Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
54.4 crowns
Apr 7, 2011

To think before you speak is like wiping your arse before you shit.

Uncle Kitchener posted:

Thank you.

I don't see what I was getting at in the thread implied that I was actually implying I want some fantasy land where secular takes precedence over actual functioning democracy and system of government.

Turkey is an example worth mending and maintaining. Wahabi Saudi and IR of Iran are not.

Question, would you consider LePen, Jarosław Kaczyński or Putin secular? No I'm not implying that you support them you might very well loathe them.

But my question is this what makes their populism so different from the robber barons in the ME who has pretty much the same worldy reasons to hammer out that they are the appostoles of their nation/ummah/identity?

Are one of the base bombastic narratives better then the other?


Secularism stands for plurality, the horror of the 30 years war might have evocted its message, but gently caress me if humans haven't created more misery out fanciful belief that did not have anything about a deity in question.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

54.4 crowns
Apr 7, 2011

To think before you speak is like wiping your arse before you shit.

Panzeh posted:

The YPG is actually left-wing and espouses left wing beliefs while the other opposition never did. I never saw any left wing issues, iconography, or anything coming out of the opposition. They were bougie as gently caress.

If we end up propping up left-wing organizations, all the better than propping up bourgeois or reactionary elements.

Thank you for the effort in making socialism into another braindead ego booster you loving Jacobin.

54.4 crowns
Apr 7, 2011

To think before you speak is like wiping your arse before you shit.

Panzeh posted:

Do you want me to bring up examples where a no fly zone has preceded greater military involvement?

Because Putins involement did, though not great....more medicore/bland, whimpering things along slowly....like they don't really give a poo poo.

Dr Kool-AIDS
Mar 26, 2004

Crossposting from the Trump thread. The former head of the CIA personally witnessed Flynn discussing with Turkish ministers how they could get their hands on the traitor Gulen:

https://twitter.com/GrahamDavidA/status/845345841497985026

Saladin Rising
Nov 12, 2016

When there is no real hope we must
mint our own. If the coin be
counterfeit it may still be passed.

SDF continue to up their trolling game:
https://twitter.com/abdullahawez/status/845300592952127488

quote:

SDF spokesperson: we welcome SAA participation in Raqqa offensive because its a national army, but refuse Turkey because it supports terror.

Attached to that is a tidbit of very interesting information:
https://twitter.com/abdullahawez/status/845301422275088385

quote:

SDF spokesperson to pro-Assad paper: our forces will reach borders of Raqqa city in 10-15 days - the full reports: http://alwatan.sy/archives/97056


Throatwarbler posted:

There's little evidence so suggest the YPG are competent at anything other than telling their American masters which house to bomb. IS is the most competent force on the ground and they would have have defeated every other faction by now if it weren't for Russian and Iranian meddling.

Human Grand Prix posted:

I'm not so sure about that one bud. I highly doubt they would have defeated the YPG, and they probably would have entered a stalemate with the regime. The Syrian Army Airforce performs decently enough, which gives them an advantage.
A decent comparison of the SDF's competence is Manbij vs Al Bab. Both are similarly sized cities, but the SDF's capture of the city was done quicker and with far less collateral damage and civilians casualties than ES's half-leveling of Al Bab. City fighting is much more reliant ground troops rather than air support, and the SDF still comes out ahead.

As for the SAA, "Lost Palmyra twice, maybe three times" is all that needs to be said. Certain branches may be competent (Tiger Forces, the guys in Deir Ez Zor) but as a whole the SAA is... pretty mediocre.

Radio Prune
Feb 19, 2010
https://twitter.com/Nidalgazaui/status/845333882627117056

Every time.

Dr Kool-AIDS
Mar 26, 2004


Assuming the SAA hasn't gotten there by the time Raqqa falls, it really seems like that has to be the next SDF target.

Throatwarbler
Nov 17, 2008

by vyelkin
Harakat Nujaba in Homs.

https://twitter.com/QalaatAlMudiq/status/845286410634625024

Throatwarbler
Nov 17, 2008

by vyelkin
https://twitter.com/CT_operative/status/845322132590645248

Brother Friendship
Jul 12, 2013

Saladin Rising posted:

Nice HD map of the Tabqa-Raqqa area:

The red X's are buried treasure bridges destroyed by the coalition and/or ISIS.

