|
new phone who dis posted:The DUI code in CA is 23512. What? Nothing in that says they can give you a DUI if you're under limit (unless you're driving a commercial vehicle) The part about "driving if you're addicted to any drug" is very very weird though. Happen to be addicted to pharmaceuticals from the treatment of a mental illness? Get hosed! Not that I imagine they've ever charged someone with that though
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 17:28
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 15:28 |
|
|
A Wizard of Goatse posted:the very first comment points out that uuuuh no, that's not normally how you treat that severe phimosis is treated with circumcision, though  look it up my man It's not the first thing they should be trying but it sounds like he's pretty far past the point of simple stretching exercises and hydrocortisone
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 17:28
|
|
|
Leon Einstein posted:I meant a source showing someone convicted of a DUI while being under the limit. Seems any lawyer could get you out of that. The problem is having to balance the cost between a lawyer and a DUI. A full-fledged DUI costs more than a lawyer, but often times they will bust it down to a "wet and reckless" which can cost less. Generally, a DUI lawyer costs in the 5-10k range here in CA unless you have some kind of hook-up.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 17:28
|
|
|
new phone who dis posted:The problem is having to balance the cost between a lawyer and a DUI. A full-fledged DUI costs more than a lawyer, but often times they will bust it down to a "wet and reckless" which can cost less. Generally, a DUI lawyer costs in the 5-10k range here in CA unless you have some kind of hook-up. Have you thought about simply not driving after drinking?
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 17:30
|
|
|
Psycho Society posted:What? Nothing in that says they can give you a DUI if you're under limit (unless you're driving a commercial vehicle) A and B are not exclusionary. They can just charge you with A and say you were doing something that caused an unsafe condition even if you are under .08.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 17:30
|
|
|
new phone who dis posted:A and B are not exclusionary. They can just charge you with A and say you were doing something that caused an unsafe condition even if you are under .08. Dude an uber costs 20 dollars
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 17:31
|
|
|
Improbable Lobster posted:Have you thought about simply not driving after drinking? I don't drink and drive, ever. I work on a military base and this entire DUI thing is part of our yearly training where cops come into a theater full of people and explain that they give out DUIs even if you are under the limit if they don't like the way you are driving.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 17:31
|
|
|
Psycho Society posted:What? Nothing in that says they can give you a DUI if you're under limit (unless you're driving a commercial vehicle) I think you'd have a very hard time proving 'addiction', especially at a traffic stop. "under the influence of any drug" is a fun one, though, that law is a great CA-style mishmash of outlawing everything and double-outlawing specific really impractical subsets of everything
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 17:32
|
|
|
new phone who dis posted:I don't drink and drive, ever. I find that very hard to believe WRT your recent posts
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 17:33
|
|
|
I guess you're right there, I kinda assumed A meant over 0.08. I live in california but I don't drink and drive so I never really paid attention to the legislation.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 17:34
|
|
|
Improbable Lobster posted:I find that very hard to believe WRT your recent posts He never denied being an alcoholic.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 17:34
|
|
|
Leon Einstein posted:You got a source on this? Obviously giving DUIs to people who aren't actually drunk is an overreach. Technically there's nothing stopping any cop from charging any driver with a DUI at any time, it's just not going to stick unless they have some evidence. BAC limits aren't a minimum for DUI, they're just the legally accepted standard as proof; if you're under the limit you can still be arrested and charged, but the arresting officer is going to need some kind of argument that you were impaired other than his say-so. Typically this is going to them catching you making multiple moving violations or doing something grossly stupid and dangerous, coupled with BAC between 0 and the limit. California's "wet reckless" law is a plea bargain that lets someone get out of the worst consequences of a DUI if the prosecutor feels their case is iffy. It's intended to be used in cases where e.g. someone blows 0.07%, and there's a case to be made that it took too long to administer the breathalyzer and they were probably driving at 0.08%, but there's no proof of that--a jury may or may not buy it, so both sides are usually happy to take a guaranteed lesser sentence in order to avoid the uncertainty and risk of a trial. However, as in all plea bargains this system has potential for abuse--unscrupulous law enforcement officers can charge someone on flimsy pretenses that would never actually hold up and then strongarm the accused into taking a plea deal, turning what would normally be a non-arrest into an easy conviction.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 17:35
|
|
|
Improbable Lobster posted:I find that very hard to believe WRT your recent posts I won't even drive after 1 or 2 beers for the very reasons I'm outlining in this thread. Anywhere I would go drink is walking distance from me. That's actually why my drunk buddy I wish I called the cops on was headed over here. 38 this year and no DUIs.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 17:36
|
|
|
On the one hand, drunk drivers are scum. On the other, all cops are bastards.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 17:39
|
|
|
VanSandman posted:On the one hand, drunk drivers are scum. On the other, all cops are bastards. I agree with this except the cops that let me shoot their guns a while ago those ones were cool
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 17:40
|
|
|
VanSandman posted:On the one hand, drunk drivers are scum. On the other, all cops are bastards. Drunk drivers kill more people than cops by an order of magnitude.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 17:42
|
|
|
VanSandman posted:On the one hand, drunk drivers are scum. On the other, all cops are bastards.  new phone who dis posted:I won't even drive after 1 or 2 beers for the very reasons I'm outlining in this thread. Small amounts of alcohol cause more impairment than most people would think and discouraging people from driving after 1-2 beers is a worthwhile public policy goal, although exploiting loopholes in the justice system to arbitrarily ruin peoples' lives at random is obviously an incredibly lovely way of doing it and probably outweighs the actual benefits.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 17:49
|
|
|
The whole point of writing lots of tickets, even if they can be easily contested, is to generate revenue. Some will pay without question, most will pay for a reduced charge, and some will contest and not pay. In a small town I used to live in, most traffic charges could be plead down to "defective equipment," which carried no permanent record in regard to your driver's license, etc. Basically, pay this speeding/reckless driving/stop sign running/wrong way on a one-way ticket of $200+, orrrrrrrrr... plead down to defective equipment and give us $75. Way easier to just plea down to the meaningless lesser charge and pay the
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 17:50
|
|
|
WampaLord posted:Drunk drivers kill more people than cops by an order of magnitude. Counterpoint: drunk drivers kill a lot of cops. WHOOP WHOOP! THATS THE SOUND OF THE POLICE! WHOOP WHOOP! THATS THE SOUND OF THE BEAST!
