|
he still. has. to. be. given. the. opportunity. to. make. the. save. you. dumbs. why is this so har JawKnee posted:ps: I hate the ... (and the Oilers) bias > the actual rules I guess okay 
|
#
?
May 4, 2017 04:23
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 23:34 |
|
|
Kessler is such a dirty oval office.
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2017 04:22
|
|
|
Perry made skate-to-skate contact with Talbot and really that's all it takes to throw a goalie off, regardless of the screen in front also "letter of the law" etc
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2017 04:22
|
|
|
are you making GBS threads me
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2017 04:23
|
|
|
shyduck posted:Perry made skate-to-skate contact with Talbot and really that's all it takes to throw a goalie off, regardless of the screen in front On the other hand goalies have every advantage as it is between coaches challenges, shot blocking, huge pads, and the trap, so they can suck it  I'd prefer goals not get waved off unless it's completely clear that the goalie had no chance at all to make a save
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2017 04:24
|
|
|
lol oilers gonna oil
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2017 04:24
|
|
|
So they have a goalie interference goal and an offside goal in the same game. gently caress this stupid piece of poo poo league
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2017 04:26
|
|
|
vainman posted:Yeah but the rule is zero contact not whether he could have or not in the shadow world where no one touched him I suspect the refs think that Carlyle will just challenge right back if they overturn it, and in that case the rules change
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2017 04:26
|
|
|
Oh good, it also should be offside to boot but the Oilers can't challenge it. gently caress the refs, stop giving this game to Anaheim.
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2017 04:26
|
|
|
Every game in this series has had like eight goals we don't have to start allowing g interference
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2017 04:27
|
|
|
Lol run their goalie
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2017 04:29
|
|
|
Ginette Reno posted:On the other hand goalies have every advantage as it is between coaches challenges, shot blocking, huge pads, and the trap, so they can suck it Shut the gently caress up 
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2017 04:28
|
|
|
Stiev Awt posted:Shut the gently caress up I missed most of the Pens game so I have to get my poo poo posting in while I'm still awake
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2017 04:29
|
|
|
When coming up with a GDT title I originally had "Cheaters Galore". I really wish I had stuck with it because jesus gently caress.
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2017 04:29
|
|
|
Ginette Reno posted:I missed most of the Pens game so I have to get my poo poo posting in while I'm still awake Stiev Awt posted:Shut the gently caress up
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2017 04:31
|
|
|
Don't fight just hate
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2017 04:32
|
|
|
Duke Chin posted:he still. has. to. be. given. the. opportunity. to. make. the. save. you. dumbs. he had the opportunity to make the save. Moreover, let's have a look at a part of rule 69: quote:Goals should be disallowed only if: (1) an attacking player, either by his positioning or by contact, impairs the goalkeeper's ability to move freely within his crease or defend his goal; or (2) an attacking player initiates intentional or deliberate contact with a goalkeeper, inside or outside of his goal crease. Incidental contact with a goalkeeper will be permitted, and resulting goals allowed, when such contact is initiated outside of the goal crease, provided the attacking player has made a reasonable effort to avoid such contact. The rule will be enforced exclusively in accordance with the on-ice judgement of the Referee(s), and not by means of video replay or review. Ignore the bolding (mine) for a moment: I think the refs probably concluded that that contact was incidental, and the replay shows that it is initiated outside the crease. Now Corey Perry is a poo poo, but I doubt he meant to perfectly position his backswinging foot into Talbots. e: forgot to address the bolding! A question about it, seems like the coach challenge overrides it? What's the point of that part of the rule now? JawKnee fucked around with this message at 04:34 on May 4, 2017 |
|
#
?
May 4, 2017 04:31
|
|
|
JawKnee posted:and the replay shows that it is initiated outside the crease. Are you blind? The overhead clearly showed Talbot was inside his crease, and the only place Perry could've touched him was inside his crease. I get that you hate the Oilers because you're a Canucks fan but c'mon now.
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2017 04:34
|
|
|
I think the fact that Talbot barely budged is why it wasn't overturned/called off on the ice. If he had been thrown more off imbalance it wouldn't have counted. The NHL is all about result based refereeing.
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2017 04:36
|
|
|
This is for sure the only 69 he remembers vividly
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2017 04:37
|
|
|
Kilza posted:Are you blind? The overhead clearly showed Talbot was inside his crease, and the only place Perry could've touched him was inside his crease. I'll have to watch it again, but the multiple times I saw it, his foot hit Talbots outside the crease (just) vainman posted:This is for sure the only 69 he remembers vividly u mad? JawKnee fucked around with this message at 04:38 on May 4, 2017 |
|
#
?
May 4, 2017 04:36
|
|
|
Lol
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2017 04:39
|
|
|
yeah, you mad
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2017 04:40
|
|
|
It is amazing though that a league that is starved for goals introduces something which is designed to get rid of them
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2017 04:40
|
|
|
Yeah goalies should be banned
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2017 04:43
|
|
|
loving kill me now
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2017 04:42
|
|
|
vainman posted:Yeah goalies should be banned Get rid of goalies, refs, pucks. Just turn it into 10 guys on ice with sticks trying to concuss eachother.
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2017 04:42
|
|
|
ha ha ha!
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2017 04:42
|
|
|
The bald man is having a whale of a playoffs
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2017 04:43
|
|
|
getzlaf'd at for having no hair (but not for scoring goals)
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2017 04:43
|
|
|
lol nuge
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2017 04:43
|
|
|
gently caress the Anaheim Corey Perries.
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2017 04:43
|
|
|
Cool Talbot remembered he's cam Talbot
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2017 04:44
|
|
|
well it's any comfort oilers fans, whoever is coming out of this series is gonna lose to nashville anyway
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2017 04:44
|
|
|
yellowcar posted:well it's any comfort oilers fans, whoever is coming out of this series is gonna lose to nashville anyway How many refs do they have on their payroll?
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2017 04:45
|
|
|
yellowcar posted:well it's any comfort oilers fans, whoever is coming out of this series is gonna lose to nashville anyway Subban lifting the cup is gonna own
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2017 04:45
|
|
|
I comfort myself by climbing power lines on Whyte and I hope you'll all join me
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2017 04:45
|
|
|
yellowcar posted:well it's any comfort oilers fans, whoever is coming out of this series is gonna lose to nashville anyway I am comforted by this It would be pretty funny to watch a Carlyle led team make it far again entirely independent of their coach
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2017 04:47
|
|
|
Ginette Reno posted:Subban lifting the cup is gonna own 
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2017 04:46
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 23:34 |
|
|
Ginette Reno posted:Subban lifting the cup is gonna own Unfortunately that would be a good thing. We are not allowed good things in this timeline.
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2017 04:47
|
|