|
SPH gonna get replaced a program and a clock and then WON'T WE LOOK FOOLISH?
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 18:04
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 21:55 |
|
|
If you want to gussy up my title it's Operation Manager at a Logistics company Moving things from one place to another is useless?
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 18:04
|
|
|
You do nothing a computer cannot.
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 18:04
|
|
|
Jukebox Hero posted:SPH gonna get replaced a program and a clock and then WON'T WE LOOK FOOLISH? Oh, I'm completely aware the time is ticking on my job, it's not long until Uber or computer programmers replace me
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 18:04
|
|
|
Spunky Psycho Ho posted:If you want to gussy up my title it's Operation Manager at a Logistics company Well i see your concern. With an impressive position of such prestige i can see how all the liebruls must be crowded around your house like a zombie horde, trying to steal aaaaaaalllllll your stuff.
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 18:06
|
|
|
Spunky Psycho Ho posted:If you want to gussy up my title it's Operation Manager at a Logistics company Yeah here's the thing, chief, you don't do that Your employees do Their timecards are probably already being managed by a piece of software, do you really think they couldn't just replace all the managers in your company with one guy who rubber stamps time cards and sorts schedules all day? Operations management is pretty much the most automatable middle management job. You are doing nothing that couldn't be done better with a piece of software Your job is essentially welfare, it's just being subsidized through service and goods costs instead of taxpayer money. Hiring you comes at the expense of the employees under you, the ones who are doing the actual, real work, you lousy bum.
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 18:06
|
|
|
Spunky Psycho Ho posted:Oh, I'm completely aware the time is ticking on my job, it's not long until Uber or computer programmers replace me Well it's a good thing that's not a problem because ?? and it will all be fine if we just start burning coal again and build a wall, that'll save you
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 18:07
|
|
|
Mirthless posted:Yeah here's the thing, chief, you don't do that I wouldn't say better, I do organize and problem solve all day. Computers can do it faster and more brutally. It would be worse for the employees.
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 18:09
|
|
|
You are so hosed in the robolution dude
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 18:10
|
|
|
KomodoWagon posted:Well it's a good thing that's not a problem because ?? and it will all be fine if we just start burning coal again and build a wall, that'll save you He wants a coal mining job so he can achieve true financial security... just so long as the librul elite doesnt come to steal his wealth from him.
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 18:10
|
|
|
Oh my god WORSE FOR THE EMPLOYEES, like they loving care
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 18:11
|
|
|
Jukebox Hero posted:You are so hosed in the robolution dude No poo poo, that's why I would like there to be more jobs.
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 18:11
|
|
|
Spunky Psycho Ho posted:I wouldn't say better, I do organize and problem solve all day. Computers can do it faster and more brutally. It would be worse for the employees. Yeah and luckily shareholders and CEOs are famously concerned with the wellbeing of employees so
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 18:12
|
|
|
But you think the jobs should be the ones that don't exist and weren't very good when they did and that nobody will pay a living wage for
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 18:12
|
|
|
Jukebox Hero posted:Oh my god WORSE FOR THE EMPLOYEES, like they loving care This is Uber, which people do not like working for.
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 18:13
|
|
|
Spunky Psycho Ho posted:I wouldn't say better, I do organize and problem solve all day. Computers can do it faster and more brutally. It would be worse for the employees. 
