|
Oh yeah whatever happened to the Bernie REVOLUTION initiative that was happening after he lost the primary? Last I heard all the good staff left because Bernie put that bald dude with a beard that ran his campaign in charge of it or something?
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 18:22
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 07:33 |
|
|
Reminder that there are bernies all over the country arguing about socialism in your nearest JCC (clothing incredibly optional)
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 18:23
|
|
|
fits my needs posted:Oh yeah whatever happened to the Bernie REVOLUTION initiative that was happening after he lost the primary? Last I heard all the good staff left because Bernie put that bald dude with a beard that ran his campaign in charge of it or something? The DSA is well on its way to quadrupling it's membership since the election and progressive groups are taking local politics over all over the country They're also terrifying people like Schumer into voting correctly
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 18:25
|
|
|
fits my needs posted:Oh yeah whatever happened to the Bernie REVOLUTION initiative that was happening after he lost the primary? Last I heard all the good staff left because Bernie put that bald dude with a beard that ran his campaign in charge of it or something? our revolution had potential, but they made it a 501(c)(4), which basically made the entire thing useless since it can't coordinate with the campaigns it's endorsing.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 18:27
|
|
|
Concerned Citizen posted:our revolution had potential, but they made it a 501(c)(4), which basically made the entire thing useless since it can't coordinate with the campaigns it's endorsing.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 18:27
|
|
|
The 2016 election is so simple to understand for people who aren't middle class internet nerds or gender studies majors. People are pissed at DC and politicians in general. Hill was a "establishment" candidate and Trump was not. Look at the 2000 election for gently caress's sake. Look at the 2008 election even.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 18:37
|
|
|
Webb!
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 18:41
|
|
|
The Webb brand is strong
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 18:43
|
|
|
ThndrShk2k posted:Good. not really sure why that's great? there are legal structures that existed prior to citizens united that would allow grassroots organzations to coordinate with campaigns so that they don't duplicate mobilization/persuasion efforts. see this interview from one of the our revolution candidates that quit: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-adNZoiREsM as someone who works in field, if someone said "hey i want to run a program where enthusiastic but not necessarily knowledgable out-of-state voters flood your state with phone calls without coordinating with your program" i would tell them to gently caress off, because 1. call quantity is not difficult to get, and they would only be annoying voters we had already spoken to on the same day and 2. we would not be able to ensure they received proper training on our campaign messaging, which could be counter-productive. i had a situation once where an independent expenditure decided to hire a call center to call into our state on our behalf, and i spent at least an hour every day explaining to people coming in with complaints that we literally cannot stop these people from contacting them even if we wanted to.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 18:45
|
|
|
ThndrShk2k posted:Good.  cc thinks citizens united was a good thing, hence his lmaoable defense of the brocktopus
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 18:46
|
|
|
Gene Hackman Fan posted:
i don't think citizens united was a good thing, and the types of groups that were enabled by citizens united would similarly be poor legal structures for our revolution. in fact, our revolution's c4 status is only possible because of the CU decision. prior to CU, it would not have been able to endorse candidates! (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 18:48
|
|
|
Concerned Citizen posted:i don't think citizens united was a good thing, and the types of groups that were enabled by citizens united would similarly be poor legal structures for our revolution. in fact, our revolution's c4 status is only possible because of the CU decision. prior to CU, it would not have been able to endorse candidates! that's nice, dear.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 18:57
|
|
|
well gently caress me i didn't realize that was that big (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 19:01
|
|
|
It's a great wall (of image) and will surely stir the qcs concern trolls
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 19:03
|
|
|
Business Gorillas posted:Bernie isn't a master politician, he's an angry zaidie that has been ranting about this poo poo for the past 60 years and would still be doing it even if he got 1% of the vote. ding ding ding Bernie isn't some super special awesome political genius, he's just a guy who sees it how it is and tells it how it is and doesn't really understand why everyone else hasn't gotten on board yet even though he's been preachin' it for a quarter-century
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 19:07
|
|
|
waaait... did... did baloogan just probate himself?
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 19:10
|
|
|
look at his rap sheet, it's not for the first time
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 19:12
|
|
|
Gene Hackman Fan posted:waaait... did... did baloogan just probate himself? after years of bad dems it really is weird seeing someone hold themselves accountable isn't it?
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 19:18
|
|
|
Gene Hackman Fan posted:waaait... did... did baloogan just probate himself again this week? ftfy
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 19:18
|
|
|
If I were ik or mod or whatever I would be probing myself all the time Just kidding im gonna probe myself regardless of forum status
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 19:30
|
|
|
Baloogan posted:she collapsed on 911 and there were no explosives Baloogan posted:gwb was there tho Gene Hackman Fan posted:her figurative collapse was a literal inside job  All good posts.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 20:26
|
|
|
Frijolero posted:The 2016 election is so simple to understand for people who aren't middle class internet nerds or gender studies majors. Her campaign staff thought Trump is Scary and Abuela is Obama v2.0 would be enough to turn out the vote.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 20:35
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/status/849276093932732417
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 20:50
|
|
|
huh. just like poo poo candidate to start doing product placement on her twitter
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 20:57
|
|
|
Jesus christ.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 20:58
|
|
|
bernie never got me a good deal on almond butter
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 20:58
|
|
|
lol
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 20:59
|
|
|
whatever you do, dont read the thread the cult is very real
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 21:00
|
|
|
lol
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 21:01
|
|
|
Excellent parody account
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 21:01
|
|
|
Hmm how could people possibly get the idea that the Democrats are the party of the wealthy professional class?
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 21:02
|
|
|
No single payer, paid family leave and Planned Parenthood is getting defunded. But don't worry Abuela will get you some discount coupons for online shopping to make up for it.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 21:05
|
|
|
Lastgirl posted:whatever you do, dont read the thread fool, i havent read in years!!!!!!!!
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 21:07
|
|
|
Lastgirl posted:whatever you do, dont read the thread https://twitter.com/SBRCelebrityArt/status/849276484145618945
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 21:07
|
|
|
Could some please kindly explain what the problem with Tulsi is?
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 21:11
|
|
|
Pinbacker posted:Could some please kindly explain what the problem with Tulsi is? She bathes in muslim blood to retain her beauty.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 21:18
|
|
|
Pinbacker posted:Could some please kindly explain what the problem with Tulsi is? She abandoned Abuela and then defended the same dictators that any other Democrat defended in the past, except this time Trump did it too so she's bad.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 21:22
|
|
|
Pinbacker posted:Could some please kindly explain what the problem with Tulsi is? She combines a certain amount of economic progressiveness with really, really, really hating Muslims. A lot.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 21:22
|
|
|
Gabbard stans are very nearly as pathetic as Clinton sycophants
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 21:29
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 07:33 |
|
|
Is a Gabbard stan someone who likes Gabbard? TIA
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2017 21:31
|
|