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 17:54
|
|
|
Why does this thread attract so many weirdos
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 17:56
|
|
Tater Love 
|
Pvt.Scott posted:The whole point of writing lots of tickets, even if they can be easily contested, is to generate revenue. Some will pay without question, most will pay for a reduced charge, and some will contest and not pay. That's a bit ancillary to calling DUI checkpoints a "commie plot"
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 17:57
|
|
|
imv driving durnk right now loll
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 17:58
|
|
|
I live in a rural town and you have to be driving backwards dragging a school playground jungle gym under your car for the cops to pull you over. It's pretty nice. Anyway the actual post didn't seem as interesting but I love the title We [24M] & [20F] played the casual sex game, now she says she's done with that, and wanted more but it's too late. Is it too late?
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 18:04
|
|
|
Straight White Shark posted:
yeah in my experience the cops are much more invested in using these laws to enforce DWB than edge cases of DWI WampaLord posted:Tell no one. Keep that for your deathbed. poo poo at this point she might as well, she managed to fake her graduation without that somehow blowing up on her, at this point it's all coasting. A Wizard of Goatse fucked around with this message at 18:13 on Mar 7, 2017 |
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 18:09
|
|
|
Goddamnit there's an update to the threesome horror story but the content got deleted. Title is still great [update] my (25m) wife (30f) made arrangment to have threesomes but her idea of guy-guy-girl made me very uncomfortable. Our issues were much deeper than that--her ex husband beat the crap out of me and she's disappeared.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 18:12
|
|
|
Bubblyblubber posted:Goddamnit there's an update to the threesome horror story but the content got deleted. Title is still great  what the hell? I don't suppose anybody in the thread saved the post, did they?
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 18:13
|
|
|
Improbable Lobster posted:That's a bit ancillary to calling DUI checkpoints a "commie plot" DUI checkpoints are incredibly sketchy and are in general a terrible idea to roll through. "Yes officer, I would love to give you probable cause to search my vehicle!" Fluoride in our water? DUI checkpoints? Social Security? All successful missions carried out by agents of the Kremlin. E: a chicken in every pot = KGB plot
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 18:14
|
|
|
flick my Mr. Bean posted:I live in a rural town and you have to be driving backwards dragging a school playground jungle gym under your car for the cops to pull you over. It's pretty nice. People say that men miss or misread signals all the time and I think that that's a huge understatement.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 18:15
|
|
|
Bubblyblubber posted:Goddamnit there's an update to the threesome horror story but the content got deleted. Title is still great I dont even know if I want the post now because the title is too good.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 18:15
|
|
|
cumshitter posted:imv driving durnk right now loll Don't fiddle with your phone while driving
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 18:23
|
|
|
From what I can gather from the comments the other guy she had picked out for the devil's threeway and wanted (demanded, even!) her own, not bisexual husband to suck'n'gently caress was none other than her goddamned ex husband. And then something something burglary and op got punched in the face and the two rear end in a top hat lovebirds escaped to Mexico. I kind of feel OP got off lightly, man. It could have turned a lot worse for him. This next one made me do a double take, the title is almost exactly the same as the short one previously. We might need to update our ~*~Tale As Old As Time~*~ databases. Me [37M] with my wife [36F] 15married, wife wants a threesome without me Relationships quote:323 points 119 comments submitted 1 year ago by warfing to r/relationships I shouldn't profile, but Terry is exactly the name of someone who would try to pull poo poo like this. Both genders of Terry, too.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 18:23
|
|
|
Now you cant stop her from having the threesome without you. But you can stop her from being your wife when it happens.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 18:25
|
|
|
Bubblyblubber posted:From what I can gather from the comments the other guy she had picked out for the devil's threeway and wanted (demanded, even!) her own, not bisexual husband to suck'n'gently caress was none other than her goddamned ex husband. good indie movie premise imho
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 18:30
|
|
|
Barudak posted:Now you cant stop her from having the threesome without you. But you can stop her from being your wife when it happens. Good advice. The only reasonable response to your girlfriend or wife suggesting you consent to her loving another dude is "bye."
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 18:33
|
|
|
Do whatever you want, honey. Do you mind if I get a written confession of your adultery for the divorce proceedings though?
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 18:34
|
|
|
If she wants a threesome so badly, why not convince her friend to have one with her and her husband?
Leon Einstein fucked around with this message at 18:42 on Mar 7, 2017 |
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 18:37
|
|
|
Bubblyblubber posted:Goddamnit there's an update to the threesome horror story but the content got deleted. Title is still great lol at this chain of comments: quote:[-]threesomequestion1
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 18:38
|
|
|
what the
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 18:39
|
|
|
Moridin920 posted:lol at this chain of comments: loving nice This mastermind lady played this sucker so hard and got a shitload of designer bags out of it lol
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 18:40
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 15:28 |
|
|
Creepo threesome stories, get them while they're hot! I overheard my roommate [F24] and her boyfriend having an imaginary threesome with me [F/23] quote:79 points 56 comments submitted 4 years ago by littletheway to r/relationships I wonder if, much like open relationships, threesomes are always more trouble and drama than they're worth.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2017 18:41
|
|