|
lol if you think a guy with this neck can be successful at anything other than eating leaves off the branches of tall trees
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 16:41 |
|
|
# ? May 11, 2024 16:45 |
|
Joey Freshwater posted:I like how you guys are calling Glennon a journeyman QB when he's only ever been on one team. He also hasn't been completely awful, but he hasn't blown the doors off either. McCown started over him because he was coming off of that mystical season in Chicago where he was somehow good and Lovie brought him in. He's a backup. Not a backup to a HOF like Brady, Manning, or Rodgers where there's a case to be made that maybe they have upside, they're just never going to beat out the HOF while they're still playing (or in the case of Manning, somewhat playing). A backup that the Bucs looked at, gave some playing time to because they hated their old QB, and as a result thought "nah" and started a journeyman QB, then when he sucked drafted a new QB. "Journeyman" is being generous for the talent he's displayed.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 16:47 |
|
Joey Freshwater posted:I like how you guys are calling Glennon a journeyman QB when he's only ever been on one team. He also hasn't been completely awful, but he hasn't blown the doors off either. McCown started over him because he was coming off of that mystical season in Chicago where he was somehow good and Lovie brought him in.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 16:51 |
|
Excuse me I think you'll find that Glennon completed 90% of his passes last year and threw a TD nearly once every 10 attempts! To be fair to him if you were so inclined you could imagine things to hope for after his rookie year. He got screwed over by the regime change and Lovie wanting no part of him, then after that year it just happened that there was a legit #1 prospect at QB when they had the top pick. So yeah he's not sitting behind a hall of famer, but he's sitting behind the current front office's guy who has looked pretty good and given them no reason to give Glennon another chance. Having said that I wouldn't want any part of him if my team needed a quarterback (or if my team needed a quarterback more than it already does).
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 17:00 |
|
He's showed enough upside that I'd take him as a guy who could compete over some 33 year old retread. Not at 14mil AAV tho you must be high
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 17:34 |
|
the aristocrats!quote:Appearing on 106.7 The Fan in D.C., the Washington Post's Mike Jones referred to NFL Network's "report" of a three-way trade involving Kirk Cousins, Tony Romo, and the 49ers as "fake."
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 18:42 |
|
hahaha that is loving amazing
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 18:52 |
|
Man imagine thinking your GM has some serious issues and not taking care of that BEFORE FREE AGENCY AND THE DRAFT THE MOST IMPORTANT MONTH OF A GM'S YEAR.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 18:53 |
|
Scot Mccloughan's face looks like a giant angry red pimple ready to burst
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 18:56 |
|
he's loving expected to be let go after the draft?
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 19:00 |
|
a patagonian cavy posted:he's loving expected to be let go after the draft? In a bold move the Redskins have drafted a kicker in every round. *Gm flips bird and walks out*
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 19:08 |
|
LiquidFriend posted:Are you his agent? Glennon is terrible. lol he's not terrible. He hasn't been good to great, definitely mediocre but he's played on some god-awful teams. You idiots are acting like he threw pics every time he took a snap. He's got a positive TD/INT ratio and a not bad QB rating. Volkerball posted:He's showed enough upside that I'd take him as a guy who could compete over some 33 year old retread. Not at 14mil AAV tho you must be high Pretty much this but I guess my disagreeing with him being awful obviously means I think he's on par with HOF Qbs. Grittybeard posted:To be fair to him if you were so inclined you could imagine things to hope for after his rookie year. He got screwed over by the regime change and Lovie wanting no part of him, then after that year it just happened that there was a legit #1 prospect at QB when they had the top pick. So yeah he's not sitting behind a hall of famer, but he's sitting behind the current front office's guy who has looked pretty good and given them no reason to give Glennon another chance. Also this
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 19:10 |
|
FizFashizzle posted:the aristocrats! They really want to overtake the Browns for sheer stupidity, don't they? Joey Freshwater posted:lol he's not terrible. He hasn't been good to great, definitely mediocre but he's played on some god-awful teams. You idiots are acting like he threw pics every time he took a snap. He's got a positive TD/INT ratio and a not bad QB rating. I think the problem with sticking up for Glennon is that he looks like a genetic mistake from some hillbilly-themed slasher movie. I agree that his actual play is merely mediocre rather than incredibad. sean10mm fucked around with this message at 19:18 on Mar 6, 2017 |
# ? Mar 6, 2017 19:15 |
|
