Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Joementum
May 23, 2004

jesus christ
They don't, but also Thiel's RNC speech was the exact opposite of that.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Phone
Jul 30, 2005

親子丼をほしい。

Joementum posted:

They don't, but also Thiel's RNC speech was the exact opposite of that.

quote:

This Simonson knows what's up.

I'd consider jumping ship to the Dems if I didn't think the socialists were poised to snatch it up.

Kunster
Dec 24, 2006

"Ok Greenwald is getting quoted and interviewed on Fox News and Breitbart, let's see if the figures around him are cool with us giving semi-flattering profiles as long as we don't say "The Michael Temer takeover was actually good" too much"

Darkman Fanpage
Jul 4, 2012

GalacticAcid posted:

The Right has discovered the Trap

lol they're discovering that there are people further to the left of liberals

Darkman Fanpage
Jul 4, 2012

quote:

The incrementalism toward social democracy advocated by traditional Democrats is unacceptable

????

Wraith of J.O.I.
Jan 25, 2012


Centrist dems freaking out over left criticism of Booker... Trump's gonna be here for 8 years isn't he?

I was just told on Facebook by some dude that "for me it, it seems reactionary anti-neoliberalism and russian propaganda designed to divide progressives is now *indistinguishable.* for my part, this is something to watch out for." Maybe uhh, Booker's vote against the bill is what is dividing progressives?

Wraith of J.O.I. fucked around with this message at 20:51 on Jan 13, 2017

Golden Bee
Dec 24, 2009

I came here to chew bubblegum and quote 'They Live', and I'm... at an impasse.
A central tenet of neoliberalism is that it is never at fault.

padijun
Feb 5, 2004

murderbears forever
according to my sources, what booker did was actually OK, because there are drug companies in NJ

uber_stoat
Jan 21, 2001



Pillbug

Wraith of J.O.I. posted:

Centrist dems freaking out over left criticism of Booker... Trump's gonna be here for 8 years isn't he?

I was just told on Facebook by some dude that "for me it, it seems reactionary anti-neoliberalism and russian propaganda designed to divide progressives is now *indistinguishable.* for my part, this is something to watch out for." Maybe uhh, Booker's vote against the bill is what is dividing progressives?

the dems are putting sites like naked capitalism on "russian propaganda operation" lists now. the new position of the lib dems is that anyone who criticizes them is a foreign agent. complete lack of interest in any kind of change or self examination. yes, they are gonna lose big and keep losing.

fatherboxx
Mar 25, 2013

tekz posted:

mark ames has been doin a lot of good stuff on the russia nonsense, and had a good interview on the latest radio war nerd if you got access to it. here's another good un (not from the podcast) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RCl_EhJk6b0

trichael macey

Kunster
Dec 24, 2006

I like that only Matt is having the reasonable "HOLY poo poo WHY ARE EVEN APPEASING TO THIS GUY" moment over the two others being starry eyed at the more accurate view of being compared to 1960's Parisian activists. Christ I'm thankful there's folk on that circle and on the DSA for the "new left" to not become the lovely caricature the evil lanyards so peg them with. Hopefully it will come before like a Breitbart or Fox News interview proposal over "Here's how the New Rational Minded Anti-PC left defeated the stupid libs" piece or some poo poo.

GalacticAcid
Apr 8, 2013

NEW YORK VALUES

padijun posted:

according to my sources, what booker did was actually OK, because there are drug companies in NJ

I'd respect it if he just said "my state needs the jobs that gouging the country on prescription drug prices creates here."

Al-Saqr
Nov 11, 2007

One Day I Will Return To Your Side.
I really loving wish centrism would harm right wingers the same way they actively harm the lefts causes. But no, they always let right wingers get what they want and stop left wingers from opposing them.

Trabisnikof
Dec 24, 2005

Wraith of J.O.I. posted:

Centrist dems freaking out over left criticism of Booker... Trump's gonna be here for 8 years isn't he?

I was just told on Facebook by some dude that "for me it, it seems reactionary anti-neoliberalism and russian propaganda designed to divide progressives is now *indistinguishable.* for my part, this is something to watch out for." Maybe uhh, Booker's vote against the bill is what is dividing progressives?

You realize even Sanders voted against the bill right? The bill was to repeal Obamacare so even adding Canadian drugs...Sanders would have still voted against the bill.

