|
I'm talking more along the lines of, "we're going to engage the enemy fleet in 2 hours, form a line abreast formation", rather than travelling everywhere that way. Maybe I have not put enough research into it, but it seems that a lot of battles, from the age of sail to WWII involved fleets starting an engagement in a column formation and having to wait their turn to . . .turn, rather than going line abreast.
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 04:54 |
|
|
# ? May 27, 2024 03:11 |
|
Columns (again, even in "box" type formations ships were organized into small divisional columns IIRC) are way easier to organize and maneuver, I think. Considering how much poo poo they got wrong anyway, in every battle, just imagine how much worse it could have been. With a column system you just have to train most ships to "follow [next ship in line]" and you've got a chain that you can maneuver by passing orders to a single other ship.
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 05:02 |
|
It also allows you to mass your firepower. The time required for maneuvering into formation wasn't that big a deal, considering it could take hours to actually pull up alongside your enemy and open fire. Longer, if you were chasing him. If you could "cross the T" by cutting your line in front of his, you could wreak utter havoc by hurling broadside after broadside into the enemy's lead ship with virtual impunity.
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 05:14 |
|
Blistex posted:I'm talking more along the lines of, "we're going to engage the enemy fleet in 2 hours, form a line abreast formation", rather than travelling everywhere that way. Maybe I have not put enough research into it, but it seems that a lot of battles, from the age of sail to WWII involved fleets starting an engagement in a column formation and having to wait their turn to . . .turn, rather than going line abreast. Not sure what you mean. At Jutland the Grand Fleet started in line abreast formation and deployed into line ahead. At Trafalgar the British fleet fought in line abreast formation. At the Nile they split into two columns. Fleets kind of did whatever was best for the situation. Line ahead is good for concentrating firepower, since every ship in the division can shoot at the same point.
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 05:59 |
|
Wingnut Ninja posted:"We need to go back to doing things more like that". I cant help but think "oval office oval office oval office" every time Loren Thompson posts anything.
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 06:10 |
|
A couple of pages ago we were talking about the aging and failing USAF fleet... From a couple of months ago: Flying boom literally falls off KC-10 in flight and yesterday: Engine literally falls off B-52 in flight Yep. Things are pretty darn good.
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 21:35 |
|
Oh come on, it's got 7 more.
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 21:36 |
|
As a pilot friend of mine called it, "the dreaded seven engine final approach".
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 21:45 |
|
About 5 years ago, an AWACS forward lower lobe partially flooded with JP-8 from a manifold that had a hole form from rubbing against a piece of equipment. The FE who discovered it said that the fuel puddle was an inch or two deep at the time of discovery shortly after takeoff.
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 22:45 |
|
Well that's horrifying. Just discovered the thread and I'm debating on whether to try and slog through the almost 1000 pages to properly catch up - is there anything vitally important I missed or can I just go back a few pages to catch the current thread of discussion?
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 23:03 |
|
Godholio posted:From a couple of months ago: For some reason I'm amusing myself imagining this fell someplace and someone decided to make a huge bong out of it. "Dude, we'll call it the 'Ricola' bong..."
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 23:05 |
|
Crazycryodude posted:Well that's horrifying. Just discovered the thread and I'm debating on whether to try and slog through the almost 1000 pages to properly catch up - is there anything vitally important I missed or can I just go back a few pages to catch the current thread of discussion? Book recommendations: LAST STAND OF TIN CAN SAILORS SHATTERED SWORD JAPANESE DESTROYER CAPTAIN And many more
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 23:08 |
|
Crazycryodude posted:Well that's horrifying. Just discovered the thread and I'm debating on whether to try and slog through the almost 1000 pages to properly catch up - is there anything vitally important I missed or can I just go back a few pages to catch the current thread of discussion? You won't really miss much jumping right in, but you won't regret reading it from all the way back either. It's basically: - this old plane was sweet, here are black and white pics and a big writeup - these old planes were sweet, here are some pics from the air show - here's a wacky Cold War doomsday weapon that would be rejected by a James Bond movie for being too ridiculous. It was finally decommissioned in 1997 after serving for thirty years. There's a lot more too, but it's not like there's some narrative you'll miss out on. Just sweet plane pics.
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 23:14 |
|
If you do chose to read the thread, skip about 15 posts if there's ever a picture of a Constellation posted. It's mostly me throwing up in my mouth.
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 23:20 |
|
Crazycryodude posted:Well that's horrifying. Just discovered the thread and I'm debating on whether to try and slog through the almost 1000 pages to properly catch up - is there anything vitally important I missed or can I just go back a few pages to catch the current thread of discussion? If you have to read only one page, #334 is a pretty good one. Phi230 posted:Book recommendations: Red Eagles is also pretty interesting.
