Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
rudatron
May 31, 2011

by Fluffdaddy
That's literally the stupidest take possible.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

rudatron
May 31, 2011

by Fluffdaddy
For mature human beings, being aware that people are products of their environment, tempers stupid & immature emotional reactions like hatred of a group of people. Rationalizing hatred as reverse-double progressiveness just means that you haven't actually internalized that fact - you're looking for an excuse for your emotional reactions, rather than challenging them.

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010
water slide wizard, the reason people hate the poor is because they think income level is a product of inherent aptitudes that people are born with, and they think class mobility is something available to anyone who just knuckles down and works hard enough. it's just-world fallacy in action: the long-term poor must be repulsive, horrible, incompetent people, because if they weren't then obviously they wouldn't be poor

it naturally follows from that that they believe helping the poor is pointless, because they believe the long-term poor have an inherent disposition toward poverty and will inevitably fall back into it without lifelong support

Baku
Aug 20, 2005

by Fluffdaddy
I guess my post would make more sense if I didn't use hate and amended it w/ the point that I disagree with the thread's fundamental premise that any majority or reasonable minority of ppl who identify as liberals "hate" the poor

they are lots of bad things at them like "callous" and "indifferent", they may be afraid of them or repulsed by them, but none of that is the same thing as "hate", nor is liberals hating trump voters or rural whites the same thing as liberals hating "poor people"

FuzzySkinner
May 23, 2012

Just posting to say Trans people are awesome human beings and are some of the most kindest souls I've ever ran into

I think it's lovely we boil people down to their identities though.

Also, I saw this old article, and it's relevant right now

https://medium.com/@lowenaffchen/i-got-mad-at-the-radio-f1515110ffb6

quote:

I got mad at the radio
I usually remember to emphatically mash my fist against the car radio when NPR segues from classical music into the afternoon news program. Unfortunately, today, as the clock approached 4pm and the final movement of Saint-Saens’ 3rd symphony faded out, I spotted a man wearing JNCO-sized basketball shorts walking down the sidewalk while chugging an entire 2 liter of Dew. The image of this horrible man so entranced me that I spent the next 10 minutes passively listening to the worst loving schlock on the planet.
They interviewed David Brooks about the newest chapter in Hillary’s extended coal miner gaffe and for a minute or two I didn’t even realize it was him: his May 6 column asserts that to compete with Trump’s rhetoric her platform needs more Big Ideas. This is undeniably true. Hillary’s “America Is Already Great” message is largely responsible for her inability to generate any enthusiasm among young people. Her promises of tax credits and job retraining programs are not enough to win over post-industrialites, hence why they cut her speech short by stripping her mic cable with their teeth so they could harvest the copper wire inside. What does Brooks suggest as an alternative? That she emulate David Cameron. That she propose “migration zones” to truck the unemployed out of the Rust Belt and into a region with an excess of full-time jobs for long-term unemployed high school graduates (???). This is almost word-for-word what Kevin “Gay Dracula” Williamson of the National Review wrote about the white working class in March:

quote:

Forget your sanctimony about struggling Rust Belt factory towns and your conspiracy theories about the wily Orientals stealing our jobs. Forget your goddamned gypsum, and, if he has a problem with that, forget Ed Burke, too. The white American underclass is in thrall to a vicious, selfish culture whose main products are misery and used heroin needles. Donald Trump’s speeches make them feel good. So does OxyContin. What they need isn’t analgesics, literal or political. They need real opportunity, which means that they need real change, which means that they need U-Haul. If you want to live, get out of Garbutt.