Darkman Fanpage
Jul 4, 2012

Trabisnikof posted:

You realize even Sanders voted against the bill right? The bill was to repeal Obamacare so even adding Canadian drugs...Sanders would have still voted against the bill.

you mean the bill that bernie wrote? or are you referring to a different bill because the one on wednesday was not for repealing obamacare

ManoliIsFat
Oct 4, 2002

Trabisnikof posted:

You realize even Sanders voted against the bill right? The bill was to repeal Obamacare so even adding Canadian drugs...Sanders would have still voted against the bill.

He's talking about the Sanders amendment. You know, drug reimportation, the thing Dems have pretended to care about for the last 20 years. Do you really think this was some sortof made-up controversy?

ManoliIsFat fucked around with this message at 22:43 on Jan 13, 2017

Megaman's Jockstrap
Jul 16, 2000

What a horrible thread to have a post.

Trabisnikof posted:

You realize even Sanders voted against the bill right? The bill was to repeal Obamacare so even adding Canadian drugs...Sanders would have still voted against the bill.

Sanders did not. I don't know what you think we're talking about but it's the Klobuchar Amendement that he's taking heat for.

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=115&session=1&vote=00020#position

Note "Sanders" in the Yea column.


Also it's a fundamental tenet of the Trap and Dirtbag Left that these "incremental improvements" are nothing of the sort - they are PR moves that actually mask or redirect the problem they are supposed to be solving.

Megaman's Jockstrap fucked around with this message at 22:43 on Jan 13, 2017

Trabisnikof
Dec 24, 2005

Darkman Fanpage posted:

you mean the bill that bernie wrote? or are you referring to a different bill because the one on wednesday was not for repealing obamacare

The Canadian drugs thing was an amendment to repealing Obamacare. So even if it had passed (hint: not a single amendments passed) then all the Democrats would still have voted against the final bill.

There are just a lot better reasons to hate Booker than a vote on an amendment that wasn't going to pass on a bill Democrats all should vote against anyway.

Teabag Dome Scandal
Mar 19, 2002


Trabisnikof posted:

You realize even Sanders voted against the bill right? The bill was to repeal Obamacare so even adding Canadian drugs...Sanders would have still voted against the bill.

This changes everything!!!

Trabisnikof
Dec 24, 2005

Megaman's Jockstrap posted:

Sanders did not. I don't know what you think we're talking about but it's the Klobuchar Amendement that he's taking heat for.

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=115&session=1&vote=00020#position

Note "Sanders" in the Yea column.

Right thats an amendment to the Obamacare repeal: https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-concurrent-resolution/3

Which look, Sanders voted against as he should.

None of the amendments were going to pass and don't give Republicans any credit for voting for these amendments either.

ManoliIsFat
Oct 4, 2002

Trabisnikof posted:

The Canadian drugs thing was an amendment to repealing Obamacare. So even if it had passed (hint: not a single amendments passed) then all the Democrats would still have voted against the final bill.

There are just a lot better reasons to hate Booker than a vote on an amendment that wasn't going to pass on a bill Democrats all should vote against anyway.

Ya but the whole point of it was it was an easy signaling vote! http://www.rollcall.com/news/politics/pharma-booker-canada That's why amendments like this even exist! Why even show up to congress f "oh well it's not gonna get in to the final bill anyway"

And "There are just a lot better reasons to hate Booker" idk if he's known for much apostasy beyond pharma and school privitization coziness.

Hulk Krogan
Mar 25, 2005



Trabisnikof posted:

The Canadian drugs thing was an amendment to repealing Obamacare. So even if it had passed (hint: not a single amendments passed) then all the Democrats would still have voted against the final bill.

There are just a lot better reasons to hate Booker than a vote on an amendment that wasn't going to pass on a bill Democrats all should vote against anyway.

If the amendment didn't matter then why did Booker vote it down?

Trabisnikof
Dec 24, 2005

Hulk Krogan posted:

If the amendment didn't matter then why did Booker vote it down?

Same reason Cruz voted for it, some arcane political calculus

Megaman's Jockstrap
Jul 16, 2000

What a horrible thread to have a post.

Trabisnikof posted:

Right thats an amendment to the Obamacare repeal: https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-concurrent-resolution/3

Which look, Sanders voted against as he should.