Everything the SDF is just a giant pincer movement :lol: Only competent force in this entire war.

They might really be able to sack Raqqa with nowhere near as much bloodshed that could have been imagined a few months ago. And if ISIS had any brains left they'd abandon the state project before it completely collapses and move on to whatever their plans might be for the future.

Human Grand Prix posted:

Another thing to highlight during this war is the absolutely insane amount casualties the Alawite community has taken. Aside from Assad, they seem to say very little.

Yea, a minority population cannot sustain this level of warfare against the majority population. Assad's rule is finished and only the SDF offers a workable framework for Syria.

Squalid
Nov 4, 2008

Brother Friendship posted:

Everything the SDF is just a giant pincer movement :lol: Only competent force in this entire war.

They might really be able to sack Raqqa with nowhere near as much bloodshed that could have been imagined a few months ago. And if ISIS had any brains left they'd abandon the state project before it completely collapses and move on to whatever their plans might be for the future.


Yea, a minority population cannot sustain this level of warfare against the majority population. Assad's rule is finished and only the SDF offers a workable framework for Syria.

What

Exactly what kind of framework do you think they offer Syria as a whole, besides gently caress off from Rojava

During some of their recent offensives local leaders in Raqqa refused to negotiate with the SDF because they believed it was too dominated by rival tribes, preferring instead to communicate directly with the YPG

Note this is not meant as a criticism, but if you think the SDF is going to replace Assad somehow you should be able to justify your reasoning.

Brother Friendship
Jul 12, 2013

Squalid posted:

What

Exactly what kind of framework do you think they offer Syria as a whole, besides gently caress off from Rojava

During some of their recent offensives local leaders in Raqqa refused to negotiate with the SDF because they believed it was too dominated by rival tribes, preferring instead to communicate directly with the YPG

Note this is not meant as a criticism, but if you think the SDF is going to replace Assad somehow you should be able to justify your reasoning.

SDF is supported by powers (USA, Russia) that otherwise are opposed, meaning that they are a vehicle for cooperation for foreign backers. They have 'settled' the Syrian situation east of the Euphrates, which gives them a large and stable base of operations both civil and martial. They are, at least nominally, arguing for a workable democratic and non sectarian framework and what I've seen over the years supports that notion. They have grown so powerful that, aside from a Turkish intervention, they cannot be attacked by any of the other factions inside Syria.

It's not perfect, but the SDF is the lynch pin of a realistic political solution. And I do not see any short term, medium term or long term stability that entrenches Assad in power. Even if the Assad regime is placed atop Syria how long will it be until it all falls apart? I just don't see any solution to Syria that doesn't involve the federalization of the provinces and the dilution of the power of Damascus, otherwise the country will get caught in the same mess a decade or a generation down the line.

Torpor
Oct 20, 2008

.. and now for my next trick, I'll pretend to be a political commentator...

HONK HONK
ISIS can't really be said to be good at war. They may fight hard on the battlefield but in the course of doing so they have made a huge amount of enemies who are beating them everywhere. That is a key component of being a fuckup at fighting wars. It is the archetypal "won the battle, lost the war".

Torpor fucked around with this message at 00:19 on Mar 25, 2017

Huggybear
Jun 17, 2005

I got the jimjams

Torpor posted:

ISIS can't really be said to be good at war. They may fight hard on the battlefield but in the course of doing so they have made a huge amount of enemies who are beating them everywhere. That is a key component of being a fuckup at fighting wars. It is the archetypal "won the battle, lost the war".

They carved out an independent polity that spanned an international border, defeated every military force originally in opposition, and just now after three years finally starting to lose their geographical gains. They spawned allegiances who carried out mass murders in multiple nations from the ones they were in to the United States, and arguably reinvented guerilla/insurgency style warfare. Warfare isn't even their raison d'etre, it was a means to an end (a caliphate). They literally invented a short-lived new nation-state with its own government and propaganda - and yet they must have known all along the end would come. I guess my point is that you are way oversimplifying this.

Squalid
Nov 4, 2008

Brother Friendship posted:

SDF is supported by powers (USA, Russia) that otherwise are opposed, meaning that they are a vehicle for cooperation for foreign backers. They have 'settled' the Syrian situation east of the Euphrates, which gives them a large and stable base of operations both civil and martial. They are, at least nominally, arguing for a workable democratic and non sectarian framework and what I've seen over the years supports that notion. They have grown so powerful that, aside from a Turkish intervention, they cannot be attacked by any of the other factions inside Syria.

