divabot posted:in which canon Harry Potter characters meet their HPMOR versions Edit: I had emptyquoted it, but since it's a new page...
|
|
# ? Mar 2, 2017 01:21 |
|
|
# ? May 17, 2024 20:16 |
|
oh boy, i forgot exactly how hosed up harry and hermione's 'relationship' is in MoR, to the point where the last chapter has to actively retcon it even harder than every other thing it tries to take back
|
# ? Mar 2, 2017 01:40 |
|
Xander77 posted:Take it back. Take it all back. I'm not so good with sarcasm... do you want me to take the baton back? I could, but I don't know how good my scheduling would be.
|
# ? Mar 2, 2017 02:12 |
|
Regarding the MP Points thing, casting magic does take focus and concentration (practice helps with that) and you'll wear out and have trouble keeping it after a while of casting and being in a chaotic situation and having to continuously context-switch your mental state for one spell or another, but that's in a natural, human manner. If Harellizer hadn't been able to cast because he had to take a moment to recenter himself or just clear his mind, that would've been totally consistent with a relatively inexperienced Harry Potter wizard. Man, Hogwarts should teach meditation.
|
# ? Mar 2, 2017 08:30 |
|
Xander77 posted:I'm not sure if we ever find out exactly how Harriezer "tricked" Quirrell or the Goblins. He also figures out that century-old institutions that serving the entire magic world might have some sort of protection against the very first get-rich-quick scheme dreamed up by an eleven year old, so we cut off that nascent plot thread (at least for the duration of the narrative - Harriezer still plans for the future as though exploiting the wizarding economy to generate unlimited funds is a given). He "tricked" Quirrel by taking exactly 5 galleons but also a shitload of knuts, which weren't limited by Dumbledore.
|
# ? Mar 2, 2017 17:50 |
|
MikeJF posted:Regarding the MP Points thing, casting magic does take focus and concentration (practice helps with that) and you'll wear out and have trouble keeping it after a while of casting and being in a chaotic situation and having to continuously context-switch your mental state for one spell or another, but that's in a natural, human manner. If Harellizer hadn't been able to cast because he had to take a moment to recenter himself or just clear his mind, that would've been totally consistent with a relatively inexperienced Harry Potter wizard. Yeah it's more like constantly solving math equations, while performing on the fly choreography, while still adapting to changing circumstances, and running around, plus whatever emotional components you need. Shits exhausting. Or consider their classes (different than combat, I know, but still)- they might bitch about how tough Transfiguration class was (because doing the same task for an hour or two trying to get a small, precise result is tough, especially for teens who aren't all that interested in it) but they don't ever say "Well we spent all our MP turning matches into needles so we can't do our Charms homework". Piell posted:He "tricked" Quirrel by taking exactly 5 galleons but also a shitload of knuts, which weren't limited by Dumbledore. You know, when I was ten I'd do the same kind of rules lawyering, like lights out for bedtime at 9:00, then right back on at 9:01, so points for describing a poo poo head ten year old, but that kinda undermines the "super rational scientist ubermensch" look he's going for.
|
# ? Mar 2, 2017 17:57 |
|
I thought the 'trick' was that he started slowly counting out 5 galleons worth of knuts, waited until the adults got bored, and shoveled handfuls of money into his pouch when they weren't looking.
Added Space fucked around with this message at 18:44 on Mar 2, 2017 |
# ? Mar 2, 2017 18:40 |
|
My new favourite thread, in which /r/rational cultists argue with several senior mods and indeed the literal owner of SV, and assume these awful critics just hate nerds as if SV isn't itself some sort of nerd neutronium.