This stuff plays great with the poor and downtrodden, much like “listen to Bill Cosby and pull up your pants” preceded a massive exodus of black voters to the GOP.
Next up was an excerpt of John Kerry’s commencement speech at Northeastern University, itself a perfect encapsulation of the modern Democratic Party:
First, the superficial appeal to diversity:

quote:

“You are the most diverse class in Northeastern’s history — in other words, you are Donald Trump’s worst nightmare.”
Second, a vision of the world where American military adventurism is a positive good and the Third World is eternally grateful for our failed attempts at nation-building. Essentially the White Man’s Burden, but you can’t say that anymore:

quote:

“When you consider the range of challenges that the world is struggling with, most countries don’t lie awake at night worrying about America’s presence; they worry about what would happen in our absence. We cannot be seduced.”
Third, a defense of free trade featuring a namedrop of capital-T Technology so devoid of context that it makes Thomas Friedman look coherent:

quote:

"We will never come out on top if we accept advice from soundbite salesmen and carnival barkers who pretend the most powerful country on Earth can remain great by looking inward and hiding behind walls at a time that technology has made that impossible to do and unwise to even attempt.”

Why does technology, gee-whiz, this stuff is nuts, we got all these apps on there and I barely even know how to turn the thing on, prevent us from adjusting our trade policies to benefit domestic workers? Whom amongſt us doth not underſtandeth the neceſsity to Uberize the global economy? I don’t know! Maybe there would be time for an explanation if the sentiment wasn’t expressed in the form of a literal, actual soundbite.

Top City Homo
Oct 15, 2014


Ramrod XTreme
when I think of liberal

the words" bicycle cop" pops into my head

Jewel Repetition
Dec 24, 2012

Ask me about Briar Rose and Chicken Chaser.

mysterious frankie posted:

what is this with the "neoliberal left" thing, like *morphs into old woman from car insurance commercial* that's not how any of this works *morphs back into self* you big dumbo *morphs into firework, explodes beautifully*

Jewel Repetition
Dec 24, 2012

Ask me about Briar Rose and Chicken Chaser.

rudatron posted:

For mature human beings, being aware that people are products of their environment, tempers stupid & immature emotional reactions like hatred of a group of people. Rationalizing hatred as reverse-double progressiveness just means that you haven't actually internalized that fact - you're looking for an excuse for your emotional reactions, rather than challenging them.

Iron Twinkie
Apr 20, 2001

BOOP

God, rereading pre-election coverage just feels so surreal. At time it seemed we were lamenting the inevitable. On November 8th, Punxsutawney Phil will see his shadow and we'll get another 8 years of neoliberalism as things will gradually get worse. That inevitability was so well cemented they couldn't even bother to offer the thinnest emptiest shreds of hope to people their policies have immiserated over the last 30 years. Of course these bloodless, alien loving ghouls lost to Trump.

GlyphGryph
Jun 23, 2013

Down came the glitches and burned us in ditches and we slept after eating our dead.
Liberals dont HATE the poor, they are contemptous of the poor and, generally speaking, anyone whose life is not on an upward trajectory.

Totally different. Whether the contempt is presented as disgust or patronization or dismissal or pity or frustrated demands and whining when the poor are disobedient or insufficiently "thankful" is pretty situational though.

comedyblissoption
Mar 15, 2006

npr is a neoliberal shithole that pushed some anti-sanders messaging during the primaries. they only covered sanders from the context of a horse race and not from the context of what policies will benefit americans. theyre currently on the russia hysteria bandwagon. im glad other people call 'em out for what they are because im sick of the insufferable attitude of people who listen to that station as if it's an unbiased or decent news network.

Darkman Fanpage
Jul 4, 2012
defund npr imho although its mostly funded by corporations and rich people these days anyways

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

comedyblissoption posted:

npr is a neoliberal shithole that pushed some anti-sanders messaging during the primaries. they only covered sanders from the context of a horse race and not from the context of what policies will benefit americans. theyre currently on the russia hysteria bandwagon. im glad other people call 'em out for what they are because im sick of the insufferable attitude of people who listen to that station as if it's an unbiased or decent news network.

Last time I listened to NPR they were interviewing some woman from Maine who wanted the trump administration to take soda and candy off off of food stamps.

