Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
rudatron
May 31, 2011

by Fluffdaddy
Its a limitation of representative politics that a single vote is actually really hard to interpret motivationally. Is a landslide electotal victory proof of a mandate' for every policy that representative believes, or simply a very broad based approval for the particular set of policies (and intensities) they advertised, relative to the opposition? You can make an argument each way for every election. Asking voters themselves may not be enlightening either, because very few people actually have the self awareness and political familiarity required, to fully & logically elaborate all of their beliefs, in every subtlety. You can feel something without actually having the language to express it.

The flip side of this is that voting to 'make a point ' rarely works.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

White Rock
Jul 14, 2007
Creativity flows in the bored and the angry!
We should treat voting habits less like moral decisions and more like situations shaped by their conditions. Clinton did lose votes because Bernie ran, because many of the people fired up by Bernie felt betrayed by their actions. Perhaps these pepole would have lazyly voted Clinton if there had been no progressive candidates, but a lot of good will was lost with the whole debacle.

Therefore if you can get any progressive to primary, even if they lose, the corporate dems will look bad doing it, lose more goodwill and be more susceptible to lose the next one.


Talking about "you should/shouldn't vote tactically" is irrelevant if it doesn't effect how people vote.

super sweet best pal
Nov 18, 2009

White Rock posted:

Perhaps these pepole would have lazyly voted Clinton if there had been no progressive candidates, but a lot of good will was lost with the whole debacle.

I registered as Democrat to specifically try and stop Clinton from getting the nomination because I'd rather see actually progressive social programs than half-assed liberal ones.

ate shit on live tv
Feb 15, 2004

by Azathoth

super sweet best pal posted:

I registered as Democrat to specifically try and stop Clinton from getting the nomination because I'd rather see actually progressive social programs than half-assed liberal ones.

so did a lot of other people, or at least they tried, but alas when the Democrats exclude you from their private club that happens to be part of the foundation of our country's election system it's not considered voter suppression.

FuzzySkinner
May 23, 2012

White Rock posted:

We should treat voting habits less like moral decisions and more like situations shaped by their conditions. Clinton did lose votes because Bernie ran, because many of the people fired up by Bernie felt betrayed by their actions. Perhaps these pepole would have lazyly voted Clinton if there had been no progressive candidates, but a lot of good will was lost with the whole debacle.

Therefore if you can get any progressive to primary, even if they lose, the corporate dems will look bad doing it, lose more goodwill and be more susceptible to lose the next one.


Talking about "you should/shouldn't vote tactically" is irrelevant if it doesn't effect how people vote.

It seem to piss off a lot of Sanders voters is that she didn't try to go after their votes. She kept going back to the center after being challenged by "populism" from both sides. Her policies were incrementalist at best, conservative at their very worst. She kept hanging out with war criminals, wall street crooks over various lefties. When VALID criticism of these sort of things were brought up. Rather than use the "lesser evil" argument ? Her supporters and surrogates would flip out, make accusations of "sexism", "racism" and that "They didn't need your vote".

It's a garbage party that's a graveyard of political ideas right now. In theory? Trump's election should be one of the best recruitment tools to get people to get off their rear end to vote in state, local, and federal elections to get some left wing leadership in power. They could really champion a lot of ideas right now like single payer and what have you. This would win them a lot of elections even in places that they think they wouldn't be able to win.

You know what we get? "RUSSIA". That's it. That's what these loving assholes have chosen to focus their aim on. A right wing gas lighting trick. All because they refuse to acknowledge that neoliberalism is a failed ideology. These COWARDS stand for absolutely nothing.

get that OUT of my face
Feb 10, 2007

FuzzySkinner posted:

In theory? Trump's election should be one of the best recruitment tools to get people to get off their rear end to vote in state, local, and federal elections to get some left wing leadership in power. They could really champion a lot of ideas right now like single payer and what have you. This would win them a lot of elections even in places that they think they wouldn't be able to win.
hell, they don't even have to go too heavily on the ideas. if they kept shouting "republicans want to take away your healthcare for tax cuts on the wealthy" or something to that effect, it'll be pretty effective. but top dems won't even do that. you have pelosi bragging that these republicans will lose their seats, and you have hillary clinton continuing to whine and completely miss the point as to why she lost

it's remarkably loving simple

FuzzySkinner
May 23, 2012

get that OUT of my face posted:

hell, they don't even have to go too heavily on the ideas. if they kept shouting "republicans want to take away your healthcare for tax cuts on the wealthy" or something to that effect, it'll be pretty effective. but top dems won't even do that. you have pelosi bragging that these republicans will lose their seats, and you have hillary clinton continuing to whine and completely miss the point as to why she lost

it's remarkably loving simple

I can see what they're trying to do. They're trying to create a benghazi-like environment around Trump so that we routinely have to hear how he's corrupt and bad.

