|
Randy Moss owns
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2017 14:37
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 00:44 |
|
|
That is a very thinly veiled humble brag. "the last time we won 2 out of 3 superbowls  "
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2017 14:40
|
|
|
lmao here we goooo https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/855055509455593472
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2017 14:50
|
|
|
Volkerball posted:Made it all day without verbally assaulting someone serving me food tho posted at 8:40 in the morning...
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2017 14:55
|
|
|
Chilichimp posted:posted at 8:40 in the morning... I work nights you mother fucker.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2017 14:56
|
|
|
fsif posted:lmao here we goooo He's light about 20 players and a non-zero number of coaches/staff from the last Pats white house visit. He thinks he controls the optics on this, but only with fox viewers. It's fuckin' adorable 
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2017 14:56
|
|
|
Ah drat it. Well most the day
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2017 14:56
|
|
|
Look at those facial expressions.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2017 14:58
|
|
|
So beautiful, it's like The Creation of Adam.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2017 15:00
|
|
|
I'm sure the Jaguars will still get a prime-time game though.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2017 15:07
|
|
|
Lance of Llanwyln posted:I'm sure the Jaguars will still get a prime-time game though.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2017 15:10
|
|
|
Chilichimp posted:He's light about 20 players and a non-zero number of coaches/staff from the last Pats white house visit. He thinks he controls the optics on this, but only with fox viewers. Technically less people went. The problem is the NYT showed pictures out of context (no coaches/staff in the group photo) which makes it seem like a substantially smaller group. That is what fake news is.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2017 15:14
|
|
|
Nixing the "every team gets a prime time game" rule is probably smart business sense, but I like my annual Titans/Jaguars shitfest or whatever. NFL catering to the freaking normies.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2017 15:13
|
|
|
Browns will play all games at 3:30 on Tuesday afternoon so no one has to watch
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2017 15:14
|
|
|
spanky69 posted:Browns will play all games at 3:30 on Tuesday afternoon so no one has to watch lol if you don't want to see your team curbstomp the browns
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2017 15:18
|
|
|
Bigass Moth posted:Technically less people went. The problem is the NYT showed pictures out of context (no coaches/staff in the group photo) which makes it seem like a substantially smaller group. That is what fake news is. Probably the wrong thread for this, but no, that is not what "fake news" is. It's either 1. the original definition of intentionally fabricated news stories designed to go viral on Facebook or 2. the new definition of accurate news that portrays Trump in a negative light.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2017 15:18
|
|
|
fsif posted:Probably the wrong thread for this, but no, that is not what "fake news" is. It's either 1. the original definition of intentionally fabricated news stories designed to go viral on Facebook or 2. the new definition of accurate news that portrays Trump in a negative light. I'm sorry but posting the pictures the NYT did with the implication that 30 guys showed up total is indeed fake news since it is misleading and does not represent reality. You don't have to be pro-Trump to see how that might be the case.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2017 15:22
|
|
|
Bigass Moth posted:I'm sorry but posting the pictures the NYT did with the implication that 30 guys showed up total is indeed fake news since it is misleading and does not represent reality. You don't have to be pro-Trump to see how that might be the case. It was misleading, yeah, but not "fake news".
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2017 15:22
|
|
|
Sweet
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2017 15:26
|
|
|
Bigass Moth posted:Technically less people went. The problem is the NYT showed pictures out of context (no coaches/staff in the group photo) which makes it seem like a substantially smaller group. That is what fake news is. Congrats on contributing on the stupid poo poo that is normalizing calling everything Fake News
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2017 15:27
|
|
|
Intentionally misleading people by presenting things out of context to create a story where there was none seems like fake news to me. I don't know why the New York Times does poo poo like that. All it does is preach to the choir, further alienate people who might be on the fence and harden those who believe the media is out to get Trump. Impossibly Perfect Sphere fucked around with this message at 15:30 on Apr 20, 2017 |
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2017 15:28
|
|
|
Jiminy Christmas! Shoes! posted:Intentionally misleading people by presenting things out of context to create a story where there was none seems like fake news to me. oh god no the nytimes sports twitter made a funny about a thin-skinned baby that did not include all possible context but matched the actual context, that a whole lot less people showed up to meet the orange man than the black man
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2017 15:29
|
|
|
Jiminy Christmas! Shoes! posted:Intentionally misleading people by presenting things out of context to create a story where there was none seems like fake news to me. I get that it's largely a semantic argument, but an error in initial reporting that is later corrected/given proper context is not "fake news". The term originally had an entirely different meaning, but it's been appropriated by Trump and allies to try and discredit legitimate news outlets. https://twitter.com/NYTSports/status/854866272592461825
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2017 15:33
|
|
|
Isn't there a chat thread for this poo poo?