|
# ? Mar 4, 2017 01:55 |
|
Trasson posted:No. No they do not. That people think that this is the case is probably the number one thing Fanfiction Gets Wrong About Harry Potter Canon once you get past the obvious junk. This is, of course, why MoR includes it because if you've gotten all of your HP knowledge from fanfiction then of course you'll think that wizards have Magical Power Levels and MP gauges and whatnot. MikeJF posted:Regarding the MP Points thing, casting magic does take focus and concentration (practice helps with that) and you'll wear out and have trouble keeping it after a while of casting and being in a chaotic situation and having to continuously context-switch your mental state for one spell or another, but that's in a natural, human manner. If Harellizer hadn't been able to cast because he had to take a moment to recenter himself or just clear his mind, that would've been totally consistent with a relatively inexperienced Harry Potter wizard. That's a pretty cool idea and while it's not a shame that Rowling didn't give it more attention, it's sad no one seems to have created some door stopper fanfiction longer than war and peace about what it would really be like to live with such a magical system. No offense, but magic is something Hogwarts students do "schoolwork" at, leaving them feeling exactly like a normal British school student, because it's the people and the experiences that they go through that matters.
|
# ? Mar 4, 2017 02:56 |
|
divabot posted:
Is that the forum with the rational naruto RP, where each post is a 100 line plan startting with 'Dont die'?
|
# ? Mar 4, 2017 03:14 |
|
Tunicate posted:Is that the forum with the rational naruto RP, where each post is a 100 line plan startting with 'Dont die'? Sure is! And this thread goes to town on that quest. The rationalists brought it up with "hey this is a great quest and a great piece of rationalfic!!" and eventually go to "unfair target we like different things to you okay "
|
# ? Mar 4, 2017 10:07 |
|
Chapter 33: Coordination Problems, Pt 1 Another complex chapter I'm going to break into pieces. quote:I just recite to myself, over and over, until I can choose sleep: It all adds up to J. K. Rowling. Link in quote is obviously my own. quote:The terrifying part was how fast the whole thing had spiraled out of control. 1. Of course Minerva is ignorant and ineffectual, because why would she not be. 2. Of course Yud types out "into four Houses divided" and then completely ignores that sentence as though it's covered with a SEP field. Every year, the four houses compete for the house cup - it's a long-standing tradition the importance of which was aptly established. Every single student has a stake in the prestige of winning the house cup, yet members of different houses do not "hex each other in corridors". 3. Ergo, even with the previously established misunderstanding of the Robber's cave experiment as poo poo still doesn't make sense. And if (per Dumbledore's interpretation) (Word recognizes Dumbledore as valid spelling, wtf) people aren't just playing around for the chance to pew pew at each other but rather are taking the conflict seriously - what's the conflict even about? The armies aren't really tied to particular ideologies, political or otherwise. They kinda cosplay as "types" (Discipline / Chaos / Niceness), but still. So the only reason for this whole thing seriously is the three army leaders being extremely charismatic, which... they are certainly not (well, the author probably intended otherwise, but I think the readers can agree here). And if they were, wouldn't they be able to control their "followers"? With that said: quote:The terrifying part was how fast the whole thing had spiraled out of control. 1. We've skipped the entirety of battle school. First battle, stuff happens offscreen, last battle incoming. Obviously a good thing if you hate this particular subplot, but this is the point at which the story lost me, and I hate-read the rest of it. quote:Professor Quirrell's eyes moved beneath their lids to regard Draco, and then Granger. "In truth, Mr. Malfoy, Miss Granger, I simply could not live with myself if I shut down the grand debacle before its climax. One of your soldiers has even become a quadruple agent." 2. Traitors. We had just established that the students are taking the whole army thing in dead earnest, and are not just using it as an excuse to wreak havoc. Ok, pretending to plot what the gently caress ever for shits and giggles - maybe. Making your own plots to win the battle - fair enough. But actually betraying your team? Imagine just how it would be received if a high school quarterback "betrayed" his team and how his life would look from that point onward. 