|
https://twitter.com/adamschefter/status/857163618231754753
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 12:08
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 11, 2024 16:06 |
|
|
If the Browns trade up for a QB in this shitass QB class LOL.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 12:40
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/status/857202708943712256
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 13:02
|
|
|
Bills reporter saying that the team might look to trade up 2-3 spots if the price isn't too steep. He said they covet 2-3 players and he doesn't know who, but he suspects Adams and Hooker. Really good rear end day if you're an NFL reporter that loves masking tepid "team X might" predictions as legitimate scoops.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 13:27
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/MikeSilver/status/857219477540360194 https://twitter.com/JasonLaCanfora/status/857219256454348800
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 14:08
|
|
|
So the Browns allegedly want to move up from #12 to take a QB. Let's look at who is ahead of them: 2. San Francisco 49ers - No QB 3. Chicago Bears - No QB 4. Jacksonville Jaguars - Bort sucks, so no QB either 5. Tennessee Titans (from Los Angeles Rams) - Have a QB! 6. New York Jets - No QB 7. Los Angeles Chargers - Have an old as heck QB 8. Carolina Panthers - Have a QB! 9. Cincinnati Bengals - Have a QB! 10. Buffalo Bills - Have a QB, but one that ownership seems to hate for some irrational reason 11. New Orleans Saints - Have an old as heck QB If, hypothetically, Trubisky is remotely worth taking before #12, then almost every team between #1 and #12 is a plausible threat to take him except the TItans, Panthers and Bengals. That would suggest you should just take him #1 overall so you actually get him, instead of trying to get cute so you can get him taken out from under your nose. On the other hand, if all these QBs are future garbagemen (which is what everyone seems to actually think) then you shouldn't even take one at #12, and instead should load up the rest of the roster and take a project in round 2+. sean10mm fucked around with this message at 14:17 on Apr 26, 2017 |
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 14:15
|
|
|
This draft seems weak overall in my expert analysis but I'm not on espn I'm currently on the toilet so I probably have no idea what I'm saying.
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 14:22
|
|
|
Armando poops all over the idea of Lamp in the first. Isn't happening. https://twitter.com/armandosalguero/status/857216514986061825
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 14:23
|
|
|
I would rather the panthers trade down with Cleveland than take Mccaffery. Like they don't even need to offer anything else. Just swap firsts.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 14:22
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 14:27
|
|
|
The Browns are going to shock us all by selecting Deshone Kizer #1 overall.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 14:56
|
|
|
Probably looking at moving back to the second to get the kicker they covet.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 15:12
|
|
|
I'm just gonna say it. I think this QB class is better than last years. I think you guys are getting down on it, because every prospect has some major flaw, but so did Goff and Wentz and I would honestly take Mahomes over both of them, even though he might be the scariest prospect of them all. I just love watching him, even though I know he needs work. I really didn't expect to like him as much as I do, because of how scary you guys made him. And you are right, but he is still incredible. I think Trubisky has a lot going for him too. While I wish he played more games, I'm not willing to say that there is something wrong with him because he didn't start, when it's just as likely the coach is an idiot. I also think Watson is the safest bet to work his hardest to maximize his opportunity, despite his issues. I think how players deal with adversity is as important as physical ability and he's the only prospect I can feel confident about in his ability to handle this.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 15:42
|
|
|
Bigass Moth posted:The Browns are going to shock us all by selecting Deshone Kizer #1 overall. Too Millennial, hard pass.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 15:44
|
|
|
Bigass Moth posted:The Browns are going to shock us all by selecting Deshone Kizer #1 overall. You misspelled Jets and #6
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 16:20
|
|
|
Sataere posted:I'm just gonna say it. I think this QB class is better than last years. *Pedantic Man swoops in* Oh yeah? Who's going to be better than Dak?
