|
Chenghiz posted:This is what keys are for. Give each element in your array of components a key that is relevant to its contents (not the index) and that should solve the issue. Perhaps I phrased this wrong, but its not an array of components. Its a single component that recieves an array of objects that represent that data of a table.
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2017 08:19
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 04:09 |
|
|
Anony Mouse posted:Is there something specific that you are still trying to learn? If you've already gotten the basics then get out there and start making stuff. Experience is the best teacher. I'm going to have to agree with this. Just go out and start on something. You won't know your roadblocks until you actually hit them. If you are way off base, you'll figure out a way...along the way, otherwise you'll remain in a project paralysis and get nothing done.
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2017 08:33
|
|
|
Professor of Cats posted:I'm going to have to agree with this. Just go out and start on something. You won't know your roadblocks until you actually hit them. If you are way off base, you'll figure out a way...along the way, otherwise you'll remain in a project paralysis and get nothing done. At what point do you go from "Learning the basics" to "I can apply to a job now doing this stuff"? I can spend years making stuff for myself, but if all my personal projects are like http://instantostrich.com/ chances are I won't be able to apply for anything. Where is the cut-off on "you now know enough to be able to get a job"?
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2017 09:04
|
|
|
It's hard to say because every person's path to web dev as a job is different. For me it was a few classes in college, an internship, some personal projects, and industry contacts made along the way. Once you have ~3-4 good projects under your belt that you can put in your portfolio, you should be hireable. If you're not getting any paid projects to start, aim lower (internships or entry level contract work) and make some personal stuff. Your own website is a good place to start. Come up with your own ideas or find old and busted sites to design and reimplement. For example I like NASA's Astronomy Picture of the Day website but it's just awful so I redid it as "APOD 2.0".
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2017 11:45
|
|
|
Love Stole the Day posted:I've learned the hard way that when for programming stuff, you cannot just go from 101 and 202 level stuff to just going out there and making things.
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2017 14:31
|
|
|
Knifegrab posted:Perhaps I phrased this wrong, but its not an array of components. Its a single component that recieves an array of objects that represent that data of a table. Post code, then someone can help you.
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2017 15:55
|
|
|
Love Stole the Day posted:I've learned the hard way that when for programming stuff, you cannot just go from 101 and 202 level stuff to just going out there and making things. There's an education gap. That's why I'm posting here about it. As has been suggested, check out Dan Abramov's Redux classes on egghead. Even if you wind up not using Redux, I think the lessons learned are invaluable: https://egghead.io/courses/getting-started-with-redux He has another one as well: https://egghead.io/courses/building-react-applications-with-idiomatic-redux Not sure if the second one has been updated to deal with React Router completely changing (for the better, imho) but again, still amazing stuff. Also piling on the "just start making your thing" bandwagon. You will learn better when you are solving problem you are encountering rather than "watching". Obviously everyone is different, but I have yet to meet anyone for whom this is not the case. I used to be paralyzed to start something until I had "figured it all out" and what I have learned from that is that I either never start, or I find out the things I thought I had figured out didn't quite match my reality. Then I'd either get frustrated and bail on the project, or wind up just learning what I needed to do to solve my problems as they came up anyway.
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2017 16:05
|
|
|
Knifegrab posted:Just touching back on this, I still haven't really figured out if there is a good way to do this other than just hidden content that is made visible when the screen sizes down. Kind of a real pain. Yeah, I eventually solved it without hidden content, but the solution was very specific to my situation (with the text/figures in two columns). As someone pointed out though, you can use flexboxes to re-order content with css. Could that work for your situation?
|
|
#
?
Jan 2, 2017 16:12
|
|
|
Another excellent resource: http://reactivex.io/learnrx/ Jafar Husain (Netflix) wrote that and is someone else whose stuff is worth watching.
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2017 03:09
|
|
|
Kekekela posted:Its not just about the result text. Read the whole thing dammit... all they're saying is that they'll use the mobile version OF THE CONTENT to rank the page. Pages that don't supply a mobile-specific version will be COMPLETELY UNIMPACTED because the content will be identical on desktop and mobile. It's to address the problem of pages slimming down their content on mobile. It even explicitly states that in all of the associated articles. Opting to entirely neglect mobile devices will have absolutely no impact on your pagerank from desktop browsers. There are other reasons to support mobile devices obviously, but pagerank is not one of them. putin is a cunt fucked around with this message at 07:03 on Jan 3, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2017 06:59
|
|
|
For a react framework, what is the best method out there for protecting returned data from being injectable. Basically I have a comment section and I know some jackasses will try and inject javascript alerts or worse into their text box. I know jquery has a parse method but I am moving away from jquery these days.
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2017 22:12
|
|
|
Knifegrab posted:For a react framework, what is the best method out there for protecting returned data from being injectable. Basically I have a comment section and I know some jackasses will try and inject javascript alerts or worse into their text box. I know jquery has a parse method but I am moving away from jquery these days. validate on the server and escape properly there. You can put javascript validation in if it makes the experience nicer, but that's the only reason to do Javascript validation, as server validation is mandatory to be any protection. also don't render comments using dangerouslySetInnerHTML if you can do so.
