|
lol https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2017/05/the-parts-of-america-most-susceptible-to-automation/525168/ Most vulnerable low skill jobs are for things such as retail work, material moving such as truck driving or food services. Coastal cities with knowledge economies will be less impacted while areas which focus on blue collar jobs will see massive job losses. quote:Economists expect that millions of American jobs are going to be replaced by automation in the coming decades. But where will those job losses take place? Which areas will be hardest hit? quote:There were, however, a few regions of the country where jobs were not as likely to be automated. They included Silicon Valley, North Carolina’s Research Triangle and the Boston area, where a high share of the jobs require more creative and social intelligence, and are thus more difficult to automate.
|
# ? May 7, 2017 15:42 |
|
|
# ? May 27, 2024 02:07 |
|
The real lol is the scale used in that graph. They estimate at least 50% job loss across the board, LOL!
|
# ? May 7, 2017 17:18 |
|
Oyak posted:The real lol is the scale used in that graph. They estimate at least 50% job loss across the board, LOL! Going to get my MBA so I can be a more efficient oxy dealer.
|
# ? May 7, 2017 17:22 |
|
Oyak posted:The real lol is the scale used in that graph. They estimate at least 50% job loss across the board, LOL! I'll be surprised if unemployment isn't 30% by 2030 That or automated vehicles get outlawed or something
|
# ? May 7, 2017 17:24 |
|
Ammanas posted:I'll be surprised if unemployment isn't 30% by 2030 the only solution is to start the Butlerian Jihad
|
# ? May 7, 2017 17:37 |
|
etalian posted:the only solution is to start the Butlerian Jihad I lust for robot death
|
# ? May 7, 2017 17:43 |
|
if a hurricane hits this season do you think trump will go hand out more playdough to the newly homeless
|
# ? May 7, 2017 18:08 |
|
Ammanas posted:I'll be surprised if unemployment isn't 30% by 2030 You would think that a smart person running for office would run the campaign on an anti-robot platform, promising to prevent automation-related job loss.
|
# ? May 7, 2017 18:11 |
|
we are going to get guaranteed minimum income or we are going to get a violent mass revolt against the holders of capital and i know i ain't got a lot of faith in the former of these two scenarios happening
|
# ? May 7, 2017 18:17 |
|
financially racist posted:we are going to get guaranteed minimum income or we are going to get a violent mass revolt against the holders of capital Capital will kill the gently caress out of us because they've been smart enough not to put the squeeze on law enforcement and the military. Unless they decide to "automate" those groups in which case the robots will kill us all anyway.
|
# ? May 7, 2017 18:24 |
|
lmao our military has been, and continues to be, completely embarrassed by a bunch goat herders in a desert
|
# ? May 7, 2017 18:28 |
|
looks good to me op
|
# ? May 8, 2017 00:59 |
|
no more lovely jobs everyone hates working anyway? bring it on
|
# ? May 8, 2017 02:20 |
|
financially racist posted:lmao our military has been, and continues to be, completely embarrassed by a bunch goat herders in a desert Umm, last time I checked getting a generation wiped out is exactly what we need to bring employment numbers back.
|
# ? May 8, 2017 02:26 |
|
Bip Roberts posted:Umm, last time I checked getting a generation wiped out is exactly what we need to bring employment numbers back. i choose the boomers
|
# ? May 8, 2017 02:29 |
|
Bip Roberts posted:Umm, last time I checked getting a generation wiped out is exactly what we need to bring employment numbers back.
|
# ? May 8, 2017 02:32 |
|
once again, everythings coming up bicostal elites
|
# ? May 8, 2017 02:31 |
|
Al! posted:once again, everythings coming up bi
|
# ? May 8, 2017 02:48 |
|
it's me, i'm the one who's constantly shocked that the places where rich people live do better than the places that poor people live
|
# ? May 8, 2017 02:51 |
|
Everywhere's gonna get hit according to that goddamn graph, nowhere is safe
|
# ? May 8, 2017 02:51 |
|
Lawman 0 posted:I lust for robot death The butlerian jihad as envisioned by frank herbert rather than the lovely prequels was less about death to robots and more about sentient robots are inherently beneficial to the upper class of people compared to the other so you have to ban it from existing ofc the universe he envisioned resulting from it is literal space feudalism with aristocracies and super-educated elite human beings who can emulate a computer's computing power so welp
|
# ? May 8, 2017 03:04 |
|
Grondoth posted:Everywhere's gonna get hit according to that goddamn graph, nowhere is safe in fact the town i live in now is one of the ones with a dot signifying >64%
|
# ? May 8, 2017 03:42 |
|
etalian posted:Going to get my MBA so I can be a more efficient oxy dealer. I dunno man, I have an MBA but I've only ever sold percs. You might need to go up to the doctorate level to make those oxy sales.
