|
FreudianSlippers posted:The dude from the 19th century has the body of a old man in his early 30s because he has been working 14 hours a day 6 days a week since he was 4. Is constantly drunk because unlike all the drinking water alcohol doesn't have poop in it. Has a bunch of parasites. Now that's what I'm talking about!
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 05:01 |
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2024 10:51 |
|
Lurdiak posted:Someone once thought I was DT, which is really mean. Oh, that's loving harsh.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 05:05 |
|
Safety Factor posted:SALT CURES HAM. God bless you for somehow getting locked inside a crack house. He's not dead, just Lord of Booty or whatever it is now. Uncle Boogeyman posted:As long as I'm asking stupid questions in this thread, if I did a podcast devoted to watching every Michael Shannon movie, could I rope some of y'all in as guests? "Man of Steel is the great film of all time" *drops mic* FreudianSlippers posted:The medieval guy doesn't understand a word anyone else is saying because he only speaks Middle English. A really chill dude who does everything really slowly because as a pre-industrial peasant time is barely a concept to him. Has a bunch of parasites. Don't doxx me bro.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 05:10 |
|
DC Murderverse posted:Music Box in Chicago is the best that I've ever been to. They do their 70mm festival every year, they show great movies all the time, and they do cool special event stuff as well. Plus they show as many movies as they can in 35mm. Music Box is nice but the programming doesn't really come close to the Drafthouse theaters or what I hear about some of the places in LA. Having just two screens kind of limits what they can do. The 70mm Festival and the horror marathon are great, though. It's kind of surprising Chicago doesn't have a bigger movie scene, you've basically got to spend half the year indoors. I assume/hope we'll get a Drafthouse at some point.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 05:14 |
|
2016 catch-up status report: Hacksaw ✚ Ridge is a'ight, about what you'd expect for Gibson's prodigal film, which is basically a more expensive and thus more competent version of a Christian independent film. He's def' an actor's director, nobody in this flick gives a mediocre performance. But it's still kind of a compromise. If you want the real nitty-gritty, you either go for Ang Lee's much more polemical/less nostalgic Billy Lynn's Long Halftime Walk or Alejandro Gomez Monteverde's Little Boy. Meanwhile, I've seen Denial twice and it's still so dope.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 05:24 |
|
DC Murderverse posted:Music Box in Chicago is the best that I've ever been to. They do their 70mm festival every year, they show great movies all the time, and they do cool special event stuff as well. Plus they show as many movies as they can in 35mm. I think one of the biggest turnarounds I've had on a movie is going from watching Dune on a crappy TV with like three people not knowing what I was going into to watching Dune at the Music Box with a game crowd.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 05:29 |
|
Dissapointed Owl posted:What's the reason for this, anyway? In addition to the more prosaic reasons mentioned to do with licensing rights, filming theatre just isn't very easy. The cameras' positioning and capabilities dictate where the actors can go, how fast they can move, how they can be lit etc. You can't have a regular crowd in because the cameras will spoil the performance for them. You end up having to restage the whole thing specifically for filming, which is what National Theatre Live and things in that fashion do, but for most plays it's just not worth it. And as well, the whole thing is live dialogue, which is considerably slower paced than people expect from TV and movies where the dialogue is either edited together to be faster or rattled off by professional presenters, so it ends up being a niche product anyway. josh04 fucked around with this message at 05:44 on Mar 6, 2017 |
# ? Mar 6, 2017 05:42 |
|
Why is John Oliver interviewing the dang Dalai Lama?
