|
Prism posted:Now, correct me if I'm wrong, but there have been zero examples of this happening and an aircraft carrier getting lost anytime recently. Ahem!  e: 
|
#
?
Apr 21, 2017 20:17
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 13, 2024 16:53 |
|
|
Did Branco ever comment on the United incident? If anyone had a hot take on it, it would definitely be him.
|
|
#
?
Apr 21, 2017 20:22
|
|
|
Sandpuppy posted:Ahem! Good call, but I don't think 1980 is recent enough (though, being more recent than Chappaquiddick, it probably counts for some of these cartoonists).
|
|
#
?
Apr 21, 2017 20:39
|
|
|
loquacius posted:oh me oh my, not blasphemy I laughed. Good one.
|
|
#
?
Apr 21, 2017 20:46
|
|
|
Sandpuppy posted:Ah. So just like the US then, where most people are on board with progressive stances until you attach them to names like "Obummer" or "Hitlary". Now there's a ménage à trois I hope to god never gets hacked from icloud. She's totally backing it up to Nugent 
|
|
#
?
Apr 21, 2017 20:51
|
|
|
Branco, of all the loving shithead hacks, got a BBC article
|
|
#
?
Apr 21, 2017 20:56
|
|
|
...that is a very unhealthy dog.
|
|
#
?
Apr 21, 2017 21:37
|
|
|
savannah long necked dogs shouldnt eat so much, those head horns dont look good
|
|
#
?
Apr 21, 2017 21:53
|
|
|
Sandpuppy posted:
Granted the whole "He doesn't even LIVE here!" is rich from the people who constantly try to pass off affluent white dudes a folksy, salt-of-earth cowboy types.
|
|
#
?
Apr 21, 2017 22:16
|
|
11
|
Lord Hydronium posted:Did Branco ever comment on the United incident? If anyone had a hot take on it, it would definitely be him. All Branco said about it was this giggity-giggity-garbage.  fake edit: AMMOLAND
|
|
#
?
Apr 21, 2017 22:28
|
|
|
Pants Donkey posted:Yeah, but that's because he was the only democrat running against a field of varying conservatives who wanted their shot at the big-time. Most of what I've read suggests that a runoff is a bad situation since it's a red district. He wasn't the only Democrat, he was just by far the one with the most support and voters. If everybody shows up again to the runoff election and votes for the same party candidate, he will probably lose but it will be incredibly close (he got 48% of the vote in the first round). If even a small portion of the Republicans don't show up for the runoff because their favorite guy lost, then Ossoff's got a pretty good shot at it.
|
|
#
?
Apr 21, 2017 22:28
|
|
|
Fivethirtyeight had a thing where they said that in runoff elections like that, both the person who won the first round and the party that in aggregate won the first round have some amount of predictive power, and it's mostly a tossup when they disagree like this.
|
|
#
?
Apr 21, 2017 22:32
|
|
|
And it should be noted that Handel, the Republican that won, is probably the best case runoff candidate for Ossoff. The 6th District is made up of affluent white suburbs of Atlanta whose main political concern is "I want low taxes." They're more cosmopolitan than the average GOP voter and moderate on issues like abortion and gay marriage. Handel, on the other hand, is a Bible thumper whose central issue is being pro-life. Out of all the Republican candidates in the running, she's probably the most at odds with the local Republican zeitgeist.
|
|
#
?
Apr 21, 2017 22:36
|
|
|
Is anything in this true except "the Us is the only country to use nukes?"Internet Webguy posted:
|
|
#
?
Apr 21, 2017 22:43
|
|
4
3
|
Internet Webguy posted:
I read "Bros" as "Soros" at first and was real confused. Although I'm sure someone has done the necessary mental gymnastics to pin this on him already.
|
|
#
?
Apr 21, 2017 22:44
|
|
|
HootTheOwl posted:Is anything in this true except "the Us is the only country to use nukes?" What, are you unaware of the US's history of making nuclear attacks on hostile nations which have nuclear capability, ensuring that only the US and its allies have nuclear weapons?
|
|
#
?
Apr 21, 2017 22:49
|
|
|
Stultus Maximus posted:What, are you unaware of the US's history of making nuclear attacks on hostile nations which have nuclear capability, ensuring that only the US and its allies have nuclear weapons? I mean it worked in Civ III
|
|
#
?