It's not perfect, but the SDF is the lynch pin of a realistic political solution. And I do not see any short term, medium term or long term stability that entrenches Assad in power. Even if the Assad regime is placed atop Syria how long will it be until it all falls apart? I just don't see any solution to Syria that doesn't involve the federalization of the provinces and the dilution of the power of Damascus, otherwise the country will get caught in the same mess a decade or a generation down the line.

All completely true, but nothing about the SDF as it exists now really offers a framework for ending the conflict. Ultimately as an extension of the YPG they suffer from the same problem you've identified in Assad's government, Syria's Kurdish minority can't, and shouldn't, control all of Syria. Until the SDf changes fundamentally such that it can act independent of the YPG there is no framework for a general peace. Honestly it's more likely cities like Raqqa will be handed back to the regime than the SDF will just keep rolling west once ISIS is defeated.

ecureuilmatrix
Mar 30, 2011

Squalid posted:

All completely true, but nothing about the SDF as it exists now really offers a framework for ending the conflict. Ultimately as an extension of the YPG they suffer from the same problem you've identified in Assad's government, Syria's Kurdish minority can't, and shouldn't, control all of Syria. Until the SDf changes fundamentally such that it can act independent of the YPG there is no framework for a general peace. Honestly it's more likely cities like Raqqa will be handed back to the regime than the SDF will just keep rolling west once ISIS is defeated.

But the SDF have already been dealing constructively with various communities? The Federation of North Syria now has lots of Arabic and Christian member localities. There are numerous tribes in Hasakah with a working relationship with their YPG neighbors. Every week, we see a new batch of Arabic recruits graduate to form a new local defense force.

The Syrian Kurds can't control all Syria, because of course they shouldn't and can't, but nobody suggested that? What are Manbij, Raqqa countryside, Hasakah and Shaddadi if not areas where the confederal framework is currently offering a way for local communities to live together, without either the Assad despotism, the rebel chaos or the Daesh absolutism?

That does not mean the Federation project as it stands (or the TEV-DEM, see the party registration thing) is perfect, far from it. But where else do we see peaceful handovers like this?

https://twitter.com/_liberationnat_/status/835268523513425920
https://twitter.com/_liberationnat_/status/835270205152505856

Somewhere in Syria, a political and security solution was reached between ADP and TEV-DEM, without bloodshed or forced expulsions. That does not mean the balance between local autonomy and Federalist unity will be easy or quick, but at least it's a try.

ecureuilmatrix fucked around with this message at 01:58 on Mar 25, 2017

Brother Friendship
Jul 12, 2013

Squalid posted:

All completely true, but nothing about the SDF as it exists now really offers a framework for ending the conflict. Ultimately as an extension of the YPG they suffer from the same problem you've identified in Assad's government, Syria's Kurdish minority can't, and shouldn't, control all of Syria. Until the SDf changes fundamentally such that it can act independent of the YPG there is no framework for a general peace.

The framework that is appealing about the SDF is that it approaches society with decentralized and democratic power structures that empower the population regardless of ethnicity, religion or gender. They have seemed fair in how they have treated those under their power, and even handed in how they've conducted themselves over conquered and occupied territories. They operate efficiently and bring stability in their wake without resorting to extreme violence and internal oppression, which makes them something of an oddity in the modern Middle East. I believe that the model they have established for themselves is the best alternative for Syria because the world is relative even while I accept it could be a bunch of bullshit I just drank the piss. Assad deserves no such consideration and has demonstrated at every turn why his rule must be systematically dismantled.

I mean, lmao, the alternative is Captain Chinless and his adventures with meat hooks and mass graves so what the gently caress does Syria have to lose?

quote:

Honestly it's more likely cities like Raqqa will be handed back to the regime than the SDF will just keep rolling west once ISIS is defeated.

Deir Ezzor would have fallen to ISIS during the last offensive if it weren't for the cooperation of the Kurds. Assadian resupply and reinforcement was based in Hasakah, which was allowed to stay Assadian hands after conflict erupted between the two parties last year and the SDF all but removed Assad's presence in Eastern Syria. From what limited I've read about Deir Ezzor it was a poor, rural and forgotten city of Sunnis for decades before the war. Then, in the pursuit of the 'Army in All Corners' strategy the Assadians clung on to it despite years of wild attacks and catastrophes. The city belongs to the people who live there and they should be allowed to determine their own fate: life under the regime or life under the SDF.

