|
🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔
|
# ? Mar 1, 2017 13:50 |
|
|
# ? May 11, 2024 13:56 |
|
https://twitter.com/mattyglesias/status/836986792293322753
|
# ? Mar 1, 2017 18:13 |
|
tulsi liked the sound of perpetual middle Eastern wars
|
# ? Mar 1, 2017 18:31 |
|
logikv9 posted:tulsi liked the sound of perpetual middle Eastern wars Why was Tulsi Gabbard considered a viable standard bearer for anything again?
|
# ? Mar 1, 2017 18:46 |
|
Alter Ego posted:Why was Tulsi Gabbard considered a viable standard bearer for anything again? seems like she hates the middle east more than she likes progressive policies so whoops no one really knew about the middle east stuff before tho so.
|
# ? Mar 1, 2017 18:58 |
|
Alter Ego posted:Why was Tulsi Gabbard considered a viable standard bearer for anything again? she backed bernie and nobody had realized that she sucks when that happened however as she is now known to be a poo poo i don't think she is considered a standard bearer of anything by anyone
|
# ? Mar 1, 2017 19:52 |
|
Tulsi The Lion al-Gabbard
|
# ? Mar 1, 2017 20:12 |
|
get that OUT of my face posted:seeing that large margin of victory in the special election in Delaware, as well as the closer-than-expected GOP victory in one of the Connecticut special Senate elections, makes me feel that Democrats will use them as an excuse to throw out any mild candidate into races and expect them to win. it will work to some extent, but not enough as actual left candidates being trotted out on the regular. and then they'll try and translate that strategy into the presidential race and who the gently caress knows what will happen. trump is unpopular but so is the lovely democratic message Please make a thread about the Periello race. I am gonna be doing one for Ossof soon
|
# ? Mar 3, 2017 00:02 |
|
Alter Ego posted:Why was Tulsi Gabbard considered a viable standard bearer for anything again? The only litmus test for the left is with bernie or against bernie
|
# ? Mar 3, 2017 02:58 |
|
anime was right posted:seems like she hates the middle east more than she likes progressive policies so whoops No one knew except for anyone who paid attention to her facing a primary challenge from the left in her district
|
# ? Mar 3, 2017 03:09 |
|
The Person Primarying Tulsi 2020 after research and consideration
|
# ? Mar 3, 2017 04:42 |
|
Alter Ego posted:Why was Tulsi Gabbard considered a viable standard bearer for anything again? She rallied a bunch of people at the Dakota Access Pipeline protests. She actually owns in most regards.
|
# ? Mar 3, 2017 04:45 |
|
https://twitter.com/imwiththoughts/status/837512858112045056
|
# ? Mar 3, 2017 05:00 |
|
GlyphGryph posted:Please make a thread about the Periello race. I am gonna be doing one for Ossof soon Vox Nihili posted:She rallied a bunch of people at the Dakota Access Pipeline protests.
|
# ? Mar 3, 2017 23:54 |
|
i don't know what her modi issue has to do with being a blood thirsty hawk. afaik she's against middle east wars like the libyan debacle, against arming salafist rebels in syria, etc like, shes bad on being islamophobic, shes bad for being supportive of modi, but i just don't see how it's accurate to call her a hawk Fast Luck has issued a correction as of 00:21 on Mar 4, 2017 |
# ? Mar 4, 2017 00:19 |
|
gee guys are we sure the virulent islamophobe is all taht bad
|
# ? Mar 4, 2017 00:22 |
|
"It's fine if they kill each other, and if Modi kills them" is not actually that big of a moral step up from "Kill them ourselves" because the central idea for both positions is that she'd like it if muslims died.
|
# ? Mar 4, 2017 00:25 |
|
Tulsi met with PEOTUS Trump because he and bannon liked the sound of her middle East stance
|
# ? Mar 4, 2017 00:34 |
|
I don't care how much foreign wrong think anyone has as long as they support uhc and aggressive wealth redistribution domestically.
|
# ? Mar 4, 2017 00:57 |
|
Tulsi was smart enough to bail on the DNC before the poo poo hit the fan so she's already better than a lot of the rest of the bad dems
|
# ? Mar 4, 2017 01:52 |
|
I say this as someone who supported Bernie: it's okay to hate Tulsi.
|
# ? Mar 4, 2017 01:53 |
|
Echo Chamber posted:I say this as someone who supported Bernie: it's okay to hate Tulsi. It's also ok to think Tulsi is fine.
|
# ? Mar 4, 2017 02:00 |
|
ate poo poo on live tv posted:It's also ok to think Tulsi is fine. how about no
|
# ? Mar 4, 2017 02:02 |
|
get that OUT of my face posted:i'd rather let someone in Virginia do that She's like a 3 on the 1 to Clinton hawk scale. Opposed Syrian intervention, in fact consistently speaks out against proxy wars and regime change in general. She has some bad Hindi-related biases though I agree.
