|
Lockback posted:Yeah, selection bias is a helluva thing. But kids that age act like kids that age. This has been true for generations, and it's true almost entirely globally. I'm not going to pretend I was any different. I was a big idiot for a long time.
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 19:48
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 13:45 |
|
|
Wait you guys are on grandma's side? Regardless of how you feel about baby pictures if the parents ask you not to do something don't do it. It's a very bad precedent, grandma has no "rights" to post pictures, and relatives that add undue burden to new parents are terrible. It's not an unreasonable request (like withholding vaccines or something) and if she had an issue with it she could have talked about it instead of steamrolling the parents.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 19:50
|
|
|
the parents are exactly how anyone raised by people like grandma could be expected to grow up
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 19:54
|
|
|
derra posted:Wait you guys are on grandma's side? Regardless of how you feel about baby pictures if the parents ask you not to do something don't do it. It's a very bad precedent, grandma has no "rights" to post pictures, and relatives that add undue burden to new parents are terrible. It's not an unreasonable request (like withholding vaccines or something) and if she had an issue with it she could have talked about it instead of steamrolling the parents. Too bad they couldn't work it out like adults.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 19:55
|
|
|
derra posted:Wait you guys are on grandma's side? Regardless of how you feel about baby pictures if the parents ask you not to do something don't do it. It's a very bad precedent, grandma has no "rights" to post pictures, and relatives that add undue burden to new parents are terrible. It's not an unreasonable request (like withholding vaccines or something) and if she had an issue with it she could have talked about it instead of steamrolling the parents. You're right, and she probably will try to raise the grandchild her own way and ignore their input forever if this isn't nipped in the bud now, but oh my god is it hard to sympathize with the whiniest babies in this story (the parents).
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 19:56
|
|
|
Leon Einstein posted:Are you aware that photographers retain the rights to their pictures, not the subjects? So yes, grandma absolutely has that "right". are you aware that "correcting" someone with completely wrong information is the #1 cause of looking dumb as hell on the Internet
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 19:59
|
|
|
derra posted:Wait you guys are on grandma's side? Regardless of how you feel about baby pictures if the parents ask you not to do something don't do it. It's a very bad precedent, grandma has no "rights" to post pictures, and relatives that add undue burden to new parents are terrible. It's not an unreasonable request (like withholding vaccines or something) and if she had an issue with it she could have talked about it instead of steamrolling the parents. Yeah, even if one of the reasons for the request is stupid, it's not an unreasonable request.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 20:00
|
|
|
Facebook is really just an online baby catalog for baby snatchers. Make sure that nobody wants your baby by giving the baby a large ugly facial scar.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 20:00
|
|
|
They have a 1 month old baby, who required an extended hospital stay. They are new parents adjusting to a crying baby and are exhausted. They had an unwanted houseguest who keeps trampling over their wishes. I give their story more credibility because it's the wife complaining about her mom and I assume she knows what grandma is like as a parent. Sure I wouldn't bitch on reddit about it but otherwise I'm completely on their side.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 20:01
|
|
|
I just figured it went without saying grandma is over the line and #1 most likely candidate to actually try to steal the baby but we're not a courtroom and that's less funny so
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 20:02
|
|
|
You can't keep that baby out of public forever, and legally you can take pictures of people in public. So you might as well learn to deal with it now, while your all natural baby is still snatchable.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 20:02
|
|
|
A Wizard of Goatse posted:are you aware that "correcting" someone with completely wrong information is the #1 cause of looking dumb as hell on the Internet
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 20:03
|
|
|
And all that is before grandma accused the father of thinking baby was ugly. Well, you can't take the pictures back, but this should be very instructive on how much access grandma should have in the future.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 20:05
|
|
|
model releases aren't a courtesy, Gawker didn't just give Hulk Hogan all their money because they felt bad about upsetting him, there's pretty extensively defined law on the conditions under which you can and can't distribute pictures of another person, and sneaking pictures of a baby in its house against the express wishes of its parents is firmly on the 'can't' side; you don't have any clue what you're talking about
A Wizard of Goatse fucked around with this message at 20:10 on Apr 11, 2017 |
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 20:06
|
|
|
They all sound like they deserve each other. That poor child.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 20:08
|
|
|
What a conundrum. If the baby gets snatched, it will spend its life in a dungeon, imprisoned by a twisted kidnapper. If the baby avoids snatching, it will spend its life in a dungeon, imprisoned by its paranoid parents to keep it safe from baby snatchers.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 20:10
|
|
|
A Wizard of Goatse posted:model releases aren't a courtesy, Gawker didn't just give Hulk Hogan all their money because they felt bad about upsetting him, there's pretty extensively defined law on the conditions under which you can and can't distribute pictures of another person, and sneaking pictures of a baby in its house against the express wishes of its parents is firmly on the 'can't' side; you don't have any clue what you're talking about
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 20:13
|
|
|
