|
I modelled my Tyrannocytes on the ground so I could still make the big spore mines, but now It could be argued that's modelling for advantage :/
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2017 16:57
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 13:22 |
|
|
TKIY posted:I modelled my Tyrannocytes on the ground so I could still make the big spore mines, but now It could be argued that's modelling for advantage :/ "Modelling for advantage" =/= "modelling against disadvantage built in by a shitlord who intentionally harms the army"
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2017 17:03
|
|
|
TKIY posted:I modelled my Tyrannocytes on the ground so I could still make the big spore mines, but now It could be argued that's modelling for advantage :/ Proletariat Beowulf posted:"Modelling for advantage" =/= "modelling against disadvantage built in by a shitlord who intentionally harms the army" As someone who also used the big tentacles to make Mucolids, it's nice not needing a horsebox towed behind my car to transport the otherwise ridiculously-sized Tyrannocytes.
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2017 17:09
|
|
|
On the plus side, Drop Pods have been cleared up Q: Do Space Marine Drop Pod doors count as solid walls that block line of sight? A: No. Q: Are Drop Pod doors ignored for game purposes once deployed? A: Yes. Also, the extra attacks for Helbrutes and other dreadnoughts stuck around to become official
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2017 17:11
|
|
|
Proletariat Beowulf posted:See, this is one of the reasons that I didn't want to grab a bunch for big bugs. What's the standard go-to for alternate models that don't have vaginacles? I've got a couple of these ones. https://puppetswar.eu/product.php?id_product=21 
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2017 19:59
|
|
|
Arson Fire posted:I've got a couple of these ones. That is a choice paintjob.
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2017 20:15
|
|
|
Behemoth is always the coolest looking hive fleet.
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2017 20:45
|
|
|
Uh....quote:Q: You cannot usually move before a game starts. How do So... apparently Cult Ambush doesn't actually count as the Movement Phase and you can make a normal move. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2017 21:04
|
|
|
PierreTheMime posted:Uh.... Still can't assault, but that's handy.
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2017 21:14
|
|
|
TKIY posted:Still can't assault, but that's handy. Yeah, it's not assaulting, but considering 1 and 2 was "you're deploying normally or outflanking" before, it's now you're deploying normally or outflanking 12" 
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2017 21:38
|
|
|
CyberLord XP posted:Glad to see Orks are still fired up. Care to summarize? I don't want to read something for a game I don't play anymore.
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2017 22:02
|
|
|
Indolent Bastard posted:Care to summarize? I don't want to read something for a game I don't play anymore. Q: On the Mob Rule table, a result of 4-6 states that ‘A brawl breaks out as the Orks decide what to do. When the dust settles, nobody can remember what the trouble was about in the first place’. Shouldn’t the subsequent hits then be Strength 3 rather than 4, as that is the base strength of Boyz? A: No. They’re really fired up!
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2017 23:07
|
|
|
 Beep. Boop.Greetings friendly warhammer players. Today is the last day to enter into Skullapaloozaa 2017- the 30k thread’s premiere skull [comedy] themed miniature painting and conversion contest. The contest begins tomorrow morning and will wrap up exactly nine weeks later on March 24th at 24:00 PST. There are multiple prizes [resin trinkets], several different awards [forums bans], a host of celebrity judges [drew short straw] , and some plot twist surprises [more comedy]. We will be posting the results of our Iron Warrior Haiku raffle, winner getting their very own Typhon [large resin tank], soon. We hope you’ll join us in having fun with our hobby: https://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3805534 Remember: A questioning servant is more dangerous than an ignorant heretic [obey]
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2017 23:10
|
|
|
SRM posted:Q: On the Mob Rule table, a result of 4-6 states that ‘A brawl Warhammer 40k: No! They're really fired up!
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2017 23:25
|
|
|
panascope posted:Warhammer 40k: No! They're
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2017 23:27
|
|
|
So the Porphyrion is like the Death Star now, right? Your brave suicide bombers have to make a trench run down its dead zone and throw Melta Bombs at its robot balls.
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2017 23:28
|
|
|
Welcome to the Knight age, per the Official FAQ this is their new firing arc. No seriously.
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2017 23:28
|
|
|
panascope posted:So the Porphyrion is like the Death Star now, right? Your brave suicide bombers have to make a trench run down its dead zone and throw Melta Bombs at its robot balls. loving amazing.
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2017 23:29
|
|
|
It's okay, I'm perfectly fine paying £95 and 470 points for a model whose only forward weapon is a meltagun. This is fine.
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2017 23:32
|
|
|
I would not be in the least bit upset if I had bought and painted a Baronial or Exalted court.