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2017 23:49
|
|
|
I figure there's probably no easy answer to this, but is there a reliable way to detect mobile devices? I want to enable the native <input type="date"> date pickers for mobile devices and tablets (because they are actually not terrible) but not for desktop (because they are actually terrible).
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2017 00:35
|
|
|
Maluco Marinero posted:validate on the server and escape properly there. You can put javascript validation in if it makes the experience nicer, but that's the only reason to do Javascript validation, as server validation is mandatory to be any protection. What is the most up to date and throough escaping method on the server?
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2017 00:37
|
|
|
Knifegrab posted:What is the most up to date and throough escaping method on the server? What is your server-side stack?
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2017 00:39
|
|
|
The Wizard of Poz posted:What is your server-side stack? Nodejs, express, postgresql.
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2017 03:19
|
|
|
edit: Double post...
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2017 03:19
|
|
|
Knifegrab posted:Nodejs, express, postgresql. If it's just node, you can probably grab something like https://www.npmjs.com/package/html-escape to escape your strings. I'm assuming you're not directly accessing postgres either, using a library that uses parameter statements properly yeah?
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2017 07:14
|
|
|
Lumpy posted:As has been suggested, check out Dan Abramov's Redux classes on egghead. Even if you wind up not using Redux, I think the lessons learned are invaluable: https://egghead.io/courses/getting-started-with-redux This is a good post and the content of the first course, which I'm halfway through now, seems very good in quality. The speaker though is just so monotone and dull that I actually fell asleep for a bit in the middle of one of the videos. Related question: where do I find simple lovely projects that I will probably be able to wrap my head around? Because whenever I look for stuff on Github I only see a bunch of convoluted, show-off, fancy poo poo written by Mozart's half brother.
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2017 13:44
|
|
|
Love Stole the Day posted:This is a good post and the content of the first course, which I'm halfway through now, seems very good in quality. The speaker though is just so monotone and dull that I actually fell asleep for a bit in the middle of one of the videos. The speaker is the guy who wrote Redux and a ton of other smarty-man stuff. I suspect he spent most of his time doing that instead of taking public speaking lessons, so I'll give him a pass.  Love Stole the Day posted:Related question: where do I find simple lovely projects that I will probably be able to wrap my head around? Because whenever I look for stuff on Github I only see a bunch of convoluted, show-off, fancy poo poo written by Mozart's half brother. This I dunno... maybe check out interesting things here: https://react.rocks/ and see if any of them aren't "look at how smart I am" codebases.
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2017 15:30
|
|
|
Maluco Marinero posted:If it's just node, you can probably grab something like https://www.npmjs.com/package/html-escape to escape your strings. I'm assuming you're not directly accessing postgres either, using a library that uses parameter statements properly yeah? Yup pg-promise, and I parameterize everything so sql injection is less of a concern. I am probably going to use https://www.npmjs.com/package/escape-html It seems a bit more popular so it seems to be the gold standard.
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2017 18:15
|
|
|
Has anyone ever had issues with a server where you'll download a CSS, PHP, etc. file to edit it, and there will be things changed in it? Such as an extra line break after each line, which is annoying but fixed with a find and replace of "\r\r" with "\r", or lines jumbled together? It's happening with Lithium Hosting and I can't figure out why. I know I had this issue many many years ago with another host, but I can't remember how it was resolved since it hasn't happened with any other host in like a decade.
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2017 22:40
|
|
|
BJPaskoff posted:Has anyone ever had issues with a server where you'll download a CSS, PHP, etc. file to edit it, and there will be things changed in it? Such as an extra line break after each line, which is annoying but fixed with a find and replace of "\r\r" with "\r", or lines jumbled together? It's happening with Lithium Hosting and I can't figure out why. I know I had this issue many many years ago with another host, but I can't remember how it was resolved since it hasn't happened with any other host in like a decade.
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2017 23:02
|
|
|
I tried e-mailing the guy who did the Learning ReactJS video and his advice for me was "give me $180 for an online workshop next week". nopeLumpy posted:This I dunno... maybe check out interesting things here: https://react.rocks/ and see if any of them aren't "look at how smart I am" codebases. This looks not terrible for a change, thank you so much
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2017 01:21
|
|
|
Sooo I am building a dashboard for a client, and he wants to implement SSO but of course, the sites we are linking to don't have SSO. What he's asking is for me to inject the login form of the site into html on our page, prepopulate the username and password, submit the form via javascript, and then open up an iframe with a link to the actual page in question. Then in theory they should be logged in and able to access the site as if they went to the login page themselves. 1st question - is this even possible? Before you say anything, yes I know how hideously ugly and stupid this is, especially injecting username/password values of clients into the html of the page. But would it work? Actually this is my only question. Would there be cross-site restrictions on submitting forms like this? Any info would be appreciated.