derra posted:They have a 1 month old baby, who required an extended hospital stay. They are new parents adjusting to a crying baby and are exhausted. They had an unwanted houseguest who keeps trampling over their wishes. I give their story more credibility because it's the wife complaining about her mom and I assume she knows what grandma is like as a parent. 100% correct. everyone shut the gently caress up about what is and isn't "legal" and recognize that these two struggle muppets need a loving nap.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 20:15
|
|
|
The dad doesn't even have a problem with the pictures! *Goons immediately focus on baby-snatching, ignore all the obnoxious things grandma is doing while she stomps her feet about Facebook posting rights*
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 20:18
|
|
|
^^ It jumps out much like a mom choosing not to vaccinate because of autism. I'd have more sympathy if the reason wasn't fear of childhood abduction, lol. Leon Einstein fucked around with this message at 20:21 on Apr 11, 2017 |
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 20:19
|
|
|
Is the "Grandma should have gotten a release form to prevent people from wanting to steal babby" in the top quintile of dumbest derails in this thread or no? It's hard to keep track. I wanted to not accidentally get a handjob while getting a massage from a Korean senior citizen, but then I did and I know why... Cause I got high Because I got high Because I got high I [27] received a happy ending at one of the most well reviewed/well known spas in Manhattan the day my wife [23] went out of town. I really need input on how to deal with what feels like irreparable damage to our relationship. quote:First, let me explain our relationship. We’ve been married for about a year and it has been everything I could have hoped. She is absolutely the love of my life. I could go on and on about how amazing our relationship has been but you can take me at my word. We do everything together and are fairly codependent, but in a good way for the time-being.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 20:19
|
|
|
Leon Einstein posted:Yeah, grandma putting pics of her grandkid on FB is totally analogous to Hulk Hogan being secretly recorded having sex. Totally the same thing. I'm sure grandma is going to be destroyed in court. correct, she would.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 20:19
|
|
|
A Wizard of Goatse posted:model releases aren't a courtesy, Gawker didn't just give Hulk Hogan all their money because they felt bad about upsetting him, there's pretty extensively defined law on the conditions under which you can and can't distribute pictures of another person, and sneaking pictures of a baby in its house against the express wishes of its parents is firmly on the 'can't' side; you don't have any clue what you're talking about The paparazzi can only function because public spaces can be photographed and those photographs distributed. I didn't say that taking pictures in the house was protected, but I am saying that you cannot keep that baby out of public spaces, so if that grandma wants pictures, by God she is going to get them. So you might as will deal with the idea that your baby is going to get his picture taken and suck it the gently caress up.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 20:20
|
|
|
Also I would laugh in my husband's face if he went high to get a massage and accidentally got jerked off by an elderly Korean and cried
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 20:23
|
|
|
derra posted:The dad doesn't even have a problem with the pictures! This Facebook is loving cancer and it brings out the worst in old people
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 20:24
|
|
|
Pick posted:The paparazzi can only function because public spaces can be photographed and those photographs distributed. I didn't say that taking pictures in the house was protected, but I am saying that you cannot keep that baby out of public spaces, so if that grandma wants pictures, by God she is going to get them. So you might as will deal with the idea that your baby is going to get his picture taken and suck it the gently caress up. There's a huge loving difference between someone taking a picture with you in it and someone taking pictures of your child, specifically, and posting them on social media. It would still be poo poo to take pictures against someone's stated wishes in the first case mind you
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 20:25
|
|
|
Pick posted:The paparazzi can only function because public spaces can be photographed and those photographs distributed. I didn't say that taking pictures in the house was protected, but I am saying that you cannot keep that baby out of public spaces, so if that grandma wants pictures, by God she is going to get them. So you might as will deal with the idea that your baby is going to get his picture taken and suck it the gently caress up. the paparazzi take picture of public figures from public land. Two big variables.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 20:27
|
|
|
Pick posted:The paparazzi can only function because public spaces can be photographed and those photographs distributed. I didn't say that taking pictures in the house was protected, but I am saying that you cannot keep that baby out of public spaces, so if that grandma wants pictures, by God she is going to get them. So you might as will deal with the idea that your baby is going to get his picture taken and suck it the gently caress up. yeah sure you have no hope of eliminating all record of your babby's existence indefinitely that was in response to the paint chips for breakfast crew's "um ACTUALLY anyone who manages to snap a photo of you gains total ownership of your image and probably your soul". if some creeper is sneaking pictures of your infant and posting them online then whether you have a reasonable grasp of risk and modern medicine or not, you don't have to just suck it up because some creeper will get in eventually. Lockback posted:Is the "Grandma should have gotten a release form to prevent people from wanting to steal babby" in the top quintile of dumbest derails in this thread or no? It's hard to keep track. cmon this isn't difficult https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1u4oXXL1a5A
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 20:28
|
|
|
"hey mom can you not post pictures of our kid online?" "excuse me? my copyright lawyer and i will see your rear end in court!"
