|
Jippa posted:ross is qualified to play for nigeria if he wanted completely false
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2017 23:05
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 31, 2024 22:04 |
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 00:46
|
|
|
chitoryu12 posted:I looked it up and yeah, you're right. As soon as they get restricted, that revenue gets cut off completely. I don't get this. Why would/should ad revenue stop just because all viewers are 18+?
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 01:28
|
|
|
Because you are underestimating the percentage of youtube viewers who are bored pre-teens. Even if they aren't following age guidelines, youtube has to pretend they do.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 01:38
|
|
|
ElGroucho posted:Because you are underestimating the percentage of youtube viewers who are bored pre-teens. Even if they aren't following age guidelines, youtube has to pretend they do. Still, it's not like, oh say, the 18-25 demographic isn't hotly sought after by advertisers. I know at least that much about how the traditional TV business works. Sucrose has a new favorite as of 01:50 on Apr 17, 2017 |
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 01:48
|
|
|
Plus, I imagine charmin or honda want to have their ads attached to a beheading or a barely non-pornographic fetish videos.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 01:50
|
|
|
Sucrose posted:I don't get this. Why would/should ad revenue stop just because all viewers are 18+? mXr had an update about it recently. It basically amounted to some advertisers discovered their ads on like hardcore terrorism videos and went ballistic. With the age restriction changes he took like an 80% revenue hit
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 01:59
|
|
|
Sucrose posted:I don't get this. Why would/should ad revenue stop just because all viewers are 18+? Ads can be pulled from videos if the advertiser doesn't want to be associated with the content. Traditionally, age restrictions were for things with sexual, violent, or vulgar content so restricted videos could safely be blocked from ad revenue. And then YouTube started restricting otherwise benign videos like guys doing target shooting or people talking about transgender rights.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 02:05
|
|
|
Vet Ranch is a good channel that helps animals that would otherwise be euthanized. They are funded by viewer donations and YouTube ad revenue. It's main viewership seems to be 8-15 year olds and the comments are one of the more positive places. They warn when there's graphic surgery footage, but it's done clinically. Little blood, sheets covering non-surgical areas, that sort of thing. Putting it on the restricted list is asinine, and if YouTube wants to curate content, they need a way more granular system. I can understand parents not wanting their kids not to see the content, but Vet Ranch being on the same list as videos discussing ISIS?
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 03:55
|
|
|
Avenging_Mikon posted:Vet Ranch is a good channel that helps animals that would otherwise be euthanized. They are funded by viewer donations and YouTube ad revenue. It's main viewership seems to be 8-15 year olds and the comments are one of the more positive places. They warn when there's graphic surgery footage, but it's done clinically. Little blood, sheets covering non-surgical areas, that sort of thing. Putting it on the restricted list is asinine, and if YouTube wants to curate content, they need a way more granular system. I can understand parents not wanting their kids not to see the content, but Vet Ranch being on the same list as videos discussing ISIS? You have to sign up through like three screens for this restricted mode. It's not like it just disappeared for the internet at large.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 05:02
|
|
|
Takes No Damage posted:Commuting through Dallas every day, I often wish I could beat the poo poo out of my fellow motorists with the only consequence being brief unemployment. Or better yet, paid administrative leave 
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 06:09
|
|
|
Avenging_Mikon posted:Vet Ranch is a good channel that helps animals that would otherwise be euthanized. They are funded by viewer donations and YouTube ad revenue. It's main viewership seems to be 8-15 year olds and the comments are one of the more positive places. They warn when there's graphic surgery footage, but it's done clinically. Little blood, sheets covering non-surgical areas, that sort of thing. Putting it on the restricted list is asinine, and if YouTube wants to curate content, they need a way more granular system. I can understand parents not wanting their kids not to see the content, but Vet Ranch being on the same list as videos discussing ISIS?  Meanwhile in Denmark....mod edit: Tag this sort of thing next time. Somebody has a new favorite as of 15:07 on Apr 17, 2017 |
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 06:11
|
|
|
chitoryu12 posted:Ads can be pulled from videos if the advertiser doesn't want to be associated with the content. Traditionally, age restrictions were for things with sexual, violent, or vulgar content so restricted videos could safely be blocked from ad revenue. IMO what Youtube really needs to do is add more internal filters, like "kid-unfriendly content" vs "offensive content." Somebody saying "gently caress" a few times or somebody firing off a gun or somebody mentioning sex shouldn't go in the same category as "guy ranting about niggers."
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 06:13
|
|
|
Mezzanon posted:Hot Mic's strike again Rule number one of broadcasting. THE MIC IS ALWAYS HOT
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 06:45
|
|
|
iospace posted:Rule number one of broadcasting. To be fair, Douggie Hamilton is one dumb motherfucker and has arguably caused Calgary both Stanley Cup playoff games with his bad penalties.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 07:18
|
|
|
JOHNSON COCKSLAP posted:completely false He isn't now because he plays for england but he could have couldn't he? A quick google says he was unless every one is going off the same wikipedia edit?