Corky Romanovsky
Oct 1, 2006

Soiled Meat

comedyblissoption posted:

npr is a neoliberal shithole that pushed some anti-sanders messaging during the primaries. they only covered sanders from the context of a horse race and not from the context of what policies will benefit americans. theyre currently on the russia hysteria bandwagon. im glad other people call 'em out for what they are because im sick of the insufferable attitude of people who listen to that station as if it's an unbiased or decent news network.

That wasn't NPR!

They have no control over what affiliate stations run!

The show wasn't made by NPR, they can't be held liable for the contents of programs they buy!

-Some pedantic fuckwit

spacetoaster
Feb 10, 2014

zegermans posted:

leftists don't have a problem with the cross burners

It's cool to see the Democrats going back to their roots. :colbert:

FuzzySkinner
May 23, 2012

Iron Twinkie posted:

God, rereading pre-election coverage just feels so surreal. At time it seemed we were lamenting the inevitable. On November 8th, Punxsutawney Phil will see his shadow and we'll get another 8 years of neoliberalism as things will gradually get worse. That inevitability was so well cemented they couldn't even bother to offer the thinnest emptiest shreds of hope to people their policies have immiserated over the last 30 years. Of course these bloodless, alien loving ghouls lost to Trump.

I keep listening to Chapo's Trap House and their words, along with this post accurately describes my feelings of disgust for them right now.

I used to think the old Conservative talking point about there being a "LIBERAL" media was horseshit. But you know what...it's a half truth. They are liberal, but only when it comes to the sort of liberalism that is espoused by Bill, Hillary and Obama. Beyond that? Well we see what happened during the primary and election cycle.

Honestly? I'm tired of their influence. They've hitched their wagons with neocons and all they care about are just the least important poo poo imaginable. Vague platitudes, and Red baiting 2.0. It feels like they're bizarrely threatened by any sort of change to their current control of the affairs and are now trying to protect that influence with Bush era republicans assisting them. It's really gross and disgusting.

I don't understand why people like Donna Brazille, Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Hillary herself just don't go away at this point. It feels like outlets like Time Magazine and others are so desperate to have this sort of neoliberal/west wing fantasy that the rest of the country has moved on from and wants nothing to do with.

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

They don't know how to do anything else.

El Pollo Blanco
Jun 12, 2013

by sebmojo

FuzzySkinner posted:

I keep listening to Chapo's Trap House and their words, along with this post accurately describes my feelings of disgust for them right now.

I used to think the old Conservative talking point about there being a "LIBERAL" media was horseshit. But you know what...it's a half truth. They are liberal, but only when it comes to the sort of liberalism that is espoused by Bill, Hillary and Obama. Beyond that? Well we see what happened during the primary and election cycle.

Honestly? I'm tired of their influence. They've hitched their wagons with neocons and all they care about are just the least important poo poo imaginable. Vague platitudes, and Red baiting 2.0. It feels like they're bizarrely threatened by any sort of change to their current control of the affairs and are now trying to protect that influence with Bush era republicans assisting them. It's really gross and disgusting.

I don't understand why people like Donna Brazille, Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Hillary herself just don't go away at this point. It feels like outlets like Time Magazine and others are so desperate to have this sort of neoliberal/west wing fantasy that the rest of the country has moved on from and wants nothing to do with.

Uh yeah, the majority of the media is economically Liberal, and pays lip service to social progressivism. Liberal media will join with neocons in destroying any legitimate attempt at leftist movements, usually by portraying them as loonie left commies, which generally goes down very well with the electorate. It's why every leftist American's fantasies about the Democrats moving way to the left and winning sweeping wave elections with figures like Sanders are hilarious to me, because socially conservative media would annihilate the movement's chances with social conservatives who may be open to economic leftism, while liberal media would slam such a movement as economically disastrous for everyone.

