|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJEtHI_L9CE
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 00:10
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 20, 2024 00:37 |
|
|
https://twitter.com/withfilesfrom/status/836702893273145346 this entire thing is amazingly bullshit https://twitter.com/withfilesfrom/status/836705312698740736
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 00:21
|
|
|
Another quality Harper appointee
Juul-Whip fucked around with this message at 00:40 on Mar 1, 2017 |
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 00:38
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 00:43
|
|
|
LOL U MAD? has been the Right's rallying cry for years now. It deftly sidesteps the need to actually address any criticism of their positions, and they can wholeheartedly embrace literally anything, if it appears to upset their political enemies.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 00:46
|
|
|
bunnyofdoom posted:https://twitter.com/withfilesfrom/status/836702893273145346 Personally I began to question my sexuality the instant they said I didn't need to write in cursive anymore.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 01:16
|
|
|
bunnyofdoom posted:https://twitter.com/withfilesfrom/status/836702893273145346 Jesus gently caress this. gently caress all of this. Sober second thought my rear end, they can all burn in hell.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 01:17
|
|
|
how about just don't elect Conservatives
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 01:24
|
|
|
I'm sorry to bring this up again, but it's starting to become bizarre for me. I'm having an impossible time finding DFO (or any other department) spending predating 1996. This link is the best I can do: https://www.canada.ca/en/treasury-board-secretariat/services/planned-government-spending/reports-plans-priorities.html And it just go backs to 1996. that's it. and most of the links don't even work ffs. Is it seriously this hard to find something as simple departmental spending by year. There's got to be a government geek here that can help me. pretty please.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 01:50
|
|
|
vyelkin posted:Personally I began to question my sexuality the instant they said I didn't need to write in cursive anymore. The government was so busy teaching me how to gently caress arses, transition gender, and apply contraceptives to vegetables that they never bothered teaching me long division! The hell is wrong with these people? Also, why do they think that you can only understand the difference between "boy" and "girl" during or after puberty? Their minds are obviously way too focused on sex!
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 01:54
|
|
|
Conservatives hate sex ed because it's easier to groom and abuse kids who are not well educated about sex. It's also why they instinctively leap to the defence of abusers and their apologists like John Furlong, Tom Flanagan, et al
Juul-Whip fucked around with this message at 02:39 on Mar 1, 2017 |
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 02:36
|
|
|
Minge Binge posted:I'm sorry to bring this up again, but it's starting to become bizarre for me. I'm having an impossible time finding DFO (or any other department) spending predating 1996. This link is the best I can do: https://www.canada.ca/en/treasury-board-secretariat/services/planned-government-spending/reports-plans-priorities.html
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 02:56
|
|
|
THC posted:Conservatives hate sex ed because it's easier to groom and abuse kids who are not well educated about sex. It's also why they instinctively leap to the defence of abusers and their apologists like John Furlong, Tom Flanagan, et al Well, I don't think that Conservatives in general even hate sex ed (most of the ones I know support it -- it's the Wildrose/SoCon types that hate it), but this is an interesting point that I'd never considered about opposition to sex ed. It was never an issue for me because my parents had The Talk with me pretty early, including what people were and were not allowed to do, but I can certainly see how a child who has never had proper sex ed would be at a much higher risk of being sexually abused or manipulated, either at a young age or, indeed, throughout their lives. That's a rather disgusting implication to think about and another reason to hate social conservatives.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 03:08
|
|
|
The root of a large amount of social conservatism is the primacy of the patriarchal family structure, with the idea that the father is the head of the household and has absolute authority over everything that happens within it. He has the right to beat his wife, he has the right to deny her a divorce, he has the right to prevent her from getting an abortion, he has the right to discipline his children how he sees fit, he has the right to teach them whatever he wants. Unsurprisingly, this tends to accompany a deep conservatism that is against many forms of progress, from women's emancipation to gay rights, because those things weaken the patriarchal authority of the father. A hell of a lot of the progress our society has made socially was achieved by passing laws that removed these paternal rights and either allocated them to the individual (for example, allowing women to get abortions without their husband or father's permission, or allowing women to vote) or to the state (for example, punishing men for domestic abuse or shifting education from a familial responsibility to a state responsibility). Sex ed is just one of the latest stages in this ongoing, seemingly endless struggle. It's still one of the things where a lot of our society buys into the idea that such a sensitive subject is best left to the family, who can choose to educate or not educate their children as they see fit. Naturally, this often means kids get no education because either their social conservative parents don't think their children should ever have sex, or because their parents are too squeamish to properly educate their children (which is fine, I wouldn't want my parents to explain sex stuff to me), and we as a society are in the process of deciding that we don't think that's appropriate for the 21st century and are instead institutionalizing actual informative sex education practices by shifting this responsibility from the family to the state. But because this is yet another loss of authority for the patriarchal traditional family structure, it means yet another battle with social conservatives.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 03:16
|
|
|
What does sex Ed say about park loving
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 03:18
|
|
|
namaste faggots posted:What does sex Ed say about park loving It's okay as long as you don't assume the gender of the other homeless guy.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 03:23
|
|
|
PT6A posted:Well, I don't think that Conservatives in general even hate sex ed (most of the ones I know support it -- it's the Wildrose/SoCon types that hate it), but this is an interesting point that I'd never considered about opposition to sex ed. It was never an issue for me because my parents had The Talk with me pretty early, including what people were and were not allowed to do, but I can certainly see how a child who has never had proper sex ed would be at a much higher risk of being sexually abused or manipulated, either at a young age or, indeed, throughout their lives. Sex Ed is also just a wedge issue to drive votes and the ability to manipulate education standards. It's the same thing with prayer / god in schools. Once you can control what is taught and what isn't, you can leave groups ignorant and/or starve them of the ability to reason, making them easier to manipulate and more rigid in their thinking, which benefits those in power.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 04:52
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/jenstden/status/836787844018487296 A bunch of incel libcucks from UBC showed up to support the trump ogres
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 05:02
|
|
|
If you are going to the trouble of making your own hat why wouldn't you go with "Make Canada Great Again"? You are still signalling to everyone that you are a garbage person to be avoided but it's a little more topical and relevant.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 05:31
|
|
|
It's oddly comforting to know that the new face of modern fascism is both completely nonthreatening personality-wise and also heavily lacking in original thought. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 05:34
|
|
|
Maybe we should let those guys tie their name to their own political party, even if mydemocracy.ca classifies it as "extremist"
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 05:38
|
|
|
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/suspended-victoria-police-chief-says-he-wants-to-resign-1.4003898quote:Suspended Victoria Police Chief says he wants to resign guys, poor babby police chief of victoria is stressed out and so anxious!!! PTSD is making his life very hard!! make these witchunts stop!
