|
Dessicated corpse of FDR 2020.
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 21:39
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 22:05 |
|
|
Macrowave Oven posted:This thread title looks familiar.
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 21:40
|
|
|
FactsAreUseless posted:Obviously no decisions of any sort should be made over the next four to eight years, because we do not have telepathy, and therefore it is impossible to know, or look into, or find out, what anyone knows or what motivates their decisions. Please do not question the President of the United States. He has a great brain. A yuge brain. He doesn't need you second guessing and commenting on everything!
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 21:42
|
|
|
The platform I would've really wanted to see in 2016 would've been "Revitalizing the American Economy Through 100% Legalized Drugs"
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 21:43
|
|
|
Spunky Psycho Ho posted:The platform I would've really wanted to see in 2016 would've been "Revitalizing the American Economy Through 100% Legalized Drugs"
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 21:46
|
|
|
Spunky Psycho Ho posted:The platform I would've really wanted to see in 2016 would've been "Revitalizing the American Economy Through 100% Legalized Drugs" well, good thing you elected Trump, the person most likely to roll back all progress on the drug war and start jailing marijuana users again in before "Well, actually, Trump said he was pro drug in..." while ignoring he picked Jeff Sessions as his AG (and we knew it was either going to be sessions or christie back in like loving september dude)
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 21:46
|
|
|
Spunky Psycho Ho posted:The platform I would've really wanted to see in 2016 would've been "Revitalizing the American Economy Through 100% Legalized Drugs" Agreed.
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 21:47
|
|
|
Mirthless posted:well, good thing you elected Trump, the person most likely to roll back all progress on the drug war and start jailing marijuana users again My hope was Trump's business intuitions and pragmatic approach to things would guide him to legalization
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 21:48
|
|
|
*this speech sponsored by JPMorgan Chase. Now get a $150 bonus and up to 5% cash back with the Chase Freedom card! Enter promo code IMWITHHER
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 21:49
|
|
|
We went from, "I disagree with what you say but will fight to the death for your right to say it" to "I disagree with everything you say and will do everything in my power to ruin your life, fascist" in 2016 to "I disagree with everything you say, but you agree with the Democrats. Therefore you are my friend" in 2017 Progress?? I think??
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 21:49
|
|
|
Mirthless posted:well, good thing you elected Trump, the person most likely to roll back all progress on the drug war and start jailing marijuana users again Shut the gently caress up, good lord. There are probably two real Trump supporters itt and one is prorat which could go either way. Besides, Clinton supporters did more to elect Trump than salty Bernouts like myself
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 21:50
|
|
|
quote:in before "Well, actually, Trump said he was pro drug in..." while ignoring he picked Jeff Sessions as his AG To be fair you can only vote for someone based on what they say, not on what their appointees are after they are already elected. I am a salty bernout. 
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 21:51
|
|
|
Spunky Psycho Ho posted:My hope was Trump's business intuitions and pragmatic approach to things would guide him to legalization haha.
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 21:51
|
|
|
lol if you think the candidate who says that vaccines cause autism is a pragmatist
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 21:52
|
|
|
Toadvine posted:Shut the gently caress up, good lord. I wasn't talking to you??? Spunky Psycho Ho has been pretty upfront about voting for Trump, lol
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 21:52
|
|
|
It's really a surprise that a disenfranchised and miserable population continously being worse off year on year voted for someone willing to at least give them sweet nothings rather than an organized machine of political/media might charging lockstep telling them their jobs arent coming back and that their opinions are worthless
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 21:55
|
|
|
Spunky Psycho Ho posted:My hope was Trump's business intuitions and pragmatic approach to things would guide him to legalization lo l
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 21:55
|
|
|
Mirthless posted:I wasn't talking to you??? I wish you weren't talking at all!!
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 21:57
|
|
|
Mirthless posted:I wasn't talking to you??? I'm still not in a position where a total collapse would devastate me so I rolled the dice
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 21:58
|
|
|
SBJ posted:It's really a surprise that a disenfranchised and miserable population continously being worse off year on year voted for someone willing to at least give them sweet nothings rather than an organized machine of political/media might charging lockstep telling them their jobs arent coming back and that their opinions are worthless i like how we cant talk about trumps ineptitude without getting into a discussion about how hillary wasnt enough of a liar
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 22:01
|
|
|
SBJ posted:It's really a surprise that a disenfranchised and miserable population continously being worse off year on year voted for someone willing to at least give them sweet nothings rather than an organized machine of political/media might charging lockstep telling them their jobs arent coming back and that their opinions are worthless nobody thinks hillary ran a good campaign but how can you still be thinking about that when what's going on in the here and now is so drat bizarre?
