|
FizFashizzle posted:dont loving do it dave NC sports talk radio this morning seemed to be unironically mad about people being racist against white running backs. 
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 18:41
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 21:37 |
|
|
https://twitter.com/JourdanRodrigue/status/850020468614725633 nonononononon
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 18:42
|
|
|
Lol
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 18:44
|
|
|
Wow. And here I was thinking "is this too high" when I was hoping the Eagles would take a hard look at him at 14
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 18:53
|
|
|
Oh my god. I hope the panthers dont take McCaffrey. I had my heart set on Fournette.
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 19:08
|
|
|
Oh word? https://twitter.com/andy_benoit/status/850050725996404737
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 19:34
|
|
|
FizFashizzle posted:dont loving do it dave Hahahhahahahah
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 19:52
|
|
|
Not sure why people don't think Mccaffery will be good
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 20:17
|
|
|
FizFashizzle posted:dont loving do it dave Sounds like you guys need HAL
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 20:19
|
|
|
a neat cape posted:Not sure why people don't think Mccaffery will be good I think the real concern among Panthers posters is that their O-line is a tire fire and drafting a RB (either Fournette or McCaffery, doesn't matter who) that high won't solve the underlying problem.
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 20:27
|
|
|
Benne posted:I think the real concern among Panthers posters is that their O-line is a tire fire and drafting a RB (either Fournette or McCaffery, doesn't matter who) that high won't solve the underlying problem. I dont think our O-line is as bad as all that. We had a lot of injuries last year.
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 20:28
|
|
|
carolina no don't do it Benne posted:I think the real concern among Panthers posters is that their O-line is a tire fire and drafting a RB (either Fournette or McCaffery, doesn't matter who) that high won't solve the underlying problem. Run blocking isn't the line's problem. Just about everyone on that line is a good to great run blocker. The problem is that no one can stop Cam from getting killed every other play
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 21:26
|
|
|
a neat cape posted:Not sure why people don't think Mccaffery will be good Does he break tackles/make people miss? Stanford is known for a really good zone blocking scheme iirc, and I looked at their RBs since Shaw came in, McCaffrey's stats are best but several guys had 5+ ypc. The couple times I saw him he seemed to benefit a lot from the scheme. edit: his 10 reps on the bench press are 1st percentile  an NFL RB probably should have a strong upper body
ragle fucked around with this message at 22:21 on Apr 6, 2017 |
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 22:04
|
|
|
Dave is obsessed with measurables, no way does he take an RB with none at 8th overall.
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 22:40
|
|
|
zimbomonkey posted:Dave is obsessed with measurables, no way does he take an RB with none at 8th overall. Tattoos: 0 Skin Color: White Good enough!
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 22:48
|
|
|
The Panthers have said their top priority is to protect Cam from getting hit as much this season. That means two things: improving pass protection and getting him help in the run game. No way we take a RB who projects to be a 10-12 carry guy who will come off the field in short yardage situations. Fournette could take 75% of those short yardage runs from Cam and we would still be effective.