Joey Freshwater posted:lol he's not terrible. He hasn't been good to great, definitely mediocre but he's played on some god-awful teams. You idiots are acting like he threw pics every time he took a snap. He's got a positive TD/INT ratio and a not bad QB rating. careful, man. The hivemind has spoken.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 19:17 |
|
Chichevache posted:careful, man. The hivemind has spoken. Jesus Christ everyone was bagging on the Bucs for benching him when they did and now he's Christian Ponder 2.0
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 19:25 |
|
SHOAH NUFF posted:Scot Mccloughan's face looks like a giant angry red pimple ready to burst
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 19:25 |
|
Gumbel2Gumbel posted:Jesus Christ everyone was bagging on the Bucs for benching him when they did and now he's Christian Ponder 2.0 I wouldn't give him 15 a year, but I'd definitely like my franchise-- if we didn't have a qb-- to give him a shot instead of reaching in this year's weak crop. He can't be worse than Osweiler. Give him a Matt Flynn contract.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 19:28 |
|
JIZZ DENOUEMENT posted:In a bold move the Redskins have drafted a kicker in every round. my coworkers and i agree that the best thing for the bears to do is draft the two best kickers in the 3rd/4th rounds and let them battle it out. it's not like they're going to have any offense anyways,
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 19:29 |
|
Gumbel2Gumbel posted:Jesus Christ everyone was bagging on the Bucs for benching him when they did and now he's Christian Ponder 2.0 This isn't the way I remember it, they were bagging on the Bucs specifically for benching him for a McCown rather than actually believing he had any sort of future. So, uh, yeah I'd rather have him than either McCown brother if that's the bar you're setting.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 19:30 |
|
Chichevache posted:careful, man. The hivemind has spoken. Hey I don't think Glennon is terrible, just that you were wrong about what a journeyman QB costs but also Glennon isn't good enough to be a franchise QB so if you are hiring him to lead your team you are basically admitting that this season is a wash
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 19:30 |
|
TheChirurgeon posted:Hey I don't think Glennon is terrible, just that you were wrong about what a journeyman QB costs You are right, I was wrong. Other posters seem to think Glennon is a completely known quantity, which I do disagree with. Yeah, he probably sucks, but so does everyone except ~20 guys. I still think he's worth trying if you don't have a franchise guy yet.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 19:51 |
|
Kalli posted:Man imagine thinking your GM has some serious issues and not taking care of that BEFORE FREE AGENCY AND THE DRAFT THE MOST IMPORTANT MONTH OF A GM'S YEAR. The Texans did that after firing Capers and had their best draft in franchise history
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 19:57 |
|
Chichevache posted:You are right, I was wrong. Other posters seem to think Glennon is a completely known quantity, which I do disagree with. Yeah, he probably sucks, but so does everyone except ~20 guys. I still think he's worth trying if you don't have a franchise guy yet. Yeah that's fair enough. I suspect his benching wasn't some palpably unfair act and more due to his ability to not play his way back into a starting role, but I see where you are coming from. He may be worth trying, but your plan should be that he won't, with the potential to be pleasantly surprised if he does.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 20:02 |
|
Chichevache posted:I wouldn't give him 15 a year, but I'd definitely like my franchise-- if we didn't have a qb-- to give him a shot instead of reaching in this year's weak crop. He can't be worse than Osweiler. Give him a Matt Flynn contract. If 2 teams offer him Flynn contracts then one team will have to up their offer to an Osweiler contract.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 20:03 |
|
DariusLikewise posted:If 2 teams offer him Flynn contracts then one team will have to up their offer to an Osweiler contract. I feel like there might be some middle ground between 8 million guaranteed and 37 million guaranteed.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 20:06 |
|
I just realized Sam Bradford threw for almost 4,000 yards and had a 20:5 TD to INT ratio last year. That's really not bad at all
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 20:18 |
|
89 posted:I just realized Sam Bradford threw for almost 4,000 yards and had a 20:5 TD to INT ratio last year. Bradford wasn't the Vikings issue, it was the offense literally falling apart around him.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 20:25 |
|
https://twitter.com/IanKenyonNFL/status/838829201885102081 https://twitter.com/IanKenyonNFL/status/838829422731997184
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 20:27 |
|
AAAAA! Real Muenster posted:I dont have it bookmarked or anything but someone posted a before/after picture of him before the alcoholism hit him hard and after he got out of rehab the first time. The difference was stark. I used to look about ten years younger than my age until I spent several years in a swimming pool of vodka. Now I'm 32, sober seven years and I look like I'm pushing 40. Turns out that being toasted and dehydrated every day does terrible things to your skin, who knew?
