|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 17:49
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 21:03 |
|
|
0/5, no Landerig.
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 17:52
|
|
|
no years-old running memes, not interested. give me dry, dusty jokes. the prehistoric, dessicated poo poo
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 18:03
|
|
|
I was horrified the first time I saw a chip butty, but holy poo poo.
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 18:08
|
|
|
Still better than pre-plastic surgery Chelsea Clinton.
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 18:22
|
|
|
Is this not a photoshop? That is terrifying.
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 18:30
|
|
|
RCarr posted:Is this not a photoshop? That is terrifying. It's some kind of fashion show so she has weird make up on. 
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 18:50
|
|
|
Boinks posted:It's some kind of fashion show so she has weird make up on. nevermind the temp makeup what about that full-time face
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 19:07
|
|
|
I'm not going to get into a discussion or argument over sandwiches but.... Ice Cream between two waffles sounds awesome.
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 19:14
|
|
|
Whatever excuse I need to eat a Choco Taco, it's done.
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 19:51
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 22:17
|
|
|
Cute thread for good cattes is thataway, friendo.
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 23:21
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 23:37
|
|
|
What the gently caress is going on here? I moved past the while "oh right it's an illusion haha" then looked closer and it just got even more loving weird.
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 23:42
|
|
|
NtotheTC posted:What the gently caress is going on here? I moved past the while "oh right it's an illusion haha" then looked closer and it just got even more loving weird. It's not an illusion, they really do appear to be in a video rental store, I had to look a few times myself. [the guy is hiked up on the girls back, her arms under his knees, his arms around her neck, and the kid in the back is just there to confuse your brain because the guys white shirt seamlessly blends into the kids grey shirt, tricking you into thinking the kids legs are someone elses.. I think.]
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2017 00:03
|
|
|
Yeah, the third set of legs in back are the kid's. Took me a minute to parse it out though.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2017 00:18
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2017 00:18
|
|
|
Chitin posted:Yeah, the third set of legs in back are the kid's. Took me a minute to parse it out though. They're all kids and I'm still loving confused on who owns the legs with the blue shorts... They have to belong to the dude on her back but it looks like he is standing and wearing the slides and the legs belong to the kid in the back except the dude in the middle is in between the kid in the back's torso and legs. This image has me all kinds of hosed up. Gonna need an mspaint line drawing for this one.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2017 00:24
|
|
|
Hihohe posted:Is it me or as the inbreeding kept on did their faces just start sloping off? Pretty sure there's a leg missing in that tree where someone hatefucked a Persian cat So what if you're like, more than one? Sometimes you gotta be a purist in the kitchen and an anarchist in the bedroom, y'know? BOOTY-ADE has a new favorite as of 00:44 on May 3, 2017 |
|
#
?
May 3, 2017 00:40
|
|
|
Ziv Zulander posted:More reader friendly version Are there any Level 6 Inbreds on record or does it start over again like Sr/Jr/III/IV?
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2017 00:51
|
|
|
Atticus Bongman posted:Are there any Level 6 Inbreds on record or does it start over again like Sr/Jr/III/IV? It's possible, but not in that family since Charles II was infertile.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2017 00:58
|
|
|
How much did learned people of that era know that inbreeding was the result of that kind of crap? Like, did they know that would happen if they just kept it up, or did they just shrug their shoulders and say "huh, guess God is trying our faith with this one?"
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2017 01:12
|
|
|
RatHat posted:It's possible, but not in that family since Charles II was infertile. At the rate things were going that seems like a minor obstacle.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2017 01:21
|
|
|
science
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2017 01:48
|
|
|
Does anyone have a link to the tumblr that just posts pictures of animals in the backgrounds of amateur porn ? Ninja edit: I found http://indifferent-cats-in-amateur-porn.tumblr.com/ (  , obviously), but I'm pretty sure there was another one.I also found http://catswatchingyouhavesex.tumblr.com/, which is mildly amusing. Lady Disdain has a new favorite as of 01:56 on May 3, 2017 |
|
#
?
May 3, 2017 01:50
|
|
|
hard counter posted:iirc if you keep track of the inbreeding coefficients across generations charles 2 electric boogaloo is actually more inbred than a brother-sister child If you go back seven generations, a typical person will have 128 distinct ancestors. A child of brother-sister incest will have 64. Charles II had seven.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2017 01:55
|
|
|
Istari posted:Does anyone have a link to the tumblr that just posts pictures of animals in the backgrounds of amateur porn ? http://indifferent-cats-in-amateur-porn.tumblr.com/
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2017 01:57
|
|
|
Same goes for Cleopatra: "Like many royal houses, members of the Ptolemaic dynasty often married within the family to preserve the purity of their bloodline. More than a dozen of Cleopatra’s ancestors tied the knot with cousins or siblings, and it’s likely that her own parents were brother and sister. In keeping with this custom, Cleopatra eventually married both of her adolescent brothers, each of whom served as her ceremonial spouse and co-regent at different times during her reign." --http://www.history.com/news/10-little-known-facts-about-cleopatra
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2017 01:59
|
|
|
I'm sad that this seems to have stopped updating.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2017 02:06
|
|
|
MisterBibs posted:How much did learned people of that era know that inbreeding was the result of that kind of crap? Like, did they know that would happen if they just kept it up, or did they just shrug their shoulders and say "huh, guess God is trying our faith with this one?" the RCC actually had prohibitions against consanguineous marriages, originally blocking just ~~ first cousin marriages (4 degrees of relation) by a weird system that traced common ancestors by roots and stocks, which they later expanded to a 7 degree limit, i'm not savvy to all the details but scholars of the era knew inbreeding was vaguely bad even if some people argue that the harder 7 degree limit was just a cash grab instead of a public health thing either way royal families hated that limit, marriages like uncle-niece pairings were sometimes used for keeping lands under one bloodline like you actually see happening in charles II's family tree, so they worked out a system where you could pay the church to sign off on a bad marriage - it def didn't work here since it made charles way too inbred and the hapsburg line in spain died with him  picture unrelated
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2017 02:16
|
|
|
Yep, already found it, but thanks.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2017 02:20
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2017 02:24
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2017 02:55
|
|
|
I didn't know United had a subway division.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2017 02:56
|
|
|
That woman getting her boob licked by that cat is way too calm. I have a cat who likes to lick me and I can't be shirtless around her because she would try to 'groom' my nipples.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2017 03:06
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2017 03:18
|
|
|
I really loving wish NYC had subway doors that cut off people's legs/arms/whatever.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2017 04:54
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2017 05:53
|
|
|
weird Asian candy posted:They're all kids and I'm still loving confused on who owns the legs with the blue shorts... I don't know how helpful this is, but I tried. 
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2017 07:54
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 21:03 |
|
|
Tiggum posted:I don't know how helpful this is, but I tried. Oh thank god. I just couldn't see the grey shirt blending in to the white before this diagram, the shade really does make it look like it's in shadow.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2017 08:24
|
|