|
Improbable Lobster posted:E: Of course, conservatives are huge baby bitches and their "campaign" against Colbert is particularly dumb and petty. Yeah, you'd think the show being boring and uninteresting would be reason enough for CBS to fire Colbert.
|
#
?
May 5, 2017 05:03
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 04:56 |
|
|
Dear Glenn, Colbert is rich and you are not. Rich people are superior to poor people, right?
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2017 05:07
|
|
|
Ditko's ideology is loathsome trash, but I can respect that he takes it seriously and isn't coy about it. The Tinsleys and Ramirezes of the world are the dudes that go to church once a month and once read the cool parts of Exodus, and indulge in whatever heresy and blasphemy they wish while preening themselves for their holiness, but Ditko is the guy that would take a bullet before breaking a commandment, out of genuine terror for his soul. Like Moore said for Rorschach, his integrity is admirable, despite it being idiotic and borderline insane.
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2017 05:17
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2017 06:07
|
|
|
Oh good we got to the "why is everyone so offended" part of his career. Goody gumdrops.
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2017 06:34
|
|
|
Bishounen Bonanza posted:Good God Almighty. Here's her tumblr, where she posts her cartoons. She's pretty amazing.
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2017 06:42
|
|
|
Wistful of Dollars posted:Dear Glenn, Not nearly as wealthy as Colbert but doesn't he do story boards and character design on some pretty big animated movies? I'm sure Glenn is living pretty fine.
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2017 06:50
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2017 07:06
|
|
|
<Guy Montag> Is not the torch on top of the book? that usually burns the book. <Indiana Jones> Never abandon your torch, thats the first rule. When you are in a dark place and you abandon your light. <Oscar Wilde> Why people knee to pray? Is God a children and you have to lower to his height to talk at his level? <Indiana Jones> Miss Lady abandon the light of enlightenment, betraying humanism, and choose superstition. A good cartoon.
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2017 07:17
|
|
4
|
Naw I'm pretty sure the anger is being directed toward discrete and identifiable targets, Stantis/Allie. Sorry if you've been getting nasty letters that make you boo-hoo, but there's a very simple reason for that: you're trash. Sure, you feeeel like you did your due penance by navel-gazing for months, but you learned absolutely gently caress-all, as you showed when you returned to your old cycle of "Trash the Clintons and liberals in general as pure evil/Bemoan how nasty everything is/Goto 10". usenet celeb 1992 fucked around with this message at 07:33 on May 5, 2017 |
|
#
?
May 5, 2017 07:31
|
|
|
Der Waffle Mous posted:The whole Kennewick Man clusterfuck was this. Even though the remains were eventually shown to be related to the nations in the area, the initial claims that he had Caucasian features got picked up and ran with.  
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2017 07:39
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2017 08:15
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2017 11:23
|
|
|
That's an awful caricature of Ryan.
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2017 11:31
|
|
|
Pretty good Mr. bean though.
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2017 11:32
|
|
|
Potato Salad posted:That's an awful caricature of Ryan.
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2017 11:50
|
|
|
Only took me a second or two to get it, better than a lot of what we see. Also, Tei, you are a good poster and don't let anyone tell you otherwise.
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2017 13:03
|
|
|
Good morning show me the Garrison! Also loved that post on Steve Ditko, thanks!
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2017 13:27
|
|
|
 1 2 3 4
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2017 14:21
|
|
|
This is clever. I almost posted AGC but then I realized it is one.
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2017 14:59
|
|
|
I hate Marlette so much, he's like the worst offender of the truth is the middle type here
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2017 15:06
|
|
|
Der Waffle Mous posted:That's kinda the thrust of it. There's been a pretty goddamn long history of science being used to delegitimize native peoples that it's made a lot of us suspicious of it. the other tribes wanted to bury kennewick man's skeleton in a secret location and permit zero study of it, so gently caress them
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2017 15:09
|
|
|
Kurtofan posted:I hate Marlette so much, he's like the worst offender of the truth is the middle type here The message would have been stronger if somebody was ripping IVs out of the arms of sickly baby chicks because of TrumstickCare, I agree. A rooster promised golden eggs, the chickens failed to think critically about what they were told, and now must pay the price.
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2017 15:12
|
|
|
Kurtofan posted:I hate Marlette so much, he's like the worst offender of the truth is the middle type here
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2017 15:23
|
|
|
Is this actually something someone said? Because, uhm...
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2017 15:24
|
|
|
Broken Cog posted:Is this actually something someone said? Because, uhm... http://shareblue.com/gop-lawmaker-to-constituents-who-will-die-without-health-care-they-didnt-vote-for-me/
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2017 15:37
|
|
|
ratbert90 posted:http://shareblue.com/gop-lawmaker-to-constituents-who-will-die-without-health-care-they-didnt-vote-for-me/ I know people here like to say the Republicans are Cartoon Villains. I just never took it to be so literal. Broken Cog fucked around with this message at 15:58 on May 5, 2017 |
|
#
?
