|
Mushika posted:"Nice meltdown" is the new "I am too lazy to respond and I'm going to laugh at you for actually giving a poo poo about this" hosed up if true
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 12:45
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 18, 2024 04:34 |
|
|
Mushika posted:"Nice meltdown" is the new "I am too lazy to respond and I'm going to laugh at you for actually giving a poo poo about this" Nice meltdown. Robo Reagan posted:the lack of international curb stomping on assad is basically going to inspire other assholes to use chemical weapons so lol buckle in and get your gas masks ready Chemical weapons always seemed like garbage weapons for retards that weren't really any more effective than more conventional weapons. With the added benefit of being great at friendly fire any time the wind would shift. As well as having pathetic shelf lives, and just generally being a pain in the rear end to handle. Is there some giant stock pile of chemical weapons that assholes are sitting around on waiting for a green light to use? Seems like a bogey man to get everyone riled up, but what do I know.
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 12:47
|
|
|
Lol Jimmy Dore. I remember when Todd Glass came out as gay on Marc Maron's podcast and the only thing Jimmy Dore could do was be furious Todd didn't do it on his own podcast so he could get more downloads lmao what a petty motherfucker.
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 12:48
|
|
|
Harrower posted:Nice meltdown. assad's got factories where he makes this poo poo and brutal dictators don't really give a gently caress about friendly fire as long as they win plus i said it's going to open the door for complete assholes not cool and good countries that never commit warcrimes like america or israel
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 12:50
|
|
|
Robo Reagan posted:assad's got factories where he makes this poo poo and brutal dictators don't really give a gently caress about friendly fire as long as they win I'm not really sure if it will give him an advantage in winning. It's my understanding that chemical weapons are just not very good in general. But you're probably right that it will give other countries an excuse to one up them and be total poo poo heads about it.
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 12:57
|
|
|
Harrower posted:I'm not really sure if it will give him an advantage in winning. It's my understanding that chemical weapons are just not very good in general. But you're probably right that it will give other countries an excuse to one up them and be total poo poo heads about it. my nigga let me tell u about psychological warfare and what having to take care of a chlorine gas'd kid will do to you
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 13:27
|
|
|
Robo Reagan posted:my nigga let me tell u about psychological warfare and what having to take care of a chlorine gas'd kid will do to you it was actually sarin nerve gas that was used in the attack 
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 13:32
|
|
|
Is Trump just fine yet?
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 13:58
|
|
|
Fog Tripper posted:Is Trump just fine yet? But remember, a fall can be forgiven so long as you stick the landing.
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 14:32
|
|
|
Knight posted:He's in the green as far as legal investigations go (appreciate that I skipped the yellow/pee joke), but his first 100 days have been marred by multiple failures, resignations, and historically low approval ratings. If it goes on like this he'll be remembered as the dupe who said ridiculous things but his administration was handicapped by its own infighting and incompetence. also he's going to have to deal with the shitstorm when he gets his tax returns and doesn't release them
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 14:35
|
|
|
Robo Reagan posted:also he's going to have to deal with the shitstorm when he gets his tax returns and doesn't release them lol trump is finally
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 14:36
|
|
|
like, the excuse has been that he's being audited but when he gets his new tax returns it doesn't get audited until he submits it so my guess is he'll camp out in a tent in front of the IRS hq so he can get rid of it asap
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 14:50
|
|
|
Knight posted:historically low approval ratings 
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 15:00
|
|
|
Nice argument
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 15:15
|
|
|
That's a prediction from Huffington Post, not a national poll. I know you know the difference because you keep bringing it up hoping that somehow you can cast off reality by believing hard enough, and each time the difference is explained and slides over your smoothbrain so you change the subject (usually something about the EC) and repeat the process. National polls had Hillary beating Trump by +3. She received 3M more votes than Trump. The polls were accurate. Predictions from Huffingtong Post, NYT, or whoever were hilariously wrong.
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 15:15
|
|
|
There were fake polls all through the election my friends, do you think they all of a sudden are totally accurate and unbiased? Lmao, it's a non-stop propaganda barrage and has been
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 15:16
|
|
|
Except she really did get millions more votes than Trump. This isn't up for debate.
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 15:24
|
|
|
Spunky Psycho Ho posted:There were fake polls all through the election my friends, do you think they all of a sudden are totally accurate and unbiased? Lmao, it's a non-stop propaganda barrage and has been Every 4 years a bunch of idiots claim polling is fake (UNSKEW) and look like morons as the polling turns out to be accurate and their candidate fails. This year national polling was still accurate but the candidate won because of the election process, and fools are taking the wrong message from that. The message they should be taking is "We can be behind in the polls but still win the election based on state strategy" but they pathologically cannot accept that they are not the silent majority.
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 15:27
|
|
|
those 3 million illegal votes don't count, holmes!
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 15:28
|
|
|
Leon Einstein posted:Except she really did get millions more votes than Trump. This isn't up for debate. Where does that poll say "More votes" they know how the electoral college works. If their sampling was hosed up and biased, that's their own fault. My prediction for Trump is either 1) the first 1-2 years he's in there trying to play their game. And he's gonna keep getting burned. And finally he says gently caress it and does it his way. or 2) he was all talk and just becomes generic president with same old poo poo anyone would've done
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 15:27
|
|
|
Spunky Psycho Ho posted:There were fake polls all through the election my friends, do you think they all of a sudden are totally accurate and unbiased? Lmao, it's a non-stop propaganda barrage and has been The only propaganda is you and Trumpo telling everyone how there's a big conspiracy and "they" are behind everything.