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

comedyblissoption posted:

npr is a neoliberal shithole that pushed some anti-sanders messaging during the primaries. they only covered sanders from the context of a horse race and not from the context of what policies will benefit americans. theyre currently on the russia hysteria bandwagon. im glad other people call 'em out for what they are because im sick of the insufferable attitude of people who listen to that station as if it's an unbiased or decent news network.

the media caring more about pushing horse races and click bait than focusing on what would most benefit people? say it ain't so

Iron Twinkie
Apr 20, 2001

BOOP

FuzzySkinner posted:


I don't understand why people like Donna Brazille, Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Hillary herself just don't go away at this point. It feels like outlets like Time Magazine and others are so desperate to have this sort of neoliberal/west wing fantasy that the rest of the country has moved on from and wants nothing to do with.


I'm trying to articulate my thoughts without it coming out as a string of profanity with the word GLOBALISTS inserted at random intervals. In my mind the core of the problem is that we have a Political and Media class in the first place and more importantly how insulated and isolated it has become. In order to get anywhere in politics or in one of the six companies media has been consolidated down to, you need both social connections to get your foot in the door and the financial means to work for little or no pay. To even get someone's coffee, you need to be in a position where food, clothing, shelter, or any other basic necessity isn't a concern and never has been. Their focus on tone, procedure, and palace intrigue is because those are the topics and social capital of everyone else they have ever known. They themselves and no one they have known has ever had a real problem in their lives.

I think what makes me angrier than anything else is that they have no comprehension of just how much they are loathed and hated. The increasing desperation of huge swaths of the population isn't even background noise in their world. They believe they are loved.

Iron Twinkie fucked around with this message at 15:59 on Mar 31, 2017

spacetoaster
Feb 10, 2014

Iron Twinkie posted:

I'm trying to articulate my thoughts without it coming out as a string of profanity with the word GLOBALISTS inserted at random intervals. In my mind the core of the problem is that we have a Political and Media class in the first place and more importantly how insulated and isolated it has become. In order to get anywhere in politics or in one of the six companies media has been consolidated down to, you need both social connections to get your foot in the door and the financial means to work for little or no pay. To even get someone's coffee, you need to be in a position where food, clothing, shelter, or any other basic necessity isn't a concern and never has been. Their focus on tone, procedure, and palace intrigue is because those are the topics and social capital of everyone else they have ever known. They themselves and no one they have known has ever had a real problem in their lives.

I think what makes me angrier than anything else is that they have no comprehension of just how much they are loathed and hated. The increasing desperation of huge swaths of the population isn't even background noise in their world. They believe they are loved.

I just started reading the wiki pages of the news faces to see if there was any truth to them all being born and raised elite assholes.

Oh man, you weren't kidding.

FuzzySkinner
May 23, 2012

Iron Twinkie posted:

I'm trying to articulate my thoughts without it coming out as a string of profanity with the word GLOBALISTS inserted at random intervals. In my mind the core of the problem is that we have a Political and Media class in the first place and more importantly how insulated and isolated it has become. In order to get anywhere in politics or in one of the six companies media has been consolidated down to, you need both social connections to get your foot in the door and the financial means to work for little or no pay. To even get someone's coffee, you need to be in a position where food, clothing, shelter, or any other basic necessity isn't a concern and never has been. Their focus on tone, procedure, and palace intrigue is because those are the topics and social capital of everyone else they have ever known. They themselves and no one they have known has ever had a real problem in their lives.

I think what makes me angrier than anything else is that they have no comprehension of just how much they are loathed and hated. The increasing desperation of huge swaths of the population isn't even background noise in their world. They believe they are loved.

I drove through a part of Akron that I spent the first two years of my life in, and my mother grew up in.

It was tough to see a lot of businesses I used to recognize as things as trivial as a "Wendy's" convert into Check Cashing places, Mobile Networks you've never heard of and the like. What Mark Blyth said about Trump/Brexit is completely accurate in this regard. These are people that are forgotten. It doesn't matter the race. The African Americans in those neighborhoods I see suffer from similar problems as their white counterparts.. Things like Flint...do not matter to these people.