You are right though, it will probably just be a bargaining chip for powers far greater than themselves.

Squalid
Nov 4, 2008

ecureuilmatrix posted:

But the SDF have already been dealing constructively with various communities? The Federation of North Syria now has lots of Arabic and Christian member localities. There are numerous tribes in Hasakah with a working relationship with their YPG neighbors. Every week, we see a new batch of Arabic recruits graduate to form a new local defense force.

The Syrian Kurds can't control all Syria, because of course they shouldn't and can't, but nobody suggested that? What are Manbij, Raqqa countryside, Hasakah and Shaddadi if not areas where the confederal framework is currently offering a way for local communities to live together, without either the Assad despotism, the rebel chaos or the Daesh absolutism?

That does not mean the Federation project as it stands (or the TEV-DEM, see the party registration thing) is perfect, far from it. But where else do we see peaceful handovers like this?

Somewhere in Syria, a political and security solution was reached between ADP and TEV-DEM, without bloodshed or forced expulsions. That does not mean the balance between local autonomy and Federalist unity will be easy or quick, but at least it's a try.

This is all well and good, but I just wanted to point out any dream of Democratic Federalism spreading across of of Syria is as of today pure fantasy and in direct contradiction to actual practice on the ground and public statements by the PYD. Perhaps if a great many things change, but nobody shout put hope in peace on a big stack of what-ifs.

This article covers some of the issues the SDF has faced as they continue expanding into former ISIS territory:

"Eastern Expectations: The Changing Dynamics in Syria’s Tribal Regions posted:

Arab tribal leaders are divided, with a small number supporting the Kurds and most others opposed to them. Many local Arabs of tribal background fear the designs of the PYD and the Kurds and have been drawn to Operation Euphrates Shield, a Turkish initiative coordinating FSA rebel groups to keep the SDF and Kurdish forces from expanding west of the Euphrates River.57 At the same time, the Syrian regime, through its presence in the cities of Deir Ezzor, al-Hasakeh, and al-Qamishli, is maintaining ties with many individuals in sheikhly families, hoping to regain ground once the Islamic State is decisively weakened.

The PYD is the dominant party in the Jazira Canton, but it faces the same challenges of developing relations with and securing the obedience of Arab tribal communities that the Syrian regime and radical Islamist groups have in the areas under their control. The main partner of the PYD has been Hameidi Dahham, the local head of the Shammar tribe and nominal governor of the Jazira Canton.58 The Army of the Brave (Jaish al-Sanadid), a militia under Dahham’s control comprised of Shammar members, coordinates its actions with the YPG. The Shammar is today a relatively small tribe in Syria (its main branches are in Iraq and the Arabian Peninsula), but it is historically prestigious and powerful, and it exerted effective control over the northeast of what is today Syria before the establishment of the modern Syrian state.59 Due to the tribe’s small size and Dahham’s control over oil resources following the withdrawal of the regime, he and the Army of the Brave have maintained their authority over the Shammar.60

The participation of Dahham in the government of the Jazira Canton is of great symbolic value to the PYD, lending legitimacy to its political plans for including the Arab tribes. Dahham and the Shammar gain as well, benefiting from local security and oil revenue. Yet the relationship between the PYD and Dahham has created strife with other tribal communities in the area.

There are two remarkable aspects in this situation. First, other Arab tribal populations have preferred to deal with the PYD rather than the Shammar. For example, some Arab tribes have sought to provide security for their areas in collaboration with the Kurdish militia. Yet when Dahham’s Army of the Brave proposed coordinating the actions of all local Arab groups, both the local Arab residents and the PYD rejected this, not wanting to hand such power to the Shammar.61 Aside from highlighting the fragmentation of Arab tribal communities, this tribal unease has cast doubt upon the PYD’s claim that the Jazira Canton administration embodies the true will of “the Arab tribes.”

Second, the efforts of the PYD to deal separately with each Arab tribe—and the similarity of this strategy to that adopted by the Islamic State—reflect a legacy of Syrian state policies that aimed to create divisions between the tribes and even among their members. It displays a concern for the threat, however remote, that a unified Arab tribal population might pose to outside actors.

