|
Guy Goodbody posted:If you really think Trump is New Hitler, fighting Hitler makes strange bedfellows well and honestly? I want both sides gone. I despise the people I just listed and I despise (a lot) of what Trump has done*. I hate the Millitary Industrial complex, I hate the "War on Drugs" these assholes cheer leaded, and I hate their stance against LGBT/women that they also champion. The words "gently caress off", cannot be said to the people I just listed enough as far as I'm concerned. *I say a lot because I think him ditching the TPP is a far batter than what any Republican would have done. I will be fair to him on things that he does that go along with my own principles.
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2017 22:28
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 23:18 |
|
|
If you want both sides gone the best thing is to push out the right leaning Democrats by running progressive candidates in the 2018 primaries, getting BLM and Antifa candidates to replace senators and representatives who considered their seats safe, then do the same thing in 2020 and so on until the party is strongly progressive.
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2017 22:50
|
|
|
Trump.. I think this guy would have been sorted into the "Slytherin" house from the Harry Potter books.
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2017 22:53
|
|
|
FuzzySkinner posted:It's just comes across as a bit of a "fad" to me. This is a good thing, this is not a bad thing. We need to remember that we can still be passionate opponents without being mortal enemies. If we've lost the ability of people with differing viewpoints to be able to come together for a common good, or in this case against a common threat, then we are already lost and truly nothing matters. We need the biggest and broadest anti-Trump coalition that we can build. What comes after Trump we can compete for, but for now, Trump absolutely has to go.
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2017 23:12
|
|
|
super sweet best pal posted:If you want both sides gone the best thing is to push out the right leaning Democrats by running progressive candidates in the 2018 primaries, getting BLM and Antifa candidates to replace senators and representatives who considered their seats safe, then do the same thing in 2020 and so on until the party is strongly progressive. I kinda dig the Justice Democrat/Draft Bernie party members I've seen pop up recently. I think they would do wonders in the Rust Belt, and those are the type of areas those people should be in. I think if Ohio, for example (my home state) ran a Bernie or Kucinich clone? They'd be well liked, supported and such. Guys like Strickland and a few others around Cuyahoga County are thought of as phonies. Guys like Kucinich are well liked/respected because they're principled. Even Right Wingers go "He's an honest man at least. I disagree with him, but he's not afraid of saying what he feels." I would also agree that in certain "blue" areas it would be far better to have BLM/AntiFa (I'm critical of the latter, fine with the former) taking the place of Pelosi and guys like John Lewis in order to push their values as well. I think they'd do quite a bit better than the people I just mentions. Those are the types that would make the party quite a bit better imo.
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2017 23:48
|
|
|
The Kingfish posted:Trump.. I think this guy would have been sorted into the "Slytherin" house from the Harry Potter books. how do i choose between umbridge and voldemort 
|
|
#
?
Feb 20, 2017 23:48
|
|
|
Apparently Milo's book got cancelled after people started using a clip of him on a podcast to suggest he's pretty much a nambla member. https://twitter.com/AdamRothberg/status/833800857762295808 Dude isn't verified on twitter but apparently works for the publisher and has lots of old tweets about stuff they're doing so I assume it's legit. Some of the articles about it even tried to cite his making a joke about catholic child abuse(something like "I'm very thankful for father michael, I wouldn't be nearly as good at giving head without his help") as if he was serious, and so did one of the guys in the podcast he was in. I recall seeing/listening to the podcast and iirc the topic of discussion was one of the boyfriends he had in his mid-teens(16-17) and his saying that at 14 he was one of those people that actively sought out sexual relationships, though the latter might have been on the Joe Rogan podcast, where I think he said the age of consent in the UK and US is generally in a pretty good place but there are people below it who know what they're getting themselves into and are emotionally ready. That's the sort of thing he's talking about when he talks about arbitrary cutoffs for consent, and the example he relates to when talking about a "younger boy" with an "older man" is when he was banging a drag queen at 17. Expect tears from all sides in the coming days I guess?
