|
Diva Cupcake posted:McGinn's final mock which is usually amongst the most accurate. Trubs #1. There's literally no way the Steelers take a WR in the 1st round. They have consistently hit big on WR in rounds 3-6 going back to '99. In fact, if this pick isn't a linebacker, cornerback or hybrid safety, I'd be shocked. Unless, of course if OJ Howard or Njoku fall to 30, which they won't
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 04:23 |
|
|
# ? May 13, 2024 00:11 |
|
I'm not a big fan of Jarrad Davis at 15, especially with Takkarist McKinley and Charles Harris still on the board
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 04:27 |
|
In the past 25 years, only three quarterbacks have been chosen in the top 100 selections after only one year as a college starter: Brock Osweiler, Mark Sanchez, and Matt Blundin. If you're asking "Who's Matt Blundin?" that's somewhat the point: he was a 1992 second-round Kansas City pick out of Virginia who never started a game in the NFL.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 04:29 |
|
I like that mcginn draft. I like it a lot.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 04:30 |
|
Diva Cupcake posted:McGinn's final mock which is usually amongst the most accurate. Trubs #1. McCaffery and Mitch now that is a Haslam as gently caress draft. This draft really is a question of whether Jimmy has given up being Jerruh.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 04:31 |
|
Kalli posted:In the past 25 years, only three quarterbacks have been chosen in the top 100 selections after only one year as a college starter: Brock Osweiler, Mark Sanchez, and Matt Blundin. If you're asking "Who's Matt Blundin?" that's somewhat the point: he was a 1992 second-round Kansas City pick out of Virginia who never started a game in the NFL. So you're saying the Chiefs are going to trade up to #1 for Trubinski? Blundin is the closest they've come to trying since Blackledge.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 04:32 |
|
My body is ready
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 04:32 |
|
MY NIGGA D-LINK posted:There's literally no way the Steelers take a WR in the 1st round. They have consistently hit big on WR in rounds 3-6 going back to '99. In fact, if this pick isn't a linebacker, cornerback or hybrid safety, I'd be shocked. Unless, of course if OJ Howard or Njoku fall to 30, which they won't It could happen. They have no one besides Antonio Brown and a rusty Martavis Bryant. I'm not sure Ladarius Green is ever going to put it together due to all of his injuries, and I know nothing about Jesse James.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 04:34 |
|
Grittybeard posted:So you're saying the Chiefs are going to trade up to #1 for Trubinski? Blundin is the closest they've come to trying since Blackledge. It's not even good if you base predictions off of two year starters: quote:This is not a good group of quarterbacks to be associated with, although Cam Newton is sort of attached with an asterisk. (He started only one year at Auburn, but also a year at junior college.) You won't find many successful one-year college starters chosen below pick 100, either: Matt Flynn is probably the best among them. On the other hand, do we really learn anything from a group with such a small sample size? It's likely more accurate to compare Trubisky to quarterbacks with either one or two years as a college starter. Since 1998, that group has over 30 players chosen in the top 100 picks instead of just two. With that in mind, we changed QBASE this year to treat players with one year of college experience the same as players with two.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 04:34 |
|
MY NIGGA D-LINK posted:There's literally no way the Steelers take a WR in the 1st round. They have consistently hit big on WR in rounds 3-6 going back to '99. In fact, if this pick isn't a linebacker, cornerback or hybrid safety, I'd be shocked. Unless, of course if OJ Howard or Njoku fall to 30, which they won't This is comforting. If the Ravens actually passed on two potential WR1s and a couple solid pass rushers to draft a decent RT, leading to the Steelers landing even more offensive superstars I would drop this fat boy obsessed team.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 04:37 |
|
MY NIGGA D-LINK posted:There's literally no way the Steelers take a WR in the 1st round. They have consistently hit big on WR in rounds 3-6 going back to '99. In fact, if this pick isn't a linebacker, cornerback or hybrid safety, I'd be shocked. Unless, of course if OJ Howard or Njoku fall to 30, which they won't They've brought in a lot of WRs for pre-draft visits, and this has correlated historically with them taking a receiver high. I expect them to snag one in the 3rd, but if Williams or Davis drops I think there's a real good chance they snag them and hit edge and secondary with the next few picks after. Of course they're also drafting a loving QB this year at some point too.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 04:40 |
|
My dick is so hard for Myles Garrett at two
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 04:44 |
|
Kalli posted:It's not even good if you base predictions off of two year starters:
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 04:52 |
|
Diva Cupcake posted:is the number of starts all that important? I saw a stat, obviously cherrypicked, that put the number of college dropbacks/pass attempts somewhat in line with what Brady and Rodgers threw. I dunno, but Brady is kind of an obscene outlier, and Rodgers has those junior college snaps as well that I presume aren't counted in that.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 04:55 |
|
Mitch Trubisky is the perfect name for a bust pick over a player that becomes a perennial All-ProDiva Cupcake posted:McGinn's final mock which is usually amongst the most accurate. Trubs #1. Why is Corey Davis falling so far? (27) I thought most mocks had him in the top 15.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 04:56 |
|
NotWearingPants posted:Mitch Trubisky is the perfect name for a bust pick over a player that becomes a perennial All-Pro I mean Myles Garrett isn't winning any name tool races himself.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 04:59 |