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 05:56 |
Alfred P. Pseudonym posted:Why is John Oliver interviewing the dang Dalai Lama? Why not?
|
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 06:22 |
|
Alfred P. Pseudonym posted:Why is John Oliver interviewing the dang Dalai Lama? The real joke is journalism.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 06:30 |
|
Late to sensory deprivation chat but I got to try it once along with a bunch of extended family (in separate pods obviously), and it was pretty neat. Nothing too crazy, but after a while I saw some really faint colors, sorta like a super-mild aurora borealis. The weird thing is a few of my other blood relatives saw colors too, but nobody else did, so I guess it's related to something genetic. Hopefully not a horrible debilitating eye disorder or something. Once in a while I felt like I was spinning in circles even though I could reach out and tell that I hadn't moved at all, but that's apparently pretty common since your whole cochlear balance system doesn't know what's going on and you have no other stimuli to orient yourself. The people working there said every once in a while someone has a pretty intense visual or auditory hallucination, even if they aren't panicking at all. And a lot of people fall asleep.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 06:32 |
|
My position is go with the sensory deprivation chamber even if you think you're gonna turn into a monkey-man or some Ken Russell poo poo, because that's actually what the ken in this subforum should aspire towards. Then again, you could probably just get real baked and watch Night Train to Terror.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 06:36 |
|
K. Waste posted:My position is go with the sensory deprivation chamber even if you think you're gonna turn into a monkey-man or some Ken Russell poo poo, because that's actually what the ken in this subforum should aspire towards.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 06:42 |
|
I guess this is the next step up from a sensory deprivation tank, and it sounds genuinely unpleasant: http://www.atlasobscura.com/places/worlds-quietest-place But parts of it sound kinda like bullshit and I can't find much else on it aside from an article in the Daily Mail, so.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 06:51 |
|
Slugworth posted:.... aren't you the ken in this forum? I mean "ken" as in the abstract 'bubble of knowledge' that becomes the bizarre, autonomous friendly space of cinephilia; as in Pauline Kael's use of it: Pauline Kael posted:I live in a rather special world. I only know one person who voted for Nixon. Where they are I don’t know. They’re outside my ken. But sometimes when I’m in a theater I can feel them.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 06:52 |
|
Slugworth posted:.... aren't you the ken in this forum? Uncle Boogeyman used to be Ken
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 06:52 |
|
I'm Blanka
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 07:02 |
|
If I wanted to be in a mind numbing chamber for hours, utterly alone, I'd probably keep doing what I'm doing every day of my life.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 07:29 |
Hat Thoughts posted:I'm Blanka I'm Dan.
|
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 08:07 |
|
My avatar is self-explanatory on this front.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 08:33 |
|
help, help, i'm trapped on tumblr and feeling bad about being 'white' 'straight' and male
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 09:59 |
|
Uncle Boogeyman posted:As long as I'm asking stupid questions in this thread, if I did a podcast devoted to watching every Michael Shannon movie, could I rope some of y'all in as guests? Sure, I could do with a rewatch of Groundhog Day anyway. josh04 posted:In addition to the more prosaic reasons mentioned to do with licensing rights, filming theatre just isn't very easy. The cameras' positioning and capabilities dictate where the actors can go, how fast they can move, how they can be lit etc. You can't have a regular crowd in because the cameras will spoil the performance for them. You end up having to restage the whole thing specifically for filming, which is what National Theatre Live and things in that fashion do, but for most plays it's just not worth it. And as well, the whole thing is live dialogue, which is considerably slower paced than people expect from TV and movies where the dialogue is either edited together to be faster or rattled off by professional presenters, so it ends up being a niche product anyway. I guess. I mean, I've seen a lot of filmed stage performances that was literally 3 cameras at 3 angles, and the occasional zoom. Seems like you really wouldn't need to restage the entire thing for filming as you already know how everyone we'll be seeing it anyway: from an audience angle that is very limited. Dissapointed Owl fucked around with this message at 11:18 on Mar 6, 2017 |
# ? Mar 6, 2017 11:16 |
|
ungulateman posted:help, help, i'm trapped on tumblr and feeling bad about being 'white' 'straight' and male
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 13:27 |
|
K. Waste posted:I mean "ken" as in the abstract 'bubble of knowledge' that becomes the bizarre, autonomous friendly space of cinephilia; as in Pauline Kael's use of it:
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 13:40 |
|
Dissapointed Owl posted:Sure, I could do with a rewatch of Groundhog Day anyway. Wait what?
