|
Section 9 posted:I might have missed this being mentioned before, but does anyone know if it is going to be released on Showtime Hulu subscription at the same time as broadcast? I don't have cable and was planning to get a Showtime Hulu sub just for this, but just need to know when to schedule my watching party. Yes, otherwise a Showtime subscription has zero reason to exist if you don't actually get Showtime.
|
#
?
May 5, 2017 12:44
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 9, 2024 14:26 |
|
|
grilldos posted:Yes, otherwise a Showtime subscription has zero reason to exist if you don't actually get Showtime. I know it is going to be on Hulu-Showtime, I'm wondering about the timing of when it will actually show up on Hulu. As it airs, an hour after it airs, a day after it airs?
|
|
#
?
May 5, 2017 22:24
|
|
|
As it airs.
|
|
#
?
May 6, 2017 02:29
|
|
|
I wonder if they'll ever do a widescreen release of the series. I have no problem with the original aspect ratio and I know it was shot with that in mind, but the blu-ray menus have some gorgeous 16:9 shots featured on each disc.
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2017 06:41
|
|
|
el oso posted:I wonder if they'll ever do a widescreen release of the series. I have no problem with the original aspect ratio and I know it was shot with that in mind, but the blu-ray menus have some gorgeous 16:9 shots featured on each disc.
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2017 08:16
|
|
|
el oso posted:I wonder if they'll ever do a widescreen release of the series. I have no problem with the original aspect ratio and I know it was shot with that in mind, but the blu-ray menus have some gorgeous 16:9 shots featured on each disc. Aren't those just zoomed-in clips from the show? Harder to tell since they only used exterior shots
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2017 19:37
|
|
|
Tim Burns Effect posted:Aren't those just zoomed-in clips from the show? Harder to tell since they only used exterior shots Yeah, you're right. Did some comparisons from the title screens to the episodes and it's just a zoom - I'm going to blame the wine consumption, but it really did some like some shots were native 16:9 on whatever disc that was. I haven't checked out The Wire in 16:9 but there's a pretty interesting article from him on the process of doing it.
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2017 21:49
|
|
|
Some actual new information! Well, at least an interesting article. http://feature.variety.com/twin-peaks/
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2017 19:24
|
|
|
quote:For those expecting a similar structure to the original, which revolved around Laura’s death, Frost issues a warning: “It’s going to be very different this time around.” Hmm. Between this and the stuff about the scope being wider this time around, I wonder if this means season 3 is going resemble something closer to Frost's novel than expected.
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2017 19:40
|
|
|
quote:“Kyle and I had several scenes, particularly in the car, when we're talking about the robins,” This sounds perfect. I can't wait.
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2017 20:09
|
|
|
I had a dream the other night where I was rewatching Batman Forever, and Sherilynn Fenn played "Spice". I was absolutely certain that I wasn't imagining it, when I woke up, but I was. Debi Mazar was Spice. And that's fine, but she's no Audrey. 
|
|
#
?
May 9, 2017 23:00
|
|
|
 hop in loser we're going to the black lodge
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2017 00:20
|
|
|
CJacobs posted:
Hope they are going to be drinking Pabst Blue Ribbon
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2017 00:22
|
|
|
bobkatt013 posted:Hope they are going to be drinking Pabst Blue Ribbon I'll watch anything that moves! That Lynch directed!
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2017 00:49
|
|
|
Raxivace posted:Hmm. Between this and the stuff about the scope being wider this time around, I wonder if this means season 3 is going resemble something closer to Frost's novel than expected. I think he just meant that the majority of the new season may not even take place in Twin Peaks.
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2017 04:06
|
|
|
Yeah I could buy other entrances to the Lodge being important. Especially after the book (which is good )
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2017 04:24
|
|
|
From the way it's written I think it might drastically expand in scale, it's no longer just about Twin Peaks. That's only where the fire started. The lodges become a metaphor for a collective soul, BOB is no longer limited to one body. He jumps at will and Cooper has to chase after him across America, uncovering more secrets of the Lodges as he goes and attempting to piece together a way to permanently seal him out of our world.
The Unlife Aquatic fucked around with this message at 04:37 on May 10, 2017 |
|
#
?
May 10, 2017 04:31
|
|
|
The Unlife Aquatic posted:From the way it's written I think it might drastically expand in scale, it's no longer just about Twin Peaks. That's only where the fire started. The lodges become a metaphor for a collective soul, BOB is no longer limited to one body. He jumps at will and Cooper has to chase after him across America, uncovering more secrets of the Lodges as he goes and attempting to piece together a way to permanently seal him out of our world. But Cooper is Bob?