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2017 00:07
|
|
|
re: Milo. On one hand I would say that after x amount of years of bullying trans, and other types of people? Perhaps this is indeed karma. On the flip side? Dude's clearly got some issues in regards to the fact that he was indeed sexually abused and is trying to desperately not be called a "Victim", hence the attitude he showed towards this. I don't agree with the attitude a lot of people took towards this, and again the "strange bedfellows" argument is being brought up again. I feel pity for anyone that indeed had that happen to them. That loving sucks. Period. I saw a lot of people literally parading proudly with a group of individuals who for a lack of a better word? Consider gay people "icky" ("The Reagan Coalition"). I don't know if I wouldn't to be with a group of people and to continue to consider those "Republicans" one of "Good ones" (to borrow a phrase). NOW LET ME PUT THIS IN CAPS: IF MILO INDEED HAD RELATIONS WITH A MINOR, LOOKED AT PORN OF A MNOR OR SAW SOMEONE WITH A MINOR AND SAID NOTHING? gently caress HIM, THAT'S DISGUSTING. THERE IS NO DEFENSE OF THAT. THAT IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE. This is all being said? I'm not thrilled with people being bullied out of a job, book deal or what ever the gently caress for having a lovely opinion bite them in the rear end. I for example, sure as hell wouldn't want to have that happen to me.
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2017 00:28
|
|
|
FuzzySkinner posted:NOW LET ME PUT THIS IN CAPS: IF MILO INDEED HAD RELATIONS WITH A MINOR, LOOKED AT PORN OF A MNOR OR SAW SOMEONE WITH A MINOR AND SAID NOTHING? gently caress HIM, THAT'S DISGUSTING. THERE IS NO DEFENSE OF THAT. THAT IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE. I think he'd said something about a Hollywood party filled with twinks.
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2017 00:31
|
|
|
FuzzySkinner posted:re: Milo. He's a pedophile
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2017 01:06
|
|
|
FuzzySkinner posted:re: Milo. better hope nobody has footage of you praising pedastry then
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2017 01:09
|
|
|
FuzzySkinner posted:re: Milo. Yeah man it sucks that he lost his job of uhhhhh baiting angry responses with dumb controversial opinions And his book deal, which should be considered a birth right, really
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2017 01:20
|
|
|
If you go through all the tweets about milo losing his book deal and replace "pedophile apologist" with "abandoned orphan, struggling to survive in the harsh city streets," well, I can tell you that it is NOT a good look for the so-called "tolerant" left
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2017 01:23
|
|
|
simon and schuster should be forced to publish the nazi pedophile's book, to do anything less is to violate the first amednment
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2017 01:24
|
|
|
the jew is a nazi  but yeah if he really is a pedophile, he can go to jail for all i care
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2017 01:33
|
|
|
spit on my clit posted:the jew is a nazi Yep.
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2017 01:35
|
|
|
a nazi jew????? now i've seen everything
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2017 01:36
|
|
|
Welcoming TERFs or pro-sharia people into the fold is a unquestionably bad thing though
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2017 07:54
|
|
|
milo thought poe's law couldn't touch him he thought wrong it folds back on every and anyone
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2017 08:48
|
|
|
oh wow a brit is a pederast how loving surprising
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2017 09:10
|
|
|
Byolante posted:The problem with relying on the army to preserve your power is when you send them to put down the uprising and they realise 'hey that's my cousin in the crowd, why should I shoot him?' Propping up the military as the social welfare state is going to have some unforseen consequences should the poor rise up.  noice
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2017 09:54
|
|
|
Lastgirl posted:milo thought poe's law couldn't touch him theses idiots will never learn; meanwhile i sleep with one eye open, because, lol, death is certain
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2017 09:58
|
|
|
FuzzySkinner posted:It's just comes across as a bit of a "fad" to me.
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2017 10:03
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/pixelatedboat/status/833887324958138368 https://twitter.com/mashable/status/834022133399433216
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2017 14:46
|
|
|
FuzzySkinner posted:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Irz56zb04A
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2017 15:00
|
|
|
Conch Shell Corp posted:oh wow a brit is a pederast how loving surprising Jim'll fix it! That whole scandal is...terrifying. One of the best "Truth telling" skits SNL did. Didn't they pull it after one showing?
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2017 17:52
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/grynbaum/status/834124012678676485 and he's outta there
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2017 20:46
|
|
|
tSpinning Robo posted:https://twitter.com/grynbaum/status/834124012678676485 He had a video or some sort of comment the other day in regards to the whole CPAC biz: "This is why most Gays vote Democrat" Shock Jock persona, and his (at the very least) pedarest sympathy a side? He's very much right on that matter. Why would anyone who's LGBT bother supporting these people at this point? Especially when Neo Libs offer you the same exact stuff you're looking for.
