird afterglow before they started deciding that 'Oh, I guess I really didn't like it that much' became the much more common opinion.

I'll bet good money on the consensus opinion being that Rogue One sucked in, say, 6 months. I mean, look at the last few pages, people *hate* The Force Awakens now. They loving hate it. That wasn't the general opinion when it came out. Explain that, mr internet contrarian man.

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

ashpanash posted:

look at the last few pages, people *hate* The Force Awakens now. They loving hate it.

Umm, no?

ashpanash
Apr 9, 2008

I can see when you are lying.


You're right - it's mostly just oohhboy who can't seem to stand the mere existence of TFA.

Shinjobi
Jul 10, 2008


Gravy Boat 2k

ashpanash posted:

You're right - it's mostly just oohhboy who can't seem to stand the mere existence of TFA.

He tends to hate drat near everything, from what I've seen.

Blazing Ownager
Jun 2, 2007

by FactsAreUseless

ashpanash posted:

I can't discount that possibility. But then again, everyone was praising poo poo like:
The prequel movies
the matrix sequels
jurassic world

You are so full of poo poo on that.

Maybe you don't remember but the prequels were being universally trashed to poo poo when they came out. Phantom Menace was hated by all. gently caress, I literally did not want to see it as a kid because I thought all the space ships and stuff looked loving terrible and stupid, like neon fish. I haven't changed my opinion much on that despite it being shallow, but it did indicate EXACTLY what kind of poo poo it was going to be.

People gave Reloaded credit because it was supposed to be the first half of a two part movie. The ending of Reloaded, which got really dumb other than a badass car chase, seemed to imply that there was another layer to reality, like a big plot twist. It then proceeded to just go "No Neo's magic IRL now lol" in the next movie, followed by the dumbest, shittiest battle sequence I've ever seen in my life: Big stationary robots with no torso armor standing and shooting and shooting and shooting and shooting and shooting and shooting and shooting and shooting at robot swarms that just kept flying around and not loving doing anything. We walked out of the theater asking what crack the directors took, and grumbling how stupid it was, and so was EVERYONE ELSE walking out of the theater.

And Jurassic World was just pretty meh. It had some good ideas executed very poorly. The ending makes me think they're STILL going to do the CyberDinosaur weapon plot, which is hilarious because I thought they decided not to. It's only not hated by virtue of the other sequels sucking, somehow, even more.

ED: Oh one more thing. Trinity's death scene in Matrix Revolutions is totally the parody death from National Lampoon's Loaded Weapon. I couldn't get that out of my head and started busting up laughing at it.

-

Oh yeah one other thing hilarious about the Matrix sequels (Goddamn I wish RLM would cover them sometime) is how Revolutions spent a huge amount of time with characters from tie-in games and animated movies, like a huge amount of time, and literally took the main characters from the films and stuck them in the backseat. Morpheous literally just got to sit in a chair and watch video game people do everything.

Blazing Ownager fucked around with this message at 21:26 on Jan 2, 2017

happyhippy
Feb 21, 2005

Playing games, watching movies, owning goons. 'sup
Pillbug
It was the jungle rave/sex scene that was the first signs of how poo poo the Matrix sequels were.
Lets bro dance like jocks in a girls gone wild video, near some lava but and only just drums, even though the overtune is fully orchestrated.
Lets pan over the crowd, and every 5th or 6th jump up for no reason.

Matrix: Retarded and Matrix: Revulsions.

Zzulu
May 15, 2009

(▰˘v˘▰)
I think the idea of it was cool. Like, humanity was getting primal and stuff again in their last moments... but the execution was very off. The sequels were just very off in general. They obviously lost some creative talent person for the sequels who was key in making the "whole" of the first matrix come together

Also all the wachowski bros movies after Matrix 1 have been bad

Fojar38
Sep 2, 2011


Sorry I meant to say I hope that the police use maximum force and kill or maim a bunch of innocent people, thus paving a way for a proletarian uprising and socialist utopia


also here's a stupid take
---------------------------->
tfa was a really good movie

Fojar38
Sep 2, 2011


Sorry I meant to say I hope that the police use maximum force and kill or maim a bunch of innocent people, thus paving a way for a proletarian uprising and socialist utopia


also here's a stupid take
---------------------------->

happyhippy posted:

It was the jungle rave/sex scene that was the first signs of how poo poo the Matrix sequels were.
Lets bro dance like jocks in a girls gone wild video, near some lava but and only just drums, even though the overtune is fully orchestrated.
Lets pan over the crowd, and every 5th or 6th jump up for no reason.

Matrix: Retarded and Matrix: Revulsions.

we got to see trinitys butt so im okay with it

Zzulu
May 15, 2009

(▰˘v˘▰)

Fojar38 posted:

tfa was a really good movie

I dont think they directed the force awakens

Paladinus
Jan 11, 2014

heyHEYYYY!!!

Fojar38 posted:

tfa was a really good movie

Do you mean The First Avenger? It was an okay movie, yes.

ashpanash
Apr 9, 2008

I can see when you are lying.

Blazing Ownager posted:

You are so full of poo poo on that.

No, I'm not.

The same people vociferously defending Rogue One are the same people who couldn't admit that Matrix Reloaded was dogshit, that The Phantom Menace was a huge pile of nonsense, or who insisted that Revenge of the Sith was actually good because it was "Dark."

All your examples are about *you* and your friends. You aren't who I'm talking about.

Paladinus
Jan 11, 2014

heyHEYYYY!!!

ashpanash posted:

No, I'm not.

The same people vociferously defending Rogue One are the same people who couldn't admit that Matrix Reloaded was dogshit, that The Phantom Menace was a huge pile of nonsense, or who insisted that Revenge of the Sith was actually good because it was "Dark."

All your examples are about *you* and your friends. You aren't who I'm talking about.

Check this out: Rogue One is good, while Matrix Reloaded is poo poo.

ashpanash
Apr 9, 2008

I can see when you are lying.

Paladinus posted:

Check this out: Rogue One is good, while Matrix Reloaded is poo poo.

Cool. Get back to me in six months, we'll see if that opinion has changed.

monster on a stick
Apr 29, 2013
The only thing I remember from seeing TFA was the audience going "meh" when Han Solo died.

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

monster on a stick posted:

The only thing I remember from seeing TFA was the audience going "meh" when Han Solo died.

Well I was spoiled thanks to the forums, but the scene is set up in a super obvious way, which diminishes a lot of the shock value.

Also a lot of people knew that he wanted Han killed off in Empire.

Plus, in TFA he's playing the role of Obi-Wan to Rey, and Obi-Wan gotta die.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Guy Goodbody
Aug 31, 2016

by Nyc_Tattoo

ashpanash posted:

No, I'm not.

The same people vociferously defending Rogue One are the same people who couldn't admit that Matrix Reloaded was dogshit, that The Phantom Menace was a huge pile of nonsense, or who insisted that Revenge of the Sith was actually good because it was "Dark."

All your examples are about *you* and your friends. You aren't who I'm talking about.

It's good that you can just assume that people who disagree with you on one thing disagree with you on another thing so you can accuse them of being stupid for having opinions you made up for them

ashpanash posted:

Cool. Get back to me in six months, we'll see if that opinion has changed.

It's good that you can just assume that people who disagree with you will inevitably eventually disagree with you, because it frees you from actually having to defend your position

  • Locked thread