|
Powaqoatse posted:well yeah they're for 90s teenagers same cause i turned 13 in 2004
|
# ? Jan 17, 2017 00:46 |
|
|
# ? May 29, 2024 15:59 |
|
ugh no i mean being a teenager in those decades american teens in the 90s wore jncos
|
# ? Jan 17, 2017 00:56 |
|
how is jncos still in business
|
# ? Jan 17, 2017 01:12 |
|
Powaqoatse posted:ugh no i mean being a teenager in those decades I was an American teen in the 90s and I've never heard of them. but my wife is going to be so embarrassed by them that they're almost worth getting now
|
# ? Jan 17, 2017 01:57 |
|
The Management posted:I was an American teen in the 90s and I've never heard of them. arent you american? wtf
|
# ? Jan 17, 2017 02:01 |
|
The Management posted:I was an American teen in the 90s and I've never heard of them. but my wife is going to be so embarrassed by them that they're almost worth getting now fart simpson posted:arent you american? wtf yeah what is this anti-jncoist nonsense?
|
# ? Jan 17, 2017 02:03 |
|
were you some from insanely rich family who sent you to fancy schools with uniforms?
|
# ? Jan 17, 2017 02:05 |
|
i went to a school with uniforms in the 90s and you could tell who the cool kids were bc they wore jncos on the "casual dress" days after getting made fun of for wearing "tight" wranglers i got my mom to get me some lee pipes from marshalls, so i could instead get made fun of for not wearing the correct brand of mega baggy pants
|
# ? Jan 17, 2017 02:15 |
|
The Management posted:I was an American teen in the 90s and I've never heard of them. but my wife is going to be so embarrassed by them that they're almost worth getting now did you grow up in a weird secluded sect maybe? are you at least aware that extremely baggy / bellbottom pants were all the rage even if they were sometimes not-cool brands?
|
# ? Jan 17, 2017 02:29 |
|
The Management's pants then & now: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWW8_8fc0-E
|
# ? Jan 17, 2017 02:51 |
|
fart simpson posted:were you some from insanely rich family who sent you to fancy schools with uniforms? lol no. I went to public school in Los Angeles suburbs.
|
# ? Jan 17, 2017 02:55 |
|
lol that all catholic schools are now fancy rich kid schools lol if you didnt have a proper tartan pattern for your school. just lol
|
# ? Jan 17, 2017 03:00 |
|
Agile Vector posted:lol that all catholic schools are now fancy rich kid schools nice projecting there tons of non-catholic schools have uniforms
|
# ? Jan 17, 2017 03:03 |
|
it's catholic schools, exclusive boarding schools or schools with metal detectors
|
# ? Jan 17, 2017 03:05 |
|
Agile Vector posted:lol that all catholic schools are now fancy rich kid schools i wasnt saying only catholic schools have uniforms but catholic school students arent normally so isolated from outside culture
|
# ? Jan 17, 2017 03:05 |
|
Powaqoatse posted:nice projecting there i didnt say they didnt
|
# ? Jan 17, 2017 03:06 |
|
The Management posted:lol no. I went to public school in Los Angeles suburbs. then i literally dont understand how you never heard of jncos lol
|
# ? Jan 17, 2017 03:07 |
|
i've never heard of jncos but i also went to school in rural massachusetts
|
# ? Jan 17, 2017 03:11 |
|
Agile Vector posted:i didnt say they didnt yea but you were the first to mention catholic schools
|
# ? Jan 17, 2017 04:03 |
|
CommunistPancake posted:i've never heard of jncos but i also went to school in rural massachusetts nobody gives a poo poo about the brands, idk that you could even get jncos in denmark they're just the american goto word for that wide-legged weirdly bell-bottom fashion though. so 90s. especially if they had straps/chains/reflective strips/etc
|
# ? Jan 17, 2017 04:06 |
|
chains on chains on chains on chains
|
# ? Jan 17, 2017 04:07 |
|
through time the pant-paraphernelia got more & more complicated, eventually becoming this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IeSNodFSAfE
|
# ? Jan 17, 2017 04:21 |
|
Powaqoatse posted:through time the pant-paraphernelia got more & more complicated, eventually becoming this: i like queen so much that i watched the whole thing
|
# ? Jan 17, 2017 06:00 |
|
Powaqoatse posted:The Management's pants then & now: that video's name makes it sound like some weird fetish thing. it's a weird fetish thing, isn't it
|
# ? Jan 17, 2017 08:09 |
|
http://www.theonion.com/graphic/cool-guy-from-middle-school-still-sporting-phat-pa-34730 lol never forget
|
# ? Jan 17, 2017 14:44 |
|
jncos were mall weenie pants, the cool kids had fresh jive, forties or GAT
|
# ? Jan 17, 2017 17:31 |
|
i always associated jncos with people who were *really* into kornWattsvilleBlues posted:Any suggestions for Nexus 7 Wi-Fi 2013 ROMs that would allow me to get security patches going forward? The last security patch from Google ended in August 2016.