None of the amendments were going to pass and don't give Republicans any credit for voting for these amendments either.

It was 100% symbolic and he couldn't even take his lips off his donors' collective cocks to vote Yea for it. I think that's a great thing to criticize him for, personally.

super fart shooter
Feb 11, 2003

-quacka fat-
So I guess someone doxxed the poo poo out of the daily shoah guy who apparently was anonymous until now?

https://twitter.com/nycantifa/status/820045822658314240

razorscooter
Nov 5, 2008


Personally, I think Mario does not gently caress, in spite of the evidence presented by Felix.

TomViolence
Feb 19, 2013

PLEASE ASK ABOUT MY 80,000 WORD WALLACE AND GROMIT SLASH FICTION. PLEASE.

super fart shooter posted:

So I guess someone doxxed the poo poo out of the daily shoah guy who apparently was anonymous until now?

https://twitter.com/nycantifa/status/820045822658314240

uber_stoat
Jan 21, 2001



Pillbug
haha, one of the Daily Shoah fucks offered to rat out his fellow nazis if it would keep his info private. he gave em the info and they doxxed him anyway...

*edit*

Alfred P. Pseudonym posted:

I think Mario fucks but Sonic the Hedgehog does not gently caress. Ever.

we have such sights to show you

https://twitter.com/GarfieldFanArt/status/784472545785372672

uber_stoat fucked around with this message at 02:45 on Jan 14, 2017

Alfred P. Pseudonym
May 29, 2006

And when you gaze long into an abyss, the abyss goes 8-8

razorscooter posted:

Personally, I think Mario does not gently caress, in spite of the evidence presented by Felix.

I think Mario fucks but Sonic the Hedgehog does not gently caress. Ever.

Famethrowa
Oct 5, 2012

super fart shooter posted:

So I guess someone doxxed the poo poo out of the daily shoah guy who apparently was anonymous until now?

https://twitter.com/nycantifa/status/820045822658314240

Maybe now chapo could invite him on the show :shrek:

TomViolence
Feb 19, 2013

PLEASE ASK ABOUT MY 80,000 WORD WALLACE AND GROMIT SLASH FICTION. PLEASE.

Like all hedgehogs Sonic definitely fucks, just very carefully.

I Before E
Jul 2, 2012

Alfred P. Pseudonym posted:

I think Mario fucks but Sonic the Hedgehog does not gently caress. Ever.

Filling his rounded belly with chili dogs.

Owlbear Camus
Jan 3, 2013

Maybe this guy that flies is just sort of passing through, you know?



uber_stoat posted:

haha, one of the Daily Shoah fucks offered to rat out his fellow nazis if it would keep his info private. he gave em the info and they doxxed him anyway...

Black Mirror once again presages real life.

Bryter
Nov 6, 2011

but since we are small we may-
uh, we may be the losers

super fart shooter posted:

So I guess someone doxxed the poo poo out of the daily shoah guy who apparently was anonymous until now?

https://twitter.com/nycantifa/status/820045822658314240



This is from an r/altright AMA where he's also asked "who is your favorite, but least well-known, writer in the Alt-Right sphere?" and responds "Hitler, I'm serious. Read Mein Kamf if you haven't"

Bryter fucked around with this message at 04:53 on Jan 14, 2017

cat doter
Jul 27, 2006



gonna need more cheese...australia has a lot of crackers
couldn't have happened to a nicer guy

KICK BAMA KICK
Mar 2, 2009

actually [pushes glasses so far up nose they fly off the back of my head] doxxing nazis is bad because

EndOfTheWorld
Jul 22, 2004

I'm an excellent critic! I automatically know when someone's done a bad job. Before you ask, yes it's a mixed blessing.
Cybernetic Crumb
https://www. slate. com/ outing-nazis-makes-you-as-bad-as-them

Corek
May 11, 2013

by R. Guyovich
https://twitter.com/randygdub/status/820116926051459073

KICK BAMA KICK
Mar 2, 2009

HRC emerges from woodlands for landmark speech: "Doxxing Nazis? We're Better Than That!"

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Jonas Albrecht
Jun 7, 2012


uber_stoat posted:

haha, one of the Daily Shoah fucks offered to rat out his fellow nazis if it would keep his info private. he gave em the info and they doxxed him anyway...

Oh I hope they devour themselves.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply