|
I keep saying pineapple and people just give me odd looks. It goes well on anything, including hamburgers.
|
# ? Mar 7, 2017 13:21 |
|
|
# ? May 9, 2024 08:05 |
|
Truck Stop Daddy posted:Fake news blir demonstrativt ikke brukt av begge sider av debatten. Høyresida har sausa sammen to forskjellige begreper. Hey, dette var et interessant poeng. Hadde jeg faktisk ikke tenkt over, men intet nytt under solen etc.
|
# ? Mar 7, 2017 13:30 |
|
Truck Stop Daddy posted:sorry, følte bare at jeg måtte gjøre min del av jobben for å holde scandipoltråden så fucka som den pleier å være :/// Vennligst ikke. Forstår at man har en del sinne man sitter på, men kritikken du får har noe ved seg.
|
# ? Mar 7, 2017 13:34 |
|
Truck Stop Daddy posted:Hvis det er typ velferdsordninger, så har jeg nyheter for deg: vi trenger en haug med innvandring for å holde tannhjula i gang framover. Hva er planen din for å demme opp for eldrebølgen hvis man skal kjøre et innvandringsfritt egoløp? Det förutsätter dock att invandrarna dels kommer i jobb samt att de hinner jobba tillräckligt mycket för att vara nettoinbetalare till pensionssystemet. Sker inte detta, kommer de istället vara en börda. Vilket det ser ut att ske i Sverige. Ser man på Sverige, så är arbetslösheten bland födda i Sverige låg, medan arbetslösheten bland invandrare är hög. Detta trots att det inom många yrken råder brist på arbetskraft. Problemet är att många av de invandrare som kommer saknar rätt utbildning och därmed inte får jobb. Särskilt eftersom vi har och kommer bortrationalisera de flesta sk enkla jobb. Så med andra ord måste de invandrare utan rätt kompetens (varav många utan ens gymnasie) utbildas för att ens kunna söka jobb i Sverige. De invandrare som kommer med lämplig utbildning får i stor mån jobb, varav de som skaffar en svensk examen lyckas bra. Många av problemen vi ser i Sverige beror på att invandrare saknar rätt utbildning, får inte jobb, vilket kombinerat med bostadsbristen är en nedåtgående spiral med en ökande andel invandrare i befolkningen. Kul att du drar ett nyliberalt argument för invandring för övrigt. Ett mer etiskt synsätt hade varit att separera asylinvandring och arbetsinvandring.
|
# ? Mar 7, 2017 13:45 |
|
Nice piece of fish posted:Hey, dette var et interessant poeng. Hadde jeg faktisk ikke tenkt over, men intet nytt under solen etc. Biomute posted:Vennligst ikke. Forstår at man har en del sinne man sitter på, men kritikken du får har noe ved seg. Cardiac posted:Kul att du drar ett nyliberalt argument för invandring för övrigt.
|
# ? Mar 7, 2017 13:47 |
|
Truck Stop Daddy posted:må jo bruke språk dere forstår. kommer ikke til å bruke noe mer tid på det her tho, virka som om folk var litt lei haha Så inget motargument, förutom en halmgubbe. Kul.
|
# ? Mar 7, 2017 14:50 |
|
Cardiac posted:Så inget motargument, förutom en halmgubbe. Kul. grenser bad, brobygging good+cool? er ikke så vanskelig altså
|
# ? Mar 7, 2017 14:56 |
|
Truck Stop Daddy posted:If it walks like a duck, and talks like a duck... Not sure if I should comment. Others are getting annoyed(from what I read on the comments.) Maybe move the thread into Scandinavian politics again? I will give an reply if you insist.
|
# ? Mar 7, 2017 16:39 |
His Divine Shadow posted:Najs, kontra en annans fördomar med dina egna stereotyper. Låter som du och heinz har något gemensamt.