3. Isn't it great that all the battles, betrayals and contrasting plans took place mostly offscreen. Not only was Yud able to avoid coming up with different brilliant strategies, but he also wasn't forced to figure out the possible motivation and intricate planning for hordes of 4. This gets discussed in detail later on, but there's no "normal" battlefield. The battles take place at random in different areas of the Hogwarts school grounds, with little prior notice. I can imagine Quirrelmorts justification about how real battles blah blah blah, but going back to the multiplayer FPS experience - nobody does well on a map they're playing for the first time. quote:Professor Quirrell's eyelids were half-closed, his chin resting on his hands as he leaned forward onto his desk. "And you, Mr. Potter?" said the Defense Professor. "Are you likewise in agreement?" quote:Hermione stared at the parchment Zabini had given her, feeling utterly and completely helpless. quote:"We are gathered," said Harry. Nah, but fair enough, the little poo poo being given power and cosplaying as an evil overlord with a mix of Monty Python is both predictable and moderately funny. quote:"Our Legionnaires have begun five new plots since yesterday evening." Time for the actual discussion of timeless decision theory etc. I'm sure that Yud is very proud of this system and the elaborate points thing, and how they play into the resolution of the battle, but my eyes start to glaze over merely looking at this bullshit (I'm assuming it's bullshit based on the statistical analysis of the average quality of Yud's ideas ) much less when the soldiers' plots are revealed. So I'll take back any complaints about the rest of battle school being offscreen, I suppose. Anyways, I suppose we're all familiar with the basic Prisoner's Dilemma, so Yud's take follows: quote:In fact, Harry had said, this was pretty much the reason why people had governments - you might be better off if you stole from someone else, just like each prisoner would be individually better off if they defected in the Prisoner's Dilemma. But if everyone thought like that, the country would fall into chaos and everyone would be worse off, like what would happen if both prisoners defected. So people let themselves be ruled by governments, just like the Death Eaters had let themselves be ruled by the Dark Lord. The first half of the chapter concludes with Hermione bumping into Dumbledore in the halls, suggesting he's putting his plan into action. Next time - the actual battle.
|
# ? Mar 4, 2017 16:35 |
|
People aren't rational actors. That's the flaw.
|
# ? Mar 4, 2017 18:17 |
|
Harriezer seems at one point to claim that if rationality led him to a conclusion he didn't like he'd say that it wasn't really rational because Rationality is True and Right and Good. This is, of course, completely irrational. A recent update to a much better HP fanfic took at swipe at these chapters: quote:After Halloween, knowing the dementors and Death Eaters were out attacking people indiscriminately, Harry wasn't the only one trying to step up his game. Everyone wanted to learn to defend themselves better against what was out there. Professor Grayson still had them doing practical drills once a week in Defence. One week, they would have a Gryffindor versus Ravenclaw mass duel—still a free-for-all with no organization, but at least with coherent sides. The next week, he would break them up for four-on-four duels, or worse, four-on-two. "All's fair in love and war," he would say with a laughed that sounded unsettlingly like Mad-Eye Moody. He mixed it up quite a bit from week to week.
|
# ? Mar 4, 2017 23:21 |
|
Pvt.Scott posted:People aren't rational actors. That's the flaw. What, with tdt? No, the problem with tdt is that it provably performs worse (or sometimes equal) on every decision theory problem than standard consequentialism, and the only problem class it performs better on requires gods to exist. Yud just happens to believe in inevitable AI gods, so he likes it.
|
# ? Mar 5, 2017 04:27 |
|
Xander77 posted:Word recognizes Dumbledore as valid spelling, wtf It's another word for "bumblebee".
|
# ? Mar 5, 2017 04:28 |
|
SolTerrasa posted:What, with tdt? No, the problem with tdt is that it provably performs worse (or sometimes equal) on every decision theory problem than standard consequentialism, and the only problem class it performs better on requires gods to exist. Yud just happens to believe in inevitable AI gods, so he likes it. Well, I know less about this stuff than Yud does, so I'm outta my depth. What the gently caress do you even use decision theory for besides robots?
