|
sit on my Facebook posted:Wasn't that when you playing Jace killed their Jace? Or both Jaces maybe? I can't remember anymore. Yeah, the old legend/planeswalker rule was that if two were in play, they both died immediately. (Basically the same as it is now, but it looked at both sides of the table). There was an even older (pre-planeswalkers) legend rule that if one was in play, you couldn't even cast another one. That would have been super obnoxious if it wasn't for the fact that legends back then mostly sucked.
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2017 03:00
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 22:05 |
|
|
Jabor posted:Yeah, the old legend/planeswalker rule was that if two were in play, they both died immediately. (Basically the same as it is now, but it looked at both sides of the table). When they didn't, though, it was pretty awful. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2017 03:07
|
|
|
Jabor posted:Yeah, the old legend/planeswalker rule was that if two were in play, they both died immediately. (Basically the same as it is now, but it looked at both sides of the table). Rogue0071 posted:When they weren't, though, it was pretty awful. Also green decks playing Tolarian Academy and zero artifacts just so they could Crop Rotation for it when playing against Academy decks.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2017 03:08
|
|
|
Jitte too in decks with little creatures.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2017 03:55
|
|
|
Hahaha a few days ago I bought 4 Saheelis because I figured I would pick up all the cheap planeswalkers. Glad my accidental timing was so good. It shipped yesterday.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2017 04:41
|
|
|
Pontius Pilate posted:Jitte too in decks with little creatures. This was my heyday, when every deck ran 4 Jitte just to kill other Jittes. It was rough and changing the legendary rule was a very good thing.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2017 04:52
|
|
|
Doesn't the Copycat combo give you infinite hasty tokens? Why do you need other ways to take advantage of infinite ETBs?
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2017 04:53
|
|
|
I feel there's going to be a lot of these slotted into sideboards shortly:
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2017 04:59
|
|
|
ManMythLegend posted:I feel there's going to be a lot of these slotted into sideboards shortly: Did they know? I think they actually might've known!
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2017 05:03
|
|
|
Thalia works too.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2017 05:04
|
|
|
Zemyla posted:Doesn't the Copycat combo give you infinite hasty tokens? Why do you need other ways to take advantage of infinite ETBs?
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2017 05:06
|
|
|
Also, there's a way to get through with the Crackdown Construct combo even on a clogged board. EDIT: And another 0-mana activated ability to go infinite with. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2017 05:13
|
|
|
Wouldn't this also require infinite equipment, or can you continue to target the same piece that's already attached to him?
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2017 05:18
|
|
|
Why not? It doesn't say "target Equipment not attached to Toll Collector" does it?
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2017 05:24
|
|
|
Zemyla posted:Also, there's a way to get through with the Crackdown Construct combo even on a clogged board. alternatively you can built to smash or, better yet, slip through space so you don't have to use a creature that costs a million mana
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2017 05:39
|
|
|
Elyv posted:alternatively you can built to smash or, better yet, slip through space so you don't have to use a creature that costs a million mana You could literally just run construct, fumaroles, expedite, and slip through space and have everything else be card draw and counterspells/targeted removal.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2017 15:04
|
|
|
ManMythLegend posted:I feel there's going to be a lot of these slotted into sideboards shortly: Completely forgot about this card lol. nevermind splinter twin
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2017 15:42
|
|
|
Terrible Horse posted:Completely forgot about this card lol. nevermind splinter twin that card might actually be a reason to run the construct/fumarole combo in addition, as a way of getting around that i have no clue if that's good mind you, i'm not really a combo deck kind of person
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2017 15:57
|
|
|
Terrible Horse posted:Completely forgot about this card lol. nevermind splinter twin the entire point of twin decks past around the second iteration or so was to use the threat of the combo to manipulate what your opponent could play and when they could play it, you know.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2017 15:59
|
|
|
We already had a one mana enchantment that hosed Twin, anyway.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2017 16:21
|
|
|
Just wanted to say how infuriating it is that I can't watch GP Louisville.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2017 17:17
