|
100% guaranteed zoning action
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2017 16:59
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 16, 2024 19:25 |
|
|
Rabelais D posted:Honestly MoMA's posts are getting a bit sad now. Derek has a verbose, belligerent style that obviously rubs some people the wrong way but he has owned MoMA hard on so many levels, and Derek hasn't even gloated about outstanding parking tickets or whatever it was MoMA did to him. I'm not allowed to go to that level.
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2017 17:00
|
|
|
Lladre posted:
Holy poo poo. Source?
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2017 17:00
|
|
|
Eldragon posted:Is there any line in the sand you are willing to draw? Where "If X is is not done by Y date" you will start to reassess your assumptions? The point you need to start to ask yourself some hard questions. In the last big thread, I stated that I wanted to see 3.0 by summertime and at least a few SQ42 levels/missions released this year. Hoping for a Christmas release of the standalone.
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2017 17:02
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:In the last big thread, I stated that I wanted to see 3.0 by summertime and at least a few SQ42 levels/missions released this year. Hoping for a Christmas release of the standalone. Are you feeling confident?
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2017 17:04
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:Um, no? He made a claim (was either here or on twitter) that he was "walking into a federal building," alluding to some sort of CIG-related inquiry. I said it was for his ticket. Hey friend I fake-read all your posts and they're all about Derek Smart this and Derek Smart that and you post more about Derek Smart than Derek Smart does How about you share some of your honest, firsthand feedback and gameplay experiences about Star Citizen from a non-Derek Smart perspective
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2017 17:04
|
|
|
I've never quite understood how people can say the Elite: Dangerous is unambitious. If you just look at DB's statement of intent for what they want to add to the game, it's way more ambitious than Star Citizen's lofty goals have ever been. It's just that, unlike CIG, Frontier don't like making promises until they know they can actually deliver them.
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2017 17:04
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:In the last big thread, I stated that I wanted to see 3.0 by summertime and at least a few SQ42 levels/missions released this year. Hoping for a Christmas release of the standalone. Yeah that's not gonna happen  What's your refund trigger? Gotta set the bar real low so you can pretend CIG didn't lambo their way under it
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2017 17:07
|
|
|
Daztek posted:Are you feeling confident? Moma just mods the SC splash screen onto E:D, straps his google cardboard on and ~=dreams=~ himself away
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2017 17:10
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:Except, inter-instance comm. is coming - 100% guarantee it. Just because you can't figure it out doesn't mean it cannot be done. And, what those idiots on reddit are trying to say is: zoning. There are zones, and others nested within. Etc. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7QZ6S6tfF78
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2017 17:14
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:In the last big thread, I stated that I wanted to see 3.0 by summertime and at least a few SQ42 levels/missions released this year. Hoping for a Christmas release of the standalone. How did last years expectations work out and why do you think they didnt?
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2017 17:14
|
|
|
Mu77ley posted:I've never quite understood how people can say the Elite: Dangerous is unambitious. If you just look at DB's statement of intent for what they want to add to the game, it's way more ambitious than Star Citizen's lofty goals have ever been. It's just that, unlike CIG, Frontier don't like making promises until they know they can actually deliver them. In the meantime, the unambitious Elon Musk is building actual loving rocket ships and aiming to go to Mars tomorrow. The hack.
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2017 17:15
|
|
|
Saying ED is bad will somehow make SC good
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2017 17:18
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:In the last big thread, I stated that I wanted to see 3.0 by summertime and at least a few SQ42 levels/missions released this year. Hoping for a Christmas release of the standalone. And now that 2016 is over and these goals not met, are they still the same for 2017 ?
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2017 17:20
|
|
|
You see Elite is a mile wide and an inch deep because you cannot stand in / near a corridor or vending machine or buy shoes
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2017 17:20
|
|
|
peter gabriel posted:You see Elite is a mile wide and an inch deep because you cannot stand in / near a corridor or vending machine or buy shoes X Rebirth proved that you can't have a good space game until you can walk around.
