|
Who What Now posted:How can you be bald and have pink hair? Pick one. don't pink shame
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 22:31
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 17:10 |
|
|
HoboTech posted:That's the clarification I'm looking for from the mods. If it's allowed, then it's allowed. If not, that's fine too. One obvious solution would be to have a conservative mod. And I don't mean conservative in the sense of "mainstream liberal that other liberals accuse of being a secret Republican." But I don't know who the good candidates are because I don't follow D&D closely enough.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 22:31
|
|
|
VikingSkull posted:because she literally outed herself, I'm sure someone will link the post People keep saying that and never, ever produce the evidence, so I doubt it. I think it's a mass hallucination on your guys' part.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 22:31
|
|
|
I have to say I haven't actually seen on D+D the kind of Oppression Olympics SJW madness that a lot of people seem to be satirising here? Or at least never to the extent that I'd actually think it was the dominant culture. Again this is where some examples of specific bans/probes would have been useful in making us know exactly what we're debating the existence of and whether it qualifies as SJW Gone Too Far.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 22:32
|
|
|
Who What Now posted:Why the hell do people keeping thinking TB is slashie? probably the same reason some people want to deny that the government is trying to poison the water to make everyone gay and that 9/11 was an inside job
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 22:33
|
|
|
Who What Now posted:People keep saying that and never, ever produce the evidence, so I doubt it. I think it's a mass hallucination on your guys' part. Sometime in 2014 someone was talking about slashie and tb was like "dude I'm right here". I assume people had already been calling her slashie for a while and she was being funny.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 22:33
|
|
|
FactsAreUseless posted:One obvious solution would be to have a conservative mod. And I don't mean conservative in the sense of "mainstream liberal that other liberals accuse of being a secret Republican." But I don't know who the good candidates are because I don't follow D&D closely enough. also because they were all driven out a long time ago which is part of the problem
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 22:33
|
|
|
Jack Trades posted:probably the same reason some people want to deny that the government is trying to poison the water to make everyone gay and that 9/11 was an inside job yeah seriously it's this I've seen the gay frogs with my own eyes it's hosed
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 22:33
|
|
|
VikingSkull posted:because she literally outed herself, I'm sure someone will link the post
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 22:33
|
|
|
FactsAreUseless posted:One obvious solution would be to have a conservative mod. And I don't mean conservative in the sense of "mainstream liberal that other liberals accuse of being a secret Republican." *counts down to them them get hounded out*
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 22:34
|
|
|
Who What Now posted:People keep saying that and never, ever produce the evidence, so I doubt it. I think it's a mass hallucination on your guys' part. The post in question has been linked and was then dismissed as a joke on TB's part. I don't think anything more solid is going to come up. I've had civil conversations with TB and mostly managed to stay out of gfsincere's way. They're still both toxic individuals who hide behind racial grievance to justify their psychotic behavior towards other people, and the frustration with both of them isn't groundless.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 22:34
|
|
|
FactsAreUseless posted:More scientific racism is still racism. I think it's okay to start with a baseline of "you can't decide that all members of a race are bad, even with numbers to back it up." I mean we're talking about the kind of poo poo that's been debunked for decades. There have to be some ground rules. But at the same time, it's dumb to not be able to discuss why those kinds of statistics exist, differences in arrest and conviction stats, etc. etc. Those are valid political issues that go beyond "it's because they have a criminal nature." I don't know, it's difficult to have a forum that allows for all sorts of political discussion without it becoming a breeding ground for the more "acceptable" kinds of racism that groups like the KKK have moved toward. At the same time, you can't just assume that everyone is arguing in bad faith or trying to infiltrate the forums or some poo poo. Yes, we've seen that happen on other sites, but there's no reason to think it would happen here, because it tends to happen in places with lax moderation. If I wandered into a DnD thread with an armload of charts showing black people had the intelligence of less-developed apes and citing the findings of some Victorian phrenologist or Nazi scientist I'd still expect a ban for being a racist gently caress.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 22:34
|
|
|
Nevvy Z posted:Sometime in 2014 someone was talking about slashie and tb was like "dude I'm right here". It was a post saying that TB was definitely Slashie because Slashie liked dinosaurs. TB then posted in the thread to call them idiots.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 22:34
|
|
|
FactsAreUseless posted:
The solution is to have Lowtax spell out what he wants the forums to be and have mods and admins that will strictly enforce it.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 22:35
|
|
|
For the record, I am glad the rio olympics did not detonate a nuclear bomb/mass casualty scenario.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 22:35
|
|
|
Nevvy Z posted:Sometime in 2014 someone was talking about slashie and tb was like "dude I'm right here". It's particularly ironic when certain posters who talk about how much they want to be able to make jokes have real problems recognizing obvious ones.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 22:35
|
|
|
FactsAreUseless posted:Who cares? Who cares if she was some other poster in the past, even a ~~~problem poster~~~. I don't get why every single D&D discussion lately has turned into a discussion of TB, or whether she's Slashie. Yes, she can be very disruptive. Yes, she can also make good posts. Both things are true. That's why she gets probated a lot but tends not to get banned. But none of those things have anything to do with whether she was Slashie, a poster I literally know nothing about except people keep telling TB she's Slashie. oh I don't give a poo poo I never report anyone lol
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 22:35
|
|
|
Invisible Handjob posted:also because they were all driven out a long time ago which is part of the problem they werent "driven out" most of them toxxed for McCain or Romney and didnt come back
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 22:35
|
|
|
Saint Isaias Boner posted:If I wandered into a DnD thread with an armload of charts showing black people had the intelligence of less-developed apes and citing the findings of some Victorian phrenologist or Nazi scientist I'd still expect a ban for being a racist gently caress. Nice virtue signalling.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 22:35
|
|
|
Just have a Baloogan clone army mod the whole forum.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 22:35
|
|
|
I don't LOVE cum but I love the IDEA of cum, possible discussion and debate topic???
