|
VHS tapes are the only true found footage. I have a tape that I bought in an estate sale years ago. The label says "[name] birthday 199x" and i dare not watch it
|
# ? Feb 25, 2017 03:56 |
|
|
# ? May 20, 2024 14:38 |
|
Spatulater bro! posted:Hmm. Well they shouldn't have music. Agreed, obviously.
|
# ? Feb 25, 2017 04:00 |
|
A found footage movie where the camera operator is followed around by someone with a tape deck that plays perpetually appropriate music.
|
# ? Feb 25, 2017 04:02 |
|
Better yet, the camera operator constantly attempts to hum or whistle appropriate music.
|
# ? Feb 25, 2017 04:06 |
|
Magic Hate Ball posted:A found footage movie where the camera operator is followed around by someone with a tape deck that plays perpetually appropriate music. A found footage film where the footage is of people filming their Sweded movie.
|
# ? Feb 25, 2017 04:15 |
|
Snak posted:Better yet, the camera operator constantly attempts to hum or whistle appropriate music. better be "This is the RE-Re-remix-ix-xsss" style
|
# ? Feb 25, 2017 04:17 |
found footage movie presented as repurposed visuals for a youtube mixtape
|
|
# ? Feb 25, 2017 04:21 |
|
15 Minutes was ahead of its time.
|
# ? Feb 25, 2017 04:26 |
|
Powaqoatse posted:VHS tapes are the only true found footage. Put on YouTube pls
|
# ? Feb 25, 2017 05:18 |
|
Is the movie Mauruders poo poo in a "just an action movie" way or is it a poo poo action movie?
|
# ? Feb 25, 2017 06:07 |
|
Powaqoatse posted:VHS tapes are the only true found footage. What are the odds someone taped Ghostbusters 2 over it? ...unless the name is Sadako, because then you should slam the tape into your microwave instead of a VCR.
|
# ? Feb 25, 2017 08:43 |
|
DeimosRising posted:Put on YouTube pls Make the title something like "SHOCKING GHOST FOOTAGE AT BIRTHDAY PARTY (1990s)" and you'll get a bunch of people in the comments saying they saw the ghost at 6:17 or 12:45, complete with red circles on blurry screenshots, and violently insisting that anyone who claims not to see the obvious ghost evidence is lying or a government plant.
|
# ? Feb 25, 2017 21:24 |
|
One time, some posted a broken English/autotranslated post in the Ghost in the Shell subreddit featuring a video of a supposed ghost leaving a car wreck. Everyone replied "what does this have to do with Ghost in the Shell, and also this is fake as gently caress" and the op replied by just restating "there is ghost there in the video!" And similar things. It was pretty funny. That's my story.
|
# ? Feb 25, 2017 21:29 |
|
BlindSite posted:Is the movie Mauruders poo poo in a "just an action movie" way or is it a poo poo action movie? It's boring and non-sensical and is more of a crime-thriller than action movie anyway. Not enjoyable on any level, IMO. Also LOL at Adrian Grenier as the least convincing Special Forces badass in film history.
|
# ? Feb 25, 2017 21:38 |
|
Human Tornada posted:It's boring and non-sensical and is more of a crime-thriller than action movie anyway. Not enjoyable on any level, IMO. There is no way he's worse than the "Delta" guys in the scifi channel original movie about killer bats. Bats: The Human Harvest, I think it was called.
|
# ? Feb 25, 2017 21:47 |
|
Snak posted:There is no way he's worse than the "Delta" guys in the scifi channel original movie about killer bats. Bats: The Human Harvest, I think it was called. He says the lines OK but Grenier's problem is that he has the face and demeanor of a person who's never faced an obstacle or worked a day in his life.
|
# ? Feb 25, 2017 22:35 |
|
How is it that there are 15 sequels to the 1988 film Witchcraft, three of which were released last year? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Witchcraft_(1988_film) I guess number five was a Troma production that has Julie Strain.
|
# ? Feb 26, 2017 03:34 |
|
I watched the first Ip Man movie tonight and something I was kind of confused about was how exactly did he have any money pre-war? They mention later in the film that he's never had a job before and he doesn't seem to have any source of income.