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 22:01
|
|
|
So based on the last few pages: Trump hosed a middle management IT guy, which led to the Democrats falling apart because it caused Hilary to not campaign. Am I getting this right?
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 22:01
|
|
|
Archer666 posted:So based on the last few pages: Trump hosed a middle management IT guy, which led to the Democrats falling apart because it caused Hilary to not campaign. ya
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 22:02
|
|
|
proof of concept posted:nobody thinks hillary ran a good campaign but how can you still be thinking about that when what's going on in the here and now is so drat bizarre? This reality is the realm of chaos and we all deserve to be here from our sins
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 22:03
|
|
|
Archer666 posted:So based on the last few pages: Trump hosed a middle management IT guy, which led to the Democrats falling apart because it caused Hilary to not campaign. you forgot the part about the impending robot invasion
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 22:05
|
|
|
Spunky Psycho Ho posted:I'm still not in a position where a total collapse would devastate me so I rolled the dice trying very hard
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 22:05
|
|
|
a bone to pick posted:you forgot the part about the impending robot invasion Oh right the robots would automate our jobs, so we'll all be jobless. Then they'll make robot jobless people so we're all be super jobless or something.
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 22:09
|
|
|
i think we need to seize the means of automation and rent the robots to the companies
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 22:10
|
|
|
What is the Romanization of Donald trump? I will guess something like Dunâraudo Târompu.
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 22:10
|
|
|
So uh...I help write software that automates/simplifies the process of goods transportation. I think I might be one of the bad guys.
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 22:12
|
|
|
Shayl posted:So uh...I help write software that automates/simplifies the process of goods transportation. I think I might be one of the bad guys. kulak spotted
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 22:12
|
|
|
Shayl posted:So uh...I help write software that automates/simplifies the process of goods transportation. I think I might be one of the bad guys. Yes. Yes you are.
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 22:14
|
|
|
Shayl posted:So uh...I help write software that automates/simplifies the process of goods transportation. I think I might be one of the bad guys. you're one of the good guys, you're one of the best guys, because you're contributing to the final cleanup phase of the industrial revolution. Thank you for being on the forefront of progress. Now if only the rest of the country would figure out the industrial revolution was over
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 22:14
|
|
|
Spunky Psycho Ho posted:My hope was Trump's business intuitions and pragmatic approach to things would guide him to legalization So that was Mrs. Lundegaard on the floor in there. And I guess that was your accomplice in the wood chipper. And those three people in Brainerd. And for what? For a little bit of legal drugs.
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 22:14
|
|
|
Mirthless posted:you're one of the good guys, you're one of the best guys, because you're contributing to the final cleanup phase of the industrial revolution. Thank you for being on the forefront of progress. yeah hi there, my computer is making a weird noise could you come and give it a look i think dwayne from accounting is playing a prank on me again thank you
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 22:15
|
|
|
Mirthless posted:you're one of the good guys, you're one of the best guys, because you're contributing to the final cleanup phase of the industrial revolution. Thank you for being on the forefront of progress. Ah ha! Low level technocrat shows his true stripes
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 22:16
|
|
|
Spunky Psycho Ho posted:Yes. Yes you are. I mean to be fair if you learn to code there are lots of jobs. We can't find enough people to fill the roles we have. Don't even have to go to college to learn it.
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 22:17
|
|
|
Computer workers are always like "Do not resist Human. Be absorbed." Like straight Borg'n on everyone
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 22:17
|
|
|
Archer666 posted:Oh right the robots would automate our jobs, so we'll all be jobless. Then they'll make robot jobless people so we're all be super jobless or something. not givin my drat scrip to some robos, no way no how
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 22:18
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 22:05 |
|
|
Shayl posted:I mean to be fair if you learn to code there are lots of jobs. We can't find enough people to fill the roles we have. Don't even have to go to college to learn it. lol yep Spunky Psycho Ho posted:Ah ha! Low level technocrat shows his true stripes I'm sorry for feeling a little resentment over the obligation to work 5 days a week when the productivity tools to halve that already exist and our economy has ample excess cash to handle the decrease in productivity per dollar per laborer if the work week was shortened or reduced. you don't have to be a technocrat to know that we don't need to pay a department to approve timecards when we already have team managers and an auditing department that goes through the records every quarter we don't need everybody to have a job and we don't need everybody to spend a third of every weekday at a jobsite. The money to do this already exists in the economy, at the top of it. A GMI would simply distribute that wealth more evenly across all income brackets. It would be good for the economy to actually have people spending the money we are printing. Mirthless fucked around with this message at 22:23 on Feb 15, 2017 |
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2017 22:20
|
|