|
Trump could ban alcohol, cigarettes, video games, put all gays in internment camps, shut down all libraries and make dissent a punishable offense and Trump supporters would still go: "OOPS THE TRUMPLESTILSKIN GOT THE CUCKS ALL BUTTHURT MMMM THAT'S A SPICY MEME PREPARE ALL YOUR PEPES!"
|
# ? Feb 8, 2017 20:17 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2024 22:52 |
|
NoEyedSquareGuy posted:The Redpanels Patreon is at $181/month, which is higher than I remember. Be sure to keep reporting it for Nazi content/hate speech/whatever and you might be able to get it shut down. What are the best cartoons to link to for proof of his Nazism? It's an easy thing but I want the best of the best.
|
# ? Feb 8, 2017 20:19 |
|
https://twitter.com/HayesBrown/status/829408747051180032
|
# ? Feb 8, 2017 20:25 |
|
Duke Igthorn posted:Is too. What value is there in that?
|
# ? Feb 8, 2017 20:28 |
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
|
# ? Feb 8, 2017 20:32 |
|
Excuse me but this cartoon implies she actually had some experience driving.
|
# ? Feb 8, 2017 20:33 |
|
I think it's worth noting whenever Dana Summers lays out what he thinks are some SICK BURNS ON THE LOONY LIBS that he looks like the Jigsaw Killer
|
# ? Feb 8, 2017 20:37 |
|
Eh. Seahawks/Pats game was close the whole time, and Carroll's decision to throw the ball on the last play actually made sense in the context of his current time-management needs and how statistically low-risk that specific pass play was. Draw this again with the Falcons snatching the sign away from the 2013 Broncos instead and it'd be better.
|
# ? Feb 8, 2017 20:39 |
|
Heh yeah that address from over 2 decades ago from Bill Clinton sure is a burn.
|
# ? Feb 8, 2017 20:40 |
|
1 2 From the Philippines: 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
|
# ? Feb 8, 2017 20:40 |
|
Plan Z posted:Stuff like this is why I kind of call bullshit on the "Clinton didn't appeal to the rust belt" jargon. Any Trump supporter you talk to mostly seems to care how much he's making liberals "LOL MAD BRO?" or by completely misunderstanding anything about him. The majority of support I see for him just seems to be wishful thinking for him to be against all of the leftist boogeymen they've thought up. The absolute turnaround now that they're actually following what he's saying and doing feels like it's helping my point. RacistGuidingLight posted:What value is there in that? *thinks* *checks rap sheet* Haha ok!
|
# ? Feb 8, 2017 20:44 |
|
Duke Igthorn posted:It only makes sense since Obama never angered the Right. There you go. I'm a huge jerk not worth a retort, and it would be pointless to debate me in earnest. Much like Klurf Boy.
|
# ? Feb 8, 2017 20:47 |
Finally something we can all agree on.
|
|
# ? Feb 8, 2017 20:51 |
|
RacistGuidingLight posted:There you go. I'm a huge jerk not worth a retort, and it would be pointless to debate me in earnest. Much like Klurf Boy. "It's pointless to debate idiots." "Haha ok." "THANK YOU FOR PROVING MY POINT BY NOT DEBATING ME!!" You win?
|
# ? Feb 8, 2017 20:52 |
|
"Putin and Trump are gay lovers" is like the hackiest cartoon to make on the subject, jesus.
|
# ? Feb 8, 2017 20:57 |
|
"Third Way" Democrats were no different than Republicans. AGC.
|
# ? Feb 8, 2017 20:58 |
|
RacistGuidingLight posted:There you go. I'm a huge jerk not worth a retort, and it would be pointless to debate me in earnest. Much like Klurf Boy. If that's the way you want to portray yourself than yeah sure.
|
# ? Feb 8, 2017 21:01 |
|
RacistGuidingLight posted:Much like Klurf Boy. Ah, the ever-underappreciated "I'm the guy that sucks, plus I got depression" gambit. You're correct that you're basically like Red Panels. Just not the way you wish you were.
|
# ? Feb 8, 2017 21:04 |
|
Guardian: "Steve Bell on Theresa May and the Brexit debate – The PM has faced down a Tory rebellion in the Commons, rejecting calls to go back to negotiations if MPs do not like her deal with the EU" Independent: Times: After Masaccio
|
# ? Feb 8, 2017 21:04 |
|
And Gorell's going hard for that 'Most Easily Reinterpreted' gaybie this year.
|
# ? Feb 8, 2017 21:06 |
|
Duke Igthorn posted:... That was my point, yes. You shouldn't be giving Nazis the validity of an argument. Since for half a year the media did, they have a higher place at the table than you. Organize against them if they bother you, but have something stronger than a list of inconsistencies if you do. RacistGuidingLight fucked around with this message at 21:17 on Feb 8, 2017 |
# ? Feb 8, 2017 21:14 |
|
RacistGuidingLight posted:There you go. I'm a huge jerk not worth a retort, and it would be pointless to debate me in earnest. Much like Klurf Boy. You are kind of a shithead.