Maybe it'll work, but it's personally driving me insane. Not to mention there's a million other things they could drop kick his rear end over and this is perhaps the weakest one. My assumption is that their thought process is this:

"Huh. We got our asses kicked and humilated by an absolute clown. What could let us get away with not being able to change a single thing, while a the same time playing well to the xenophobic rubes in his base?"

"Well why did they vote for Reagan?"

"Well he beat the communists in Russia. They hated commies. Hey you know..PUTIN is a bad guy always invading countries and poo poo. Eliminating gay rights. Propping up dictators. He's still bad. HEY. I got it! We'll blame it on the Russians! The idiots in this country will eat this up! Let's feed this poo poo to the media. If they can sell the country on a bullshit war in Iraq? We can sell them on Russia. Not like the country has an absolute distrust and disgust in the media right now either!"

It just feels bizarrely insulting to my intelligence. I mean according to "Shattered" wasn't this exactly the talking point Robby Mook and others cooked up to deflect blame, parachut eout?

get that OUT of my face
Feb 10, 2007

FuzzySkinner posted:

I can see what they're trying to do. They're trying to create a benghazi-like environment around Trump so that we routinely have to hear how he's corrupt and bad.

Maybe it'll work
the benghazi hysteria didn't work, why would this

Guy Goodbody
Aug 31, 2016

by Nyc_Tattoo

FuzzySkinner posted:

I can see what they're trying to do. They're trying to create a benghazi-like environment around Trump so that we routinely have to hear how he's corrupt and bad.

Maybe it'll work, but it's personally driving me insane. Not to mention there's a million other things they could drop kick his rear end over and this is perhaps the weakest one. My assumption is that their thought process is this:

"Huh. We got our asses kicked and humilated by an absolute clown. What could let us get away with not being able to change a single thing, while a the same time playing well to the xenophobic rubes in his base?"

"Well why did they vote for Reagan?"

"Well he beat the communists in Russia. They hated commies. Hey you know..PUTIN is a bad guy always invading countries and poo poo. Eliminating gay rights. Propping up dictators. He's still bad. HEY. I got it! We'll blame it on the Russians! The idiots in this country will eat this up! Let's feed this poo poo to the media. If they can sell the country on a bullshit war in Iraq? We can sell them on Russia. Not like the country has an absolute distrust and disgust in the media right now either!"

It just feels bizarrely insulting to my intelligence. I mean according to "Shattered" wasn't this exactly the talking point Robby Mook and others cooked up to deflect blame, parachut eout?

Blaming Russia for Clinton losing is stupid and wrong, but I don't think you can honestly say that there's nothing to the Russia connection after today. Clearly there's something to the Russia connection, and it's gotta be pretty loving damaging for Trump to just fire Comey like that.

It's the piss tape.

Tunicate
May 15, 2012

Guy Goodbody posted:

Blaming Russia for Clinton losing is stupid and wrong, but I don't think you can honestly say that there's nothing to the Russia connection after today. Clearly there's something to the Russia connection, and it's gotta be pretty loving damaging for Trump to just fire Comey like that.

It's the piss tape.

Unless trump is playing 13-dimensional chess and is going to concede on the most obviously transparent democrat-choice investigator imaginable, and let the dems focus a ton of effort on what actually is a nothingburger.

FuzzySkinner
May 23, 2012

get that OUT of my face posted:

the benghazi hysteria didn't work, why would this

It did in some aspects. The whole thing kinda riled up the GOP base against her yet again, though whether they needed more meat to throw at them for such a thing remains to be seen.


Tunicate posted:

Unless trump is playing 13-dimensional chess and is going to concede on the most obviously transparent democrat-choice investigator imaginable, and let the dems focus a ton of effort on what actually is a nothingburger.

There's times when I am kinda cheering on Trump to humiliate these liberals even more. ( liberals =/= leftists. Again, Healthcare being taken away and right wing lunatics being in charge of the government is not good. )

I mean look at this poo poo.

https://twitter.com/hspaulds/status/862155670828838912


https://twitter.com/colbertlateshow/status/862119534500749312

His audience cheers this, and then they go "no, no. This is bad you guys!"