|
|
# ? Mar 7, 2017 16:41 |
For å snakke om noe helt annet: Aftenposten mener at egenandelen for barnehage bør bestå, de er ikke spesielt nøye på hvorfor: http://www.aftenposten.no/meninger/leder/Aftenposten-mener-Ja-til-egenandel-for-barnehage-616527b.html Har egentlig lenge lurt på hvorfor det er sånn at folk synes at barnehage skal koste litt mens alle andre velferdsgoder har en nærmest ikke-eksisterende egenandel.
|
|
# ? Mar 7, 2017 16:50 |
|
Alhazred posted:For å snakke om noe helt annet: Aftenposten mener at egenandelen for barnehage bør bestå, de er ikke spesielt nøye på hvorfor: http://www.aftenposten.no/meninger/leder/Aftenposten-mener-Ja-til-egenandel-for-barnehage-616527b.html Its stupid. But its nothing compared to the fact that we don't consider teeth a part of the body.
|
# ? Mar 7, 2017 17:10 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m5bGaR2I4bI
|
# ? Mar 7, 2017 19:28 |
|
Heinz Hynkel posted:Its stupid. But its nothing compared to the fact that we don't consider teeth a part of the body. Well after they fall out you'll find they'd be correct. Anyway going to the dentist isn't that expensive, that's speaking as someone who paid something like 6,000kr for root canals (though at that point I would have considered almost any sum reasonable just to make the pain stop) and you can mostly do just fine by just taking care of your teeth. I don't disagree that it probably should be covered, but it's not nearly as bad as it could have been.
|
# ? Mar 7, 2017 20:54 |
|
Alhazred posted:For å snakke om noe helt annet: Aftenposten mener at egenandelen for barnehage bør bestå, de er ikke spesielt nøye på hvorfor: http://www.aftenposten.no/meninger/leder/Aftenposten-mener-Ja-til-egenandel-for-barnehage-616527b.html Tror det er en relikvie fra da det skulle koste litt ekstra for kvinner som valgte å gå ut i arbeidslivet.
|
# ? Mar 7, 2017 21:41 |
|
Fjern kontantstøtten og bruk penga til å gjøre egenandelen(gratis om det er nok peng til det).
|
# ? Mar 8, 2017 17:38 |
|
Randarkman posted:Well after they fall out you'll find they'd be correct. That's what you think now but just wait until you're old and you'll be faced with paying 200k or losing literally all your teeth. It's hosed up.
|
# ? Mar 8, 2017 17:48 |
|
Randarkman posted:Anyway going to the dentist isn't that expensive Your teeth are going to all fall out if you keep smoking whatever it is you're smoking.
|
# ? Mar 8, 2017 19:07 |
|
Randarkman posted:Well after they fall out you'll find they'd be correct. I got the choice about getting a my teeth drilled out or getting i it drawn and replaced. I asked about the cost of getting it removed and replaced; 27k. Yeah that is not very expensive. Now I understand why people take trips to Poland for tooth care.
|
# ? Mar 8, 2017 20:44 |
|
Baudolino posted:Fjern kontantstøtten og bruk penga til å gjøre egenandelen(gratis om det er nok peng til det). Hear hear
|
# ? Mar 8, 2017 22:01 |
|
I have a severe fear of dentistry and having stuff done to my teeth. So having all my teeth replaced is both a horrible nightmare and a dream come true at the same time. Thank you for reading.
|
# ? Mar 8, 2017 22:10 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v0p7Oyvql9s Oh, Steffe gonna be mad.
|
# ? Mar 9, 2017 14:03 |
|
Karpaw posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v0p7Oyvql9s Is anyone running around pretending crime doesn't happen? I don't see much wrong with what that guy said, I've never been to Rinkeby, but I would hardly call it a "no go zone" from the reports I get from locals. Also, his comment about the "game" school kids play where they gang molest female students sounded eerily similar to "the knock out game" Fox News ran with during the Obama Presidency. Dirk Pitt fucked around with this message at 15:15 on Mar 9, 2017 |
# ? Mar 9, 2017 15:09 |
|
Dirk Pitt posted:Is anyone running around pretending crime doesn't happen? I don't see much wrong with what that guy said, I've never been to Rinkeby, but I would hardly call it a "no go zone" from the reports I get from locals. Well, the no-go zone list is actually divided into 3 categories in how severe the problems are. Example: only the south parts of Rosengård are on the most severe list. The most severe areas are just 10 or so and basically each constitutes an apartment block. The no-go zone in these cases refer to areas where the local gang controls the neighbour making it harder for the police to go in there without opposition from the local gang. By lack of opposition from the police, the local gang with hangarounds gets to decide the rules that apply. So if you are not accosted by the local gang, you can probably live in relative peace in a no-go-area. Just be prepared that all commerce and official buildings will relocate or reduce their presence there and firefighters/ambulances will often want police escort to go in there.
