|
"Claw hands strangling giraffe woman" was the sole descriptor for that tattoo
|
# ? Jan 18, 2017 14:04 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2024 03:02 |
|
It took me a minute to see it and now I wish I hadn't expended the effort.
|
# ? Jan 18, 2017 15:10 |
Cet A CRlP
|
|
# ? Jan 18, 2017 15:35 |
|
Oh man it took me forever to parse that image. "I see a butt... and a Fleshlight?"
|
# ? Jan 18, 2017 19:16 |
|
I can't help but think that in a few years, when she isn't spreading them apart, it's going to look like a deformed penis sticking up between her boobs!
|
# ? Jan 19, 2017 21:14 |
|
ricketyvickyt posted:
don't kinkshame
|
# ? Jan 19, 2017 21:23 |
|
ricketyvickyt posted:
I know there are some artists in here, so can someone please tell me: is that pointillism an actual style, or just a the result of a really horrid tattoo artist? I've seen a few in here that look sort of like this, and I can only think that they'll all be shapeless blobs within a year or so. I seriously can't imagine it being a deliberate choice.
|
# ? Jan 20, 2017 02:29 |
|
Zamboni_Rodeo posted:I know there are some artists in here, so can someone please tell me: is that pointillism an actual style, or just a the result of a really horrid tattoo artist? I've seen a few in here that look sort of like this, and I can only think that they'll all be shapeless blobs within a year or so. I seriously can't imagine it being a deliberate choice. just trying to accurately represent the jpeg artifacts on the reference pic
|
# ? Jan 20, 2017 03:00 |
|
Pointilism can be a style. I'd argue that this is an example of that style executed very poorly.
|
# ? Jan 20, 2017 03:01 |
|
Isn't it, like with pretty much all other tattoos, better when there's a solid outline?
|
# ? Jan 20, 2017 03:41 |
|
there wolf posted:Isn't it, like with pretty much all other tattoos, better when there's a solid outline? As someone with very little artistic experience yes but it looks like they were going for a older watercolor type thing.
|
# ? Jan 20, 2017 04:16 |
|
I think the main idea is not so much that it needs a black outline, just sufficient amounts of black in general. Over time it will be the black that is still most visible so the more black in the tattoo the better it will stand the test of time. That being said, even black will fade and spread so all those little dots may sort of congeal.
|
# ? Jan 20, 2017 07:02 |
|
That feeling when think you've found a really bad tattoo, but in the once-over before you hit post you realize it's just drawn on.
|
# ? Jan 20, 2017 08:27 |
|
|
# ? Jan 20, 2017 08:31 |
|
Is this a pokemons?
|
# ? Jan 20, 2017 11:58 |
|
DumbparameciuM posted:Is this a pokemons? It looks like the sloth from Zootopia????
|
# ? Jan 20, 2017 13:34 |
|
Just looks like a new school sloth to me. It's not a great tattoo, but it's not awful.
|
# ? Jan 20, 2017 15:01 |
|
I like the sloth, it's cute.
|
# ? Jan 20, 2017 15:02 |
|
Cool and good.
|
# ? Jan 20, 2017 16:56 |
|
It's a new tattoo but looks really old and is supposed to be Luna lovegood from Harry Potter but her uniform is all wrong and she is wearing the wrong house colours and her legs are just ridiculously long. The line work is questionable as well. I just hate it ha.
|
# ? Jan 21, 2017 02:05 |
|
I saw him stencil it. And get out weird colors. But I didnt say anything.
|
# ? Jan 21, 2017 02:16 |
|
Bombadilillo posted:I saw him stencil it. And get out weird colors. But I didnt say anything. I can see people not noticing the colors or discounting it if they don't know anything about how tattoos work. The stencil I got no excuse for.
|
# ? Jan 21, 2017 02:29 |
|
|
# ? Jan 21, 2017 02:35 |
|
Li Champions must be his favorite player!
|
# ? Jan 21, 2017 03:22 |
|
ricketyvickyt posted:
What is it supposed to say by the drawing? I can only really read it as saying "Anal"?
|
# ? Jan 21, 2017 05:34 |
|
cuntvalet posted:What is it supposed to say by the drawing? I can only really read it as saying "Anal"? ...Lana
|
# ? Jan 21, 2017 05:38 |
|
Tears In A Vial posted:...Lana Danger Zone!
|
# ? Jan 21, 2017 05:48 |
|
UMMMB it's Luna
|
# ? Jan 21, 2017 05:49 |
|
Oh hey look a local shop, I wonder if their work is any g- https://instagram.com/p/BPeXyEJguLG/
|
# ? Jan 22, 2017 18:18 |
|
Those kids are too young to have grills that hosed up already.
|
# ? Jan 22, 2017 18:30 |
|
Field Mousepad posted:Those kids are too young to have grills that hosed up already. They both look like Benjamin Button
|
# ? Jan 22, 2017 18:38 |
|
a good sign is when a fresh tattoo already looks between 5-10 years old
|
# ? Jan 22, 2017 18:42 |
|
do people sometimes intentionally make tattoos look older the same way you can get t-shirts with faded logos?
|
# ? Jan 22, 2017 19:29 |
|
Thom and the Heads posted:a good sign is when a fresh tattoo already looks between 5-10 years old I guess that 'distressed tattooing' might be a thing?
|
# ? Jan 22, 2017 19:40 |
|
It is weird how faded that guy's pieces are, even ones with what look like vibrant colors. How important is the quality/cost of ink for that? At least he helped this guy out a little. I can't imagine it looks very good at natural head position, though...
|
# ? Jan 22, 2017 19:40 |
|
sleppy posted:It is weird how faded that guy's pieces are, even ones with what look like vibrant colors. How important is the quality/cost of ink for that? That is a terrible place for a smeary red tattoo.
|
# ? Jan 22, 2017 20:10 |
|
REMEMBER SPONGE MONKEYS posted:Oh hey look a local shop, I wonder if their work is any g- https://instagram.com/p/BPeXyEJguLG/ Instagram recommended this one to me from that link: https://www.instagram.com/p/BPeVgfXgZiO/ I kind of like it.
|
# ? Jan 22, 2017 20:12 |
|
Real question: How much would constant shaving ruin a tattoo? I realize it's only scratching off the top layer of of skin cells, but that has to be similar to getting a palm or sole tattoo, right? Same question about those armpit tattoos posted earlier.
|
# ? Jan 22, 2017 22:00 |
|
hyperhazard posted:Real question: How much would constant shaving ruin a tattoo? I realize it's only scratching off the top layer of of skin cells, but that has to be similar to getting a palm or sole tattoo, right? Actually palm and sole tattoos wearing off have less to do with constant use and more to do with the body's adaptations to the underlying skin because of humanity's constant use of them over their evolution. The skin of your palms isn't anchored the same way as the skin on say your arms or legs is, and your palm has no hair follicles, no tanning response, and a few other structural differences from regular skin. The soles of your feet are similar. Basically the way that palm/sole skin works and replenishes itself will tend to fade and eventually destroy a tattoo as it forces the ink away from where the artist originally put it. It doesn't all come out with shed skin, it gets broken apart and then dissolved by the body as well from the immune response. Normal tattoo fading from sun exposure is actually a tint caused by your melanocytes, but since palm skin doesn't tan it's literally your tattoo breaking down!
|
# ? Jan 22, 2017 23:10 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2024 03:02 |
|
That's pretty fascinating, thanks! The more you know.
|
# ? Jan 22, 2017 23:38 |