|
# ? Jan 17, 2017 17:40 |
|
the android tablet landscape is so hosed and iyg posters so bad that that thread regularly recommends a four and two year old tablet as the best
|
# ? Jan 17, 2017 17:47 |
|
I still don't get how android tablets have failed that badly, I mean I've used a couple and I understand why people don't like them but they've done so badly even microsoft has a foothold in that market
|
# ? Jan 17, 2017 17:51 |
|
Tablets are dead tho so that's not too surprising
|
# ? Jan 17, 2017 18:16 |
|
i bought my grandma an ipad air 2 for christmas to replace a really old acer laptop and i'd do it again
|
# ? Jan 17, 2017 18:44 |
|
qirex posted:I still don't get how android tablets have failed that badly, I mean I've used a couple and I understand why people don't like them but they've done so badly even microsoft has a foothold in that market I have a 2013 Nexus 7 that I use solely for watching documentaries while I'm on my exercise bike. It works okay for that.
|
# ? Jan 17, 2017 18:45 |
|
Progressive JPEG posted:Tablets are dead tho so that's not too surprising apple sells more than 40 million a year, or about $16 billion in revenues. this is more than the iPod at its peak when it was a hit product. sales are slowing down but they are certainly not dead. android tablets, on the other hand, are terrible and nobody wants them. google stopped caring about them a long time ago and manufacturers make no money selling them so they are all poo poo, which made consumers stop buying them.
|
# ? Jan 17, 2017 18:47 |
|
qirex posted:I still don't get how android tablets have failed that badly, I mean I've used a couple and I understand why people don't like them but they've done so badly even microsoft has a foothold in that market
|
# ? Jan 17, 2017 18:54 |
|
and then paid a football league to use them
|
# ? Jan 17, 2017 18:58 |
|
anthonypants posted:isn't the only reason microsoft has any sort of foothold in the tablet market because they paid people to make them they spent way more money trying to get windows phone going and that got nowhere I think the "it actually runs word/excel/powerpoint" is still a non-trivial draw for a lot of people, especially while all the alternatives are still pretty bad
|
# ? Jan 17, 2017 19:09 |
|
microsoft's deal with the nfl is like 400 million, they spent at least 3 billion on winpho marketing
|
# ? Jan 17, 2017 19:10 |
|
anthonypants posted:isn't the only reason microsoft has any sort of foothold in the tablet market because they paid people to make them nobody uses the Microsoft tablets without a keyboard. they are laptops.
|
# ? Jan 17, 2017 19:17 |
|
qirex posted:I think the "it actually runs word/excel/powerpoint" is still a non-trivial draw for a lot of people, especially while all the alternatives are still pretty bad tablets are for reading, laptops are for writing and this washing machine does a terrible job cleaning my potatoes
|
# ? Jan 17, 2017 19:21 |
|
|
# ? May 29, 2024 15:59 |
|
"tablets are 100% consumption devices" is false, the vast majority of people use them for that but I bet a whole lot of them buy them with the intent of using them for productivity plus windows touch UI is so bad I've only ever seen people using surfaces with the keyboards
|
# ? Jan 17, 2017 19:29 |