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2017 02:05
|
|
|
FateFree posted:Sooo I am building a dashboard for a client, and he wants to implement SSO but of course, the sites we are linking to don't have SSO. What he's asking is for me to inject the login form of the site into html on our page, prepopulate the username and password, submit the form via javascript, and then open up an iframe with a link to the actual page in question. Then in theory they should be logged in and able to access the site as if they went to the login page themselves. Even if everything you described is technically possible, some of those sites may have EULA that specify such a thing as not acceptable, and you or you users could get in trouble.
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2017 06:15
|
|
|
Skandranon posted:Even if everything you described is technically possible, some of those sites may have EULA that specify such a thing as not acceptable, and you or you users could get in trouble. I used to not take that kind of thing very seriously, but recently just heard a story about a guy that got sued into near oblivion by Facebook for aggregating social network feeds on the behalf of users.
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2017 09:08
|
|
|
The Fool posted:I used to not take that kind of thing very seriously, but recently just heard a story about a guy that got sued into near oblivion by Facebook for aggregating social network feeds on the behalf of users. He was also making money off of it. Mostly people will just have their accounts suspended or hacked because yeah lets just get all of our users used using what looks like a low effort phishing site NBD, right?
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2017 16:12
|
|
|
The Fool posted:I used to not take that kind of thing very seriously, but recently just heard a story about a guy that got sued into near oblivion by Facebook for aggregating social network feeds on the behalf of users. Also they tried multiple times asking him to just not do it but he wanted to fight. (iirc, and we're talking about the same thing)
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2017 16:54
|
|
|
Forgall posted:Difference between windows and unix style line endings. On my local computer, I have a PHP file that is 102 lines long. I upload it to my Lithium Hosting server using Wordpress's plugin installer (it's part of a plugin), then click view/edit in FileZilla to edit it, and it's somehow 203 lines long with extra line breaks on the server. This doesn't happen when I repeat the exact same steps on a site I have hosted with Media Temple. What can I do to stop this from happening?
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2017 17:29
|
|
|
BJPaskoff posted:On my local computer, I have a PHP file that is 102 lines long. I upload it to my Lithium Hosting server using Wordpress's plugin installer (it's part of a plugin), then click view/edit in FileZilla to edit it, and it's somehow 203 lines long with extra line breaks on the server. Make sure you're not transferring any files in text mode. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/554960/how-can-i-stop-filezilla-changing-my-linebreaks
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2017 17:48
|
|
|
Yeah, one line difference is probably a transmission problem. Straight up double-lines is Windows/Linux EOL problems. As an aside for anyone worried about this, I know Textpad lets you set what style of line ending you want when saving, and I believe Notepad+ and UltraEdit do as well.
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2017 19:02
|
|
|
Frankly any text editor that doesn't have line ending translation by now doesn't deserve the name.
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2017 00:49
|
|
|
A few sites I host with google map embeds have suddenly started throwing up:code:
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2017 11:41
|
|
|
The protocol shouldn't be in the whitelisted domain should it? It should be this I think: *.domain.com/* domain.com/*
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2017 12:12
|
|
|
Oops I meant *.domain.com/* not */domain.com/* Adding domain.com/* fixed it, thanks. That makes sense because the sites are just domain.com not www
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2017 13:26
|
|
|
Not sure if this is the right place to ask, but someone here might have the insight I need. I have beyondsecurity doing security scans on my debian 8 webserver from time to time and it's started complaining that my version of apache2 is too old and needs to be updated to a newer version for vulnerability reasons. I've got 2.4.10 on the box and it appears to be the most current version via apt-get. Do I need to go do some weird poo poo to get the new version in place or should I wait for the package fairy to add the newer version to whatever repos I'm drawing from?
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2017 16:01
|
|
|
Warbird posted:Not sure if this is the right place to ask, but someone here might have the insight I need. You can get the latest (2.4.25) from non-official PPAs like this one: https://launchpad.net/~ondrej/+archive/ubuntu/apache2 code:NOTE: that that link is an Ubuntu PPA, since that's what I know / use. I dunno if that will work on Debian proper, but you do the same thing. Lumpy fucked around with this message at 16:29 on Jan 6, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2017 16:21
|
|
|
Gave it a shot, but it started complaining. I'll keep messing with it. Apparently you have to run code:code:While I'm here, what's considered the sane way to push files to your box? I've got a domain I'm using for just piddling around, but I'd prefer to have the editor hook into the files on the box as opposed to messing around and then waiting for WinSCP transfer everything in place. Is that a thing? I know it's a drat good way to break a site, but I'm not concerned about that. Warbird fucked around with this message at 21:38 on Jan 6, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2017 20:48
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 04:09 |
|
|
Warbird posted:While I'm here, what's considered the sane way to push files to your box? I've got a domain I'm using for just piddling around, but I'd prefer to have the editor hook into the files on the box as opposed to messing around and then waiting for WinSCP transfer everything in place. Is that a thing? I know it's a drat good way to break a site, but I'm not concerned about that. If WinSCP's in-place editing is too slow for your liking, I'm not sure how anything else would be better.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2017 16:54
|
|