|
Vanilla Mint Ice posted:If he just wants to play pendant dragon than forte isn't super necessary. I'll post my deck later tonight, it's pretty cheap with no legends and wins most games on turns 8-9. I don't just want to play meme decks, but it's quite fun at the moment. Here's the video with the decklist btw: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Jx6EKP8Eqw&t=60s I haven't really commit to a class yet but I have 2 Sibyl's, and Ouroboros and most of the other ramp Dragon cards. I'm tempted to just craft the Bahumuts and make a real ramp deck.
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2017 00:01
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2024 22:23 |
|
|
If you're ever going to spend money on the game, I highly recommend buying the precon decks for the legendaries you want to use (IE Forte.) From a value standpoint you come out way ahead of spending the same amount on packs and hoping to get enough dust or the legendary you want.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2017 00:12
|
|
|
running into turn 5 syb into a turn 6 ouroboros in take two, 2 games in a row, is super fun
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2017 00:16
|
|
|
moush posted:I don't just want to play meme decks, but it's quite fun at the moment. Yeah that's the type of deck I suspected people would try to figure out, which is a hard ramp to go for a pendant grimnir finish but I suspected it isn't super good because of a reliance of a card that you have no way of searching for. So people gotta put in alternative stuff like storm and ouroburos. Here's my pet deck which I've refined for months and is the closest thing to a completely original deck that I came up with:  It's pretty budget. You play defensively for first six turns and go on the offense starting on turn 7. Either you win by 8-9 or don't. Games rarely hit 10pp for me. The only card I haven't experimented with adding to this deck is sycther
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2017 00:30
|
|
|
Just went test of strength > heavenly aegis > bahamut in take two. Now I'M the piece of poo poo This format is awful
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2017 15:11
|
|
|
Jimmy Hats posted:running into turn 5 syb into a turn 6 ouroboros in take two, 2 games in a row, is super fun Please ban Ouroboros from Take Two.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 03:48
|
|
|
Dias posted:Please ban Ouroboros
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 12:01
|
|
|
 Finally did it. Mostly on the back of sword and shadow, with honorable mention to rune and forest before their nerfs.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 19:15
|
|
|
Just pulled an animated Minthe from a pack 
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 21:35
|
|
|
Zoe works pretty well in a storm havencraft. Play her turn 3 into a turn 4 octobishop to add some good pressure.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 22:44
|
|
|
Jimmy Hats posted:Just pulled an animated Minthe from a pack She blinks, by the way.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2017 19:02
|
|
|
7 hours if rerolls and this is the only time I got more than 4 legendaries. Please tell me this is okay to start with. Aurelia 1x Otohime 1x Nephthys 1x Daria 1x Bahamut 1x Dragonsong flute 1x Crystalia Tia 1x Sybil 1x Maelstrom 1x
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 01:00
|
|
|
It's fine
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 01:20
|
|
|
I'd keep that. It's got some power legendaries, but it's also a bit spread out.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 02:40
|
|
|
TheTromboner posted:7 hours if rerolls and this is the only time I got more than 4 legendaries. Please tell me this is okay to start with. I rerolled on and off for three days and in hindsight probably should have just jumped on the first decent roll I had. (although I was rerolling at work so really it wasn't much of a loss) I started with 2x Albert, Seraph, Cerberus, Odin, Neph (animated), Bloodhungry Matriarch and Alexander. Since starting from free packs I've picked up 2x Ancient Elf, Eidolon of Madness, Rose Queen, 2x Jeanne D'Arc, Merlin, Fairy Princess, Deepwood Anomaly, Ouroboros, Maelstrom Serpent, Mythril Golem, Fafnir and Heavenly Aegis. I have sixteen Take Two tickets to spend when I have time as well so that's likely to yield a couple more. Most of those legendaries are bad, but you're going to pull a ton of them off free packs. It's not like Hearthstone where legendaries are few and far between.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 04:08
|
|
|
Depends on your luck, really. I've had tons of luck in RoB, and absolutely none in TotG.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 04:35
|
|
|
I havent opened an animated legendary in 200 packs. Great luck otherwise though.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 18:34
|
|
|
playing versus the shadowcracft aggro 7 games in a row is really fun and good
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2017 23:35
|
|
|
Jimmy Hats posted:playing versus the shadowcracft aggro 7 games in a row is really fun and good Feels better than playing against Ramp Dragon with their new support.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 00:46
|
|
|
Built an Aggro Blood deck for the new expansion since it's always been my favorite class. It absolutely crushes Dragon, but the matchup vs Aggro Shadow is terrible. Is there a way to tech this against Shadow without sacrificing too much against Dragon? FWIW, Yurius and Alpha Wolfman both feel kind of marginal in this. https://shadowverse-portal.com/deck...6Fm.6F6Fm.6F6Fm
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 03:12
|
|
|
The tech against Shadow is Hungering Horde to eat all the skelemans at onces
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 03:33
|
|
|
pacmania90 posted:Built an Aggro Blood deck for the new expansion since it's always been my favorite class. It absolutely crushes Dragon, but the matchup vs Aggro Shadow is terrible. Is there a way to tech this against Shadow without sacrificing too much against Dragon? FWIW, Yurius and Alpha Wolfman both feel kind of marginal in this. This is what I'm running and Aggro Shadow seems to be a coin flip. https://shadowverse-portal.com/deck...pFW.5_pFW.5_pFW Spiderweb Imp is huge, such an insane card. The ability to throw down a 1/4 taunt and just go face with everything is a huge difference maker.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 03:42