It's gotten so bad that even my :911: dittohead father has now fully embraced elements of "New deal" leftism. I've heard him bitch about how corrupt the banks are, how we need to invest in infastructure spending...all of this.

But they keep putting their heads in the sand, and ignoring these people. They don't matter to them. They bailed out wall street and gave the finger to main street. They get to go back to their white upper class neighborhoods, or gentrified neighborhoods, then look down at everyone else that doesn't share their sesame street version of "diversity".

Thoguh
Nov 8, 2002

College Slice

comedyblissoption posted:

npr is a neoliberal shithole that pushed some anti-sanders messaging during the primaries. they only covered sanders from the context of a horse race and not from the context of what policies will benefit americans. theyre currently on the russia hysteria bandwagon. im glad other people call 'em out for what they are because im sick of the insufferable attitude of people who listen to that station as if it's an unbiased or decent news network.

NPR's news lost me around early February last year. It makes sense, they're much more dependent on corporate funding than they used to be and their target demographic is middle aged upper middle class people. But it just got too insufferable.

Typo
Aug 19, 2009

Chernigov Military Aviation Lyceum
The Fighting Slowpokes

FuzzySkinner posted:


It's gotten so bad that even my :911: dittohead father has now fully embraced elements of "New deal" leftism. I've heard him bitch about how corrupt the banks are, how we need to invest in infastructure spending...all of this.

But they keep putting their heads in the sand, and ignoring these people. They don't matter to them. They bailed out wall street and gave the finger to main street. They get to go back to their white upper class neighborhoods, or gentrified neighborhoods, then look down at everyone else that doesn't share their sesame street version of "diversity".

something I thought of

Obama took Andrew Jackson from the $20 last year

Trump (prob at Bannon's behest) layed the wreath at Jackson's tomb and tweeted about him and put his portrait in the oval office

there's prob no better symbolism for the way democrats gave up their original core identity as anti-bank, anti-northeastern elite populists with its core constituents in the south and midwest than this

FuzzySkinner
May 23, 2012

Typo posted:

something I thought of

Obama took Andrew Jackson from the $20 last year

Trump (prob at Bannon's behest) layed the wreath at Jackson's tomb and tweeted about him and put his portrait in the oval office

there's prob no better symbolism for the way democrats gave up their original core identity as anti-bank, anti-northeastern elite populists with its core constituents in the south and midwest than this

i know his background kinda contradicts this, but when's the last time you've heard a Dem champion FDR and his legacy?

I got stamps the other day and the post office worker from behind the counter seemed so drat proud they featured "New Deal" programs on them. Those programs are STILL taught in school to this day as an example of how we dug our asses out of financial ruin and helped grow the middle class.

They don't do that. You know who they do like to talk about. i'll give you a little hint:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXqz0-fVcn4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=seBrOcoj89s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UV0AjH0ahWU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FQai93glsy0

(That last one? Ran in Ohio during the election btw).

MaxxBot
Oct 6, 2003

you could have clapped

you should have clapped!!

wizard on a water slide posted:

as an aside I think it's astounding that there are ppl on this forum and probably itt who take it as axiomatic that people on the trans spectrum or w/e are inherently repulsive, while simultaneously not getting how someone can hate poor people

nobody likes poor people, including a lot of poor people; poor people constantly need financial help, dress and eat poorly, are less healthy, less educated, etc etc etc

liberals hate poor people for the same reason everybody else does, which is that many of them are repellent; liberals are just more forthright about it because they're more concerned with aesthetics than socialists and the far right, and they have fewer other people to spread their hate around to (whereas the us far right, for example, hates pretty much everybody including each other). the foundation of social science is the belief that we're products of our environment, and study after study after study has shown that poverty has negative consequences on basically every physical and mental quality of a human being

here's the punchline tho: this is precisely why nobody deserves to live in poverty

this is why you become a leftist in the first place, why you fight for economic justice, etc because poverty is loving gross and inhumane, and the myth that it's somehow ennobling and aggrandizing is one of the vilest lies in american mythology

in other words, turn their hatred of poor people into passion for economic justice lmao

:chloe:

Jewel Repetition
Dec 24, 2012

Ask me about Briar Rose and Chicken Chaser.
What's the point of NPR existing now that Car Talk's over?