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 15:28
|
|
|
Spunky Psycho Ho posted:There were fake polls all through the election my friends, do you think they all of a sudden are totally accurate and unbiased? Lmao, it's a non-stop propaganda barrage and has been If Trump so popular why so few people at the inaugural speech? Answer that one spunk man. Because Obama locked Trumps fan in a basement?
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 15:29
|
|
|
Spunky Psycho Ho posted:Where does that poll say "More votes" they know how the electoral college works. If their sampling was hosed up and biased, that's their own fault. quote:If the general election were held today, and the candidates were [Hillary Clinton for the Democrats] and [Donald Trump for the Republicans], for whom would you vote? And gently caress off with your "if their sampling was hosed up and biased" because it wasn't, they had Clinton +3 and the result was Clinton ahead by 3M votes.
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 15:34
|
|
|
SpaceGoatFarts posted:If Trump so popular why so few people at the inaugural speech? Probably you don't research anything and are ignorant? http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/01/crowd-size-matters-trump-is-right-it-was-huge/
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 15:34
|
|
|
Spunky Psycho Ho posted:Where does that poll say "More votes" they know how the electoral college works. If their sampling was hosed up and biased, that's their own fault. What's "does it his way"? Cry more how there's a separation of power and realise not everyone is kissing his rear end?
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 15:34
|
|
|
Knight posted:Do you really not understand how polling works? A typical polling question looks like this: Lol, they all tried to predict the electoral college results. You guys are laughable. They were predicting the winner of the presidency, not homecoming queen
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 15:37
|
|
|
SpaceGoatFarts posted:If Trump so popular why so few people at the inaugural speech? lieberal camera angles
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 15:37
|
|
|
They published some picture of the crowd in the morning before people were even there. CNN. "Reading wikileaks is illegal." "Ignore Susan Rice, it's meaningless" "Lets interview our own cameraman and pretend he's a protester"
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 15:39
|
|
|
Spunky Psycho Ho posted:Probably you don't research anything and are ignorant? That link is showing pictures with a sparse crowd and a bunch of hollow words to confuse the feeble minds like you. All the aerial pics are clear. I challenge you to find a single aerial pic of Trump speech with a dense crowd. You won't find any Because Trump isn't popular. People did not vote for Trump, they voted against Hillary. Sorry you're too dim to realize this harsh truth
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 15:39
|
|
|
Spunky Psycho Ho posted:Probably you don't research anything and are ignorant? holy gently caress do you actually believe this someone dig out the gigapixel vs aerial comparisons to demonstrate how they're pictures of the exact same crowd and the concept of "perspective"
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 15:39
|
|
|
Even on those "real" photos there's a relatively small crowd. Sure there were more than your average birthday party, but nothing special. But that's not enough for Trump he has to be the best and biggest, so he had thw biggwst inaugaration crowd, he won by the greatest margin in history and if everyone says otherwise they must be lying.
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 15:44
|
|
|
Spunky Psycho Ho posted:Lol, they all tried to predict the electoral college results. You guys are laughable. They were predicting the winner of the presidency, not homecoming queen Wrong. They would have screened their results by state and weighted the results accordingly to reflect the electoral college results. Instead they screen by age and race to reflect the general population of likely voters. There's no question what the purpose of public polling is and it's hilarious that you're that ignorant of its purpose. Fortunately, we don't have to worry about screening results to show that the majority of Americans disapprove of Trump and his administration. His job approval ratings are historically low.
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 15:45
|
|
|
SpaceGoatFarts posted:Because Trump isn't popular. Trump was packing stadiums for rallies with lines of cars for miles every day during the election
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 15:45
|
|
|
WOW! still crying about trump, lol, what.... get over it... poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 15:47
|
|
|
Spunky Psycho Ho posted:They published some picture of the crowd in the morning before people were even there. If only that was just CNN. Trump is the subject of international ridicule. Everybody worldwide is making fun of him and his tweets. He's only popular as a clown. His support demographic is internet trolls, religious nuts and hate groups. Trump is not widely popular. He never was
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 15:47
|
|
|
SpaceGoatFarts posted:
Lmao, what world do you people live in. You don't live in reality. Like you literally live on the internet. You don't know whats going on around you.
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 15:49
|
|
|
Spunky Psycho Ho posted:Trump was packing stadiums for rallies with lines of cars for miles every day during the election That still doesn't make him widely popular if a bunch of inbreds bought his hats, sorry
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 15:49
|
|
|
You're like babies that need someone to shovel pre-digested pap in your mouths to digest reality. You're soft, and misguided.
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 15:52
|
|
|
Spunky Psycho Ho posted:Like you literally live on the internet. You don't know whats going on around you. This explains a lot. Because I'm sure you are the one living on /the_donald
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 15:54
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 18, 2024 04:34 |
|
|
During the election on the expressway out of the Chicago, there were people that would hang flags and Trump banners over the expressway every weekend and all the truckers going by "HONK HONK"
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 15:54
|
|