|
Grittybeard posted:This is a good read, which you can choose to believe or not believe. As far as I remember it hasn't been discounted at least. I had never read this before and those men are heroes. I'd be pretty stoked with Thomas. Now if the 49ers can completely drop the ball and let the Bears go draft Garrett, that'd be great. Also, if Watson and/or Mahomes drop to the bottom of the first, the Bears better be trading back into the first. I'd love to land one of them.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 05:05 |
|
NotWearingPants posted:Mitch Trubisky is the perfect name for a bust pick over a player that becomes a perennial All-Pro Because no matter what anyone says NFL teams draft off need. Most of the WR need is in the top half of the draft. I could see a fall to the mid 20s if he lasts past Baltimore. Also, Davis has to be judged exclusively on tape due to his injury. A lot of teams don't like that.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 05:05 |
|
https://twitter.com/FakeWIPCaller/status/857374938667204608
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 05:07 |
|
Diva Cupcake posted:McGinn's final mock which is usually amongst the most accurate. Trubs #1. Another mock with Atlanta taking a CB in the first Yeah, after paying our top 2 corners we are going to add to our already crowded position. Stupid pick.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 05:54 |
|
weird Asian candy posted:Another mock with Atlanta taking a CB in the first Eli Apple
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 05:59 |
|
THE MOST IMPORTANT MCGINN LIST http://www.jsonline.com/story/sports/nfl/packers/mcginn/2017/04/26/mcginn-nfl-draft-specialists-tall-task-kicker/100868844/ quote:It’s hard enough making it in the NFL as a kicker. Ask Roberto Aguayo, the can’t-miss prospect that did miss last season as the second-round selection of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. http://www.jsonline.com/story/sports/nfl/packers/mcginn/2017/04/26/ranking-nfl-draft-prospects-specialists/100868698/ quote:Kickers
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 06:00 |
|
Gareon Conley and Charles Harris: Do not want
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 06:04 |
|
imagine talking yourself into taking Mitch Trubisky at #1
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 07:07 |
|
Alaois posted:imagine talking yourself into taking Mitch Trubisky at #1 That's Our Browns! sitcom laughter
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 07:19 |
|
Browns are drafting Garrett first
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 07:29 |
|
corn on the cop posted:“All the teams that are winning – the New Englands, the Pittsburghs, the Seattles, the Green Bays – their coaches aren’t involved in the selection process. Let the coaches coach and the scouts scout. I don’t do this for a hobby. I’m a professional evaluator. They’re professional coaches.” drat why'd they interviewed Daltos in that writeup?
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 09:27 |
|
Sup? It's draft day.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 10:24 |
|
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 10:25 |
|
Wew lads, only 13.5 hours left to see if the Browns are gonna do the dumbest thing ever.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 11:26 |
|
Michael Corleone posted:Wew lads, only 13.5 hours left to see if the Browns are gonna do the dumbest thing ever. C'Mon Sashi don't let Jimmy throw his weight around Flikken fucked around with this message at 12:44 on Apr 27, 2017 |
# ? Apr 27, 2017 11:33 |
|
What human being that we are imperfectly informed about do you all want your preferred sports teams to capture via capitalism? Mike Williams
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 11:51 |
|
The Jets roster is so barren they could take almost any position and be ok with it. If they take an interior defensive lineman like Jonathon Allen the booing from Philly will rival anything on JetsBlunders.flv. I would like Jamal Adams though.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 11:58 |
|
OSheaman posted:THE MOST IMPORTANT MCGINN LIST Which one goes in the second round???
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 12:22 |
|
a new study bible! posted:Sup? It's draft day. I can't wait for it to be over so we can go back to not caring about football until August.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 12:28 |
|
The scouts quotes about tall kickers are great.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 12:29 |
|
It's completely nonsensical, but I would kind of love for Philly to make a play for OJ Howard.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 12:33 |
|
Diva Cupcake posted:The Jets roster is so barren they could take almost any position and be ok with it. If they take an interior defensive lineman like Jonathon Allen the booing from Philly will rival anything on JetsBlunders.flv. Adams is rad. I'm sort of bummed that these generational talents at safety pop up right after the Ravens have theoretically filled there holes at the position. At least it's unlikely Adams or Hooker falls to Baltimore.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 13:05 |
|
I prefer Hooker to Adams though I'd be fine with either. I'd also be happy to see us trade down if neither of them are available. I just really don't like any of these QBs.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 13:09 |
|
|
# ? May 13, 2024 00:11 |
|
The Puppy Bowl posted:What human being that we are imperfectly informed about do you all want your preferred sports teams to capture via capitalism? For the first time in a long time there isn't one guy that I'm wishing for - I'd be happy with any of like 6-7 guys. The draft is deep at the spots where we have needs, so day 1 isn't critical. If Fournette drops to us by some miracle, that'd be nice. But any of the first round projected rbs, cbs, or edge rushers are fine. Even a trade down wouldn't kill me, as long as there aren't superstars left.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 13:32 |