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2017 15:33
|
|
|
Lets just agree that you are both insufferable and be done with it.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2017 15:34
|
|
|
fsif posted:I get that it's largely a semantic argument, but an error in initial reporting that is later corrected/given proper context is not "fake news". The term originally had an entirely different use, but it's been appropriated by Trump and allies to try and discredit legitimate news outlets. Except that they're supposed to be one of the premier news gathering organizations in the United States. Making factual errors about ultimately trivial topics (remember that supposed removal of the MLK bust?) which only further flames partisanship because you couldn't do the proper verification is dumb as poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2017 15:36
|
|
|
Pats fans are the loving worst.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2017 15:37
|
|
|
Jiminy Christmas! Shoes! posted:...Making factual errors about ultimately trivial topics... is not a big deal at all, and who loving cares, they issued a correction
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2017 15:38
|
|
|
Codependent Poster posted:Pats fans are the loving worst.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2017 15:38
|
|
|
fsif posted:I get that it's largely a semantic argument, but an error in initial reporting that is later corrected/given proper context is not "fake news". The term originally had an entirely different meaning, but it's been appropriated by Trump and allies to try and discredit legitimate news outlets. It's good they corrected it, but the damage was already done with the inaccurate reporting in the first place. Most people won't see the retraction or read beyond the headline.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2017 15:39
|
|
|
Codependent Poster posted:Pats fans are the loving worst.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2017 15:40
|
|
|
I don't know if anybody really asked for this Wonder Twins reboot.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2017 15:39
|
|
|
Bigass Moth posted:It's good they corrected it, but the damage was already done with the inaccurate reporting in the first place. Most people won't see the retraction or read beyond the headline. The damage was already done!! gently caress!
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2017 15:41
|
|
|
Bigass Moth posted:It's good they corrected it, but the damage was already done with the inaccurate reporting in the first place. Most people won't see the retraction or read beyond the headline. This is an excellent hill to die on, the NYT sports page hurting the feelings of the biggest loving rear end in a top hat in the universe.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2017 15:40
|
|
|
Codependent Poster posted:Pats fans are the loving worst.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2017 15:40
|
|
|
Bigass Moth posted:Technically less people went. The problem is the NYT showed pictures out of context (no coaches/staff in the group photo) which makes it seem like a substantially smaller group. That is what fake news is. In order to be fake, it has to have been a lie. Sure pictures showed a greater disparity, but... a disparity was real, regardless. edit: Disclaimer: if you dun wanna read political poo poo, ignore this spoilered blurb. Also, "Fake News" has a meaning in the political lexicon, and it's not "overzealous press" or "media narratives". Fake news is manufactured stories that are outright fiction masquerading as the truth, published by real news outlets. They're created to play on the suspicions of a particular group, reinforcing preconceptions. This tactic makes them MORE believable to those groups, and causes them to spread. CNN, Fox, MSNBC, Huffingonpost, and even BRIETBART are not "Fake news," and Trumps bastardization of that word really nees to die. Chilichimp fucked around with this message at 15:48 on Apr 20, 2017 |
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2017 15:42
|
|
|
Why is this so important to argue either way lol Seriously who gives a poo poo
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2017 15:43
|
|
|
I'm a Pats fan and we're the loving worst
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2017 15:44
|
|
|
TBeats posted:Why is this so important to argue either way lol It's really not important I just can't believe there was an argument about what fake news is in a loving football thread.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2017 15:45
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 00:44 |
|
|
TBeats posted:Why is this so important to argue either way lol I don't know, it's more interesting than BBQ chat and at least tangentially related to the NFL. Not exactly much other non-draft stuff going on now anyway. Bigass Moth posted:It's really not important I just can't believe there was an argument about what fake news is in a loving football thread. You brought it up! fsif fucked around with this message at 15:48 on Apr 20, 2017 |
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2017 15:45
|
|