Apr 21, 2017 23:04
|
|
|
Pants Donkey posted:Yeah, but that's because he was the only democrat running against a field of varying conservatives who wanted their shot at the big-time. Most of what I've read suggests that a runoff is a bad situation since it's a red district. The aggregate only had Republicans up two points, and they had a asston of candidates. Ossoff has a reasonable shot.
|
|
#
?
Apr 21, 2017 23:06
|
|
|
Prokhor Zakharov posted:I mean it worked in Civ III it was democrat weakness that allowed that trigger-happy madman, Mahatma Gandhi, to go unchecked
|
|
#
?
Apr 21, 2017 23:48
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Apr 21, 2017 23:55
|
|
|
Prism posted:But they knew where they were. HootTheOwl posted:Is anything in this true except "the Us is the only country to use nukes?" That bit isn't true either. What he wanted to say was "used nukes in anger".
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2017 00:05
|
|
|
Hawaii's senators weren't happy about that one. The response from office of the AG was particularly galling.
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2017 00:06
|
|
|
 1 2 3
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2017 01:32
|
|
|
Hmm, the pants are on a pedestal, does that still qualify as being on the ground?
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2017 01:48
|
|
|
Twelve by Pies posted:Hmm, the pants are on a pedestal, does that still qualify as being on the ground? Pants on the mound, pants on the mound, praying like a fool, to those pants atop the mound.
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2017 01:54
|
|
|
I want that Hypocrites shirt
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2017 02:25
|
|
|
HootTheOwl posted:Pants on the mound, pants on the mound, praying like a fool, to those pants atop the mound. While mound rhymes with ground, pants on the plinth has alliteration.
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2017 02:38
|
|
|
duz posted:While mound rhymes with ground, pants on the plinth has alliteration. Which would require anyone to know that word pre-google.
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2017 03:03
|
|
|
I love that to conservative shitheels like Ramirez still don't understand the difference between consensual adultery and unwanted sexual advances.
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2017 03:45
|
|
SwitchbladeKult posted:I love that to conservative shitheels like Ramirez still don't understand the difference between consensual adultery and unwanted sexual advances. Ramirez almost certainly believes the "Bill Clinton rapist" twitter meme.
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2017 03:49
|
|
|
To be fair, there is Juanita Broaddrick, who still maintains that she was raped by Bill Clinton, and I don't see how you can dismiss her claims without going into "Well women make up false allegations sometimes" like people like Glenn Beck are doing with O'Reilly.
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2017 03:54
|
|
|
Sandpuppy posted:
Sarah Palin is the late 90's popup ad of our time.
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2017 03:56
|
|
Twelve by Pies posted:To be fair, there is Juanita Broaddrick, who still maintains that she was raped by Bill Clinton, and I don't see how you can dismiss her claims without going into "Well women make up false allegations sometimes" like people like Glenn Beck are doing with O'Reilly. Oh right, that genuinely slipped my mind because she's not the one people use to try and tar the Clintons.
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2017 04:04
|
|
|
I wonder how long "Bill Clinton exists" will continue to serve as a shield against criticism of any conservative figure with some type of sex scandal
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2017 04:11
|
|
|
Based on Ted Kennedy at least 8 years after he dies
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2017 04:15
|
|
|
One can say that Juanita Broaddrick's accusation probably isn't true without going into full "women are lying whores who accuse successful men of rape for profit" mode. Despite testifying under oath that he raped her, she also said in a sworn affidavit that Clinton never made any unwelcome sexual advances towards her. Her case was so dubious even Kenneth Starr ultimately didn't try to press her claims.
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2017 04:20
|
|
|
And of course, by going "b-b-but Bill Clinton", Ramirez is once again pretending that Trump doesn't exist.
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2017 04:25
|
|
|
loquacius posted:I wonder how long "Bill Clinton exists" will continue to serve as a shield against criticism of any conservative figure with some type of sex scandal They'd do it for JFK if he wasn't assassinated.
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2017 04:35
|
|
|
Those drat hypocritical millennial lefties with their warped views of the Clinton presidency back when they were pre-school. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2017 04:35
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 13, 2024 16:53 |
|
|
Trapezium Dave posted:Those drat hypocritical millennial lefties with their warped views of the Clinton presidency back when they were pre-school.
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2017 05:07
|
|