|
# ? Feb 26, 2017 08:09 |
|
muscles like this! posted:I watched the first Ip Man movie tonight and something I was kind of confused about was how exactly did he have any money pre-war? They mention later in the film that he's never had a job before and he doesn't seem to have any source of income. He was born into wealth. Although in real life "never had a job" wasn't quite true. He worked as a policeman in Foshan, but that's missed out the biopic. Cerv fucked around with this message at 10:51 on Feb 26, 2017 |
# ? Feb 26, 2017 10:48 |
|
I watched Hacksaw Ridge the other day and it got me thinking about large battle scenes in movies. How are largely dialog-free, action-heavy portions of films dealt with in the script? There's definitely a narrative to the sequences of events in Hacksaw Ridge and other movies, but you could narrow down like half an hour of that movie to a bullet pointed list. At that point does a writer just leave it up to the storyboard artist?
|
# ? Feb 26, 2017 10:58 |
|
Precambrian posted:Make the title something like "SHOCKING GHOST FOOTAGE AT BIRTHDAY PARTY (1990s)" and you'll get a bunch of people in the comments saying they saw the ghost at 6:17 or 12:45, complete with red circles on blurry screenshots, and violently insisting that anyone who claims not to see the obvious ghost evidence is lying or a government plant. Hah that's a pretty good idea!
|
# ? Feb 26, 2017 14:55 |
|
Why does Logan look like its about Mel Gibson?
|
# ? Mar 3, 2017 21:40 |
|
Tenzarin posted:Why does Logan look like its about Mel Gibson? ozzy convict genes
|
# ? Mar 4, 2017 04:48 |
|
Tenzarin posted:Why does Logan look like its about Mel Gibson? prosopagnosia?
|
# ? Mar 4, 2017 12:56 |
|
Are there multiple cuts of The Unknown (1927)? The version I watched ran 50 minutes, but it's listed many places as 63 minutes. Seems like a big discrepancy if it's just a frame rate difference.
|
# ? Mar 5, 2017 04:02 |
|
Spatulater bro! posted:Are there multiple cuts of The Unknown (1927)? The version I watched ran 50 minutes, but it's listed many places as 63 minutes. Seems like a big discrepancy if it's just a frame rate difference. That would be pretty much the exact difference if you played a 24fps video at 30 or a 20 fps video at 24.
|
# ? Mar 5, 2017 04:12 |
|
Baron von Eevl posted:That would be pretty much the exact difference if you played a 24fps video at 30 or a 20 fps video at 24. Oh. Hmm. I guess that explains it then.
|
# ? Mar 5, 2017 04:40 |
|
muscles like this! posted:I watched the first Ip Man movie tonight and something I was kind of confused about was how exactly did he have any money pre-war? They mention later in the film that he's never had a job before and he doesn't seem to have any source of income. Ip's financial struggles on-screen are really more symbolic of chinese martial arts' struggle to be preserved and remain popular, in a lot of cases though. I can't explain to you what Mike Tyson was in Ip Man 3 for, although it was probably because he happened to be vacationing and was in the area and someone who didn't even know who he was, grabbed him off the street and asked him to come star in a movie/show and he rolled with it.
|
# ? Mar 5, 2017 12:54 |
|
Spatulater bro! posted:Are there multiple cuts of The Unknown (1927)? The version I watched ran 50 minutes, but it's listed many places as 63 minutes. Seems like a big discrepancy if it's just a frame rate difference. It was a lost film for years, but an incomplete 35mm print was found in France at some point. So, that print likely had missing footage. I know there's at least one part where there's a huge continuity jump that sticks out. Notice how the existing version has modern-looking credits and title cards since it was re-translated from French. There's apparently 9.5mm/16mm prints with more footage, but I doubt The Unknown is a high priority for a more complete restoration.
|
# ? Mar 5, 2017 16:59 |
|
Egbert Souse posted:I know there's at least one part where there's a huge continuity jump that sticks out. Are you talking about from the visit to the doctor to the next scene where he's already armless?
|
# ? Mar 5, 2017 17:09 |
|
Spatulater bro! posted:Are you talking about from the visit to the doctor to the next scene where he's already armless? It's earlier in the film. I recall it jumps from Joan Crawford's character walking around outside, then a title card, then she's suddenly speaking to someone inside a cabin. Whether it's just an odd bit of editing or missing footage, I don't know. Wikipedia says most of the missing footage is in the early part of the film. Funny story: It was lost for years mainly because French film cans were marked "Unknown" in French, as if it was unidentified footage. (Also, footage finally surfaced from London After Midnight, but it's only two frames from a trailer)
|
# ? Mar 5, 2017 17:18 |
|
Can you folks recommend some good Gil Birmingham movies where he has a decently-sized role? He's good in Hell or High Water, and the only other things I've seen/heard him in are Veronica Mars, Rango, and Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt.
