|
A GLISTENING HODOR posted:Why did Robert Cop 2016 have a hand though like it wasn't attached to any human parts it was just a severed hand it's not like he also kept his dick Because it would be pretty far-fetched to just have a human head on a robot body.
|
# ? Mar 26, 2017 23:38 |
|
|
# ? May 9, 2024 23:48 |
|
Castor Poe posted:Because "You can tell a lot about a man by his handshake". Really, that's the reason they came up with. I am assuming that at some point the idea was that Robocop would use his human hand to shoot Michael Keaton after they used their remote control to shut down his robot parts.
|
# ? Mar 26, 2017 23:43 |
|
Castor Poe posted:Because "You can tell a lot about a man by his handshake". Really, that's the reason they came up with. Jesus christ. Okay well the actual answer not left on the cutting room floor was that if a human hand is pulling the trigger then it bypasses the international laws against using drones. It was a drone allegory.
|
# ? Mar 26, 2017 23:42 |
|
I thought he needed that hand to jerk off
|
# ? Mar 26, 2017 23:45 |
|
Your dead hand would get pretty chapped jerking off a robot dick. Also, if you're more machine than man aren't you technically jerking off someone else and therefore you're a robo homo?
|
# ? Mar 27, 2017 00:04 |
|
but it always feels better when someone else does it, he must have the best jerk off seshs
|
# ? Mar 27, 2017 00:06 |
|
What does it feel like to cum sparks from your cyber dick and if one hand is robot and one human is that technically a threesome or a solo twosome?
|
# ? Mar 27, 2017 00:09 |
|
Speaking of dicks, did you guys notice how often they went out of their way to make sure we knew that Stephen Hawking's dick worked in The Theory of Everything? It was at least 3.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2017 00:17 |
|
insensitive comments imo. Poor schmuck's probably got a cloaca or something, no body shaming though.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2017 00:18 |
|
Captain Lavender posted:Speaking of dicks, did you guys notice how often they went out of their way to make sure we knew that Stephen Hawking's dick worked in The Theory of Everything? It was at least 3. you mean like, post-wheelchair or pre-wheelchair?
|
# ? Mar 27, 2017 00:21 |
|
Captain Lavender posted:Speaking of dicks, did you guys notice how often they went out of their way to make sure we knew that Stephen Hawking's dick worked in The Theory of Everything? It was at least 3. I can't imagine wanting to see a film less than theory of everything
|
# ? Mar 27, 2017 00:27 |
|
Captain Lavender posted:Speaking of dicks, did you guys notice how often they went out of their way to make sure we knew that Stephen Hawking's dick worked in The Theory of Everything? It was at least 3. Its the only way I would sign off on an autobiography
|
# ? Mar 27, 2017 00:35 |
|
a bone to pick posted:you mean like, post-wheelchair or pre-wheelchair? Post. Quantum of Phallus posted:I can't imagine wanting to see a film less than theory of everything Yeah it wasn't great. But if you're concerned about Stephen Hawking's dick not working, rest easy. It does. Work, I mean. It really, really works.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2017 00:35 |
|
I didn't want to see it in theaters and then it was HBO go with the stupidest looking cover photo of all time it's just this dumb guy sitting down with this big goofy smile and his eyes closed looking stupid and then you know you'll put it on your to watch list and pick wedding crashers or something for the eighth time instead of this dumb-looking movie
|
# ? Mar 27, 2017 00:36 |
|
Quantum of Phallus posted:I can't imagine wanting to see a film less than theory of everything That movie seems like it existed solely to be able to describe it self as nominated for best picture
|
# ? Mar 27, 2017 00:37 |
|
Captain Lavender posted:It does. HD lovingly shot slow motion erection of Stephen Hawking like something out of Planet Earth as narrated by David Attenborough set to classical music
|
# ? Mar 27, 2017 00:47 |
|
Eddie Redmayne has such a bizarre career. Two massive oscar bait movies (theory of everything, danish girl) and then you see him hamming it up in Jupiter ascending and that piece of crap Harry Potter thing
|
# ? Mar 27, 2017 00:48 |
|
Quantum of Phallus posted:Eddie Redmayne has such a bizarre career. Two massive oscar bait movies (theory of everything, danish girl) and then you see him hamming it up in Jupiter ascending and that piece of crap Harry Potter thing Hah was just about to post that, was going to suggest he get a better agent but I think the fantastic beasts flick made some cash. It was dumb and bad, though.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2017 01:07 |
|
I've watched fantastic beasts about 5 times now with a girl who really loves harry potter
|
# ? Mar 27, 2017 01:18 |
|
priznat posted:Hah was just about to post that, was going to suggest he get a better agent but I think the fantastic beasts flick made some cash. It was dumb and bad, though. I ended up watching it cause family wanted to see it. The ending was the most blatant asspull you can imagine. At this point JK Rowling can get away with the shittiest writing and get praised for it.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2017 01:21 |
|
a bone to pick posted:I've watched fantastic beasts about 5 times now with a girl who really loves harry potter Did she let you into Diagon Alley?
