cinci zoo sniper posted:

*in snatch duster voice* ah, a cosplay fan

stone cold posted:

n-nani?

but also, who is snatch duster

Avshalom posted:

Filthy Hans posted:

That rooster looks like he doesn't take poo poo from anyone

cinci zoo sniper posted:

the other latvian supermarket chain pastry section - the chain is better, but the shop smaller than the one i posted yesterday

V. Illych L. posted:

is this loving rimi

what is rimi doing in latvia

Mr Hootington posted:

Hey at least we won't be WV

Mr Hootington posted:

This bearglove old spice deodorant smells great.

quote:

Now if a parent may own his child (within the framework of non-aggression and runaway freedom), then he may also transfer that ownership to someone else. He may give the child out for adoption, or he may sell the rights to the child in a voluntary contract. In short, we must face the fact that the purely free society will have a flourishing free market in children. Superficially, this sounds monstrous and inhuman. But closer thought will reveal the superior humanism of such a market. For we must realize that there is a market for children now, but that since the government prohibits sale of children at a price, the parents may now only give their children away to a licensed adoption agency free of charge. This means that we now indeed have a child-market, but that the government enforces a maximum price control of zero, and restricts the market to a few privileged and therefore monopolistic agencies. The result has been a typical market where the price of the commodity is held by government far below the free-market price: an enormous "shortage" of the good. The demand for babies and children is usually far greater than the supply, and hence we see daily tragedies of adults denied the joys of adopting children by prying and tyrannical adoption agencies. In fact, we find a large unsatisfied demand by adults and couples for children, along with a large number of surplus and unwanted babies neglected or maltreated by their parents. Allowing a free market in children would eliminate this imbalance, and would allow for an allocation of babies and children away from parents who dislike or do not care for their children, and toward foster parents who deeply desire such children. Everyone involved: the natural parents, the children, and the foster parents purchasing the children, would be better off in this sort of society.

Randler posted:

4.5 day weekend closing in. Hail Catholicism.

cinci zoo sniper posted:

the best grocery store chain in the country for decades there's reason that baltics are thought to be owned by scandinavians. statoil is the single nation-wide gas station network too; i used to have an account open at dnb, we have swedbank and skandinavska enskilda banken, tele2, telia owns 49% of state wired and wireless telecoms, etc etc etc

Randler posted:

4.5 day weekend drawing closer. Hail Catholicism.

V. Illych L. posted:

We don't even have rimi any longer wth

Randler posted:

4.5 day weekend drawing closer. Hail Catholicism.

Mr Hootington posted:

Ah trump is an SA poster

fishmech posted:

BI NOW GAY LATER posted:

We're slightly better than Kansas.

Majorian posted:

There needs to be more of them.

fishmech posted:

Majorian posted:

I have enough of these in my life, they're called my family thx.

Furnaceface posted:

Could be worse, could be evangelicals.

Majorian posted:

Evangelicals count as Protestants, and I'm afraid my dear ancient grandparents are among them.

Mr Hootington posted:

Still one more week until tickled is on HBO Go.

Volkerball posted:

That movie is hosed up