Arab fears of the Kurds in al-Hasakeh Governorate have combined with fears of a Shammar resurgence to drive support for the Assad regime. Tribal members in the area, notably those of the Jubour, Sharabiyya, and Tayy tribes, fear the Shammar will use their growing strength to return to previous patterns of domination and establish Shammar predominance in the region.62 That is why few tribal leaders have broken with Damascus, and many have established militias closely allied with the Syrian Army, such as the National Defense Force or the Popular Committees.

For instance, a leader of the Tayy tribe in Syria, Mohammad al-Fares, gave a speech in September 2015 in al-Hasakeh publicly thanking “al-Hajj Jawad” for funding a Tayy militia called the Commandos (al-Maghawir).63 Hajj Jawad is the nom de guerre of an Iranian military figure in Syria whose true identity remains a subject of speculation, known for his role in mobilizing militias. Many similar militias, organized on a local basis and associated with the Syrian army, have sprung up in the area.64 The Assad regime is also drafting more tribal members from Deir Ezzor and al-Hasakeh into the regular army.65

Brown Moses
Feb 22, 2002

One thing that's going to be interesting to see with the apparent US loosening of bombing rules in Syria is unlike Afghanistan (and a lesser extend Iraq) Syrians have 6 years of experience documenting being bombed, so attacks where civilians are killed will be well documented. For example, with the Al-Jinah mosque bombing we have over 35 videos from the attack site, and multiple photographs, including the debris of munitions, victims being dug out of rubble, and multiple videos that give a full tour of the site. This also includes multiple witness statements to camera, and these are shared on social media pages that can be used to reach out to witnesses of the attack for additional material. So far we've spent the last week looking into it and found zero evidence to support the presence of Al-Qaeda militants, with witnesses being consistent about the victims being members of the local religious group and civilians, and saying the building attacked was a mosque. The main inconstancy is exactly how many bombs and missiles were used, but that's unsurprising considering the circumstances.

Panzeh
Nov 27, 2006

"..The high ground"

Brown Moses posted:

One thing that's going to be interesting to see with the apparent US loosening of bombing rules in Syria is unlike Afghanistan (and a lesser extend Iraq) Syrians have 6 years of experience documenting being bombed, so attacks where civilians are killed will be well documented. For example, with the Al-Jinah mosque bombing we have over 35 videos from the attack site, and multiple photographs, including the debris of munitions, victims being dug out of rubble, and multiple videos that give a full tour of the site. This also includes multiple witness statements to camera, and these are shared on social media pages that can be used to reach out to witnesses of the attack for additional material. So far we've spent the last week looking into it and found zero evidence to support the presence of Al-Qaeda militants, with witnesses being consistent about the victims being members of the local religious group and civilians, and saying the building attacked was a mosque. The main inconstancy is exactly how many bombs and missiles were used, but that's unsurprising considering the circumstances.

It would not shock me if that mosque was bombed because there was intelligence that the locals had a nickname for the guy who held meetings in that building and some DoD guy thought that was an al-queda leader.

The US intelligence agencies are really really dumb like that.

Throatwarbler
Nov 17, 2008

by vyelkin
DIsastrous TOW strike on government forces in Hama.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8e0QaQIS1cY

WarpedNaba
Feb 8, 2012

Being social makes me swell!
God drat, how many got taken out by that, thirty?

Reminds me of those schmucks crowding around a wall a year or two back that got TPK'd by a TOW. Weren't they also Govt?

WarpedNaba fucked around with this message at 23:34 on Mar 25, 2017

Huggybear
Jun 17, 2005

I got the jimjams

WarpedNaba posted:

God drat, how many got taken out by that, thirty?

Reminds me of those schmucks crowding around a war a year or two back that got TPK'd by a TOW. Weren't they also Govt?

Yes. I'm not going to link the video because it's NMS. It's FSA taking out SAA with a TOW. Using a wire guided ATGM on infantry (assuming they've sighted it on an actual human) is just beyond all kinds of hosed up. Does no one in the ME have mortars? Because assuming the bad guys in both videos deploy armoured vehicles, why would you waste a TOW missile on a bunch of infantry that are in MG and mortar range. Anyway the only reason it wasted so many dudes is because they're clustered like that, which is stupid as hell in open flat ground with no cover in broad daylight. While at war.