|
# ? Mar 9, 2017 15:22 |
|
Svartvit posted:I have a severe fear of dentistry and having stuff done to my teeth. So having all my teeth replaced is both a horrible nightmare and a dream come true at the same time. Thank you for reading. Wasn't there an irish custom at some point to remove all your teeth before marriage, so as to save on dental costs and avoid problems stemming from them in the future? I personally probably wouldn't mind removing them and replacing them with something fake, mostly on account of already having had a few knocked out due to a biking accident and some bad molars.
|
# ? Mar 9, 2017 15:22 |
|
evilmiera posted:Wasn't there an irish custom at some point to remove all your teeth before marriage, so as to save on dental costs and avoid problems stemming from them in the future?
|
# ? Mar 9, 2017 17:10 |
|
It appears I might not have been the only one to go "this is madness" over the whole reform of the county and municipality system in Norway that's been unveiled to be going forward. SP has been shown to be steadily growng in recent polls, and are now hovering around 11% in the most recent ones, appearing to be leeching voters off AP and H (though AP is harder hit it seems). This doesn't necessarily bode that well for Red-Greens though, as AP's decline means that the bourgeois ("borgerlig", usual moniker for Norwegian political right-wing) parties are still looking at something resembling the kind of sort of majority they have going at the moment. e: Oh, wait latest one says right-wing loses majority. https://www.nrk.no/norge/ny-nrk-maling_-venstre-gir-solberg-hodebry-1.13415161 Randarkman fucked around with this message at 19:19 on Mar 9, 2017 |
# ? Mar 9, 2017 19:15 |
|
Randarkman posted:It appears I might not have been the only one to go "this is madness" over the whole reform of the county and municipality system in Norway that's been unveiled to be going forward. mmh, if V drops below 4% and SV can keep its act together to some extent (which honestly seems likely, given støhre's obvious preference for centreward cooperation) the blue-blues will fall more to the point, both KrF and V have been vehement about not supporting an FrP government after the election, sooo V. Illych L. fucked around with this message at 19:36 on Mar 9, 2017 |
# ? Mar 9, 2017 19:33 |
|
from a left-wing perspective, the country could probably do worse than an AP+Sp+KrF government it'd be socially conservative as gently caress, but i doubt they could do any lasting damage on those fronts - AP needs to maintain some level of credibility wrt its whole state-feminist project, at least, and KrF are not, mostly, racists the environment'd be hosed, though
|
# ? Mar 9, 2017 19:35 |
|
V. Illych L. posted:from a left-wing perspective, the country could probably do worse than an AP+Sp+KrF government Well, at least SP didn't end up led by Ola Borten Moe. Dude was just kind of scary when it came to his enthusiasm for everything oil. Don't really know much about Vedum as regards oil, but he can't really be as bad as Borten Moe. Who also looked downright sinister at times.