|
# ? Mar 5, 2017 21:47 |
|
Detective Thompson posted:Can you folks recommend some good Gil Birmingham movies where he has a decently-sized role? He's good in Hell or High Water, and the only other things I've seen/heard him in are Veronica Mars, Rango, and Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt. I haven't seen 'em, but he's apparently in most of Twilight films.
|
# ? Mar 5, 2017 22:22 |
|
Penpal posted:Can anyone name any movies that use a diegetic soundtrack at any point? The one that comes to my mind is the Zatooichi live action that came out a while ago. You would see a telephoto establishing shot and hear the beat, and the camera would then slowly pan down to reveal the music was a group of rice farmers, and then start trickling in more instrumentation. Specifically not radios/speakers in the film The movie Twisted Nerve has its theme music on the soundtrack, whistled by the main character as well as a 60s pop version on the radio. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S4QiCD_MZQk
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 08:32 |
|
Some reviews of American Honey mention that Star was sexually abused by a family member (her father maybe) in the past. Does anyone remember how this was revealed? In John Carpenter's The Thing, is the alien eating people and making replicas of them or just inhabiting their bodies, or is the movie ambiguous about this?
|
# ? Mar 8, 2017 23:26 |
|
Human Tornada posted:In John Carpenter's The Thing, is the alien eating people and making replicas of them or just inhabiting their bodies, or is the movie ambiguous about this? It seems to "infect" and take-over biological matter at a cellular level. We don't really see it grow or duplicated outside of reaction to trauma. So kind of both? I think it is eating people and making replicas of them, but on a cellular level a not like, shoving bodies into it's mouth and making clones or something.
|
# ? Mar 8, 2017 23:34 |
|
Human Tornada posted:Some reviews of American Honey mention that Star was sexually abused by a family member (her father maybe) in the past. Does anyone remember how this was revealed?
|
# ? Mar 9, 2017 07:58 |
|
Human Tornada posted:Some reviews of American Honey mention that Star was sexually abused by a family member (her father maybe) in the past. Does anyone remember how this was revealed? After the initial grocery store scenes, when she goes home, it happens on-screen; her father is drunk and angry, dances with her, tries to do things, and the way the scene is played out it's obvious that this is not the first time.
|
# ? Mar 9, 2017 15:41 |
|
Snak posted:It seems to "infect" and take-over biological matter at a cellular level. We don't really see it grow or duplicated outside of reaction to trauma. So kind of both? I think it is eating people and making replicas of them, but on a cellular level a not like, shoving bodies into it's mouth and making clones or something. Yeah, we have the scene where Dr. Blair runs the simulation on his computer, with the alien cell reaching out and grabbing a normal cell, pulling it in, then pushing a clone cell back out. So in a way, it does consume the original host, but not so much in a sense that it's doing it for sustenance or whatever (though maybe it does in the process, but that doesn't seem to be the goal), but it needs to replicate the host and simultaneously destroy it, cell by cell. It does it quickly enough, as it can double its numbers in the host body each time it replicates, but it still takes some time since it its doing it cell by cell. The monster they find at the Norwegian camp has two heads split in half, one the original human, the other the replica. I think it's a probably a pretty good visual example of how it works, that each version exists for a moment in time, until the alien clone fully emerges.
|
# ? Mar 9, 2017 18:57 |
|
|
# ? May 20, 2024 14:38 |
|
Detective Thompson posted:Yeah, we have the scene where Dr. Blair runs the simulation on his computer, with the alien cell reaching out and grabbing a normal cell, pulling it in, then pushing a clone cell back out. So in a way, it does consume the original host, but not so much in a sense that it's doing it for sustenance or whatever (though maybe it does in the process, but that doesn't seem to be the goal), but it needs to replicate the host and simultaneously destroy it, cell by cell. It does it quickly enough, as it can double its numbers in the host body each time it replicates, but it still takes some time since it its doing it cell by cell. The monster they find at the Norwegian camp has two heads split in half, one the original human, the other the replica. I think it's a probably a pretty good visual example of how it works, that each version exists for a moment in time, until the alien clone fully emerges. yeah, that's all true, my point is that it's not really increasing biomass at all. "Making Clones/Duplicates" kind of implies that it would be able to, and I was just trying to be clear that its method of replication more or less conserves biomass.
|
# ? Mar 9, 2017 19:00 |