I mean, I'm so paranoid I won't sit in a restaurant or pub with my back to the door and I live in Canada ffs, how do you stand around in a goddamn field in sunshine in a combat environment? No snipers or spotters to identify a TOW nakedly set up on a roof? Any hint of awareness that people are out to kill them whatsoever.

Throatwarbler
Nov 17, 2008

by vyelkin

Huggybear posted:

Yes. I'm not going to link the video because it's NMS. It's FSA taking out SAA with a TOW. Using a wire guided ATGM on infantry (assuming they've sighted it on an actual human) is just beyond all kinds of hosed up. Does no one in the ME have mortars? Because assuming the bad guys in both videos deploy armoured vehicles, why would you waste a TOW missile on a bunch of infantry that are in MG and mortar range. Anyway the only reason it wasted so many dudes is because they're clustered like that, which is stupid as hell in open flat ground with no cover in broad daylight. While at war.

I mean, I'm so paranoid I won't sit in a restaurant or pub with my back to the door and I live in Canada ffs, how do you stand around in a goddamn field in sunshine in a combat environment? No snipers or spotters to identify a TOW nakedly set up on a roof? Any hint of awareness that people are out to kill them whatsoever.

The shot would have been from almost 4km away, no one in the targeted group could possibly have seen the shooter. TOW missiles are great weapons because you can get them for free from the CIA.

Huggybear
Jun 17, 2005

I got the jimjams

Throatwarbler posted:

The shot would have been from almost 4km away, no one in the targeted group could possibly have seen the shooter. TOW missiles are great weapons because you can get them for free from the CIA.

It looks more like 3k but w/e, a good spotter with binoculars could easily have picked up a TOW team setting up or at least shouted several warnings during the 12ish seconds of flight, hell even a mobile phone (which easily recorded the event from the same distance as the TOW) has decent magnification. I stand by my analysis that those dudes are terrible at soldiering.

Brother Friendship
Jul 12, 2013

WarpedNaba posted:

God drat, how many got taken out by that, thirty?

Reminds me of those schmucks crowding around a war a year or two back that got TPK'd by a TOW. Weren't they also Govt?

From my limited understanding these are anti armor weapons, not anti personal, so their explosive is designed to penetrate feet of armor by concentrating its blast so it punctures tanks like a spear. Anti personal weaponry would be designed to have a large spread. So while ATGMs are effective at long range strikes, they are not necessarily big killers. So maybe not dozens killed, maybe not even wounded, but that is a bloodier hit than anything we saw coming out of Aleppo last summer. Those soldiers were lined up against a wall for the most part, and only one landed in a crowd. This was a gathering of a hundred if not more soldiers. It's a side effect of new front lines I suppose, there was another instance were an Assadian officer drove into a rebel held town only to be gunned down.

This is a regime friendly outlet, and they provide a tally of 5 killed and nearly a dozen injured. Just remember everyone lies about everything because this is the SCW. The videos are interesting on this page as well, especially the third which shows intense urban combat footage. I have no idea who is fighting or where or why :shrug:

https://southfront.org/government-forces-recapture-more-points-from-terrorists-in-northern-hama/

Volkerball
Oct 15, 2009

by FactsAreUseless

Throatwarbler posted:

The shot would have been from almost 4km away, no one in the targeted group could possibly have seen the shooter. TOW missiles are great weapons because you can get them for free from the CIA.

It's the Saudi's providing TOW's to those groups for the most part. The US stopped as far as I know around the time Hazm collapsed and JaN captured the TOW's there.

Brother Friendship
Jul 12, 2013

Hama

The rebel offensive in Hama is not yet over. The prize of Hama city, with its rich reserves of manpower and prestige, and the breaking of the Rastan siege almost seem within the rebels reach. The main defense line of Hama city has been punctured and now the rebels relentlessly attack the village of Qomhana, referred to by the Assadians as "The Mother of Resistance" for its thick layers of defensive lines and strong supporting positions in the mountains. Without the capture of Qomhana the rebels will be unable to press an attack against Hama city, and even with it they would still need to take the mountains east of Qomhana, which towers over the surrounding area and has long since been turned into a fortress by the Assadians.