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 22:35
|
|
|
Lowtax posted:I don't LOVE cum but I love the IDEA of cum, possible discussion and debate topic???
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 22:36
|
|
|
Lowtax posted:I don't LOVE cum but I love the IDEA of cum, possible discussion and debate topic??? I disagree I do not like cum in my hair therefor do not like cum at all
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 22:36
|
|
FactsAreUseless posted:Who cares? Who cares if she was some other poster in the past, even a ~~~problem poster~~~. I don't get why every single D&D discussion lately has turned into a discussion of TB, or whether she's Slashie. Yes, she can be very disruptive. Yes, she can also make good posts. Both things are true. That's why she gets probated a lot but tends not to get banned. But none of those things have anything to do with whether she was Slashie, a poster I literally know nothing about except people keep telling TB she's Slashie. taking this to mean that I make good post since I have tons of probes but only two bans (which is really just one ban)
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 22:36
|
|
|
What animal's
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 22:36
|
|
|
VikingSkull posted:oh I don't give a poo poo I never report anyone lol
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 22:37
|
|
|
Lowtax posted:I don't LOVE cum but I love the IDEA of cum, possible discussion and debate topic??? what's to debate? cumming owns
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 22:37
|
|
|
FactsAreUseless posted:More scientific racism is still racism. I think it's okay to start with a baseline of "you can't decide that all members of a race are bad, even with numbers to back it up." I mean we're talking about the kind of poo poo that's been debunked for decades. There have to be some ground rules. But at the same time, it's dumb to not be able to discuss why those kinds of statistics exist, differences in arrest and conviction stats, etc. etc. Those are valid political issues that go beyond "it's because they have a criminal nature." I don't know, it's difficult to have a forum that allows for all sorts of political discussion without it becoming a breeding ground for the more "acceptable" kinds of racism that groups like the KKK have moved toward. At the same time, you can't just assume that everyone is arguing in bad faith or trying to infiltrate the forums or some poo poo. Yes, we've seen that happen on other sites, but there's no reason to think it would happen here, because it tends to happen in places with lax moderation. I think there it's the difference between claiming black people are more likely to suffer from circumstances that lead them to desperate actions, and claiming that black people have some sort of inherent defect in their base nature that lead them to desperate actions. One is something that can be argued about existing and changed with proper political policy, and the other doesn't lead much of anywhere but discussing if they are worthy of obliterating or not. The first is not racist, the second is. Thus the second should not be allowed both because it's raw bigotry and because it isn't good for debate or discussion.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 22:36
|
|
|
i am a white male a loving white male
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 22:37
|
|
|
Oxxidation posted:The post in question has been linked and was then dismissed as a joke on TB's part. I don't think anything more solid is going to come up. I've never, ever said this. It's just dumb as hell that so many people keep bandying about the most retarded conspiracy theory imaginable as if it were some world-shattering poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 22:37
|
|
|
eric posted:The solution is to have Lowtax spell out what he wants the forums to be and have mods and admins that will strictly enforce it. i think he wants people not to be rustled or probated for, say, microaggressions when trying to argue in good faith in dnd, and for it not to be necessary to declare yourself in favour of full stalinism now before posting in the UKMT at risk of being accused of trolling (for instance) no i will not show you where the UKMT touched me
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 22:37
|
|
|
spit on my clit posted:i am a white male Why contain it, it's cool.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 22:37
|
|
|
eric posted:what's to debate? cumming owns this topic isn't about the act of cumming it's about cum theory you loving idiot!!!!1!
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 22:37
|
|
|
spit on my clit posted:i am a white male apologize
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 22:38
|
|
|
spit on my clit posted:i am loving a mighty whale
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 22:38
|
|
|
Orange Fluffy Sheep posted:I think there it's the difference between claiming black people are more likely to suffer from circumstances that lead them to desperate actions, and claiming that black people have some sort of inherent defect in their base nature that lead them to desperate actions.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 22:37
|
|
|
VikingSkull posted:oh I don't give a poo poo I never report anyone lol Paid for the ability to report, but doesn't report. That's privilege!
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 22:37
|
|
|
spit on my clit posted:i am a white male gently caress you buddy
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 22:38
|
|
|
Lowtax posted:I don't LOVE cum but I love the IDEA of cum, possible discussion and debate topic??? 
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 22:38
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 17:10 |
|
|
Tolkien minority posted:I'm just doing my part, no need to thank me. However, please remember that What the hell! Is this a my little pony hat? Disgusting!
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2017 22:38
|
|