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 07:36
|
|
|
stop talking to farooq
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 07:39
|
|
|
I respect that you linked the image instead of inlining it, but please do tag it properly.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 09:21
|
|
|
I watched two manatee necropsies this year and I have to say they were some of the most fascinating experiences of my life. If ever I had the chance to help out with something like that beyond taking notes, I totally would.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 10:07
|
|
|
gently caress you
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 10:18
|
|
|
Mikl posted:
lol grow the gently caress up Dex has a new favorite as of 10:48 on Apr 17, 2017 |
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 10:45
|
|
|
What's the story on this?
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 10:49
|
|
|
RatHat posted:What's the story on this? https://www.theguardian.com/travel/2015/oct/15/danish-odense-zoo-dissection-lion
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 10:54
|
|
|
RatHat posted:What's the story on this? They're assembling a Frankenlion prior to reanimation.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 11:00
|
|
|
Maybe it's just because I grew up in a super hick area but it's really weird to me that showing the insides of an animal is considered controversial or to anyone of any age group. I was wondering if kids still get to dissect stuff in school but it's probably a felony to bring a scalpel into a school now or some poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 11:32
|
|
|
I've seen some Scandinavians kill and dissect a giraffe in a similar manner. They never seen to have very good reasons for killing the animals, but I guess they know more about zoo management than I do.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 11:35
|
|
|
PostNouveau posted:I've seen some Scandinavians kill and dissect a giraffe in a similar manner. They never seen to have very good reasons for killing the animals, but I guess they know more about zoo management than I do. The reason tends to be "this animal could flip out at any moment and kill all our specimens if kept in current conditions, and we have nowhere to relocate it". Which is very legitimate.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 12:01
|
|
|
Someone post it in the PYF lion thread.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 12:45
|
|
|
steinrokkan posted:The reason tends to be "this animal could flip out at any moment and kill all our specimens if kept in current conditions, and we have nowhere to relocate it". Which is very legitimate. Oh yeah that seems like a good reason. These lions were "They might gently caress each other and we don't want inbreeding, and they might kill each other." I think the inbreeding thing was the reason they killed the giraffe. Seems like neutering them is preferable, and they might kill each other unless we kill them first doesn't make sense. But I'm no zoologist. I doubt the zoo is just itching to kill animals. PostNouveau has a new favorite as of 13:04 on Apr 17, 2017 |
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 13:01
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 13:41
|
|
|
Dex posted:lol grow the gently caress up I don't particularly care about it, in my work I see dead / bloody / disemboweled animals p.often. But since this is PYF and not BYOB, some other people might neither expect not want to see animal guts first thing in the morning. Have some common courtesy and don't be a jerk.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 14:35
|
|
|
United Airlines just can't catch a break. http://www.khou.com/news/local/bride-and-groom-booted-off-united-flight-in-houston/431644313
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 14:57
|
|
|
10 Beers posted:United Airlines just can't catch a break. Catch a break or buy a clue?
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 15:00
|
|
|
I will never get tired of hero dad knocking out a child kicker.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 15:06
|
|
|
10 Beers posted:United Airlines just can't catch a break. quote:These passengers repeatedly attempted to sit in upgraded seating which they did not purchase 
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 15:10
|
|
|
Mikl posted:I don't particularly care about it, in my work I see dead / bloody / disemboweled animals p.often. But since this is PYF and not BYOB, some other people might neither expect not want to see animal guts first thing in the morning. Have some common courtesy and don't be a jerk. "ok, new day, here's hoping for a sweet video of some dude breaking his spine to get my day rolli- wait, what the gently caress, a dead animal? noooooooooo"
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 15:11
|
|
|
10 Beers posted:United Airlines just can't catch a break. Delta is smart and went the other way, now gate agents can offer up to $5000 cash and supervisors up to $9950 without management approval.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 15:14
|
|
|
10 Beers posted:United Airlines just can't catch a break. This is probably stuff that would've flown under the radar otherwise if the thing with the doctor last week hadn't happened. They're just having a real rough time of all of this now. This line says it all, really. quote:"The way United Airlines handled this was really absurb.”
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 15:17
|
|
|
Mephiston posted:Someone post it in the PYF lion thread. Oh man I would be so owned
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 15:19
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 31, 2024 22:04 |
|
|
SpacePig posted:This is probably stuff that would've flown under the radar otherwise if the thing with the doctor last week hadn't happened. They're just having a real rough time of all of this now. This line says it all, really. Exactly. They're compounding their mistakes at an impressive rate.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2017 15:47
|
|