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 20:28
|
|
|
Pick posted:Also I would laugh in my husband's face if he went high to get a massage and accidentally got jerked off by an elderly Korean and cried She needs space because she doesn't want to laugh so hard she pisses herself when she sees him again.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 20:29
|
|
|
Lockback posted:I [27] received a happy ending at one of the most well reviewed/well known spas in Manhattan the day my wife [23] went out of town. I really need input on how to deal with what feels like irreparable damage to our relationship. Read this again; he booked a massage and a day he knew it was going to be very "difficult for him" because he was so distraught that his wife would be gone for a week.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 20:29
|
|
|
I don't even know about this one. If you feel like skipping the content you get the gist from the title. My(27F) boyfriends(27M) bestfriend(27M) ate my betta fish quote:I am still in shock. This happened over the weekend. My boyfriend of 8 months, Ill call him Joe, and I planned to have people over and enjoy the weather by making a bonfire in my back yard. The party was going well and Joe had all his close friends attend. His closes friend, Ill call him Richard, and I have always been cordial but I find him loud and obnoxious and generally just do not like him. There are many reasons why I do not like him including him telling me very inappropriate jokes about women and weight that I do not find funny, him calling me an inappropriate name, him disrespecting my relationship with Joe by bringing up Joe's past relationships, him keeping a pair of prescription glasses accidentally left at his house, the list goes on. Although I do not care for Richard I have always encouraged Joe and his friendship.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 20:30
|
|
|
mods change my name to "abducted baby sex tape trial" and if that's too long, "fisheater friend-in-law" the bitcoin of weed fucked around with this message at 20:34 on Apr 11, 2017 |
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 20:31
|
|
|
Lockback posted:I don't even know about this one. If you feel like skipping the content you get the gist from the title. im sorry this is just hilarious lol
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 20:33
|
|
|
Yeah the biggest issue his wife is going to have is ever taking him seriously again. I'm kind of impressed by the massage therapist's man milking skills, though. That's nigh industrial levels of precision and pumping expertise.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 20:34
|
|
|
Lockback posted:I don't even know about this one. If you feel like skipping the content you get the gist from the title. don't skip the content it's the 'what does this lawyer seek to gain from having sex with me' of pet eating
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 20:34
|
|
|
fish eating one is bizarre, good thing her dog was with her No self-awareness on this one: Not sure what my [m34] neighbor [f 20] is up to for the past few months. Been showing her self in the most minimalistic of clothing either in her back yard / pool and also notice her quite often in her room/home (when no is around) walking bare. What is she trying to get at?
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 20:34
|
|
|
Tiny Deer posted:Yeah the biggest issue his wife is going to have is ever taking him seriously again. I want to meet her and shake her hand (after she's washed them. And I'm wearing two pairs of gloves, but still.)
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 20:36
|
|
|
the fact that it includes the guy planning a sitcom caper of replacing the fish puts it into  territory
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 20:36
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 13:45 |
|
|
Jeffrey of YOSPOS posted:fish eating one is bizarre, good thing her dog was with her  NOT TRYING TO gently caress YOU THAT'S FOR SURE BUD
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 20:36
|
|