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2017 23:34
|
|
|
It's fine.
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2017 23:34
|
|
|
panascope posted:So the Porphyrion is like the Death Star now, right? Your brave suicide bombers have to make a trench run down its dead zone and
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2017 23:36
|
|
|
Do you think they'll update Warhammer 40,000: Freeblade with this new errata?
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2017 23:36
|
|
|
panascope posted:So the Porphyrion is like the Death Star now, right? Your brave suicide bombers have to make a trench run down its dead zone and throw Melta Bombs at its robot balls.
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2017 23:37
|
|
|
panascope posted:So the Porphyrion is like the Death Star now, right? Your brave suicide bombers have to make a trench run down its dead zone and throw Melta Bombs at its robot balls. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2017 23:48
|
|
|
Hencoe posted:Welcome to the Knight age, per the Official FAQ this is their new firing arc. Surely this just some kind of hyperbolic interpretation of the F.A- https://www.warhammer-community.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Imperial_Knights_v1.0.pdf Oh
|
|
#
?
Jan 20, 2017 23:55
|
|
|
So if you have a variant with two ranged weapons on the arms, they can't possibly ever fire at the same target....? Nice.
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2017 00:02
|
|
|
Hencoe posted:Welcome to the Knight age, per the Official FAQ this is their new firing arc. Hahaha, that's beautiful.
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2017 00:02
|
|
|
It's fine. A Knight Warden only costs £95. Who cares?
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2017 00:03
|
|
|
So what if your two hundred trump bucks model can't shoot directly in front of itself? How often does that even come up?
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2017 00:06
|
|
|
Hencoe posted:Welcome to the Knight age, per the Official FAQ this is their new firing arc. Oh my god I get to trench run in single file with Reavers 
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2017 00:12
|
|
|
The target area is only two meters wide: it's a small thermal exhaust port, right below the main port. The shaft leads directly to the reactor system.
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2017 00:22
|
|
|
adamantium|wang posted:The target area is only two meters wide: it's a small thermal exhaust port, right below the main port. The shaft leads directly to the reactor system. Everyone knows that we wont use the metric system in the future, it will all be Imperial.
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2017 00:37
|
|
|
So guys, I have come into a sizable block of IG infantry. Mostly plastic, a bunch of weapon teams and commisars. Like 3 tanks and a couple command looking attachments. All unpainted. What will be the path of least resistance unloading this, cash preferable?
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2017 00:50
|
|
|
Lovely Joe Stalin posted:It's okay, I'm perfectly fine paying £95 and 470 points for a model whose only forward weapon is a meltagun. This is fine. Can you imagine somebody bringing one, or even TWO, and concentrating their fire onto your beautiful new Magnus the Red™ or Lord of Change™ model and evaporating it from the table? Though those may be large enough to get both weapons on. Honestly I'm all for reducing the value of super-heavies but this seems like a ham-fisted way to do it.
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2017 01:00
|
|
|
Bombogenesis posted:Can you imagine somebody bringing one, or even TWO, and concentrating their fire onto your beautiful new Magnus the Red™ or Lord of Change™ model and evaporating it from the table? Though those may be large enough to get both weapons on. Honestly I'm all for reducing the value of super-heavies but this seems like a ham-fisted way to do it. Bombogenesis posted:Can you imagine somebody bringing one, or even TWO, and concentrating their fire onto your beautiful new Archaon the Everchosen™ or Malekith™ model and evaporating it from the table? Though those may be large enough to get both cannons on. Honestly I'm all for reducing the value of war machines but this seems like a ham-fisted way to do it.
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2017 01:11
|
|
|
Stanyer89 posted:Everyone knows that we wont use the metric system in the future, it will all be Imperial.  Arson Fire posted:I've got a couple of these ones. Oh wow, I totally forgot about Puppetswar. Thanks, man! Does it make me a shitter that when the Euro took a shot to the junk, I ordered my counts-as Wraiths in Merkelmarks instead of burgerbux?
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2017 01:34
|
|
|
This is the direct image and text from the Knight FAQ:
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2017 01:35
|
|
|
I'm aware that I'm dumb and tired tonight, but I still don't get why those arcs are offset like that. They aren't based on the forward facing, or physical positioning of the guns, or the hull of the vehicle.
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2017 01:43
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 13:22 |
|
|
TKIY posted:This is the direct image and text from the Knight FAQ: This is so loving bad. They were better off just saying "yes, 45 degree arc in front for each" and leaving it there.
|
|
#
?
Jan 21, 2017 01:59
|
|