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 06:06
|
|
|
lmao apparently Vancouver Police ordered a Rebel reporter out of the Trump protest for trying to get both sides to fight each other
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 06:21
|
|
|
DariusLikewise posted:lmao apparently Vancouver Police ordered a Rebel reporter out of the Trump protest for trying to get both sides to fight each other Journalism in 2017.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 06:35
|
|
|
DariusLikewise posted:lmao apparently Vancouver Police ordered a Rebel reporter out of the Trump protest for trying to get both sides to fight each other Hell yes
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 06:36
|
|
|
DariusLikewise posted:lmao apparently Vancouver Police ordered a Rebel reporter out of the Trump protest for trying to get both sides to fight each other Be careful talking bad about The Rebel here because we should support their free speech. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 06:59
|
|
|
DariusLikewise posted:lmao apparently Vancouver Police ordered a Rebel reporter out of the Trump protest for trying to get both sides to fight each other https://twitter.com/bethanylindsay/status/836687014883778560
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 07:08
|
|
|
Isn't that literally inciting a riot? edit: also, if all that dweeb wanted to do was start a fight, he should have just given the crowd that smug whitey oops-you-got-me smirk. Bleu fucked around with this message at 07:16 on Mar 1, 2017 |
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 07:10
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EAzzhsR8YLg
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 07:10
|
|
|
Are we really going to look that gift horse that is the rebel being oppressed by the state, in the mouth gently caress your free speech bullshit if your answer is yes
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 07:16
|
|
|
namaste faggots posted:Are we really going to look that gift horse that is the rebel being oppressed by the state, in the mouth Free speech is dumb and overrated, my answer is yes bby
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 07:17
|
|
|
Also related: https://twitter.com/AmyJBrittain/status/836675890037862400?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 07:37
|
|
|
Shiiiiit. I claimed 69 in my IRATA logbook. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 07:52
|
|
|
CLAM DOWN posted:Free speech is dumb and overrated, my answer is yes bby
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 08:17
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 08:51
|
|
|
The Dark One posted:Click through if you enjoy reading gross accounts of domestic violence, I guess. Surely some lovely cop who beats up his wife wouldn't beat up a complete stranger!  bunnyofdoom posted:https://twitter.com/withfilesfrom/status/836702893273145346 Older teachers get really upset that teaching cursive isn't part of the curriculum and quite a few of them use valuable class-time to teach it anyway. I use it myself but tell students that focusing on typing is much more valuable, since that's how most of them will be communicating for the rest of their lives. Getting upset that signatures won't look right is a new one for me, but getting upset that time that could be spent teaching cursive is being spent on proper sex ed is one of the dumbest things I've ever heard.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 13:06
|
|
|
Professor Shark posted:Older teachers get really upset that teaching cursive isn't part of the curriculum and quite a few of them use valuable class-time to teach it anyway. I use it myself but tell students that focusing on typing is much more valuable, since that's how most of them will be communicating for the rest of their lives. Old teachers and old conservatives are locked onto this weird fixation with trying to make everything 1920 again and anything that goes against that is seen as a waste of time and money. e: vvv I write in all capital letters and my signature is a box taking a poo poo and I had to learn cursive as well.  
Furnaceface fucked around with this message at 13:21 on Mar 1, 2017 |
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 13:19
|
|
|
I learned cursive and my signature is basically just a loop and a scribble.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 13:19
|
|
|
Furnaceface posted:Old teachers and old conservatives are locked onto this weird fixation with trying to make everything 1920 again and anything that goes against that is seen as a waste of time and money. I guess I should have said some older teachers. I think I've mentioned it here before, but one of my Peer Role Models is an older teacher who, after some church made a coordinated effort to have members elected to some board that controlled Sex Ed curriculum in the school board and tanked it, defied the curriculum and taught everything she felt her students needed to know. She bought her own materials and when she was questioned on it, told them she was a teacher and was doing her job. Eventually the curriculum was changed again and we have pretty good Sex Ed now, however I have caught one of the Youth Health workers at a school focusing on teaching abstinence as well as the Extreme Dangers of Marijuana
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 13:27
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 20, 2024 00:37 |
|
|
RebelRousers
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 14:51
|
|