Azathoth
Apr 3, 2001

Jeb! Repetition posted:

What's the point of NPR existing now that Car Talk's over?

A Prairie Home Compan....wait...dammit...

Typo
Aug 19, 2009

Chernigov Military Aviation Lyceum
The Fighting Slowpokes

FuzzySkinner posted:

i know his background kinda contradicts this, but when's the last time you've heard a Dem champion FDR and his legacy?

I was gonna say bernie but then I remembered that he's not a democrat

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


FuzzySkinner posted:

i know his background kinda contradicts this, but when's the last time you've heard a Dem champion FDR and his legacy?

I got stamps the other day and the post office worker from behind the counter seemed so drat proud they featured "New Deal" programs on them. Those programs are STILL taught in school to this day as an example of how we dug our asses out of financial ruin and helped grow the middle class.

They don't do that. You know who they do like to talk about. i'll give you a little hint:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXqz0-fVcn4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=seBrOcoj89s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UV0AjH0ahWU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FQai93glsy0

(That last one? Ran in Ohio during the election btw).

that makes me wanna vomit

bad dems are disgusting :barf:

FuzzySkinner
May 23, 2012

Typo posted:

I was gonna say bernie but then I remembered that he's not a democrat

"He's not a democrat"

Thank loving christ.

(Edit: Not directed at you. But a lot of HRC mainstream supporters said that poo poo as a smear).


Condiv posted:

that makes me wanna vomit

bad dems are disgusting :barf:

i showed this to my father and several others that despise Hillary, view Reagan as the 2nd coming of Lincoln.

The sheer look of disgust on their face was incredible. They were so angry at it that they went "I don't even want to talk about it". I don't know who they were trying to reach in that ad. Reagan supporters generally love Trump. Old school Democrats hate Reagan and what he did to unions.

They were trying to reach some small sliver of "NEVER TRUMP" republicans that is such a minuscule, pathetic sample size that it's not even worth addressing.

MaxxBot
Oct 6, 2003

you could have clapped

you should have clapped!!
Hillary and Jeb! both ran campaigns that would have been more at home in the early 90s, they were way out of touch with our current political reality.

Ytlaya
Nov 13, 2005

comedyblissoption posted:

npr is a neoliberal shithole that pushed some anti-sanders messaging during the primaries. they only covered sanders from the context of a horse race and not from the context of what policies will benefit americans. theyre currently on the russia hysteria bandwagon. im glad other people call 'em out for what they are because im sick of the insufferable attitude of people who listen to that station as if it's an unbiased or decent news network.

I've found that a lot of NPR's coverage of leftists isn't usually explicitly negative (though it sometimes is), but it's almost always covered with this sort of skeptical/incredulous tone. Like the person talking about something a leftist said will have this tone to their voice like "but isn't this dumb and weird?" They also almost always end the segment with the anti-leftist perspective in such cases (though to be fair one of the inevitable problems with presenting two sides to an issue in the news is that you have to give one side the last word, so to speak).

I find that NPR is good for covering anything that isn't that important. Like their coverage of random stuff that isn't related to politics, the economy, or foreign policy is pretty good.

edit: Oh, I forgot to mention NPR's love affair with natural gas. One of NPR's big sponsors (at least for a while, not sure if they're still a sponsor) was a natural gas industry advocate group, and they would frequently give these extremely positive spots on natural gas/fracking. It got to the point where it became an in-joke of sorts where my friend and I would text each other when NPR did a pro-natural gas spot.

Ytlaya fucked around with this message at 22:06 on Mar 31, 2017

The Brown Menace
Dec 24, 2010

Now comes in all colors.


