|
if what I'm seeing about his contract is true, oh my god what are you doing Raiders.
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 20:40
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 8, 2024 07:35 |
|
|
Blitz7x posted:
Mostly referring to irl Raiders fans. Also Toymachine and warcrimes
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 20:44
|
|
I am far from the most insufferable Raiders poster. Probably top 5 though
|
a neat cape posted:Also Toymachine and warcrimes
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 20:44
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/RapSheet/status/857319587582545925
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 20:46
|
|
|
Eli Wiggum posted:I thought they were the same person? That would explain a lot
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 20:46
|
|
|
Guess there's our annual old player reclamation. Bennett was too young and too recently good to qualify. This guy was cut by the Seahawks. Not exactly a vote of confidence.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 20:52
|
|
|
TheChirurgeon posted:I mean it's possible but I suspect we'll see some teams trade up because of the perceived value of the QB position and because everybody thinks they'll need to If Mahomes is still sitting there toward the bottom of the first and the Cowboys don't see a defensive player available they rank much higher than guys with a 2nd or 3rd round grade, they might do what Seattle did last year and trade down for a 2nd & 3rd or 4th just for sheer volume of defensive spots to fill.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 20:53
|
|
|
Trade is Lynch + 2018 6th for 2018 5th Lynch's contract is  https://twitter.com/Schultz_Report/status/857313275104591877
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 20:59
|
|
|
What the gently caress Raiders
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 21:00
|
|
|
I'd laugh at that but they've got the space and it almost surely won't prevent them from getting whoever they want later on.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 21:04
|
|
|
Ragnarok the Red posted:If Mahomes is still sitting there toward the bottom of the first and the Cowboys don't see a defensive player available they rank much higher than guys with a 2nd or 3rd round grade, they might do what Seattle did last year and trade down for a 2nd & 3rd or 4th just for sheer volume of defensive spots to fill. Maybe but I think there's almost no way the Cowboys don't draft a DB at 28. Kalli posted:Trade is Lynch + 2018 6th for 2018 5th That is a lot of money to pay for a Marshawn Lynch in current condition
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 21:08
|
|
|
lol AP must be stomping mad
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 21:08
|
|
|
fsif posted:lol AP must be stomping mad
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 21:12
|
|
|
You guys should stop beating around the bush with these jokes.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 21:14
|
|
|
Should probably just switch topics altogether.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 21:15
|
|
|
weird Asian candy posted:Should probably just switch topics altogether. I've got this in the bag.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 21:27
|
|
|
Are they doing this to cull players but maintain the salary floor?
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 21:27
|
|
|
sean10mm posted:I've got this in the bag. and stop talking about the Lynch contract? That's nuts
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 21:28
|
|
|
Beep boop wait for the guaranteed numbers
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 21:31
|
|
|
Happy about Beastmode, don't give a poo poo about the numbers. His contract won't prevent us from keeping anyone important. Gonna go buy some Skittles and get drunk. Raiders, bitch
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 22:13
|
|
|
Raiders have the cap space I believe, and Lynch is going to help sell jerseys and get butts into (decrepit crumbling) Oakland seats. e. They need to get some silver and black skittles for him and then also sell silver and black skittles, get a marketing thing going with Mars/Wrigley.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 22:15
|
|
|
I would definitely buy black & silver Skittles.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 22:20
|
|
|
"over paying for Marshawn Lynch to unretire and run roughshod behind Oaklands Oline is a bad idea" - a freaking lame-o
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 22:21
|
|
|
Blitz7x posted:"over paying for Marshawn Lynch to unretire and run roughshod behind Oaklands Oline is a bad idea" - a freaking lame-o The running roughshod bit to be determined of course.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 22:25
|
|
|
Black Sunshine posted:Happy about Beastmode, don't give a poo poo about the numbers. His contract won't prevent us from keeping anyone important.  Edit: "Beast Mode the rainbow" is pretty weak.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 22:27
|
|
|
Grittybeard posted:The running roughshod bit to be determined of course. I do like that the Raiders saw what the colts have been doing and thought, yeah that.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 22:42
|
|
|
Blitz7x posted:"over paying for Marshawn Lynch to unretire and run roughshod behind Oaklands Oline is a bad idea" - a freaking lame-o Lol you're excited about a 31 year old RB who hasn't played in two years and was hurt and lovely the last time he played
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 22:43
|
|
|
Marshawn Lynch does, in fact, own, though.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 22:43
|
|
|
fsif posted:Marshawn Lynch does, in fact, own, though. 1/1 Severely injured Canadian girls agree
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 22:44
|
|
|
a neat cape posted:Lol you're excited about a 31 year old RB who hasn't played in two years and was hurt and lovely the last time he played 2014: 3 wins 13 losses 2015: 7 wins 9 losses 2016: 12 wins 4 losses A little forecasting using complicated math 2017: 18 wins 2 losses Yeah I'm excited
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 22:52
|
|
|
Blitz7x posted:2014: 3 wins 13 losses Being excited about the Raiders and thinking Lynch is going to be the piece that pushes you over the top are two different things my friend
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 23:06
|
|
|
Blitz7x posted:2014: 3 wins 13 losses How are they playing 20 games while still having 18 wins? 14-2 and they dont get a bye?
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 23:19
|
|
|
cheesetriangles posted:How are they playing 20 games while still having 18 wins? 14-2 and they dont get a bye? 
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 23:20
|
|
|
SKULL.GIF posted:Guess there's our annual old player reclamation. Bennett was too young and too recently good to qualify. He played for the Saints last year and was alright.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 23:21
|
|
|
Blitz7x posted:2014: 3 wins 13 losses Your math is flawed. You should have -2 wins. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 23:28
|
|
|
You mean -2 losses. 13 -4 = 9 -5 = 4 -6 = -2 and next year that'll go to -9 losses.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 23:32
|
|
|
Leperflesh posted:You mean -2 losses. I can't do anything right today 
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 23:54
|
|
|
CharlestheHammer posted:I do like that the Raiders saw what the colts have been doing and thought, yeah that.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2017 02:07
|
|
|
Derek Carr will prove to be better than Andrew Luck. There I said it that's my hot take
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2017 02:08
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 8, 2024 07:35 |
|
|
Leperflesh posted:Derek Carr will prove to be better than Andrew Luck. There I said it that's my hot take I mean he pretty clearly already is
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2017 02:12
|
|
