|
The bishop thing will be extra funny because Budaj was an okay backup, and if bishop leaves and quick gets injured again the Kings are going to make the Avalanche look like a professional hockey team by comparison.
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 00:39
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 14:27 |
|
|
Kilza posted:I don't know why you wouldn't be pleased. Bishop is a good goalie, he had an off year this season but he still was better than either of Elliott or Johnson. Aside from Matt Murray being force traded, he's arguably the best goalie option out there. He's 30 and goalies almost always regress afterwards (unless your name is Hasek, Plante, or Roy, then it's showtime). I'm not convinced it's an aberration. And being better than Elliott's Jekyll n' Hyde act isn't saying much, my concern is they'll overpay for him with the significant cap space they have ($21M) and ignore other needs, like shoring up their D. Gio, as much as I love the guy, is starting to show his age and Brodie and Hamilton can't play 60 minutes. I don't expect them to sign Shattenkirk but it's something that needs to be addressed.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 00:42
|
|
|
Powershift posted:The bishop thing will be extra funny because Budaj was an okay backup, and if bishop leaves and quick gets injured again the Kings are going to make the Avalanche look like a professional hockey team by comparison. Isn't it great? It's even funnier because Bishop lost 3/4 games to Calgary as a King, which gave them the points to make the playoffs over the Kings.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 01:13
|
|
|
Kilza posted:https://twitter.com/FriedgeHNIC/status/856279551248412672 https://twitter.com/TSNBobMcKenzie/status/856284045864579073 Also, I think I'm just posting in the loser thread out of habit at this point.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 02:53
|
|
|
El Gallinero Gros posted:Brian Campbell is the only D to win it in the last 53 years, the last guy before him was Red Kelly. Unoffically, it's basically an award for the most gentlemanly forward. Not unlike how the Norris has sorta become the Art Ross for defencemen.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 02:55
|
|
|
NOW ACCEPTING TITLES FOR THE NEW LOSERS, QUOTE THIS WITH IDEAS
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 03:11
|
|
|
iospace posted:NOW ACCEPTING TITLES FOR THE NEW LOSERS, QUOTE THIS WITH IDEAS gently caress the leafs
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 03:15
|
|
|
CAPS MORE LIKE CAPABLE OF BEATING US 
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 03:13
|
|
|
Did I mention gently caress you Martin Marincin you big useless piece of poo poo?
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 03:14
|
|
|
iospace posted:NOW ACCEPTING TITLES FOR THE NEW LOSERS, QUOTE THIS WITH IDEAS Whats blue and just fell off the tree? And then the first post should just be bear/trampoline.gif
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 03:14
|
|
|
Ot is a harsh mistress
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 03:15
|
|
|
As a big salty baby, I'm relieved I won't need to be in a Toronto that gets deeper into the playoffs than Montreal until next season.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 03:16
|
|
|
Don't Toronto Fanta Also Bruins
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 03:17
|
|
|
Welcome LAS
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 03:17
|
|
|
They put in a lot more effort than I was expecting and really gave the Caps a scare there. If we can improve our defense a bit I'm really looking forward to next year.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 03:20
|
|
|
Credit where credit is due, I thought the Leafs wouldn't do well against the Caps, but they definitely held their own against them. All games were one goal games, 5/6 OT games. They looked really good for stretches, too. The future's bright for you, LAS. Enjoy it.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 03:19
|
|
|
The Leafs are gonna be so good next year goddamnit 
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 03:20
|
|
|
Hello darkness my old friend.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 03:22
|
|
|
bewbies posted:did someone get a screen cap of the fat guy at the end flipping off MacArthur A fat, angry Boston sports fan flipping off opposing players? You may need to be more specific.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 03:23
|
|
|
At least Toronto got to see their game IN Toronto. How much were tickets to that game anyway?
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 03:29
|
|
|
iospace posted:NOW ACCEPTING TITLES FOR THE NEW LOSERS, QUOTE THIS WITH IDEAS Leaf us alone, we don't know what to do with these jerseys we aren't throwing.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 03:37
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 04:02
|
|
|
iospace posted:NOW ACCEPTING TITLES FOR THE NEW LOSERS, QUOTE THIS WITH IDEAS Make like a tree and gently caress you Bruins
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 04:05
|
|
|
It's Leaves with a V, I can't believe nobody noticed this until now.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 04:08
|
|
|
Aphrodite posted:It's Leaves with a V, I can't believe nobody noticed this until now. Proper plurals take singular construction.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 04:31
|
|
|
iospace posted:NOW ACCEPTING TITLES FOR THE NEW LOSERS, QUOTE THIS WITH IDEAS Hi, Loser thread So, what do the Leafs need most in the offseason? Offensive depth? I kind of don't want them to trade almost anyone they have other than to upgrade Matt Martin to almost literally anyone else
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 04:34
|
|
|
Kalenn Istarion posted:Hi, Loser thread Buzz I saw on hockey twitter seems to be that they're 1 top D and a solid goaltender away from being legit cup contenders. Dellow suggested throwing gobs of money at Shattenkirk or trading a bunch of draft picks for someone like OEL.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 04:36
|
|
|
Kalenn Istarion posted:Hi, Loser thread Double down on grit and punchmen. Trade those softy kids away!
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 04:46
|
|
|
Leafs had 60+ goals from their top 3 lines, offensive depth wasn't exactly a problem. It's D, dummy.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 04:48
|
|
|
Your thread title at work. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 04:48
|
|
|
The problem with the leafs trading for OEL specifically is that the coyotes are only somewhere between 1 and 3 years away from being done with their own rebuild so fair value in picks that the coyotes would want is like 3 or 4 firsts spread over this and next year's draft. If the avs are shipping people off for real now I think it'd be easier to trade for barrie
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 05:18
|
|
|
Xtanstic posted:Buzz I saw on hockey twitter seems to be that they're 1 top D and a solid goaltender away from being legit cup contenders. Dellow suggested throwing gobs of money at Shattenkirk or trading a bunch of draft picks for someone like OEL. Andersen's a solid goaltender tho Dr Zaius posted:Leafs had 60+ goals from their top 3 lines, offensive depth wasn't exactly a problem. It's D, dummy. Typo, obviously defense, dummy In any case, what rfa d-men are around in the off-season? Is anyone good likely to be exposed to LV?
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 05:22
|
|
|
Kalenn Istarion posted:Andersen's a solid goaltender tho https://capfriendly.com/browse/free-agents/2018/points/all/defense/rfa My boss is a Leafs fan and thinks they should either go after OEL, or try and make an offer to Minnesota for Dumba or Bordin since one will likely have to be exposed.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 05:31
|
|
|
Who is OEL? Shatty's the only elite d-man on ufa this year, so he'll be expensive. None of the rfas are particularly exciting either.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 05:48
|
|
|
Kalenn Istarion posted:Who is OEL? oliver ekman-larsson hes good
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 05:49
|
|
|
Trade Matthews for Kane and Taise
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 05:50
|
|
|
MOVIE MAJICK posted:Trade Matthews for Kane and Taise this but unironically
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 05:51
|
|
|
mike stone was apparently good in calgary so there's another top 4 guy you can want on your team to sign. 36 points last year and then he tore his acl
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 05:56
|
|
|
hifi posted:mike stone was apparently good in calgary so there's another top 4 guy you can want on your team to sign. 36 points last year and then he tore his acl Blown acls are a death cry for hockey players
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 05:56
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 14:27 |
|
|
Kalenn Istarion posted:Blown acls are a death cry for hockey players In 1996 maybe.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 06:12
|
|