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 20:28 |
|
big money big clit posted:Bradford wasn't the Vikings issue, it was the offense literally falling apart around him. I wish I could time travel to 2012-2014 and share this with the forums.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 20:28 |
|
Chichevache posted:You are right, I was wrong. Other posters seem to think Glennon is a completely known quantity, which I do disagree with. Yeah, he probably sucks, but so does everyone except ~20 guys. I still think he's worth trying if you don't have a franchise guy yet. I don't think he's a completely known quantity, but I also think we've seen enough that these contract numbers and Buccaneers interest in re-signing him sounds like the Rams talking up Casey Keenum at the end of 2015. big money big clit posted:Bradford wasn't the Vikings issue, it was the offense literally falling apart around him. Yeah, the Vikings problem is their offensive line is terrible and also super injured.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 20:29 |
|
wandler20 posted:https://twitter.com/IanKenyonNFL/status/838829201885102081
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 20:32 |
|
FizFashizzle posted:the aristocrats! Sign Tebow you fuckheads.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 20:33 |
|
Kalli posted:I don't think he's a completely known quantity, but I also think we've seen enough that these contract numbers and Buccaneers interest in re-signing him sounds like the Rams talking up Casey Keenum at the end of 2015. Yeah that talk came out of nowhere and the most hilarious/baffling bit to me was Kubiak coming out of nowhere talking up a guy he literally refused to start over a pick-6-throwing machine quote:Yeah, the Vikings problem is their offensive line is terrible and also super injured. It takes a lot to make the Cowboys' defensive line look good, but they certainly obliged
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 20:35 |
|
Cash Monet posted:Sign Tebow you fuckheads. Browns should trade Joe Thomas for him and some farm teamers. gently caress yeah moneyball!
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 20:45 |
|
FizFashizzle posted:the aristocrats! gently caress this stupid team.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 20:48 |
|
TheChirurgeon posted:
That was a pretty good game. I enjoyed it.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 21:01 |
|
Joey Freshwater posted:lol he's not terrible. He hasn't been good to great, definitely mediocre but he's played on some god-awful teams. You idiots are acting like he threw pics every time he took a snap. He's got a positive TD/INT ratio and a not bad QB rating. Glennon hit the bench because he couldn't handle being pressured and his confidence was easily shaken up which led to some real uneven performances. The upside with Glennon wasn't enough to really feel interested in being patient. He's a good #2 guy that can dink and dunk around with a scaled down playbook and take a shot or two down the field when your team gets behind, but you're going to be wondering when your younger QB with a higher ceiling is gonna be ready. He's Hoyer at an inflated price.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 21:07 |
|
https://twitter.com/TMZ/status/838789666123833344?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 21:15 |
|
|
# ? May 11, 2024 16:45 |
|
a patagonian cavy posted:lemme whisper in your ear brock osweiler got $37 million guaranteed Yeah and as has been repeatedly stated, it was a once in a generation contract for a relatively unknown commodity at quarterback that blew up in the Texans face. Teams tend to do things the same way they always do them and most organizations are risk averse because of fear of tying their job to one dumb mistake that can cost you your job. I wonder if Smith feels as comfortable making that Brock deal if he isn't so tight with the owner. All I am saying is that number is clearly being leaked by Glennon's camp, just like the numbers on his career being tweeted by Ian Kenyon are being pushed by the teams trying to sign him. It's negotiations through the media and focusing on an outlier as opposed to normal signing trends is silly, even if it is more fun to overreact to it. I could absolutely see the Bears signing him for $15mil a year, but they won't tie themselves to more than one year of him. That is the one thing about Pace contracts his first two years as GM -- he pushes most of the guaranteed money up front so they are not tied down.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2017 21:15 |