FuzzySkinner posted:

They were trying to reach some small sliver of "NEVER TRUMP" republicans that is such a minuscule, pathetic sample size that it's not even worth addressing.

the size is 3 (bill kristol, jennifer rubin and rick wilson)

and they all probably still voted trump or abstained, lol

FuzzySkinner
May 23, 2012

The Brown Menace posted:

the size is 3 (bill kristol, jennifer rubin and rick wilson)

and they all probably still voted trump or abstained, lol

Glenn Beck.

Who's pissed all of his credibility among right wing circles as a result.. A lot of liberals are calling him "one of the good ones" now along with war criminals George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and others.

Iron Twinkie
Apr 20, 2001

BOOP

FuzzySkinner posted:

They were trying to reach some small sliver of "NEVER TRUMP" republicans that is such a minuscule, pathetic sample size that it's not even worth addressing.


What's that in the sky? A turd? A vein? A jar of mayonnaise? No it's Chuck Schumer!

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/438481/chuck-schumer-democrats-will-lose-blue-collar-whites-gain-suburbs

quote:

At least publicly, Schumer has no worries about his party’s dwindling fortunes among working-class white voters. “For every blue-collar Democrat we lose in western Pennsylvania, we will pick up two moderate Republicans in the suburbs in Philadelphia, and you can repeat that in Ohio and Illinois and Wisconsin.”


The modern Democrats desperately, DESPERATELY want to be the party of Wealthy, Socially Conscious, Smart, Respectable Republicans. Why do we have to visit all these weird rat men and mole people every four years that worry about strange things like clean water, police brutality, or feeding their children when we could be retweeting and giving TED talks to like, ten other people?

Iron Twinkie fucked around with this message at 23:41 on Mar 31, 2017

Typo
Aug 19, 2009

Chernigov Military Aviation Lyceum
The Fighting Slowpokes

Iron Twinkie posted:


The modern Democrats desperately, DESPERATELY want to be the party of Wealthy, Socially Conscious, Smart, Respectable Republicans.

they are stuck in the 1990s

democrats of a certain age have still not gotten over the trauma of Reagan and Nixon destroying the new deal coalition

Azathoth
Apr 3, 2001

FuzzySkinner posted:

i know his background kinda contradicts this, but when's the last time you've heard a Dem champion FDR and his legacy?

I got stamps the other day and the post office worker from behind the counter seemed so drat proud they featured "New Deal" programs on them. Those programs are STILL taught in school to this day as an example of how we dug our asses out of financial ruin and helped grow the middle class.

They don't do that. You know who they do like to talk about. i'll give you a little hint:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXqz0-fVcn4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=seBrOcoj89s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UV0AjH0ahWU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FQai93glsy0

(That last one? Ran in Ohio during the election btw).
FDR, for all his faults, is as close as Democrats have right now to a Ronald Reagan figure, and I've never understood why they don't do more to talk about being his inheritors in the same way that Republicans talk about being the party of Lincoln and Reagan.

I've thought for a while that Democrats could get a lot of traction nationwide with a set of policies that intentionally hearken back to FDR's Four Freedoms:

Freedom of Speech - Even if Trump disagrees with you
Freedom of Worship - But not just for Christians
Freedom from Want - The 1% shouldn't live the good life while others suffer
Freedom from Fear - But not just for white folks

It's a coherent message that has relevancy today, while having historical resonance, but I doubt it'd get play inside their messaging shops. Democrats have been utterly incompetent at messaging for as long as I've been alive, I don't know why I think they'll suddenly figure it out now.

comedyblissoption
Mar 15, 2006

i listened live to a segment npr was doing where they literally brought up "bernie bros" as "another" example of online harassment when they were discussing the anti-semitic ((())) marker

npr's coverage on foreign policy is super bad and super pro bombing brown people

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Lindsey O. Graham
Dec 31, 2016

"We're not generating enough angry white guys to stay in business for the long term."

- The Chief

:chloe:

  • Locked thread