|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:scala's paren free syntax is seriously gross It Begins
|
# ? Jan 31, 2017 02:37 |
|
|
# ? May 22, 2024 10:02 |
|
Brain Candy posted:It Begins no kidding. if this is shocking to you i can't wait until you have to deal with implicit based di
|
# ? Jan 31, 2017 04:21 |
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:scala's paren free syntax is seriously gross confirm
|
# ? Jan 31, 2017 04:32 |
"arity" is such a weird word. I occasionally feel the same way about "tuple" as well
|
|
# ? Jan 31, 2017 09:21 |
|
VikingofRock posted:"arity" is such a weird word. I occasionally feel the same way about "tuple" as well two-tuple
|
# ? Jan 31, 2017 09:37 |
|
I pronounce tuple like two-ple. It feels right and I'm not sorry.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2017 12:18 |
|
Was Scala always such a mess or did they just never say no? I mean the type system has to be complicated to interop with Java (see also F#), but it seems to have a lot of other gratuitous superficial complexity.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2017 12:49 |
|
AggressivelyStupid posted:I pronounce tuple like two-ple. It feels right and I'm not sorry. it is right and you shouldn't be
|
# ? Jan 31, 2017 14:33 |
|
you guys are allergic to cool math words
|
# ? Jan 31, 2017 14:48 |
|
VikingofRock posted:"arity" is such a weird word. I occasionally feel the same way about "tuple" as well The APL community uses the much cooler word "valence". Functions which accept a variable number of arguments are, naturally, "ambivalent".
|
# ? Jan 31, 2017 15:23 |
|
tuple is pronounce tuh-pul.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2017 15:39 |
|
Shaggar posted:tuple is pronounce tuh-pul. That's not right, either for tuple itself (via Oxford) or for the analogous quintuple and sextuple via Merriam-Webster. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/tuple https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/quintuple https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sextuple xref https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/tuple
|
# ? Jan 31, 2017 16:13 |
|
those are all incorrect.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2017 16:17 |
|
as long as no one says "libe" for lib we're good
|
# ? Jan 31, 2017 16:27 |
|
ulmont posted:That's not right, either for tuple itself (via Oxford) or for the analogous quintuple and sextuple via Merriam-Webster. thank christ i have never had to say the word tuple out loud
|
# ? Jan 31, 2017 17:13 |
|
carry on then posted:as long as no one says "libe" for lib we're good Or "enoom" for enum
|
# ? Jan 31, 2017 17:15 |
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:scala's paren free syntax is seriously gross Brain Candy posted:It Begins this is unfortunately what happens when you don't get a feel for the language you'll be using in a new job prior to accepting said job
|
# ? Jan 31, 2017 17:29 |
|
or "char"
|
# ? Jan 31, 2017 17:29 |
|
Wheany posted:thank christ i have never had to say the word tuple out loud i like to say sextuple out loud
|
# ? Jan 31, 2017 17:32 |
|
Also, ~ is teal-day
|
# ? Jan 31, 2017 17:46 |
|
AggressivelyStupid posted:Also, ~ is teal-day its till-duh and i will fight you
|
# ? Jan 31, 2017 18:42 |
|
till-dee, you maniacs.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2017 18:43 |
|
AggressivelyStupid posted:Also, ~ is teal-day over my dead body, vato. till-day
|
# ? Jan 31, 2017 18:43 |
|
Slurps Mad Rips posted:over my dead body, vato. till-day Look, esé, you can't bastardize the two versions into one only half wrong version!!! LeftistMuslimObama posted:its till-duh and i will fight you you'll need to learn BUMPS when I'm done w/ you
|
# ? Jan 31, 2017 19:02 |
|
LeftistMuslimObama posted:its till-duh and i will fight you this is correct
|
# ? Jan 31, 2017 19:12 |
|
Athas posted:Was Scala always such a mess or did they just never say no? I mean the type system has to be complicated to interop with Java (see also F#), but it seems to have a lot of other gratuitous superficial complexity. i think it actually started out completely insane and then got somewhat saner over time as they realized what a bad idea a bunch of its features were
|
# ? Jan 31, 2017 19:25 |
|
triple sulk posted:this is unfortunately what happens when you don't get a feel for the language you'll be using in a new job prior to accepting said job i didn't accept until today so getting a feel for the language before accepting is exactly what i was doing. im very happy to use scala because i want functional programming experience. also, all of my professional experience is in ruby so i am thrilled to have an opportunity to never touch ruby again
|
# ? Jan 31, 2017 19:47 |
|
Slurps Mad Rips posted:over my dead body, vato. till-day squiggly line
|
# ? Jan 31, 2017 20:24 |
|
dick traceroute posted:squiggly line This is acceptable
|
# ? Jan 31, 2017 21:44 |
|
Sagacity posted:Or still use c++ perhaps? They're still working on the WebSocket server examples, I'm not overly sure on the integration model either. Anyway I decided to be a bit smarter and flipped things around to make the C++ only a client so I can still use that gigantic turd of Node.js because it needs to integrate with other stuff. I get about 3 hours of time to work on this every day, I've managed to waste a lot of it so far doing wonderful things like debugging Node.JS native code integration, upgrading from Fedora 23 to 25, fixing Fedora 25 and Wayland breaking the VM, moving everything to Fedora 24, and reviewing every WebSocket library code out there. MrMoo fucked around with this message at 04:25 on Feb 1, 2017 |
# ? Feb 1, 2017 04:22 |
|
Powaqoatse posted:its so you can go just learned a new use case of this code:
c is hosed up
|
# ? Feb 1, 2017 20:24 |
|
then on another level you also need to remember ## in the preprocessor, so you can do stuff like #define CALL(obj, method) ((obj ## _vtable_lookup)(#method))(obj) .. CALL(obj, method); .. (been a solid 10 years since i wrote c so i may be off on the details)
|
# ? Feb 1, 2017 20:54 |
|
You forgot the __VA_ARGS__
|
# ? Feb 1, 2017 21:38 |
|
Stop triggering me, assholes.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2017 22:47 |
|
HappyHippo posted:
why can't you just do C code:
|
# ? Feb 2, 2017 01:12 |
|
qntm posted:why can't you just do because then STR(MAJOR_VERSION) will just expand to "MAJOR_VERSION" apparently dont ask why cuz i dont know HappyHippo fucked around with this message at 02:18 on Feb 2, 2017 |
# ? Feb 2, 2017 02:15 |
|
lets macros get run over the arguments iirc
|
# ? Feb 2, 2017 02:19 |
|
HappyHippo posted:c is hosed up
|
# ? Feb 2, 2017 02:29 |
|
there was a time when I would use PHP to dynamically generate JavaScript and that creeped me out even at a time when I was voluntarily using PHP and JavaScript
|
# ? Feb 2, 2017 12:17 |
|
|
# ? May 22, 2024 10:02 |
|
There is something wrong with both PHP and Javascript, but there is nothing wrong with code generation.
|
# ? Feb 2, 2017 17:20 |