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 18:13
|
|
|
Spunky Psycho Ho posted:No poo poo, that's why I would like there to be more jobs. of course somebody who does a make-busy do-nothing job for a living thinks the solution is more jobs and not just a cut-to-the-chase GMI
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 18:14
|
|
|
Spunky Psycho Ho posted:This is Uber, which people do not like working for. Holy gently caress
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 18:14
|
|
|
Mirthless posted:of course somebody who does a make-busy do-nothing job for a living thinks the solution is more jobs and not just a cut-to-the-chase GMI I work non-stop, and also I make sure that my employees are taken care of in best way I can. I often battle management and take the side of the employees
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 18:16
|
|
|
Spunky Psycho Ho posted:This is Uber, which people do not like working for. you work the most replaceable middle management job in one of the leading drivers of the death of traditional employment, lol, i cannot believe anyone can really be this thick Spunky Psycho Ho posted:I work non-stop, and also I make sure that my employees are taken care of in best way I can. I often battle management and take the side of the employees you really don't you would know this if you'd ever actually done one of these coal, manufacturing, or warehousing jobs you seem to think really need saving
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 18:17
|
|
|
Lay off Spunky Psycho Ho. He's always posting through the workday like the rest of us, so he must at least work as hard as us. Oh poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 18:17
|
|
|
just buy property and rent it out lol there's nothing humans can do that machines won't be able to do better within our lifetimes
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 18:17
|
|
|
Mirthless posted:
I've worked in a warehouse and worked off conveyor belts, yes
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 18:18
|
|
|
Knight posted:Lay off Spunky Psycho Ho. He's always posting through the workday like the rest of us, so he must at least work as hard as us. I do a million things at once, I enjoy mental stimulation
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 18:19
|
|
|
Spunky Psycho Ho posted:I've worked in a warehouse and worked off conveyor belts, yes Sure you have, your vast experience at the frito-lays plant when you were a teenager really has made you qualified to comment on the erosion of middle class manufacturing jobs
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 18:20
|
|
|
Mirthless posted:you work the most replaceable middle management job in one of the leading drivers of the death of traditional employment, lol, i cannot believe anyone can really be this thick Oh I don't know, I work in finance, and I should make minimum wage. I will be replaced by an excel macro in the near future. I only hope I make retirement before then. LMFAO
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 18:20
|
|
|
This thread was fun when it was prophesying trumps downfall, shut the hell up spunky
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 18:21
|
|
|
Mirthless posted:you work the most replaceable middle management job in one of the leading drivers of the death of traditional employment, lol, i cannot believe anyone can really be this thick No, he meant Uber, the competition, is not a good place to work, so by ensuring that his own company is nice to employees people will rather work for them than Uber. This means Uber will die off if he keeps his job. It was even dumber than you thought
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 18:22
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 18:22
|
|
|
KomodoWagon posted:No, he meant Uber, the competition, is not a good place to work, so by ensuring that his own company is nice to employees people will rather work for them than Uber. This means Uber will die off if he keeps his job. No, it means Uber is the future (unless there is regulation put into place) but people do not want to work for Uber
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 18:22
|
|
|
Toadvine posted:This thread was fun when it was prophesying trumps downfall, shut the hell up spunky No let him self own a little more
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 18:22
|
|
|
Spunky Psycho Ho posted:No, it means Uber is the future (unless there is regulation put into place) but people do not want to work for Uber Okay, so?
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 18:24
|
|
|
Arrhythmia posted:No let him self own a little more He's a bad troll duh
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 18:25
|
|
|
I don't get what the problem is. I'm like a liberal arts major that had to work lovely jobs because I loving hated trying to go into advertising or marketing and it's not so bad. I want there to be more people working and more opportunities for everyone
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 18:26
|
|
|
Spunky Psycho Ho posted:No, it means Uber is the future (unless there is regulation put into place) but people do not want to work for Uber People mainly don't want to work for Uber because the wages are inconsistent and it's hard to cover the base expenses of the job and all your bills on the money you make A GMI would make the gig economy actually make sense.
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 18:26
|
|
|
What if there just isn't enough useful work for everyone?
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 18:28
|
|
|
Everyone should know what the problem is - the .001% control 1/3 of the world's money
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 18:30
|
|
|
Spunky Psycho Ho posted:I don't get what the problem is. I'm like a liberal arts major that had to work lovely jobs because I loving hated trying to go into advertising or marketing and it's not so bad. I want there to be more people working and more opportunities for everyone 1. Look up the phrase "Full Employment" 2. Even if that wasn't a thing, opportunities will continue to dry up unless we take an aggressively luddite stance on new productivity developments Even if you banned full automation of job responsibilities on the federal level, people would still be finding ways to improve processes so they can cut the HR or Accounting department down a few more heads. Jobs that used to take hundreds of people to do can now be done with a team of ten people, and those jobs aren't going to be around for much longer either.
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 18:30
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 18:32
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 21:55 |
|
|
Full employment is bad. You cannot have it. It leads to hyper inflation.
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 18:33
|
|