|
# ? Mar 5, 2017 05:15 |
|
Pvt.Scott posted:Well, I know less about this stuff than Yud does, so I'm outta my depth. What the gently caress do you even use decision theory for besides robots? There really isn't any use for it unless your situation involves absolutely, 100% omnipotent beings. Which, you know, aren't things that exist, and almost certainly cannot possibly exist. I guess you could maybe use it in situations where you had beings that were, like, 90% omnipotent, and maybe it would be better than other models. But, again, a scenario like that is so irrational it's barely coherent. If you were using TDT for normal problems, at best it would just unnecessarily complicate things for no benefit. Like, say you wanted to figure out the probability of rolling a dice and getting an even number five times in a row. You could try to figure that out by rolling ten thousand dice with one hundred sides each, totalling the result, and seeing if the total is odd or even. Or you could just get a regular dice and roll it five times for the exact same result in a fraction of the time with less chance for a stupid calculation error
|
# ? Mar 5, 2017 08:04 |
|
Its worse than that because IIRC, operating under that decision philosophy lets people say "I am AI GOD, and unless you give me $20, I will torture you for an arbitrarily high number of years." and mug you.
|
# ? Mar 5, 2017 08:28 |
|
Cyrai posted:There really isn't any use for it unless your situation involves absolutely, 100% omnipotent beings. Which, you know, aren't things that exist, and almost certainly cannot possibly exist. As I recall, neither actual- nor near-omnipotence / omniscience is necessary for the various Newcomblike problems to work, it's merely an idealized scenario (that the AI fans latched on). All you need is to have reason to believe that the guy offering you the deal has a better-than-even odds of predicting your behaviour. You can replace the infallible machine oracle with a mildly talented cold reader and the paradoxes still stand, you just have to multiply every payout by 51% / 49% instead of 100% / 0%.
|
# ? Mar 5, 2017 09:15 |
|
He was upset that his holy Bayes Theorem gave him an answer he didn't like, so he decided that causality must be wrong.
|
# ? Mar 5, 2017 09:45 |
|
Cyrai posted:Like, say you wanted to figure out the probability of rolling a dice and getting an even number five times in a row. You could try to figure that out by rolling ten thousand dice with one hundred sides each, totalling the result, and seeing if the total is odd or even. Or you could just get a regular dice and roll it five times for the exact same result in a fraction of the time with less chance for a stupid calculation error ... Edit - oh yeah, I figured at least part of the reason why the house conflict doesn't matter, while the army conflict does. Not sure what the technical name for it is, but it's a fairly common trope where previous conflicts that don't directly involve the protagonist don't matter / can be solved with a quick talk. Kirk is star-trekking across the universe, when he runs into a pair of planets at war with each other. Of course the moral of the episode is going to be that war is wrong, and they can settle matters with a nice chat. Is Kirk going to apply that lesson to the Federation's conflict with the Klingons? Don't be absurd, that conflict stems entirely from the Klingons being So the houses being separated by ideology / personality traits doesn't matter, while the armies are serious business (to an extent). Xander77 fucked around with this message at 12:51 on Mar 5, 2017 |
# ? Mar 5, 2017 10:21 |
|
I don't understand the box problem. If there's a million dollars in the box if and only if a perfect oracle predicted you were going to open the box, why wouldn't you open that box? Mind-gaming yourself into picking the other box only means the perfect oracle would have predicted you'd mind-game yourself into picking the other box. I can't figure out how this is supposed to map onto the Prisoner's Dilemma because the perfect oracle literally guarantees your "partner" will vote the same way you do.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 02:27 |
|
blastron posted:I don't understand the box problem. If there's a million dollars in the box if and only if a perfect oracle predicted you were going to open the box, why wouldn't you open that box? Mind-gaming yourself into picking the other box only means the perfect oracle would have predicted you'd mind-game yourself into picking the other box. The hangup is that predicting the future is supposed to be impossible, so there's no reason to believe the oracle's act. Picking both boxes isn't going to change what's in the first box, so you're always better off picking both boxes and snagging some extra money. The problem only becomes difficult if you believe the oracle's power is real. It's like how Turn of the Screw, where a governess claims that the child she is looking after is being injured by a ghost. is only a mystery story if you believe in ghosts.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 05:29 |
|
Added Space posted:The hangup is that predicting the future is supposed to be impossible, so there's no reason to believe the oracle's act. Picking both boxes isn't going to change what's in the first box, so you're always better off picking both boxes and snagging some extra money. Exactly. Regular consequentialism says you two-box, because causation exists. It's the "too late now" principle. No matter what happened before the decision point, and no matter how reliable the oracle is (like maybe the oracle went and read your posts on the Something Awful forums where you say "always two-box", and so the oracle actually does know exactly what you're going to do), it doesn't matter; the money is already in the box; everything has already happened. The only reason you need to one-box is if you believe that the oracle's power is not only real, it's acausal, that is, your choice in the moment actually affects what the oracle did in the past. And that's why you need gods for TDT to improve on consequentialism.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 06:00 |
|
My counter would be, under pragmatism, you wouldn't worry about all this physics and causality stuff. If the oracle had a good track record of making predictions, no matter how impossible it may be, it's pragmatic to play along with the oracle. You'd just have to be sure you had a wide enough data set on the oracle's actions to not fall prey to something like a perfect prediction scam.