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 13:57 |
|
Grizzled Patriarch posted:I guess this is the next step up from a sensory deprivation tank, and it sounds genuinely unpleasant: I mean, I love Atlas Obscura but remain pretty skeptical of their more outlandish articles.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 14:00 |
|
Grendels Dad posted:Wait what? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjltG0T1430
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 14:02 |
|
I love moments like these. You watch movies, come to like an actor and then you find out you've seen him in stuff you loved twenty years ago.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 14:08 |
|
K. Waste posted:2016 catch-up status report: Hacksaw ✚ Ridge is a'ight, about what you'd expect for Gibson's prodigal film, which is basically a more expensive and thus more competent version of a Christian independent film. He's def' an actor's director, nobody in this flick gives a mediocre performance. But it's still kind of a compromise. If you want the real nitty-gritty, you either go for Ang Lee's much more polemical/less nostalgic Billy Lynn's Long Halftime Walk or Alejandro Gomez Monteverde's Little Boy. I missed Silence in the theaters (I decided to see it the last day it was playing here), but I still wonder if the only reason I thought Hacksaw Ridge was just alright was because of Garfield.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 14:24 |
|
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 14:38 |
|
Uncle Boogeyman posted:As long as I'm asking stupid questions in this thread, if I did a podcast devoted to watching every Michael Shannon movie, could I rope some of y'all in as guests? I'm not sure my doe-eyed swooning would translate very well to the podcast medium. As for anechoic chambers, I've been in one of the BBC's and, yeah, I definitely experienced an intense awareness of my bodies internal sounds plus a loss of my sense of balance. It wasn't nauseatingly unpleasant like some articles claim, but it definitely was trippily weird. Returning - after about 5 minutes I think - back to customarily normal noisy environments was a bit of shock, feeling like when suddenly awakens from a dream and everything has change. Other's experiences may vary, though, as I have a few factors - autism, above-average hearing sensitivity/acuity, OCD, abundance of mental illness, etc - which probably contributed to my personal response.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 14:41 |
|
This video for Acid Rain by Lorn is drat good. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nxg4C365LbQ
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 15:06 |
|
HUNDU THE BEAST GOD posted:I missed Silence in the theaters (I decided to see it the last day it was playing here), but I still wonder if the only reason I thought Hacksaw Ridge was just alright was because of Garfield. That's a safe bet, but stand-out supporting performances from Hugo Weaving, Teresa Palmer, Luke Bracey, and Vince Vaughn (!!!) certainly helped. My favorite part is when they're in the movie theater and they have that whole exchange about how "You're the most beautiful thing I've ever seen"/"That's just because we're sitting in the dark," meanwhile the entire setting is fully illuminated. It's like anti-atmosphere.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 15:14 |
|
I honestly thought Garfield was great and his best actor nomination completely deserved. And in the last movie I saw of his, 99 Homes, he was terrible.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 15:16 |
|
Are there any great write-ups about the Old Hollywood system re: contract players? I know a bit about it but watching Feud last night made me really want to delve into it.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 15:58 |
|
Uncle Boogeyman posted:I honestly thought Garfield was great and his best actor nomination completely deserved. Same, but about Bill Murray as Garfield. The problem with Andrew Garfield is that when he smiles he looks like he has no teeth. Also, I wonder about the motivations of a young actor taking two roles (Hacksaw and Silence) that are so similar - stubborn religious dorks with no ability to compromise or act like real human beings. Also, dude is doing Angels in America now, guy is either a masochist or is using his job as therapy.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 16:04 |
|
Andrew Garfield is so attractive he made me realize I'm not straight. So he gets a pass on everything from me. Also he was the best Spider-Man loving FIGHT ME
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 16:22 |
|
Coffee And Pie posted:Andrew Garfield is so attractive he made me realize I'm not straight. So he gets a pass on everything from me. Nah that new Spider-Man kid was way better even in his few minutes of Avengers screentime. I do agree that Tobey Maguire was just awful though
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 16:26 |
|
Coffee And Pie posted:Andrew Garfield is so attractive he made me realize I'm not straight. This would make the best poster blurb for Silence.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 16:45 |
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2024 10:51 |
|
Spatulater bro! posted:This would make the best poster blurb for Silence. There was a film critic who once said the same of Alain Delon in Purple Noon.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 16:46 |