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2017 22:15
|
|
|
FuzzySkinner posted:t good point, but, that's why he was an idiot from the start to think he could be openly gay and be an accepted part of old school right wing politics you need to kiss the ring to be accepted you.need.to.kiss.the.ring.  unless you are the ring, like this guy: 
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2017 23:19
|
|
|
Lindsey O. Graham posted:good point, but, that's why he was an idiot from the start to think he could be openly gay and be an accepted part of old school right wing politics They were not gonna circle the wagon for him like our side has done for the likes of Lena Dunham (who has done something I believe sort of similiar? If not. Correct me, and perhaps even give me a more accurate. They were gonna toss his rear end out the moment he became "useless" to them. There's a certain wing of the GOP that has a strong, vice like grip on the control of the party and their values. I've met republicans, I've been raised by them my entire life, etc. Generally they don't care what music people listen to, they're not anti-science, and frankly don't care about people that are gay (or actually support their right to marry). The problem is...the people I think the old guard GOP enjoys cow-towing to are old school evangelical/mormon "FAMILY VALUES" -types. You know...the nutbars that you know in school that want creationism taught and are paranoid about the gay menace? Those idiots never really left.
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2017 23:48
|
|
|
FuzzySkinner posted:They were not gonna circle the wagon for him like our side has done for the likes of Lena Dunham (who has done something I believe sort of similiar? If not. Correct me, and perhaps even give me a more accurate. They were gonna toss his rear end out the moment he became "useless" to them. oh, the Evangelical Christian Right? no those fools aren't going anywhere because they whip votes, the pulpit is their political platform, and as long as they can deliver their congregation's votes, my party will continue to give them thoroughly enthusiastic rim jobs; it's the name of the game milo was never going to be as useful, because half his fans never leave the house, let alone to vote he can assist in slightly increasing the vote count, but he can't deliver states, like pastors, ministers, and the like do routinely Lena Dunham did what she did at seven, that's why the left hasn't completely abandoned her, even though i doubt she maintains any relevance at this point it's different when its kids with kids, it's still messed up, but it isn't the same
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2017 00:08
|
|
|
lena dunham has put her foot in her mouth so frequently that she must love the taste. writing that incident in her book is the sort of poo poo that makes you think, "why would you want anyone to know about this?" she's rich enough to hire a publicist to cover her tracks, but she's so stupid and full of herself that she probably doesn't see the need to besides, lena's influence doesn't extend beyond Dem party elites and a handful of idiot millennials. most people have no idea who she is and don't particularly care
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2017 02:17
|
|
|
get that OUT of my face posted:besides, lena's influence doesn't extend beyond Dem party elites and a handful of idiot millennials. most people have no idea who she is and don't particularly care I only know from these threads.
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2017 02:32
|
|
|
get that OUT of my face posted:lena dunham has put her foot in her mouth so frequently that she must love the taste. writing that incident in her book is the sort of poo poo that makes you think, "why would you want anyone to know about this?" she's rich enough to hire a publicist to cover her tracks, but she's so stupid and full of herself that she probably doesn't see the need to Well how influential is Milo? That's a question we need to ask ourselves. From what I'm seeing though it feels like a lot of establishment republican types (McMullin, JEB!) were ashamed of Trump/Milo not because they're racist, they're ashamed that they've completely torn off the filter they used to dog whistle voters and scam people out of their money. Make no mistake when I type this. I have friends that do hold conservative/right leaning values that legitimately find Trump abhorrent. This is more so about people that are in the "1 percent", people that are in the media,elected officials and donors all have no problem with each other in that realm. The fact that leading to and after the election that Bush-type Republicans and Clinton-type Democrats are so willing to be buddy-buddy together is actually quite alarming. It reminds me of the "TREEHOUSE OF HORROR" ep where Kang and Kodos are holding hands as Bush and Dole.
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2017 02:42
|
|
|
Child rape aside, besides what about that LENS DUNHAM HMMMMMM? -a thing posted itt, jfc
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2017 03:24
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2017 03:59
|
|
|
bystander: no
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2017 04:02
|
|
|
Baloogan posted:bystander: no They just can't stop thinking about their forest queen! https://twitter.com/wokieleaks1/status/833920750977314817
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2017 04:55
|
|
|
http://www.hillarybeattrump.org/
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2017 10:39
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 23:18 |
|
|
what's the link to that "hillary won" twitter account where every tweet ends with bill getting sent to do some poo poo chore? thought that was the saddest thing, this witch-in-the-woods fanfiction is even sadder cause he thinks she gives a poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Feb 22, 2017 13:36
|
|