Added Space fucked around with this message at 06:06 on Mar 6, 2017 |
# ? Mar 6, 2017 06:04 |
|
Added Space posted:My counter would be, under pragmatism, you wouldn't worry about all this physics and causality stuff. If the oracle had a good track record of making predictions, no matter how impossible it may be, it's pragmatic to play along with the oracle. You'd just have to be sure you had a wide enough data set on the oracle's actions to not fall prey to something like a perfect prediction scam. That's a winning strategy in the event that the oracle is real, but I assert you'd need to see effectively god-like performance from the oracle before you should be willing to believe that this time, definitely this time, this time the magic is for real and I'm definitely not being tricked. I think we could probably quibble over how much god-like performance you need to see before you should abandon a belief in causality, but I think we're in agreement that TDT doesn't solve any problems and it creates a few of them.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 06:27 |
|
The solution is to use the oracle's predictions as a form of temporal arbitrage, basing your final decision of which box to open off of the performance of a stock market portfolio.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 07:36 |
|
Monocled Falcon posted:First thing I thought when I read Xander77's post was 'of course there's mana pool, all magic follows basically the same lazy rule set for drama's sake' but this fits what evidence I can remember after all these years better. I always like to note that Vancian magic is such a pain in the rear end that not even the fictionalized D&D novels ever gave it more than lip service.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 08:54 |
|
Yeah, Newcomb's seems like a pretty poor paradox if you don't assume causality-breaking. The contents of the boxes don't change based on your actual actions, but on the predictor's assumptions of what your actions will be, so you might as well take both boxes because nothing you can do at the point you're presented with the choice can effect the outcome in any way.
Liquid Communism fucked around with this message at 09:59 on Mar 6, 2017 |
# ? Mar 6, 2017 09:12 |
Or don't make a decision and flip a coin when you're beside the box. Unless it's able to predict the outcome of a coin it doesn't know anything about. Of course if it really is omnipotent/omniscient then it would know about it, so it depends on the formulation of the problem and how much you believe in gods/AI.