FuzzySkinner has issued a correction as of 05:55 on May 10, 2017

Kraps
Sep 9, 2011

This avatar was paid for by the Silent Majority.
hey guys
Milk is a nazi symbol

quote:

Milk is the new, creamy symbol of white racial purity in Donald Trump's America
but then again

quote:

The whole milk-chugging, anti-vegan narrative is complicated by a number of factors, not least of which being that Adolf Hitler was possibly vegetarian for a short time, or that there are many places in Africa where milk is a dietary staple.
maybe not

I don't know, here are words that form sentences. https://mic.com/articles/168188/milk-nazis-white-supremacists-creamy-pseudo-science-trump-shia-labeouf#.EKmZ6YmKH

get that OUT of my face
Feb 10, 2007

that article is months old and uses /pol/ as a primary source. it's bunk

MaxxBot
Oct 6, 2003

you could have clapped

you should have clapped!!
Oh no :ohdear:

rudatron
May 31, 2011

by Fluffdaddy
Turns out that very few people want to read pretentious & condescending lectures.

deadgoon
Dec 4, 2014

by FactsAreUseless

rudatron posted:

Turns out that very few people want to read pretentious & condescending lectures.

guilt porn is the only way i can maintain my erection!!!

sword_man.gif
Apr 12, 2007

Fun Shoe

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rddRQyBmBkw

get that OUT of my face
Feb 10, 2007



i can't help but think that the person who typed that sentence is neither black nor from the south. i'd write an article about why she shouldn't culturally appropriate them but i don't wanna stoop to their level

Uncle Wemus
Mar 4, 2004

Im still certain that site is written by robots since everything is so dry and boring

Taintrunner
Apr 10, 2017

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
someone post a best of everyday feminism thread when they die off

OhFunny
Jun 26, 2013

EXTREMELY PISSED AT THE DNC
I choose to mock this dude, because he deserves as much mockery as possible.

https://twitter.com/nowthisnews/status/862389285982306304

FuzzySkinner
May 23, 2012

https://twitter.com/woke8yearold/status/862458502857584642

get that OUT of my face
Feb 10, 2007

i'd say that he could move to taiwan but moviebob ain't that bright

SMILLENNIALSMILLEN
Jun 26, 2009



OhFunny posted:

I choose to mock this dude, because he deserves as much mockery as possible.

https://twitter.com/nowthisnews/status/862389285982306304

Here we see the garden variety trump supporter, scientific name; standard bigot

get that OUT of my face
Feb 10, 2007

i'm sure if somebody went up to him and acted slightly threatening in response, he'd piss his pants and run away in terror

FuzzySkinner
May 23, 2012

get that OUT of my face posted:

i'm sure if somebody went up to him and acted slightly threatening in response, he'd piss his pants and run away in terror

He's acting like a loving gorilla. Pounding his chest, playing with his dick.

He reminds me of those dipshits I'd run into back home in my little town. They'd live in the 'burbs, but try to put up this big front about how "country" they were, all while driving those big rear end "lifted" trucks. They always seemed to reject education and opportunities to better themselves in favor of being purposely ignorant.

There's like a mass difference between guys like this and the "trailer park" stereotypes people like to prop up as stereotypical :911: voters. In my experience? That guy would be more of an accurate representation versus someone who's struggling to make ends meet.

Uncle Wemus
Mar 4, 2004

OhFunny posted:

I choose to mock this dude, because he deserves as much mockery as possible.

https://twitter.com/nowthisnews/status/862389285982306304

is he a midget? he looks like he has short features

Grognan
Jan 23, 2007

by Fluffdaddy
Lol holy poo poo, I probably would have prodded him on and then dealt with the possible face punches.

Edit: LOL underarmor

get that OUT of my face
Feb 10, 2007

FuzzySkinner posted:

He's acting like a loving gorilla. Pounding his chest, playing with his dick.
his dick is probably small like a gorilla's too

MaxxBot
Oct 6, 2003

you could have clapped

you should have clapped!!
Gorilla Mindset™

Nonsense
Jan 26, 2007

https://twitter.com/Freeyourmindkid/status/862496188540518400

ate shit on live tv
Feb 15, 2004

by Azathoth

bahaha seriously? What a loving idiot.

get that OUT of my face
Feb 10, 2007

hahahaha not so tough now, are you, bitch

deadgoon
Dec 4, 2014

by FactsAreUseless
why would anyone think someone ranting in public was tough instead of desperate

Clawtopsy
Dec 17, 2009

What a fascinatingly unusual cock. Now, allow me to show you my collection...

deadgoon posted:

why would anyone think someone ranting in public was tough instead of desperate

have you seen any of the recent protests or counter protests

deadgoon
Dec 4, 2014

by FactsAreUseless

Clawtopsy posted:

have you seen any of the recent protests or counter protests

no i don't really like crowds

rudatron
May 31, 2011

by Fluffdaddy
Laffo

sword_man.gif
Apr 12, 2007

Fun Shoe

now that's comedy

deadgoon
Dec 4, 2014

by FactsAreUseless
capitalism is a far greater crime than harassment but here we are cheering on the system for punishing someone it has already broken

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

rudatron
May 31, 2011

by Fluffdaddy
gently caress off, harassing strangers is peak douchebag behavior

  • Locked thread