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 16:20
|
|
|
fsif posted:*Pedantic Man swoops in* I hope Dak is exposed this year and is bad forever.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 16:35
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/greggabe/status/856970745896988672 Nfldraftcoverage.txt
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 16:37
|
|
|
fsif posted:*Pedantic Man swoops in* Mahomes. He'll also be worse.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 16:58
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/TylerDBrooke/status/857262456917372931 You must trade up to 6, Indy.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 17:02
|
|
|
Diva Cupcake posted:https://twitter.com/TylerDBrooke/status/857262456917372931 Oof, that would be a knife in the gut. Doubt it happens though, Ballard has been raving about the depth in the draft and the importance of having lots of picks
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 17:07
|
|
|
I just watched a highlight video of Pat Mahomes and I swear it was indistinguishable from an EJ Manuel highlight reel I watched in 2013.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 17:07
|
|
|
Bengals at #9 are a super obvious candidate for trading down imo since they are probably more sensitive to the 5 year rookie option cutoff than most teams and they are in a spot where they are likely going to be picking from the second-tier of talent at that spot for the position they are looking at anyways.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 17:09
|
|
|
Diva Cupcake posted:https://twitter.com/TylerDBrooke/status/857262456917372931 lol this would be the dumbest loving thing McCaffery doesn't play literally any position on defense
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 17:14
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 17:14
|
|
|
Diva Cupcake posted:https://twitter.com/TylerDBrooke/status/857262456917372931 no way
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 17:15
|
|
|
sean10mm posted:So the Browns allegedly want to move up from #12 to take a QB. Let's look at who is ahead of them: They would need to trade up to #5 to get Trubisky I think. Even then, there are a lot of teams willing to move back either now or once their guy gets picked. San Fran might move back if Cleveland takes Garrett. I think they could be sitting on this pick because the value could skyrocket if the Browns take Trubisky first, so they don't want to miss out on that. But if Cleveland makes the obvious move, San Fran could have some deals already lined up to move back. And a lot of that could be driven by the fear that Chicago and Jacksonville could actually draft Trubisky at #3-4, and that Tennessee may be actively shopping the #5 pick.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 17:27
|
|
|
Bigass Moth posted:The Browns are going to shock us all by selecting Deshone Kizer #1 overall. I won't be that shocked
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 17:32
|
|
|
Sataere posted:I think Trubisky has a lot going for him too. While I wish he played more games, I'm not willing to say that there is something wrong with him because he didn't start, when it's just as likely the coach is an idiot. Because Marquise Williams was actually a really good college QB, and that 2015 UNC team was in contention for the college football playoffs until the last week of the regular season. Coaches are not paid to develop NFL prospects. Williams was the better QB for the team that year. And that is definitely a knock on Trubisky, because he was on the active roster in 2014 and 2015 and didn't win the job.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 17:40
|
|
|
Rivera told Thomas he's the Panthers pick if he's there at 8.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 17:39
|
|
|
I'm just going to convince myself that the Colts are really wanting to trade up for someone else and that's a smokescreen, for my own sanity.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 17:43
|
|
|
Dexo posted:https://twitter.com/greggabe/status/856970745896988672 What loving good is this tweet ya turdburger Greg Gabriel
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 17:57
|
|
|
FizFashizzle posted:Rivera told Thomas he's the Panthers pick if he's there at 8. if it means no loving McCaffery I'll take it
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 18:02
|
|
|
FizFashizzle posted:Rivera told Thomas he's the Panthers pick if he's there at 8. Well if we always target fat boys then I'm sure we have said the same thing to Garrett and Allen. But neither of them will be available at 8 either.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 18:10
|
|
|
Slowpoke! posted:Because Marquise Williams was actually a really good college QB, and that 2015 UNC team was in contention for the college football playoffs until the last week of the regular season. However, good NFL QBs often sit in college longer than they should because the guy in front of them is pretty good or good enough to not risk changing. Having a small sample size for Mitch sucks but blaming him for not winning the job when he probably didn't have any real chance to change the coach's mind is kind of silly.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 18:35
|
|
|
fsif posted:I just watched a highlight video of Pat Mahomes and I swear it was indistinguishable from an EJ Manuel highlight reel I watched in 2013. It's entirely possible and maybe probable that Mahomes isn't as good (well, 'good') as EJ in the NFL because holy poo poo does he need some stuff fixed, but EJ didn't have the arm that Mahomes has.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 18:37
|
|
|
Grittybeard posted:It's entirely possible and maybe probable that Mahomes isn't as good (well, 'good') as EJ in the NFL because holy poo poo does he need some stuff fixed, but EJ didn't have the arm that Mahomes has. Yeah, I don't see it. EJ didn't look nearly as reckless as Mahomes. Part of me wonders ifor my fascination with Mahomes is the same feeling pyromaniacs get watching things burn.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 18:52
|
|
|
it's all Brett favres fault for winning one title and convincing decades of scouts that funslinging will be an asset
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 19:03
|
|
|
I heard somebody do some analysis of this draft on corners. Their idea is that this draft class is FAR from an all time great corner class....BUT it's just that there are so many serviceable corners in this draft. With Sidney Jones injured and Conley possibly doing the whole rape thing...is there even a corner that's worth a top 15 or 20 1st round pick that's not Lattimore? Seems like it's more like a "draft secondary later cause of depth" kind of situation. This is the most ready I've ever been for a draft.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 19:12
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 11, 2024 16:06 |
|
|
mastershakeman posted:it's all Brett favres fault for winning one title and convincing decades of scouts that funslinging will be an asset funslinging IS an asset, to totally rad and fun to watch games
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 19:16
|
|