|
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 13:15 |
|
Cavelcade posted:Or don't make a decision and flip a coin when you're beside the box. Unless it's able to predict the outcome of a coin it doesn't know anything about. One of the basic premises of the paradox as written, though, is that random chance can't be used. Specifically because an omnipotent/omniscient being is the only way to accurately predict a single unknown random bit more than 50% of the time on average.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 17:49 |
|
Liquid Communism posted:I always like to note that Vancian magic is such a pain in the rear end that not even the fictionalized D&D novels ever gave it more than lip service. Vancian magic in Vance's Dying Earth stuff is baller as gently caress. You can only cram so many reality altering/bending, hyper-complex math equations into your brain before you risk permanent damage. So you learn to temporarily retain the few you need (eventually learning to cram in another one or two with experience) and discharging them from memory when they are used. Keeping "spells" ready for too long was taxing and dangerous, too. So you prepared only what you thought you'd need briefly ahead of time with a few hours of study and meditation. E: most Vancian "wizard" poo poo was reclaiming ancient technologies and genetic manipulation, etc EE: it also works fine as a game mechanic in a resource based teamwork game, ie tabletop RPG poo poo Pvt.Scott fucked around with this message at 19:52 on Mar 6, 2017 |
# ? Mar 6, 2017 19:49 |
|
"how many levels of rationalism are you on right now, my dude?" "uh... like five or six?" "you are like a little baby. watch: Draco saying he wants to rape Luna is a perfectly logical thing to happen in that circumstance." - horizonthetransient that SV thread got locked too, by the actual director of SV. I mean, if anyone's going to declare a thread a toxic waste dump it's him. BUT HE TOOK AWAY MY CHEW TOY
|
# ? Mar 8, 2017 01:38 |
|
divabot posted:"how many levels of rationalism are you on right now, my dude?" That thread was a great read, what a fuckin dumpsterfire. "No but guys, the fanfic with a cut-out scene of the author self insert loving a pony isn't fetishism because..."
|
# ? Mar 8, 2017 16:30 |
|
Kronecker Delta posted:Step one: Your character must know that they are the smartest and bestest. Smug is smart, smugger is smarter, and smuggest is smartest! (yeah I'm dredging message boards for amusing takes again)
|
# ? Mar 9, 2017 19:41 |
|
Chapter 33: Coordination Problems, Pt 1 (pt 2)quote:Draco had hoped that they would be fighting in the upper levels of Hogwarts again. Professor Quirrell had said that real fights were more likely to take place in cities than forests, and fighting inside schoolrooms and corridors was supposed to simulate that, with ribbons to mark the allowed areas. Dragon Army had done well in those fights. Let me whinge some more - I feel like the whole planning bit for each army can't really be skipped, so I'm obliged to post huge chunks of text for each: quote:"Listen to me very carefully," said General Malfoy. His voice came out a little lower, a little burbly with bubbles, libsten to me vebwy caerbfully, but the sound traveled clearly. "There's only one way we can win this. We've got to march on Sunshine together with Chaos, and beat Sunshine. Then we fight it out with Potter and win. That's got to happen, understand? No matter what else goes on, that part has to happen that way -" Seven Sunshine troops swim off away from the action, in a cunning plan. quote:"Now what?" said Ron. 2. Good thing we don't have to account for the force of destruction that is Mr. Crabbe. The highly accomplished broomstick flyer. Can you even imagine what he would have done under water? Because I can't. (Also, how was he dealt with in the other battles?) 3. It took me quite a while to figure out how the points worked out here. Someone shot Crabbe in the name of Sunshine, and then someone else on Dragon shot that spy in the name of Dragon, figuring that losing a point is better than giving Chaos / Sunshine two points. Something to keep in mind for later. quote:Harry took a deep breath, feeling the water gurgle harmlessly in his lungs. quote:Like every Chaos Legionnaire in the army, Neville's head was constantly rotating as he swam, looking up, down, around, to every side. Not just watching for Sunshine Soldiers, but watching for any sign that a Chaos Legionnaire had drawn their wand and was about to betray them. Usually traitors waited until the confusion of battle to make their move, but that early gong had put them all on guard. quote:"It's all right," Susan Bones said firmly. Heads turned to look at the Sunshine Captain. "Our job is the same, to take as many of them with us as we can. And remember, Zabini took away all the spies! We don't have to stay on the lookout like they do!" The girl was smiling defiantly, provoking answering smiles from many of the other soldiers, even from Hermione herself. "It can be like it was in November. We just have to keep our heads high, fight