|
# ? Mar 4, 2017 02:21 |
|
ate poo poo on live tv posted:It's also ok to think Tulsi is fine. Hmm... I donno
|
# ? Mar 4, 2017 02:23 |
|
Oh Snapple! posted:The D&D treatment of her is just really kind of weird and gross anyway. That was some outright obsession with silencing a dissenting viewpoint just for the sake of it. What about her viewpoint did people dislike so much?
|
# ? Mar 4, 2017 02:24 |
|
It should be extremely easy to look at Tulsi and go "I think we can do better."Jeb! Repetition posted:What about her viewpoint did people dislike so much? It cast Obama's work in a negative light. That was literally it.
|
# ? Mar 4, 2017 02:27 |
|
I hear all this "damning" stuff about Tulsi, but then I think back to the Democratic Candidate of 2016 and I don't see much of a difference.Oh Snapple! posted:It should be extremely easy to look at Tulsi and go "I think we can do better." But the same could be said about almost everyone in the Democratic Party.
|
# ? Mar 4, 2017 02:29 |
|
ate poo poo on live tv posted:I don't care how much foreign wrong think anyone has as long as they support uhc and aggressive wealth redistribution domestically. The LBJ gambit.
|
# ? Mar 4, 2017 02:33 |
|
ate poo poo on live tv posted:I don't care how much foreign wrong think anyone has as long as they support uhc and aggressive wealth redistribution domestically. Found the LBJ voter
|
# ? Mar 4, 2017 02:39 |
|
Tulsi was only anti Libya because letting Ghadaffi murder everyone would have led to markedly less Muslims
|
# ? Mar 4, 2017 02:41 |
|
financially racist posted:how about no Hillary-aligned talking heads have been trying to shank her with things like this ever since she endorsed Sanders. All the Dems stood up and clapped for Trump when he walked into the room, when he mentioned protecting Israel, etc., but apparently Tulsi also clapped for something else? Oh no! Meanwhile she's anti-PATRIOT Act, pro-legalization, pro-refugee, green, etc. etc. She supports cuts to military spending but still maintains the reputation of a veteran with the pro-military types. Of course liberals hate her, she could actually win something.
|
# ? Mar 4, 2017 02:49 |
|
zegermans posted:Tulsi was only anti Libya because letting Ghadaffi murder everyone would have led to markedly less Muslims Haha the US efforts in Libya and Syria have saved so many Muslim lives, haven't they?
|
# ? Mar 4, 2017 02:54 |
|
Liberal here. Maybe opposing war actually makes you a dangerous hawk? Just a thought.
|
# ? Mar 4, 2017 02:56 |
|
zegermans posted:Tulsi was only anti Libya because letting Ghadaffi murder everyone would have led to markedly less Muslims Nice projection
|
# ? Mar 4, 2017 03:03 |
|
zegermans posted:Tulsi was only anti Libya because letting Ghadaffi murder everyone would have led to markedly less Muslims
|
# ? Mar 4, 2017 05:07 |
|
tulsi defense force, engage *india-pakistan nuclear war breaks out*
|
# ? Mar 4, 2017 05:11 |
|
Vox Nihili posted:Hillary-aligned talking heads have been trying to shank her with things like this ever since she endorsed Sanders. All the Dems stood up and clapped for Trump when he walked into the room, when he mentioned protecting Israel, etc., but apparently Tulsi also clapped for something else? Oh no! sir this is a picture of nancy reagan
|
# ? Mar 4, 2017 05:14 |
|
Fast Luck posted:Are people juts going to keep peddling this thoroughly debunked bullshit eternally or is zegermans a special case Noted mentally stable dictator Ghadaffi was totally not about to exterminate every person in rebel strongholds from the air before the Europeans intervened of course. Anyway as soon as Trump starts war with Iran, Tulsi will be cheerleading because it means more Muslim blood for her elephant god. (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
# ? Mar 4, 2017 05:29 |
|
|
# ? May 11, 2024 13:56 |
|
Vox Nihili posted:Hillary-aligned talking heads have been trying to shank her with things like this ever since she endorsed Sanders. All the Dems stood up and clapped for Trump when he walked into the room, when he mentioned protecting Israel, etc., but apparently Tulsi also clapped for something else? Oh no! loving Clinton's incompetence saddled us with the horrifying specter of the Trump presidency! Our only hope is to swing haaaard left, and nominate his biggest fan in the entire Democratic house.
|
# ? Mar 4, 2017 05:32 |