|
# ? Feb 8, 2017 21:14 |
|
"Don't vote for Clinton, she's just as bad as the rest. Don't support the status quo!!" (5 months later) "I miss the status quo "
|
# ? Feb 8, 2017 21:18 |
|
Fourth estate re-establishes relevance by taking an uncompromising stand against an abusive Executive. AGC. Technowolf posted:And Gorell's going hard for that 'Most Easily Reinterpreted' gaybie this year. I like it.
|
# ? Feb 8, 2017 21:20 |
|
A HUNGRY MOUTH posted:"Don't vote for Clinton, she's just as bad as the rest. Don't support the status quo!!" Perhaps when all of this is over Rall will learn that long-term political idealism must also, for the benefit of the vulnerable, be matched with short term pragmahahahahaha just kidding he won't learn a loving thing.
|
# ? Feb 8, 2017 21:22 |
|
RacistGuidingLight posted:That was my point, yes. You shouldn't be giving Nazis the validity of an argument. Since for half a year the media did, they have a higher place at the table than you. Organize against them if they bother you, but have something stronger than a list of inconsistencies if you do. What a baffling point. Do we just ignore the GOP then? Your point is completely loving stupid.
|
# ? Feb 8, 2017 21:25 |
|
OldTennisCourt posted:What a baffling point. Do we just ignore the GOP then? Your point is completely loving stupid. No, just don't debate points which are self-evidently insincere. Nazis don't care about tolerance. They push the intolerant left nonsense so you'll shy away from doing anything effective. The dude sincerely made a comic about replacing the need for a girlfriend with a body pillow, and yet this thread thinks his opinion is worth dissecting and refuting. EDIT: Sometimes you get mad about it!
|
# ? Feb 8, 2017 21:32 |
|
RacistGuidingLight posted:That was my point, yes. You shouldn't be giving Nazis the validity of an argument. Since for half a year the media did, they have a higher place at the table than you. Organize against them if they bother you, but have something stronger than a list of inconsistencies if you do. RacistGuidingLight posted:That was my point, yes. You shouldn't be giving Nazis the validity of an argument. Since for half a year the media did, they have a higher place at the table than you. Organize against them if they bother you, but have something stronger than a list of inconsistencies if you do. But then you'd just come back with how refusing to debate you somehow means you win? And how your three word thesis requires a well thought out and articulate retort? So, with that in mind, was I debating the author of the comic, a person who is not here and will never see my response, or was I highlighting his ignorance for everyone to see and hopefully prevent impressionable people from falling into the trap of either believing his nonsense or not having a retort when confronted by this bullshit? Keeping in mind that I'm not REALLY responding to you, but grandiosely going in for an easy dunk on your displayed ignorance
|
# ? Feb 8, 2017 21:36 |
|
Duke Igthorn posted:Aaaaaaaaagain: where was I engaging them in debate? Did I address them in anyway? Ask them a question or direct something at them? See, what I'm doing NOW is directing this at YOU and engaging YOU, if I were to take a passive voice and not do that I wouldn't be: What the gently caress?
|
# ? Feb 8, 2017 21:38 |
|
Duke Igthorn posted:Keeping in mind that I'm not REALLY responding to you, but grandiosely going in for an easy dunk on your displayed ignorance
|
# ? Feb 8, 2017 21:41 |
|
Gallium yttride?
|
# ? Feb 8, 2017 21:48 |
|
OldTennisCourt posted:What a baffling point. Do we just ignore the GOP then? Your point is completely loving stupid. Punch them in the face
|
# ? Feb 8, 2017 21:50 |
|
|
# ? Feb 8, 2017 22:07 |
|
loving inconsistent pixel sizes within the same image are the worst thing. I'm okay with a pixel-vector blend but the pixels should be actual goddamn pixels.
|
# ? Feb 8, 2017 22:12 |
|
Improbable Lobster posted:Punch them in the face Can't incite violence, but yeah, that's something more effective at swaying opinions than being a wiener about logical fallacies.
|
# ? Feb 8, 2017 22:27 |
|
RacistGuidingLight posted:Can't incite violence, but yeah, that's something more effective at swaying opinions than being a wiener about logical fallacies. I can, Nazis should be punched in the face whenever they decide the show their slimy face and ask "if jews are people" or "if there should be negros" or say that "the holocaust never happened but if it did then the jews and fags and gypsies would have deserved it".
|
# ? Feb 8, 2017 22:35 |
|
Improbable Lobster posted:I can, Nazis should be punched in the face whenever they decide the show their slimy face and ask "if jews are people" or "if there should be negros" or say that "the holocaust never happened but if it did then the jews and fags and gypsies would have deserved it". Sir, that is an appeal to force fallacy.
|
# ? Feb 8, 2017 22:52 |
|
RacistGuidingLight posted:Sir, that is an appeal to force fallacy. Attacking Nazis is always self defense.
|
# ? Feb 8, 2017 22:54 |
|
Improbable Lobster posted:Attacking Nazis is always self defense. Unless you fit the Aryan ideal. Then it's just good manners.
|
# ? Feb 8, 2017 23:47 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2024 22:52 |
|
Neat cartoon from the 40s. No other information on it
|
# ? Feb 8, 2017 23:54 |