our best, and trust each other -" Neville quote:"Rainbows and unicorns! " roared the Sunshine Captain. quote:The two shoals swam uneasily next to each other, the soldiers in each army awaiting an order to call out their true allegiances, and attack... Standoff between the exactly even surviving forces, and... the seven Sunshine soldiers (including Zabini) swim up and join the Dragons. Chaos keeps using hit-and-run tactics (which I'm going to allow, given offscreen training or whatever) and somehow keeping up with superior Dragon numbers. quote:This wasn't working, and Draco needed to rethink things. quote:Zabini came in next, commanding a force of two Sunnies and four Dragons, one of whom was Gregory keeping an eye on Zabini. Draco didn't trust Zabini. And neither Draco nor Zabini trusted the Sunnies enough to make them a majority of any unit; they were supposed to be loyal either to Draco directly, or to Granger who'd been fooled by the promise that the Dragons would be betrayed in the end after both forces had been depleted, just as Harry's more trusted Chaotics should've been fooled into not shooting at the Sunnies by the promise of their firing fake Sleep Hexes and switching to support Chaos later; but it was possible some of the Sunnies were loyal to Chaos and weren't firing real Sleep Hexes and that was why Dragon wasn't winning the way their numerical advantage should've let them win... Anyways, as I keep pointing out - having an informal system that discourage unwanted behavior even if allowed by adult rules is literally what high school is ALL ABOUT. quote:Longbottom's body drifted chaotically through the water, arms and legs disarrayed. After Draco had finally got a hit in they'd all shot him again just to be sure. quote:Granger: 253 / Malfoy: 252 / Potter: 254 quote:Parvati stared at him, trying to think, but she wasn't really good at plotting; Zabini'd said the plan was to secretly keep the scores of Chaos and Dragon as even as possible so they'd use Sunshine's name to execute their traitors instead of losing even a single point, and that had worked... but... she had the feeling she was missing something, she wasn't a Slytherin... The constant posting of the score and focus on the score system kinda gives it away.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2017 19:38 |
|
Ugh. Just post the homoerotic scenes from Ender's Game. They're less terrible than this poo poo.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2017 09:30 |
|
Hang on, so all that poo poo about plots and traitors and points was just to build to the really obvious twist of Zabini not actually being a traitor? What the gently caress is any of this?
|
# ? Mar 11, 2017 10:03 |
|
|
# ? May 17, 2024 20:16 |
|
Stanfield posted:Hang on, so all that poo poo about plots and traitors and points was just to build to the really obvious twist of Zabini not actually being a traitor? Chapter 34: Coordination Problems, Pt 2 quote:There'd been one brief moment when the explosion might've come; but Dumbledore had already been standing up and applauding warmly, and no one had proven foolish enough to riot in front of the Headmaster. You get a Quirrell gift! You get a Quirrel gift! quote:"General Granger and I would both like to say," Draco said in his most formal voice, knowing it was being amplified and heard, "that we will no longer accept the help of any traitors. And if, in any battle, we find that Potter has accepted traitors from either of our armies, we will join forces to crush him." quote:"Very good," said their Defense Professor, smiling. "It took the two of you long enough, but you are still to be congratulated on having thought of it before any other generals." Now, Quirrell has something to say: quote:And Professor Quirrell turned from the three children, and straightened at the podium to address the whole watching crowd; his customary air of detached amusement dropped away like a falling mask, and when he spoke again his voice was amplified louder than it had been. Draco and Albus dislike this immensely, for different reasons: quote:"Such speeches are not for the ears of students," said Albus Dumbledore in a dangerously rising voice. "Nor for the mouths of professors!" Both Draco and Hermione wish for their house to win the House Cup: quote:"There were soldiers from every House in my army, and I don't mean to slight any of them. But Houses should still count for something, too. It was sad when students in the same House were hexing each other just because they were in different armies. People should be able to rely on whoever's in their House. That's why Godric Gryffindor, and Salazar Slytherin, and Rowena Ravenclaw, and Helga Hufflepuff created the four Houses of Hogwarts in the first place. I'm the General of Sunshine, but even before that, I'm Hermione Granger of Ravenclaw, and I'm proud to be part of a House that's eight hundred years old." As to Harriezer: quote:There was a pause as Professor Quirrell looked at the parchment. Anyways, Quirrell: quote:"I mean that I shall grant three wishes using a single plot."
|
# ? Mar 11, 2017 13:01 |