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2017 05:22
|
|
|
cis autodrag posted:But Cooper is Bob? If anyone else wrote this, I'd say that's a given. But honestly I could totally see Lynch saying "yeah, we dealt with that offscreen."
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2017 05:46
|
|
|
"We're not going to talk about Bob at all"
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2017 05:55
|
|
|
I can see it being the "Who killed Laura Palmer?" question this time around. Never directly addressed, let alone resolved, but just left to constantly tick in everybody's mind as they watch.
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2017 06:29
|
|
|
Huh, I always just assumed this season would start with the real Cooper returning from the Black Lodge.
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2017 06:32
|
|
|
Captain_Person posted:I can see it being the "Who killed Laura Palmer?" question this time around. Never directly addressed, let alone resolved, but just left to constantly tick in everybody's mind as they watch. Now that I you mention it, I think you're right. Lynch loves unsolved mysteries and he really didn't want to reveal Laura's killer.
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2017 07:22
|
|
|
Maybe he just changed his mind but I still find it hard to believe that he never wanted to reveal it at all considering he made an entire movie surrounding the answer and wasn't under obligation to do so.
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2017 13:06
|
|
|
A True Jar Jar Fan posted:Maybe he just changed his mind but I still find it hard to believe that he never wanted to reveal it at all considering he made an entire movie surrounding the answer and wasn't under obligation to do so. If the world gives you lemons...
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2017 13:11
|
|
|
And More posted:Huh, I always just assumed this season would start with the real Cooper returning from the Black Lodge. Honestly I've been expecting possessed Coop as the villain personally.
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2017 16:38
|
|
|
Zartosht posted:Honestly I've been expecting possessed Coop as the villain personally. IIRC there's a bit of foreshadowing in the original series that suggests Hawk might save Coop from BOB, and they could always say that happened inbetween seasons I guess.
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2017 16:43
|
|
|
What if Laura Dern is Diane
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2017 16:44
|
|
|
multijoe posted:What if Laura Dern is Diane What if she's Judy?
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2017 16:59
|
|
|
Captain_Person posted:I can see it being the "Who killed Laura Palmer?" question this time around. Never directly addressed, let alone resolved, but just left to constantly tick in everybody's mind as they watch. Huh? Whether or not Lynch wanted to answer it, this was addressed... Also is a huge part of what makes this show amazing tbh.
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2017 17:00
|
|
|
multijoe posted:What if Laura Dern is Diane I'm guessing she's either Diane or the agent from Frost's book.
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2017 18:05
|
|
|
RIP Michael Parks
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2017 18:08
|
|
|
I hope Lynch does something new with Twin Peaks and just leaves old questions completely unanswered. Yeah Coop is okay now and no you don't get to figure out why.
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2017 21:03
|
|
|
Why?
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2017 21:06
|
|
|
It would be difficult to come up with satisfactory answers after 25 years of fan speculation.
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2017 21:16
|
|
|
Sure, and there's absolutely no way everyone's satisfied no matter what Lynch does. "Don't even try" seems like a lazy idea though.
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2017 21:30
|
|
|
I'd be alright with that so long as they write in a part for the kid that danced his way out of the scene in the first episode.
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2017 22:15
|
|
|
A True Jar Jar Fan posted:Sure, and there's absolutely no way everyone's satisfied no matter what Lynch does. "Don't even try" seems like a lazy idea though. Let me put it this way: I'd rather he make something good even if he ignores old continuity elements in favor of bringing in something new. What I don't want to see is fan service crap where we need follow ups on every minute thing that happened in the old series. But Lynch always tends to go his own way, so I'm not too worried that will happen.
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2017 22:49
|
|
|
Ginette Reno posted:Let me put it this way: I'd rather he make something good even if he ignores old continuity elements in favor of bringing in something new. There's fanservice continuity wank and then there's the insane cliffhanger where the protagonist has his soul taken by the primary antagonist and is possessed by him. If Lynch didn't go somewhere with that I'd question why he agreed to revive Twin Peaks.
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2017 22:56
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 9, 2024 14:26 |
|
|
Ginette Reno posted:What I don't want to see is fan service crap where we need follow ups on every minute thing that happened in the old series. But Lynch always tends to go his own way, so I'm not too worried that will happen. This I completely agree with.
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2017 22:58
|
|