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2017 17:24
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:In the last big thread, I stated that I wanted to see 3.0 by summertime and at least a few SQ42 levels/missions released this year. Hoping for a Christmas release of the standalone. Here it is: ManofManyAliases posted:I know I said it a number of times: I really expect at least a mission or two out of SQ42 this year as a teaser, with release of SQ42 next year (summer maybe)? And I'm thinking we'll enter beta by the end of next year with full release in 2018. That said, my 'oh-poo poo' moment will likely be observation of progress by end of Q2 next year: if procedural tech, netcode and and other gameplay mechanics aren't more refined at that point, it's probably too far past a salvage point. Then again, I fully expect the grey-market to still be a viable alternative to offload most of my assets, even by Summer of next year. I think you will grandstand some insignificant "progress" in summer 2017 and not sell any ships, claiming you can still offload in December if needed. Hopefully the bank run on refunds will hit before 2018 so you'll might be cutting it close.
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2017 17:25
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:In the last big thread, I stated that I wanted to see 3.0 by summertime and at least a few SQ42 levels/missions released this year. Hoping for a Christmas release of the standalone. You've been selling more ships though, right?
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2017 17:25
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:Wasn't that sub supposed to be an archive of Derkisms as they related to SC? They never specified. The official line I got from the mods was that it was for archiving Derek and anything that he posts. Well there is a funny thing about archiving, it means you cannot cherry pick what it is you are archiving because that opens up the argument of bigotry and bias. And yes, I know Derek is a big boy that can handle himself and doesn't need shoes with velcro. But there is no way on this earth that they are just there for archiving. Archives do not allow for hate commentary.
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2017 17:26
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2017 17:28
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:Um, no? He made a claim (was either here or on twitter) that he was "walking into a federal building," alluding to some sort of CIG-related inquiry. I said it was for his ticket. What exactly do you call what you are doing here? If you are getting paid, is the idea that CIG employees reading this thread might not leak info to Derek if you can somehow turn everyone against him? We are already maximum 'against him' as we can be, really. In the end, he is just a dude posting in these threads. Unlike you who only seems to be here to deliver your latest round of research that turns out to be misguided bullshit. Really, you researched up about a traffic infraction and thought that ANY time was the right time to drop that casually in. What the gently caress?
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2017 17:33
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:In the last big thread, I stated that I wanted to see 3.0 by summertime and at least a few SQ42 levels/missions released this year. Hoping for a Christmas release of the standalone. So 3.0 by September 1st, and including all the features originally promised in Sept? That would put 3.0 about 9 months past the original projection. Seems reasonable, lets see if it happens.
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2017 17:34
|
|
|
Personally I don't think there's any realistic chance of 3.0 by August, moma's "summertime". I have no clue what the current plans for Gamescom 2017 are but let's recall that the plan for GamesCom 2016 was 2.6 & Star Marine, for Citizen Con it was a SQ 42 demo and for the Christmas sale, 3.0. So that all went great. Ignoring the staff departures, presumably most not yet public, the only competent thing I've noticed recently is all UK game support staff rebranding their twitter accounts to "Player Relations" and dropping all reference to CIG. I heartily approve of anyone trying to distance themselves from the eclipse of competence that is CIG , even if the high priests potentially see legal advantages to a pretense at "CIG mate, dunno, think they maybe hosed up that game thing, I'm not sure as I only work for F42 UK and I'm not really involved" Exciting year ahead.