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 23:22 |
|
Oh also don't forget Pacific Crucible, The Conquering Tide, and Neptune's Inferno
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 23:24 |
|
None of those are cold war books though. Blind Man's Bluff and Command and Control are very thread-appropriate.
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 23:29 |
|
Well fine if we are doing Cold War strictly then Team Yankee Red Army Chieftans
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 23:34 |
|
Crazycryodude posted:Well that's horrifying. Just discovered the thread and I'm debating on whether to try and slog through the almost 1000 pages to properly catch up - is there anything vitally important I missed or can I just go back a few pages to catch the current thread of discussion? Be aware that if you like this thread, you should probably read the 1000 pages of the Aeronautical Insanity thread, or at least the posts linked in the OP. Lots of very cold war effort posts in there about assorted Cold War aircraft, how to set climb records (it's by flying horizontally at sea level), and while admittedly not Cold War, very good posts about Zeppelins.
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 23:35 |
|
holocaust bloopers posted:About 5 years ago, an AWACS forward lower lobe partially flooded with JP-8 from a manifold that had a hole form from rubbing against a piece of equipment. The FE who discovered it said that the fuel puddle was an inch or two deep at the time of discovery shortly after takeoff. That must've been an interesting conversation. "You found WHAT?" And then a scrunching sound as the seat cushions of every person on board moved three inches into their rectums.
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 23:43 |
|
Crazycryodude posted:Well that's horrifying. Just discovered the thread and I'm debating on whether to try and slog through the almost 1000 pages to properly catch up - is there anything vitally important I missed or can I just go back a few pages to catch the current thread of discussion? Brian Shul, Sled Driver posted:There were a lot of things we couldn’t do in an SR-71, but we were the fastest guys on the block and loved reminding our fellow aviators of this fact. People often asked us if, because of this fact, it was fun to fly the jet. Fun would not be the first word I would use to describe flying this plane. Intense, maybe. Even cerebral. But there was one day in our Sled experience when we would have to say that it was pure fun to be the fastest guys out there, at least for a moment. That's the peak of the thread, right there.
|
# ? Jan 5, 2017 23:59 |
|
PittTheElder posted:Be aware that if you like this thread, you should probably read the 1000 pages of the Aeronautical Insanity thread, or at least the posts linked in the OP. Lots of very cold war effort posts in there about assorted Cold War aircraft, how to set climb records (it's by flying horizontally at sea level), and while admittedly not Cold War, very good posts about Zeppelins. I highly recommend Mr. Chips' effort posts about Soviet Cold War aircraft listed in the OP of this thread
|
# ? Jan 6, 2017 00:07 |
|
Crazycryodude posted:Well that's horrifying. Just discovered the thread and I'm debating on whether to try and slog through the almost 1000 pages to properly catch up - is there anything vitally important I missed or can I just go back a few pages to catch the current thread of discussion? On top of all the other suggestions, Hit "show posts by this user" for iyaayas01 (the OP) and go through at least the first 5 pages
|
# ? Jan 6, 2017 00:20 |
|
Phi230 posted:Book recommendations: Don't forget The Jungle is Neutral. (For when you need 100 pages about dysentery)
|
# ? Jan 6, 2017 00:34 |
|
Phi230 posted:Book recommendations: Command and Control
|
# ? Jan 6, 2017 01:16 |
Hannibal Rex posted:That's the peak of the thread, right there. This. Also the simulated genie shot against F16s
|
|
# ? Jan 6, 2017 01:25 |
the a-10 coloring book
|
|
# ? Jan 6, 2017 01:27 |
|
Phi230 posted:Book recommendations: Speaking of the cold war, this reads to me like a beast from another dimension showed up to a regional conflict. WWII battleship goes unmatched on the korean peninsula e: quote:New Jersey returned to Wonsan 18 July for an exhibition of perfect firing: five gun emplacements demolished with five direct hits. Herv fucked around with this message at 01:35 on Jan 6, 2017 |
# ? Jan 6, 2017 01:31 |
|
Smiling Jack posted:the a-10 coloring book I printed that out and gave it to a former A-10 pilot as his "daily threat brief"--it was glorious.
|
# ? Jan 6, 2017 01:33 |
|
holocaust bloopers posted:About 5 years ago, an AWACS forward lower lobe partially flooded with JP-8 from a manifold that had a hole form from rubbing against a piece of equipment. The FE who discovered it said that the fuel puddle was an inch or two deep at the time of discovery shortly after takeoff. Didn't hear about that one. That Works posted:This.
|
# ? Jan 6, 2017 01:42 |
|
Hannibal Rex posted:That's the peak of the thread, right there. "What's the slowest you've ever flown an SR-71?" was good, too.