May 5, 2017 15:51
|
|
|
Skippy Granola posted:The message would have been stronger if somebody was ripping IVs out of the arms of sickly baby chicks because of TrumstickCare, I agree. i'm talking about his cartoons in general, it's always one pro-dem, one pro-gop cartoon, rinse and repeat Kurtofan fucked around with this message at 16:00 on May 5, 2017 |
|
#
?
May 5, 2017 15:58
|
|
|
ratbert90 posted:http://shareblue.com/gop-lawmaker-to-constituents-who-will-die-without-health-care-they-didnt-vote-for-me/ He almost said something reasonable, innovation driven by free market economics will save more lives, an idea that you can disagree with but is grounded in actual economic theory. Instead, the Republicans just can not seem to hold back their true feelings of FYGM anymore.
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2017 16:20
|
|
|
DACK FAYDEN posted:I said this like two months ago and a bunch of people jumped down my throat but he's been doing it intermittently since January, if not November. And often enough that I took notice, and I'm not very observant. What happened to him? Nothing happened to him, he's just a Floridian who thinks that not believing every right-wing talking point all of the time makes him a politically enlightened centrist unburdened by bias. He'll still draw Ed Asner Hillary holding a bag of But Those Emails—but it's ok because he did one where he admitted that Jeff Sessions was controversial.
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2017 16:30
|
|
|
Marlette was always "both candidates are bad!" And shat on Hillary a bunch in the election. His caricature of her is probably one of the more vile ones. I think him and Stiglich are the two cartoonists that I hate the most.
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2017 16:37
|
|
|
Broken Cog posted:I know people here like to say the Republicans are Cartoon Villains. I just never took it to be so literal. I assume what he meant, based on his comments about "location," was not "gently caress my constituents if they didn't vote for me," but rather "these are out-of-state protesters." Still a dumb argument.
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2017 16:38
|
|
|
If I remember correctly, early in the primary season, Marlette supported Hillary, and he only backed off into "both candidates are bad" after the buttery males got to him.
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2017 16:40
|
|
|
seiferguy posted:Marlette was always "both candidates are bad!" And shat on Hillary a bunch in the election. His caricature of her is probably one of the more vile ones. I think him and Stiglich are the two cartoonists that I hate the most. The "Both candidates are bad" pisses me off because it's such a poor excuse to wash away any responsibility for electoral outcomes. They get to say they hate both but never have to really put any effort into actually doing any good in our political system.
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2017 16:50
|
|
|
Ularg posted:The "Both candidates are bad" pisses me off because it's such a poor excuse to wash away any responsibility for electoral outcomes. They get to say they hate both but never have to really put any effort into actually doing any good in our political system. Usually both candidates are bad in the sense that it is bad to have a cold, and bad to have cancer, but if you were forced to pick, you would pick the former.
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2017 17:13
|
|
|
BarbarianElephant posted:Usually both candidates are bad in the sense that it is bad to have a cold, and bad to have cancer, but if you were forced to pick, you would pick the former. But her emaiiijgggghhckk; 
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2017 17:16
|
|
|
Technowolf posted:But her emaiiijgggghhckk; I'm shocked how effective this line has been and continues to be.
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2017 17:18
|
|
|
BarbarianElephant posted:Usually both candidates are bad in the sense that it is bad to have a cold, and bad to have cancer, but if you were forced to pick, you would pick the former. Or you can complain more about the former to make up for the other and go "Oh I'm not going to vote".
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2017 17:20
|
|
|
BarbarianElephant posted:Usually both candidates are bad in the sense that it is bad to have a cold, and bad to have cancer, but if you were forced to pick, you would pick the former. It's more "we are all flawed human beings, and it's nearly impossible to find someone that aligns with our political views 100%" but for some reason, most Americans just decide to simplify it down to "both sides are bad" to handwave any critical thinking on the topic. Ularg posted:Or you can complain more about the former to make up for the other and go "Oh I'm not going to vote". At least I get to avoid the cold, and everyone else gets cancer!
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2017 17:23
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 04:56 |
|
|
seiferguy posted:It's more "we are all flawed human beings, and it's nearly impossible to find someone that aligns with our political views 100%" but for some reason, most Americans just decide to simplify it down to "both sides are bad" to handwave any critical thinking on the topic. we are all flawed human beings This issue is especially powerful in young voters, which is why I think, they don't tend to vote. They see that both Clinton and Trump are crashing hypocrites in a lot of things, so they drat them as equally bad, when Clinton had a much better plan for the country (since Trump's plan was basically "lighting the country on fire" it was hard to be worse.) Men also get more of a pass for being flawed, so Clinton's peccadillos were more of a concern to people than Trump's complete corruption. Her slight smugness was absolutely infuriating to a lot of people, while Trump's towering vanity and arrogance got given the "great man" pass.
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2017 17:25
|
|