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2017 17:37
|
|
|
aleksendr posted:No direct sources and i'm not telling this as facts. disney and EA are buddy buddy with the star wars IP (with the exception of mobile games) and had a new agreement signed with the mouse in 2013 (a ten year contract with reups, 5 game minimum) the new battlefront has new order/resistance factions and a single player storyline around the rebels timeline, fyi the new visceral game is supposedly set on the outer rim during the rise of the new order (think remnant fleet) and the other studio (EA undisclosed) is working on the space mama jamma thing, set among new republic planets
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2017 17:39
|
|
|
Someone good at editing replace billy with derek tia
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2017 17:39
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:Except, inter-instance comm. is coming - 100% guarantee it. Just to reiterate something you might have missed in your mission briefing: the whole point of having instances is that they don't communicate and that there is no interaction between them. It's not that it can't be done — it's that it would be a tremendously stupid thing to do. And if what reddit is talking about is zoning, rather than instancing, then congratulations, we had that in 1993. What progress. Tippis fucked around with this message at 17:46 on Feb 7, 2017 |
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2017 17:43
|
|
|
AP posted:Personally I don't think there's any realistic chance of 3.0 by August, moma's "summertime". I have no clue what the current plans for Gamescom 2017 are but let's recall that the plan for GamesCom 2016 was 2.6 & Star Marine, for Citizen Con it was a SQ 42 demo and for the Christmas sale, 3.0. So that all went great. 2.6 technically isnt even out yet. These sub patches are all poo poo they cut out of 2.6
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2017 17:45
|
|
|
zane is gone? i though he was a hot shot guy?
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2017 17:47
|
|
|
The real question is, how long until Ben eats the rest of his hands? They're fairly normal length in that picture
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2017 17:48
|
|
|
intardnation posted:zane is gone? i though he was a hot shot guy? He's not gone. He still works in UK office.
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2017 17:49
|
|
|
TheAgent posted:what? no when do we get swtor 2?
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2017 17:49
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:He's not gone. He still works in UK office. since you have been so wrong before I am going to need a citation please. I trust the X till then. No refunds: http://i.imgur.com/7nLm7si.mp4 intardnation fucked around with this message at 17:54 on Feb 7, 2017 |
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2017 17:50
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:He's not gone. He still works in UK office. Oh you've visited lately have you?
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2017 17:51
|
|
|
Chris's hairpiece looks like some furry creature just fell off the roof onto his head there.
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2017 17:51
|
|
|
intardnation posted:when do we get swtor 2? SWTOR was actually salvaged into a decent computer game though, they just keep pumping out expansions now and people play and the content is fairly ok.
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2017 17:53
|
|
|
TrustmeImLegit posted:2.6 technically isnt even out yet. These sub patches are all poo poo they cut out of 2.6 Exactly. The "patcher" still downloads the entire game* *game lol Somebody mentioned a bit ago CIG did well with their implementation of two factor authentication, I assume they just bought it off a shelf and paid someone to put it in. They didn't make their own version because Chris Roberts either didn't care enough about that element to
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2017 17:56
|
|
|
Ol Cactus Dick posted:Chris's hairpiece looks like some furry creature just fell off the roof onto his head there. 
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2017 17:57
|
|
|
intardnation posted:since you have been so wrong before I am going to need a citation please. I trust the X till then. Moma is correct on that point, at least 4 others crossed out are still there too.
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2017 17:58
|
|
|
Truga posted:SWTOR was actually salvaged into a decent computer game though, they just keep pumping out expansions now and people play and the content is fairly ok. never went back after the forced transfers and I wasnt able to put my characters together. Due to low pop I was forced off to another server, so I quit and never went back. Bad decisions and Iliium (sp) made it that I will never play another bioware game again. But it was my first mmo and taste of pvp and liked it. just didnt like what they did with it. Waiting for CU now and maybe a VR MMO. Fallout 4 VR is my biggie this year - other than Star Citizen VR 3.0.
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2017 18:00
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 16, 2024 19:25 |
|
|
AP posted:Moma is correct on that point, at least 4 others crossed out are still there too. ok then. I was surprised because Zane was a hot shot and thought they would want to keep him from what is left of my memory. The PR guy is still there and spamming paid articles and reviews as well.
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2017 18:01
|
|