|
# ? Jan 6, 2017 01:44 |
|
Much less humorous, but I'm particularly fond of this tale, about an SR-71 disintegrating at Mach 3, and how the pilot somehow lived to tell about it: http://roadrunnersinternationale.com/weaver_sr71_bailout.html
|
# ? Jan 6, 2017 02:49 |
Herv posted:Speaking of the cold war, this reads to me like a beast from another dimension showed up to a regional conflict. quote:At sunrise on 25 July 1953 New Jersey was off the key port, rail and communications center of Hungnam, pounding coastal guns, bridges, a factory area, and oil storage tanks. She sailed north that afternoon, firing at rail lines and railroad tunnels as she made for Tanchon, where she launched a whaleboat in an attempt to spot a train known to run nightly along the coast. Her big guns were trained on two tunnels between which she hoped to catch the train, but in the darkness she could not see the results of her six-gun salvo Seems like after a while they were just letting her cruise up and down the coasts blowing up whatever they could.
|
|
# ? Jan 6, 2017 03:45 |
|
Nebakenezzer posted:Still, though, very interesting. It is slightly depressing to me that a military culture can not only be hosed up, it can be hosed up for several hundred years. So...where does the perceived hyper-competence of the old RN, come from, anyway? A tradition earlier than that? It comes from the superb quality of British seamanship and the fact that there were enough competent officers in the right places to keep the entire thing from turning into a disaster. The continental blockade was ridiculously hard on ships, sure, but you can't maintain entire fleets at sea for upwards of a year and a half straight with drooling morons at all of the levers of power. The RN did not promote solely on the basis of social connections or wealth; officers had to be demonstrably competent to advance beyond their buy-in rank (midshipman) and had to pass professional exams administered by other professional mariners. It's also a relative thing: sure, the RN may have been dysfunctional but it was rather less dysfunctional than most of its contemporaries. The French Navy of the same period was routinely pillaged for its resources, ranging from money to guns to the gun crews themselves, making it seriously difficult to recover from a massive blow to institutional prestige like Trafalgar. Consider the brutality of RN discipline at the same time: the 1797 mutinies largely ended the practice of whipping sailors to death and prevented the worst authoritarian excesses from officers, but contemporary British Army officers are recorded as having been amazed at the laxity of naval discipline-- apparently, whatever was going on in the Army at the same time was far nastier.
|
# ? Jan 6, 2017 04:26 |
|
Bro Enlai posted:Stopped by the USS Midway yesterday. Nice collection! The coolest thing on the Midway, hands down, is Major Buang-Ly’s note. My lovely cellphone snap is better than the images GIS turns up, so here it is:
|
# ? Jan 6, 2017 04:38 |
|
shame on an IGA posted:amoritizing the entire cost of the Hanford site project over that first 10mg and adjusting for inflation, $640B per gram. There's good reason they used a 300lb lump of gold for a doorstop in the Pu room. A few hundred pounds of gold is nothing when you’re borrowing 14.7 thousand motherfucking tons of silver from the Treasury. fakeedit: The silver is more than a thousand times more valuable at today’s spot rates. The exact ratio won’t hold for the 1940s, but I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that the difference isn’t by a factor of one thousand. Platystemon fucked around with this message at 04:45 on Jan 6, 2017 |
# ? Jan 6, 2017 04:43 |
|
Platystemon posted:A few hundred pounds of gold is nothing when you’re borrowing 14.7 thousand motherfucking tons of silver from the Treasury. I wasn't able to find silver prices for the 1940s, so I did the math based on today's values. 300 pounds of gold is $5.1 million 14,700 thousand motherfucking tons of silver is $7.8 billion
|
# ? Jan 6, 2017 05:02 |
|
Platystemon posted:The coolest thing on the Midway, hands down, is Major Buang-Ly’s note. I hadn't heard this story before and upon looking it up, it's a cool one. Thanks for sharing! https://tacairnet.com/2015/08/20/a-south-vietnamese-air-force-officer-was-responsible-for-one-of-the-craziest-carrier-landings-of-all-time/
|
# ? Jan 6, 2017 05:14 |
|
Godholio posted:and yesterday: We've been trying to get rid of those engines for years...
|
# ? Jan 6, 2017 05:40 |
|
|
# ? May 27, 2024 03:11 |
|
joat mon posted:"What's the slowest you've ever flown an SR-71?" was good, too. I liked the story posted a few months ago about an SR-71 that kept rudely cutting through Swedish airspace all "cant catch me lol" until a Viggen pilot climbing like a bat out of hell made an insane intercept to get a simulated kill on it. Would love to know how surprised that SR-71 crew was when the Viggen locked on to them.
|
# ? Jan 6, 2017 06:19 |