|
|
|
BGrifter posted:This is what I'm running and Aggro Shadow seems to be a coin flip. As aggro-shadow scum player I have to say that yeah, the only thing that can save blood's rear end are those imps (hungering horde is cute but not really as effective). In any case, the game is definitely in shadow's favor.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 07:38
|
|
|
Aegis + Test of Strength is the most bullshit interaction ever. Aegis would have been great just as "this card cannot be destroyed or banished", the bullshit extra wording just means that they'll have to look really really closely at every Neutral and Haven card from now on to make sure it doesn't make Aegis too good
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 10:33
|
|
|
frakeaing HAMSTER DANCE posted:Aegis + Test of Strength is the most bullshit interaction ever. Eh, test of strength was pretty much specifically printed for Aegis, no other card can really take advantage of it as well. And the bullshit extra wording is what makes Aegis actually decent (right now Haven is the dumpster class, it can fend off shadow sometimes but it loses horribly to anything else that is not a slow-rear end control deck, specially blood, goddamn, that is a massacre) As for being careful about future interactions, haven is partly based on white from mtg and taking advantage of that kind of asymmetries is pretty much what it does, so I'm sure the developers have a lot of experience with that. trucutru fucked around with this message at 11:22 on Apr 11, 2017 |
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 11:18
|
|
|
Test of Strength seems like an anti-aggro card on its face. I don't think its primary purpose was to make an Aegis player untouchable
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 11:29
|
|
|
frakeaing HAMSTER DANCE posted:Test of Strength seems like an anti-aggro card on its face. I don't think its primary purpose was to make an Aegis player untouchable Test of strength is specifically worded to make it work with Aegis, they did it on purpose. It could just grant all minions ward or something and it wouldn't work with aegis, but they didn't do that.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 14:48
|
|
|
Indecisive posted:Test of strength is specifically worded to make it work with Aegis, they did it on purpose. It could just grant all minions ward or something and it wouldn't work with aegis, but they didn't do that. I thought it was more of how it was coded, where it should affect the leaders and their choices for attacks, they decided to make it a debuff to every unit instead.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 15:00
|
|
|
It's really, really lame that it doesn't affect aegis. I never wanted to live in a world where I'm forced to pack geryon in my deck @_@
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 15:20
|
|
|
Indecisive posted:Test of strength is specifically worded to make it work with Aegis, they did it on purpose. It could just grant all minions ward or something and it wouldn't work with aegis, but they didn't do that. No, Aegis is specifically worded to not be negatively affected by it. Because Aegis is a very poorly designed card
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 15:41
|
|
|
For those running aggro/vengeance blood, how are the matchups at the moment? So far in the meta, I've just seen tons and tons of shadow (aggro/midrange), and dragon (ramp, obviously), and some sprinklings of the others.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 15:59
|
|
|
Generally, Aggro Blood wins against control and loses against other aggro decks. It really depends on if you can safely trigger vengeance. Sun Haven and Control Blood can beat you, but they have to draw really well.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 16:39
|
|
|
Aggro blood is really weak you should be playing OTK blood, the best blood.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 17:21
|
|
|
Yukari posted:For those running aggro/vengeance blood, how are the matchups at the moment? So far in the meta, I've just seen tons and tons of shadow (aggro/midrange), and dragon (ramp, obviously), and some sprinklings of the others. I'm playing at low ranks so it's probably not super indicative of the actual meta, but Aggro Shadow tends to be a coin flip, I crush Aggro Sword and most of the Ramp Dragon I've encountered would be about to stabilize one turn late. The Dragon lists in particular tend to let me goldfish for the first four turns, which tends to work out well. These are probably poorly optimized versions of the decks though and missing cards.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 17:41
|
|
|
I now have 3 Elf Queens, the legendary that nobody could ever want 3 copies of. E; One of them is animated tho
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 22:19
|
|
|
lol, went to reddit to check for news or whatever and they are in the middle of a "should porn be allowed in here?" storm. Never change 
trucutru fucked around with this message at 07:34 on Apr 12, 2017 |
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 07:31
|
|
|
Shadow goes first Turn 1 - Skull Beast Turn 2 - Goblin x2 Turn 3 - Catacomb Turn 4 - Skeleton Warrior, Catacomb This feels like bullshit. Is there anything in the game that can beat Shadow when they have a good draw going first?
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 17:53
|
|
|
pacmania90 posted:Shadow goes first Can the same not be said for literally any deck in any card game??
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 18:03
|
|
|
pacmania90 posted:Shadow goes first Blazing Breath, Unica, grimnir, Rahab/Dragon Warrior, sibyl. Why do I say this? It's happened to me being that shadow player that got the above draw.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 18:06
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2024 22:23 |
|
|
pacmania90 posted:Shadow goes first Yes, haven can banish all that with a single card.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 18:39
|
|