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 23:04
|
|
|
hot take central itt
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 23:36
|
|
|
Id rather them draft oj howard too high
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 23:56
|
|
|
the best players to draft are the ones who do well after signing With any of the teams and really just playing some good stinking football, or a different sport if thats what they wind up doing. hell i'm just speculating edit It looks like i actually was thinking of 'free agency' instead of the draft. I dont know what the hell the other one is edit 2 well i've figured things out and it even applies to the previous situation most likely. Cavauro fucked around with this message at 00:14 on Apr 7, 2017 |
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2017 00:05
|
|
|
MakaVillian posted:Michael Lombardi's draft secrets: The Lombardi GM'd Browns had Brandon Weeden, Jason Campbell and Brian Hoyer. Lombardi added Hoyer and Campbell. Yup should listen to ths.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2017 00:19
|
|
|
Cavauro posted:the best players to draft are the ones who do well after signing With any of the teams and really just playing some good stinking football, or a different sport if thats what they wind up doing. hell i'm just speculating 
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2017 00:25
|
|
|
Cavauro posted:the best players to draft are the ones who do well after signing With any of the teams and really just playing some good stinking football, or a different sport if thats what they wind up doing. hell i'm just speculating Yeah this is about right for a Bengals fan
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2017 00:32
|
|
|
I think the first QB off the board this year is Kizer. Most NFL ready out of the big bodied QBs and a bunch of coaches probably believe they can mold him. Then probably Trubisky. I just don't see Watson going that high but watch me eat crow when some franchise is dumb as gently caress with him.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2017 00:41
|
|
|
Flikken posted:The Lombardi GM'd Browns had Brandon Weeden, Jason Campbell and Brian Hoyer. Lombardi added Hoyer and Campbell. Yup should listen to ths. Weeden wasn't a 3 year starter and only proves Lombardi's methodology is sound. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2017 00:43
|
|
|
Ches Neckbeard posted:Weeden wasn't a 3 year starter and only proves Lombardi's methodology is sound. Or Weeden just...sucked?
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2017 00:59
|
|
|
Amy Pole Her posted:Yeah this is about right for a Bengals fan andey!!!
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2017 01:29
|
|
|
GOT HIM
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2017 01:34
|
|
|
Yeah maybe Mcaffery will be good, but taking any RB in the top 10 short of like a Peterson talent in TYOOL 2017 is a huge waste of resources.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2017 03:14
|
|
|
Just take Fournette ffs.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2017 03:42
|
|
|
I think the concern is that fournette won't make it to 8.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2017 04:19
|
|
|
Is this the year? In three weeks when the draft starts is it finally going to be the day TFF spontaneously combusts when three RBs are taken in the top 10?
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2017 04:29
|
|
|
Strobe posted:Is this the year? In three weeks when the draft starts is it finally going to be the day TFF spontaneously combusts when three RBs are taken in the top 10? Probably not, no. It'll be the year I stay up way too late to watch the Chiefs first round selection, only for them to trade out of the first round. Oh that was last year.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2017 04:31
|
|
|
zimbomonkey posted:I think the concern is that fournette won't make it to 8. Than you take cook. Mccaffery would be good for someone like belichick or reid. Its retarded putting him in Shula's offense.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2017 04:47
|
|
|
BlindSite posted:Than you take cook. Cook is a walking IR list attendee
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2017 04:51
|
|
|
howard or adams Run a two tight end set and find some running back to follow up jonathan stewart, or set up your secondary for the next five years bing bong so simple
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2017 04:53
|
|
|
FizFashizzle posted:howard or adams That works for me too. Or just try like gently caress to trade back. That two tight end set we had with shockey and olsen when chud ran the offense gets my dick hard just thinking about it.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2017 05:08
|
|
|
Yea but Cecil Lammey is a loving idiot though
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2017 05:21
|
|
|
FizFashizzle posted:howard or adams No way Adams falls to 8 after running a sub 4.4. He might not fall past 3. Fournette might not fall past 5-6 since he also had a good Pro Day. I think realistically it's Fournette if he is there, or one of the corners or DEs.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2017 05:23
|
|
|
FizFashizzle posted:howard or adams I don't think Adams would ever happen... DG doesn't seem to value safeties at all and we just signed Mike Adams so he's probably thinking "good enough." But FUUUUUCKKKK I want Jamal Adams.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2017 05:33
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 21:37 |
|
|
Slowpoke! posted:No way Adams falls to 8 after running a sub 4.4. He might not fall past 3. Fournette might not fall past 5-6 since he also had a good Pro Day. Corners won't happen either, at least not at 8. They would want to let worley get the chance to develop into a number 2 for at least one more year before going back to that well. I could definitely see Barnett being the pick if Fournette isn't available. Also Fiz, I'm loling at the idea that shula could effectively use a 2 TE set.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2017 05:36
|
|