|
# ? May 8, 2017 03:53 |
|
silicon valley is furiously moving towards self-driving vehicles so they can eliminate manned truck driving which is the best job most people can get outside of a city doobie is a trucker now lol Grondoth posted:Everywhere's gonna get hit according to that goddamn graph, nowhere is safe neoliberals keep pushing tech jobs as the future of industry but programmers have been very hard at work over their few decades of existence creating higher and higher level languages and tools so that one programmer today can do the work of fifty from 1985 the bitcoin of weed has issued a correction as of 04:05 on May 8, 2017 |
# ? May 8, 2017 04:01 |
|
Fullhouse posted:silicon valley is furiously moving towards self-driving vehicles so they can eliminate manned truck driving which is the best job most people can get outside of a city zuckerberg is gonna run for office and tell everybody they can get jobs as robocar mechanics via facebook's new job platform, "Sokyt™"
|
# ? May 8, 2017 04:08 |
|
Fluoride Jones posted:zuckerberg is gonna run for office and tell everybody they can get jobs as robocar mechanics via facebook's new job platform, "Sokyt™"
|
# ? May 8, 2017 04:08 |
|
etalian posted:the only solution is to start the Islamocommunist Jihad
|
# ? May 8, 2017 04:39 |
|
gonna need to start a massive landwar so we can kill off all the unemployable males we'll end up having sooner the better hth
|
# ? May 8, 2017 05:27 |
|
Butlerian Jihad is the only answer.
|
# ? May 8, 2017 06:14 |
|
Retail is already in trouble today, but self driving cars aren't as clever as people think, so it may take longer to automate truckers. It's like white collar work is any safer either, in fact its probably easier to automate a lot of that then it is totally replace blue collar stuff.
|
# ? May 8, 2017 06:15 |
|
A lot of white collar work has already been quietly automated over the years, hasn't it? It's just less obvious it's happening.
|
# ? May 8, 2017 06:20 |
|
Fuuka Ayase posted:A lot of white collar work has already been quietly automated over the years, hasn't it? It's just less obvious it's happening. Remember when secretaries and clerks were jobs just because nobody knew how to type and spreadsheets didn't exist?
|
# ? May 8, 2017 06:33 |
|
how many people did spreadsheets put out of work remember we used to do have people who did all that poo poo by hand
|
# ? May 8, 2017 06:40 |
|
I as a resident of the Riverside-San Bernardino area. Yeah. If they just swithchef over to self checkouts at every store the economy here would colapse. You can't even go to school cause that auto-doc Watson is coming or that next.
|
# ? May 8, 2017 07:00 |
|
McGavin posted:Remember when secretaries and clerks were jobs just because nobody knew how to type and spreadsheets didn't exist? And now they have spreadsheets and they still gently caress up my payroll. Because they hire idiots who don't know how to read a sheet or run a computer program. Also, most people are too loving stupid to use self-checkout and would bitch. Even if you did replace them and told the retards to suck it, you'd have to have people baby sit them to discourage theft and tag out 18/21+ poo poo. (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
# ? May 8, 2017 07:02 |
|
They're trying to do self checkout here, but it ends up needing more people than regular checkout to make sure it doesn't get screwed up.
|
# ? May 8, 2017 07:34 |
|
Fuuka Ayase posted:They're trying to do self checkout here, but it ends up needing more people than regular checkout to make sure it doesn't get screwed up. Yeah, you really have to work all day in it to really see how dumb most people are when it comes to self-checkout.
|
# ? May 8, 2017 07:38 |
|
financially racist posted:we are going to get guaranteed minimum income or we are going to get a violent mass revolt against the holders of capital
|
# ? May 8, 2017 07:54 |
|
KiteAuraan posted:Yeah, you really have to work all day in it to really see how dumb most people are when it comes to self-checkout. I have heard no positive opinions about it from people who work it. It's mind numbingly boring most of the time, but someone always has to stand right by the stupid thing because something always goes wrong. Which then usually involves calling management, and management has to get involved far more with the glorious automated future than normal registers. They are also the sole source of increased losses through theft here.
|
# ? May 8, 2017 09:43 |
|
|
# ? May 27, 2024 02:07 |
|
Self-checkout is a relic of the past, built around cumbersome barcodes and dumb systems The new hotness in retail automation is eliminating the checkout process altogether, so you can just wheel your cart out the door and the store automatically detects what you've got and charges your card there are various methods and approaches that are being worked on and none of them are really ready yet, so it's probably still a few years out, but self-checkout as we know it is going to be obsolete soon too. and obviously, eliminating the human component altogether is going to work a lot better than just making the customer take the place of the human worker
|
# ? May 8, 2017 14:54 |