https://twitter.com/PetoLucem/status/845741266151378945

https://twitter.com/worldonalert/status/845753757371633666

The real battle for Hama has now begun, and with it the last hopes of the rebellion against the regime. If the Assadians repeat their success of defending the initial withering blows of the rebels without losing critical territory such as Qomhana and the mountains to its east, if they can flood the area with reinforcements and rake rebel positions and supply lines with air power and artillery, they will break the back of the rebellion. If the rebels succeed in pushing into Hama, linking up with the Rastan pocket, it will be the biggest change in the war since the Russian intervention. Each side will pour themselves into this until there is nothing left but victory or death. There is no other choice.

ass struggle
Dec 25, 2012

by Athanatos

Throatwarbler posted:

DIsastrous TOW strike on government forces in Hama.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8e0QaQIS1cY

from the other prospective

WarpedNaba
Feb 8, 2012

Being social makes me swell!
The upside-down guy got a laugh out of me.

Volkerball
Oct 15, 2009

by FactsAreUseless
Stop saying Assadian

Throatwarbler
Nov 17, 2008

by vyelkin

rear end struggle posted:

from the other prospective



I think this has been debunked as a photoshop.

TOS-1 in action in Hama.

https://twitter.com/QalaatAlMudiq/status/845688327231750144

Saladin Rising
Nov 12, 2016

When there is no real hope we must
mint our own. If the coin be
counterfeit it may still be passed.

Volkerball posted:

Stop saying Assadian
What's a better term, "regime"? There's not really a good term for the motley collection of "SAA, NDF, Hezbollah, SSNP, Shia militias, Afghan militias, Russian forces, Iranian forces" and whoever else is fighting on that side.

News:
https://twitter.com/CivilWarMap/status/845745327298805760

quote:

Syrian Democratic Forces fully captured Tabqa AirBase and al-Ajil

https://www.reddit.com/r/syriancivilwar/comments/61go3s/sdfs_liwa_suqur_al_raqqa_our_forces_are_now_in/
SDF's Liwa Suqur al Raqqa: Our forces are now in full control of Tabqa Airbase.

That's apparently the official facebook of Liwa Suqur al Raqqa, so yeah, looks like ISIS no longer controls Tabqa airbase.:toot:

E: More stuff from Tabqa:
https://twitter.com/AfarinMamosta/status/845650737900273665

quote:

SDF discovered an ISIS mortar shell manufacturing factory in the newly liberated village of Hamad Al Assaf. #Raqqa
Location of the village is in here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/syriancivilwar/comments/61hw5d/sdf_discovered_an_isis_mortar_shell_manufacturing/

https://twitter.com/24Raqqa/status/845698439174348800

quote:

A French army unit was seen by Jaabar N #Tabqa. The Unit is technical unit and experts to support the clashes near of #EuphratesDam.
#R24
Yep, France has SOF guys on the ground too.

Saladin Rising fucked around with this message at 00:57 on Mar 26, 2017

Volkerball
Oct 15, 2009

by FactsAreUseless

Saladin Rising posted:

What's a better term,

Something that's an actual word people use.

TildeATH
Oct 21, 2010

by Lowtax

Huggybear posted:

I mean, I'm so paranoid I won't sit in a restaurant or pub with my back to the door and I live in Canada ffs

See a doctor, for real.

Enjoy
Apr 18, 2009

Saladin Rising posted:

What's a better term, "regime"? There's not really a good term for the motley collection of "SAA, NDF, Hezbollah, SSNP, Shia militias, Afghan militias, Russian forces, Iranian forces" and whoever else is fighting on that side.

Anti-rebel?

Cat Mattress
Jul 14, 2012

by Cyrano4747

Saladin Rising posted:

What's a better term, "regime"? There's not really a good term for the motley collection of "SAA, NDF, Hezbollah, SSNP, Shia militias, Afghan militias, Russian forces, Iranian forces" and whoever else is fighting on that side.

Assadist?

Al-Saqr
Nov 11, 2007

One Day I Will Return To Your Side.
Fascist Animals is a pretty good descriptor for anyone who supports or fights for Assad.

Cease to Hope
Dec 12, 2011

Al-Saqr posted:

Fascist Animals is a pretty good descriptor for anyone who supports or fights for Assad.

it's not very specific though

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Throatwarbler
Nov 17, 2008

by vyelkin
Mosul operations suspended after hundreds of civilians killed in air strike.


https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/mar/25/iraq-suspends-mosul-offensive-after-coalition-airstrike-atrocity
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...legedly-killed/

  • Locked thread