|
|
|
mcmagic posted:Just wanted to say how infuriating it is that I can't watch GP Louisville. Dead format that doesn't sell packs -WoTC
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2017 18:00
|
|
|
80s James Hetfield posted:Dead format that doesn't sell packs actually GP Louisville isn't Standard
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2017 18:04
|
|
|
Shots Fired. I'm sure some marketing gimboid somewhere is like "If you cover an eternal format the players will get confused and wont' be as excited about AER" as if the magic population are all imbeciles completely unable to be excited about two things at once.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2017 18:08
|
|
|
SoftNum posted:as if the magic population are all imbeciles to be fair, we pay dozens if not hundreds of dollars for small colorful pieces of cardboard so they'd be forgiven for thinking this
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2017 18:24
|
|
|
Magic players are top 3 dumbest along with moba players and people who care about the differences between melee and other smash games.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2017 18:43
|
|
|
black potus posted:Magic players are top 3 dumbest along with moba players and people who care about the differences between melee and other smash games. You forgot MMO players somewhere in there, also people who spend money on Facebook games.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2017 19:03
|
|
|
mcmagic posted:Just wanted to say how infuriating it is that I can't watch GP Louisville. Yup, streaming this stupid poo poo over GP Louisville is dumb as hell.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2017 19:34
|
|
|
Errant Gin Monks posted:Yup, streaming this stupid poo poo over GP Louisville is dumb as hell. Legacy doesn't make money, new set does. Dumb as hell yes. Financially unsound? No. The real shame is I wanted to hope someone was playing Oops All Spells
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2017 19:37
|
|
|
Count Bleck posted:Legacy doesn't make money, new set does. While there is some merit to your point there is also some merit to constantly making decisions that piss off your fanbase isn't good financially.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2017 19:41
|
|
|
Sickening posted:While there is some merit to your point there is also some merit to constantly making decisions that piss off your fanbase isn't good financially. Well yeah but when has WotC ever made decisions that didn't piss off at least somebody?
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2017 19:42
|
|
|
Count Bleck posted:Well yeah but when has WotC ever made decisions that didn't piss off at least somebody? You absolutely cannot please everyone. You could include actual money in the packs and people would poo poo bricks about it somewhere.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2017 19:48
|
|
|
Count Bleck posted:Well yeah but when has WotC ever made decisions that didn't piss off at least somebody? There's a difference between "piss off somebody" and "please nobody" Like,  What's the point of printing this then actively choosing to tank the only place it'd be played?
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2017 19:52
|
|
|
Count Bleck posted:Legacy doesn't make money, new set does. It's called Breakfast Burrito you neanderthal
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2017 20:08
|
|
|
Orange Fluffy Sheep posted:What's the point of printing this then actively choosing to tank the only place it'd be played? They're not actively tanking it, they're ignoring it. Which is what you do when you are a company that survives on growth and you have a product where growth is impossible.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2017 20:29
|
|
|
Fuzzy Mammal posted:They're not actively tanking it, they're ignoring it. Which is what you do when you are a company that survives on growth and you have a product where growth is impossible. Maybe they could sell some cards instead. The Shortest Path posted:It's called Breakfast Burrito you neanderthal I just looked that up. I don't know what I'm looking at. Is it the legendary Chupacabra?
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2017 20:36
|
|
|
Fuzzy Mammal posted:They're not actively tanking it, they're ignoring it. Which is what you do when you are a company that survives on growth and you have a product where growth is impossible. And yet they made product for it anyway?! 
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2017 20:38
|
|
|
Orange Fluffy Sheep posted:And yet they made product for it anyway?! To be fair, it might as well be called Commander Masters.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2017 20:51
|
|
|
Count Bleck posted:To be fair, it might as well be called Commander Masters. Let's get a Commander Draft going. Everybody bring ten packs, let's do this.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2017 20:54
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 22:05 |
|
|
Soul Glo posted:Let's get a Commander Draft going. I'm down as gently caress.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2017 20:58
|
|