|
ate poo poo on live tv posted:I say because involuntary imprisonment for life is cruel for sentient beings. It's less expensive than and at least as good a deterrent as capital punishment. Capital punishment really only works better in the sense of feeling vengeance, and as such shouldn't be considered a social good.
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 01:04 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 13:04 |
|
Too exploitive and abusive imo. That said I still maintain that 10year sentences are more then enough time for "vengeance," punishment and rehabilitation.
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 01:12 |
|
ate poo poo on live tv posted:Too exploitive and abusive imo. roof dylan out in 2027!
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 01:18 |
|
charlie manson out back in 1981!
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 01:18 |
|
you are dumb thot control
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 01:19 |
|
Baloogan posted:charlie manson out back in 1981! i just read that jerry brown has been denying the other members of his gang parole out of spite lol
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 01:26 |
|
Al! posted:i just read that jerry brown has been denying the other members of his gang parole out of spite lol his aura smiles and never frowns
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 01:33 |
|
Court mandated therapy with a good counselor on a frequent basis and prescribed meds if necessary is more than sufficient for Roof. 20 years max with annual check-ins to see if he's made any progress and not just telling people what they want to hear. I mean the worst case scenario there is that he finally has an epiphany and realizes how lovely he is and kills himself but then at least it's his decision. Best case scenario is that he gets his poo poo together and works as a counselor himself to reach out to other racists kind of like some former gang members do.
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 01:54 |
|
ate poo poo on live tv posted:Too exploitive and abusive imo. It is not.
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 02:31 |
|
VikingSkull posted:because it costs money and feeds the privatized prison system yes, it is a good idea to kill people if it saves you money
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 02:45 |
|
I mean my position is actually that we should decrease the number of people we execute down to the narrowest of crimes but ok if that's what you want to take from what I said
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 02:49 |
|
VikingSkull posted:I mean my position is actually that we should decrease the number of people we execute down to the narrowest of crimes but ok if that's what you want to take from what I said Yeah there are just so many different crimes with penalties of death right now.
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 03:05 |
|
VikingSkull posted:I mean my position is actually that we should decrease the number of people we execute down to the narrowest of crimes but ok if that's what you want to take from what I said "why not just leave them in prison" "because it costs too much" is an argument for killing people to save money
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 03:05 |
|
eh I'm also fine with abolishing it if that's what the country wants, you guys can rehabilitate Dylan Roof if you want though because I'm not helping that shitheel do anything
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 03:17 |
|
Baloogan posted:roof dylan out in 2027! Baloogan posted:charlie manson out back in 1981! Nah just kill them both, after 10 years, No fuss.
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 03:19 |
|
How about don't kill people to save money
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 03:21 |
|
Jeb! Repetition posted:How about don't kill people to save money Hottest take of the thread, right here.
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 03:21 |
|
Jeb! Repetition posted:How about don't kill people to save money Fiscally Conservative has nothing to do with it.
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 03:24 |
ate poo poo on live tv posted:I say because involuntary imprisonment for life is cruel for sentient beings. And literally killing people isn't cruel?
|
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 03:29 |
|
chitoryu12 posted:And literally killing people isn't cruel? Perhaps after 10* years of involuntary confinement the sweet release of death is better then the alternative. Especially given the US justice system. But even better would be to stop handing down ridiculous sentences. *can be any number you want, doesn't change the argument.
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 03:36 |
|
ate poo poo on live tv posted:Perhaps after 10* years of involuntary confinement the sweet release of death is better then the alternative. Especially given the US justice system. Mandatory minimums should be abolished and discretion allowed to judges in sentencing. Which is, at the end of day, oddly related back to the topic of the thread.
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 03:41 |
|
CaptainSarcastic posted:Mandatory minimums should be abolished and discretion allowed to judges in sentencing. Which is, at the end of day, oddly related back to the topic of the thread. You're right. If the Hammond's original sentences had stood, there would have been no reason for the Bundy militia to go to Oregon.
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 03:43 |
|
It's fantastic that it took the sentencing of two white ranchers to bring attention to minimum sentencing laws.
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 03:48 |
|
Facebook Aunt posted:You're right. If the Hammond's original sentences had stood, there would have been no reason for the Bundy militia to go to Oregon.
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 03:48 |
|
TotalLossBrain posted:It's fantastic that it took the sentencing of two white ranchers to bring attention to minimum sentencing laws. Eh, it's an opinion I've held since 1994 if more people hold it now, great! Progress has been made. Same with my opinion of BLM. I'm glad they are bringing awareness to it, but I've held that opinion since way before Michael Brown. ate shit on live tv has issued a correction as of 03:54 on Jan 5, 2017 |
# ? Jan 5, 2017 03:50 |
|
I'm only talking about the occupiers, sorry.
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 03:51 |
|
ate poo poo on live tv posted:Perhaps after 10* years of involuntary confinement the sweet release of death is better then the alternative. Especially given the US justice system. Maybe we could make prisons not awful Anders Breivik didn't get put in an awful hellhole
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 05:04 |
|
Yeah, the state shouldn't kill people, or through inaction allow people to die, so ban all guns.
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 05:37 |
|
Doc Hawkins posted:Yeah, the state shouldn't kill people, or through inaction allow people to die, so ban all guns. possession and aquisition of firearms are a inalienable human right
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 05:40 |
|
incorrect
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 05:44 |
|
Any news on the trial? I won't be able to check the usual sources, and execution chat is making me want the mazatello to make a comeback.
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 05:44 |
|
Discendo Vox posted:Any news on the trial? I won't be able to check the usual sources, and execution chat is making me want the mazatello to make a comeback. Nah the people who kidnapped and beat the retarded trump supporter haven't been charged yet afaik.
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 05:47 |
|
Baloogan posted:most of the uranium on earth is under the ocean floor yeah right off the nc coast
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 05:49 |
|
Baloogan posted:possession and aquisition of firearms are a inalienable human right Fine, just bullets then
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 05:50 |
|
Darkman Fanpage posted:incorrect I disagree
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 05:50 |
|
VikingSkull posted:you guys can rehabilitate Dylan Roof if you want though because I'm not helping that shitheel do anything Except arm himself? E: I should stop, since I'm personally at peace with gun control being a dead issue for the rest of my life, or at least until the Black Panthers come back. Doc Hawkins has issued a correction as of 05:54 on Jan 5, 2017 |
# ? Jan 5, 2017 05:52 |
|
Main Paineframe posted:Maybe we could make prisons not awful Was he imprisoned for life? Anyway what I'm saying is this quote:As an American, or maybe just as a moral human being, it's hard not to feel appalled, even outraged, that Norwegian far-right monster Anders Breivik only received 21 years in prison for his attacks last year, including a bombing in Oslo and a cold-blooded shooting spree, which claimed 77 lives.
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 05:52 |
|
Doc Hawkins posted:Except arm himself? he is now a convicted felon, it would be illegal for him to own a firearm under current laws
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 05:58 |
|
ate poo poo on live tv posted:Was he imprisoned for life? He didn't "only" receive 21 years you disingenuous gently caress. 21 is the point at which a judge looks at his case and decides whether to feee him or throw him back in jail.
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 07:15 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 13:04 |
|
fake news!
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 07:18 |