|
# ? Mar 27, 2017 01:26 |
|
vermin posted:I ended up watching it cause family wanted to see it. The ending was the most blatant asspull you can imagine. At this point JK Rowling can get away with the shittiest writing and get praised for it. I always thought of her as a cut rate Roald Dahl anyway. Was fantastic beasts another book of hers or was it a film only spinoff? I had thought the latter, it seemed too light on world building details to be based on a book.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2017 01:28 |
|
a bone to pick posted:I've watched fantastic beasts about 5 times now with a girl who really loves harry potter My condolences My GF is a big HP fan but even she found it bad. The scene were redmayne nearly gets hosed by a horny rhino was too much for me. Colin Farrel and the evil kids storyline was cool so naturally it was only 5% of the film whereas the rest was Redmayne gurning around like an autistic zookeeper
|
# ? Mar 27, 2017 01:35 |
|
I am going to watch Ghost in the Shell this Thursday.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2017 02:02 |
|
Paladinus posted:I am going to watch Ghost in the Shell this Thursday. Is a female forcing you to do this???
|
# ? Mar 27, 2017 02:10 |
|
I just saw CHiPs and thought it was funny. With our tickets I think it's gross is now over $30.00.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2017 02:11 |
|
a bone to pick posted:I've watched fantastic beasts about 5 times now with a girl who really loves harry potter She'd better be like super hot because dang son
|
# ? Mar 27, 2017 02:28 |
|
Paladinus posted:I am going to watch Ghost in the Shell this Thursday. I am going to watch it Wednesday. I am prepared to die.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2017 02:33 |
|
reignofevil posted:Did she let you into Diagon Alley? let's just say she made me sound like ezra miller getting blown up by magic https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jwu-4d0Fj2Q&t=82s
|
# ? Mar 27, 2017 03:01 |
|
Quantum of Phallus posted:the rest was Redmayne gurning around like an autistic zookeeper I wonder if Rowling wrote his character after marathoning the latest Dr Who season or if it was just calculated to be that way
|
# ? Mar 27, 2017 03:22 |
|
vermin posted:I wonder if Rowling wrote his character after marathoning the latest Dr Who season or if it was just calculated to be that way Oh I'm gonna go with 100% calculated. I remember thinking how it was like Redmayne just saw Matt Smith's Doctor Who and just played that character.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2017 10:10 |
|
priznat posted:I always thought of her as a cut rate Roald Dahl anyway. Was fantastic beasts another book of hers or was it a film only spinoff? I had thought the latter, it seemed too light on world building details to be based on a book. It was like a fake almanac about the monsters and poo poo. No characters or anything; all the rest of the movie was built around that thin frame. I'd rate it as more contrived than basing 3 movies off The Hobbit, but less contrived than basing a movie off the board game Battleship.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2017 10:32 |
|
ghost in the shell is the latest in sexy women in tight clothes beating up bad guys movies following up from underworld and resident evil. i cant wait to watch it.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2017 12:20 |
|
hemale in pain posted:ghost in the shell is the latest in sexy women in tight clothes beating up bad guys movies following up from underworld and resident evil. i cant wait to watch it. Uhm, I expect that she's going to beat guys while not wearing any clothes, actually.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2017 14:00 |
|
She's going to be naked, but also invisible. You wont be able to see he boobs any more than you could see the predator's.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2017 14:05 |
|
I wonder how ScarJo will hold up in GITS. I don't think she's a particularly good actor and I never understood why people were clamouring for a Black Widow marvel movie, that character is boring as gently caress. Her best film was Under the Skin but I think that was a combination of it being a loving excellent film and the fact that she had very little dialogue. I can't remember the character in GITS at all, I saw it years ago but is the ScarJo character an android? Like will she act non-human? Cos she's not bad at that (I liked her in Her as a robot)
|
# ? Mar 27, 2017 14:21 |
|
Isn't under the skin the one where she is..... Unclothed
|
# ? Mar 27, 2017 14:25 |
|
Quantum of Phallus posted:I wonder how ScarJo will hold up in GITS. I don't think she's a particularly good actor and I never understood why people were clamouring for a Black Widow marvel movie, that character is boring as gently caress. I would say she'll do pretty well actually considering how robotic her acting is.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2017 14:27 |
|
Quantum of Phallus posted:I wonder how ScarJo will hold up in GITS. I don't think she's a particularly good actor and I never understood why people were clamouring for a Black Widow marvel movie, that character is boring as gently caress. she's a cyborg so still technically a human
|
# ? Mar 27, 2017 14:50 |
|
|
# ? May 9, 2024 23:48 |
|
Scarlett is washed up. They should cast some hot 23 year old in there. Let Scarlett play Ghost in the Shell's mother.
|
# ? Mar 27, 2017 15:11 |