|
# ? Mar 9, 2017 19:39 |
|
Randarkman posted:Well, at least SP didn't end up led by Ola Borten Moe. Dude was just kind of scary when it came to his enthusiasm for everything oil. Don't really know much about Vedum as regards oil, but he can't really be as bad as Borten Moe. tbh vedum seems like a classical SP mercenary type who's managed to catch a whiff of where the popular opinion was headed and capitalised on it pretty well - i think a parallel can be made to what kristin halvorsen did with SV back in the early 2000's, where the oppositional zeitgeist was suddenly very much in favour of SV's traditional antimilitarism, and where they managed to completely monopolise important sectors of policy (education, environment, war). halvorsen's trick, as with vedum, was mainly in recognising her strength and realising it - it is, however, going to be very fleeting indeed, and i expect SP to be back down to 6-8% as their issues fade from relevance and/or they seize power
|
# ? Mar 9, 2017 19:46 |
|
borten moe's biggest problem was that he was so obviously arrogant and entitled, which is poison in a norwegian political context
|
# ? Mar 9, 2017 19:47 |
|
V. Illych L. posted:tbh vedum seems like a classical SP mercenary type who's managed to catch a whiff of where the popular opinion was headed and capitalised on it pretty well - i think a parallel can be made to what kristin halvorsen did with SV back in the early 2000's, where the oppositional zeitgeist was suddenly very much in favour of SV's traditional antimilitarism, and where they managed to completely monopolise important sectors of policy (education, environment, war). halvorsen's trick, as with vedum, was mainly in recognising her strength and realising it - it is, however, going to be very fleeting indeed, and i expect SP to be back down to 6-8% as their issues fade from relevance and/or they seize power Oh, most definitely, they'll be down to their traditional loyal core once the roiling anger cools down or they get into power as you say. It's the same as when the EU issue came up back in the day and SP harvested that opposition to their hearts' content (other parties also took a stance against EU, but I don't believe any really have typified EU opposition like SP)
|
# ? Mar 9, 2017 19:52 |
|
It's tough to be a leftist right now. I desperately want to get the right-wing out of power, but AP has never been shittier. SV appears to be in no position to form a coalition with AP and try to bring them back over the line so there does not appear to be any legitimate (as in, one that would have any effect) left-wing vote this election. Gonna vote Rødt.
|
# ? Mar 9, 2017 23:08 |
|
Biomute posted:It's tough to be a leftist right now. I desperately want to get the right-wing out of power, but AP has never been shittier. SV appears to be in no position to form a coalition with AP and try to bring them back over the line so there does not appear to be any legitimate (as in, one that would have any effect) left-wing vote this election. Gonna vote Rødt. #feelthebjørn
|
# ? Mar 9, 2017 23:21 |
|
Truck Stop Daddy posted:
Eh, might as well.
|
# ? Mar 9, 2017 23:36 |
|
|
# ? Mar 10, 2017 05:50 |
|
det er godt mulig at moxnes kommer på tinget med direktemandat fra oslo, så det er ikke egentlig mer bortkastet å stemme rødt der enn noen andre partier med mindre du bor i oslo eller i enkelte merkelige scenarier hordaland er det imidlertid ikke så mye poeng. om man stemmer rødt i hordaland, burde man supplere opp thorstein dahle stort sett ville jeg anbefalt å stemme SV, deres heller patetiske forsøk på populisme til tross. det er et poeng at det eksisterer en stortingsgruppe til venstre for arbeiderpartiet, i alle fall e. wait hang on i forgot which thread this was sorry let's not pretend that anybody reads this thread who can't parse that post though, for real
|
# ? Mar 10, 2017 07:01 |
|
http://sverigesradio.se/sida/artikel.aspx?programid=83&artikel=6648825quote:I en ny opinionsmätning från Demoskop får Sverigedemokraterna en högre procentsats än Moderaterna. SD får 18,2 procent mot 16,6 för moderaterna. I'm getting MP 2014 flashbacks, man is this going fast.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2017 08:26 |
|
Tvinga tbx Reinfeldt imo
|
# ? Mar 10, 2017 08:46 |
|
|
# ? May 9, 2024 08:05 |
|
MiddleOne posted:http://sverigesradio.se/sida/artikel.aspx?programid=83&artikel=6648825 Regarding C? In that case, me too. Also, what bugs me about the poll-of-polls is the 1% increase for SD coming after Ms change in SD treatment. Why would one leave M for SD when M says they are ok with support from SD? The cannibalism within Alliansen is an interesting phenomena, which S seems rather unable to profit from.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2017 10:07 |