|
Oh my god I got 10 seconds in and there's no way I can go more than another 20 of these assholes. Like goddamn just make a listicle. No one wants to watch your garbage half hour videos.
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2017 03:03
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 16:42 |
|
|
Endless Mike posted:Oh my god I got 10 seconds in and there's no way I can go more than another 20 of these assholes. Are you mad because they're mocking the nerdy list?
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2017 03:06
|
|
flosofl posted:Are you mad because they're mocking the nerdy list? I think he's mad because he's stupid.
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2017 03:09
|
|
|
Yeah, that video's a parody.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2017 03:09
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2017 03:16
|
|
|
Endless Mike posted:Oh my god I got 10 seconds in and there's no way I can go more than another 20 of these assholes.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2017 03:20
|
|
|
Probably a re-post, but dang Clark to the "K" is
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2017 03:31
|
|
|
That's clearly an allusion to Murray The K which makes that pretty awesome.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2017 03:39
|
|
|
Kwyndig posted:Yeah, that video's a parody. I've gotten the impression that RLM's style of parody is really entertaining to some people, and insufferable to others. Personally, I fall into the latter camp, so I can understand where Endless Mike's coming from.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2017 03:47
|
|
|
I like how he completely dresses the part, even though he's in a radio studio and nobody but his producer would ever know.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2017 03:48
|
|
|
Kwyndig posted:I like how he completely dresses the part, even though he's in a radio studio and nobody but his producer would ever know. Well, gosh, if someone saw him in just his sweats, they might think that Clark Kent and Superman could be one and the same!
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2017 04:14
|
|
|
flosofl posted:Are you mad because they're mocking the nerdy list? Lurdiak posted:I think he's mad because he's stupid. Kwyndig posted:Yeah, that video's a parody. And parodies don't need to a half hour long, either.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2017 04:21
|
|
|
Endless Mike posted:
You must hate Mel Brooks movies.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2017 04:26
|
|
|
Kwyndig posted:I like how he completely dresses the part, even though he's in a radio studio and nobody but his producer would ever know. In the early days of radio, it was policy that the announcers and anchors would wear tuxedos while on the air. It was to get them in the right frame of mind, the idea being - they're entering people's homes, so you've got to be polite.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2017 05:57
|
|
|
Bongo Bill posted:In the early days of radio, it was policy that the announcers and anchors would wear tuxedos while on the air. It was to get them in the right frame of mind, the idea being - they're entering people's homes, so you've got to be polite. I saw a true crime documentary about a dude who robbed people's houses and he wore a tux while robbing because he felt it was rude to do otherwise.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2017 06:01
|
|
|
Rhyno posted:I saw a true crime documentary about a dude who robbed people's houses and he wore a tux while robbing because he felt it was rude to do otherwise. Was he Jack Donaghy? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_P7yWnAAd0&t=12s
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2017 06:56
|
|
|
X-O posted:How does Darth Vader drink coffee? Does his mask have a Go Go Gadget Straw?
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2017 08:10
|
|
|
a kitten posted:Probably a re-post, but dang Clark to the "K" is Is Clark wearing a monocle just because that seemed more British than glasses? Cause if so, that's gear. Dad.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2017 09:15
|
|
|
What's the story behind these panels? EDITED: Removed image - link below. Why is Lois so relaxed about a guy getting shot? Why is Clark more concerned with his shirt getting ripped? Wheat Loaf fucked around with this message at 11:55 on Jan 23, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2017 11:28
|
|
|
Wheat Loaf posted:What's the story behind these panels? You should get rid of the hotlinked image. Context, apparently: quote:Part III: Clark Kent, Get Out Of My Life! From here. Sounds like classic Cary Bates kookiness. BravestOfTheLamps fucked around with this message at 11:56 on Jan 23, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2017 11:47
|
|
|
Always a bummer when that happens. Source seems to be Undersea Agent.
|
|
#
?
Jan 24, 2017 02:41
|
|
|
Which are...?
|
|
#
?
Jan 24, 2017 02:55
|
|
|
Who What Now posted:Which are...? Pants tend to chafe.
|
|
#
?
Jan 24, 2017 03:21
|
|
|
Who What Now posted:Which are...? That Say Nothing found another edit with no source?
|
|
#
?
Jan 24, 2017 03:23
|
|
|
I can't find any other versions.
|
|
#
?
Jan 24, 2017 04:09
|
|
|
That's from Chuck Austen's World Watch and it's not an edit. That same character is later about to be raped by a Hulk-like villain.
|
|
#
?
Jan 24, 2017 04:27
|
|
|
Rhyno posted:That's from Chuck Austen's World Watch and it's not an edit. That same character is later about to be raped by a Hulk-like villain. I wouldn't expect better from Chuck Austen, but good lord.
|
|
#
?
Jan 24, 2017 06:44
|
|
|
I believe that series also involved Austen writing a Vince Russo/pro-wrestling style terrible "swerve" where he got "fired" from his own IP and replaced by himself under a pseudonym? Edit: For actual funny panel content, here is something I found (darkly) comedic from Annihilation Prologue - I remember laughing when I read it and then realizing it was actually pretty horrible  
Jerusalem fucked around with this message at 07:08 on Jan 24, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jan 24, 2017 07:06
|
|
|
a kitten posted:Always a bummer when that happens. The cool panther whale in the back with the sunglasses.
|
|
#
?
Jan 24, 2017 08:19
|
|
|
Jerusalem posted:I believe that series also involved Austen writing a Vince Russo/pro-wrestling style terrible "swerve" where he got "fired" from his own IP and replaced by himself under a pseudonym? Funny thing about that panel. It's from the printed edition. The preview edition (that showed up online around the time) had different (and I would submit better) dialogue. In the online version she says that if Rich and her get out of this, they are going to mate. And her species is one which mates for life. Then que dramatic irony based death yada yada. I always preferred the preview version because the dialogue flowed better in that version.
|
|
#
?
Jan 24, 2017 10:38
|
|
|
good luck to all involved.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 03:23
|
|
|
Say Nothing posted:I can't find any other versions. Awful username/post combo
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 06:58
|
|
|
a kitten posted:good luck to all involved. Their weakness is they have to piss through their feet.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 08:14
|
|
|
Endless Mike posted:As I heavily implied, I didn't get anywhere near far enough into it to find that out. Plus Palpatine Surgical Reconstruction Center will never not make me laugh that and the fact that all of Vader's short comings were do to budgetary short cuts imposed by Palpy.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 13:55
|
|
|
I wanna know what on earth the guy who wrote the book where some robots have to cut corners on Vader's surgery due to budgetary constraints was even going for, if not comedy.
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 21:07
|
|
|
Lurdiak posted:I wanna know what on earth the guy who wrote the book where some robots have to cut corners on Vader's surgery due to budgetary constraints was even going for, if not comedy. That wouldn't be a problem in the star trek universe
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 21:10
|
|
|
purple death ray posted:That wouldn't be a problem in the star trek universe 
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 21:11
|
|
|
purple death ray posted:That wouldn't be a problem in the star trek universe Well of course not. In the Star Trek universe he'd just be dead, and then they'd have to come up with a convoluted technobabble way to fix that.
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 21:32
|
|
|
Jerusalem posted:I believe that series also involved Austen writing a Vince Russo/pro-wrestling style terrible "swerve" where he got "fired" from his own IP and replaced by himself under a pseudonym? Is this the quickest fridge ever?
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 21:45
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 16:42 |
|
|
Obligatory budget cuts panels from the ABC Warriors, 2000AD 576 May 28 1988  
|
|
#
?
Jan 25, 2017 21:45
|
|
