Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Teemu Pokemon
Jun 19, 2004

To sign them is my real test

With full no movement clause
To be completely fair, having Tanner Glass on that ice to protect a 1-goal lead in the waning minutes of a playoff game is alarming. Doing it three times in a series with the same result is about as close as you can get to a legitimate fireable offense

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

corn on the cop
Oct 12, 2012

Break what must be broken, once for all, that's all, and take the suffering on oneself.

― Corey Dostoyevsky
https://streamable.com/c22jw

this is everything

Jovial Cow
Sep 7, 2006

inherently good

a false posted:

i've been saying this for the entire playoffs: i think vigneault is a good coach but i also think that his time with the rangers is over. i think every coach has a limited lifespan at the helm of any given team and alain vigneault has reached his with the rangers as he has become unable to make correct personnel decisions, his judgment clouded by his history with individual players. i've also said that i'm not sure that there's any coach who doesn't have this problem with a team eventually, which is the reason you bring in a new coach who can look at a team with fresh eyes and decide who his best players are in a relatively objective fashion.

as far as no coach in the world being able to make adjustments during the playoffs, that is a very perplexing thing to say. of course coaches can make adjustments during the playoffs, and of course there have been coaches who have not had problems doing so when necessary. vigneault has not been one of them. one change to the team's playing style that would not have been difficult to make would have been instructing the team to play the same when they have a lead as they do when they do not have a lead. even with a one-goal lead, the rangers were coached to be more passive on the attack, and more "defensive" players (read: players like dan girardi) were deployed more frequently. this is exactly why the rangers lost this series despite scoring first in FIVE OF SIX GAMES. that is a coaching problem, and a different coach could have avoided it.

The problem is there are problems throughout the blue line. Everyone was up in arms when Staal and Holden were out for goals against, and folks were up in arms over Smith as well. McDonagh, Skjei, and Girardi are not Karlsson. He can't keep them on the ice forever. And everyone hates Girardi anyway.

100% agreed on the glass stuff.

JawKnee
Mar 24, 2007





You'll take the ride to leave this town along that yellow line

glorious

fits
Jan 1, 2008

Love Always,
The Captain

a false posted:

i've been saying this for the entire playoffs: i think vigneault is a good coach but i also think that his time with the rangers is over. i think every coach has a limited lifespan at the helm of any given team and alain vigneault has reached his with the rangers as he has become unable to make correct personnel decisions, his judgment clouded by his history with individual players. i've also said that i'm not sure that there's any coach who doesn't have this problem with a team eventually, which is the reason you bring in a new coach who can look at a team with fresh eyes and decide who his best players are in a relatively objective fashion.

it seems to be in vogue now to hire old coaches you won cups/had past success with so

mike keenan, come on down!

Levitate
Sep 30, 2005

randy newman voice

YOU'VE GOT A LAFRENIÈRE IN ME
I think people especially Vancouver fans miss the point of why people are complaining about AV. Just because your team went and hired some lovely coaches doesn't mean AV is without fault. I'd rather he magically learn to fix his mistakes but I feel comfortable saying some of his decisions probably cost the Rangers that series. It's an issue. It needs to be addressed one way or another.

Jamwad Hilder
Apr 18, 2007

surfin usa
The Rangers need to buy out Girardi and hope Staal can be traded or something. That guy they got from Minnesota-Duluth is the real deal and Skjei should be getting way more minutes. That's my opinion.

Levitate
Sep 30, 2005

randy newman voice

YOU'VE GOT A LAFRENIÈRE IN ME

Jamwad Hilder posted:

The Rangers need to buy out Girardi and hope Staal can be traded or something. That guy they got from Minnesota-Duluth is the real deal and Skjei should be getting way more minutes. That's my opinion.

:agreed:

They also signed that Russian defenseman (Bereglazov) who's been very good in the KHL

grack
Jan 10, 2012

COACH TOTORO SAY REFEREE CAN BANISH WHISTLE TO LAND OF WIND AND GHOSTS!
Change for the sake of change is a stupid idea. If you get rid of AV, who do you replace him with? Even if you find a coach who won't make the same mistakes you're going to be hard pressed to find someone who is, overall, any where as near as good a coach as Vigneault. Focusing solely on the flaws is a horrendous way to make decisions like this. Sure, he makes some bad decisions at times. Every coach does. You seem to be forgetting the very simple fact that the Rangers' success over the last few years is due in a large part to his strategies. You really think another coach on the market is going to make the Rangers a better team?

Seriously, what coach on the market today is a better choice? Sutter? Keenan? Marc Crawford?

Matt Zerella
Oct 7, 2002

Norris'es are back baby. It's good again. Awoouu (fox Howl)
I'd :lol: at Keenan having another go around in NY.

Spring Break My Heart
Feb 15, 2012
Every team does worse with a lead than while trailing, it's certainly not an easy thing to change. And it goes beyond who you're giving shifts to, the exact same set of players perform worse with the lead.

Levitate posted:

I think people especially Vancouver fans miss the point of why people are complaining about AV. Just because your team went and hired some lovely coaches doesn't mean AV is without fault. I'd rather he magically learn to fix his mistakes but I feel comfortable saying some of his decisions probably cost the Rangers that series. It's an issue. It needs to be addressed one way or another.
Sure but if you get rid of Vigneault than you have to hire someone else when the complaints posted about Vigneault are said about every coach in the league.

ThinkTank
Oct 23, 2007

Levitate posted:

I think people especially Vancouver fans miss the point of why people are complaining about AV. Just because your team went and hired some lovely coaches doesn't mean AV is without fault. I'd rather he magically learn to fix his mistakes but I feel comfortable saying some of his decisions probably cost the Rangers that series. It's an issue. It needs to be addressed one way or another.

He's not flawless, no one is saying he is, but when you fire a coach you have to ask "who will replace him and are they an improvement?" If the answer is 'no' then it's probably not worth firing them unless you're just looking for a shakeup. There aren't exactly a ton of great coaching candidates out there right now, so I don't see the sense in firing AV.

JawKnee
Mar 24, 2007





You'll take the ride to leave this town along that yellow line
if you fire AV he is instantly the best available coach on the market by a long shot

e: honestly, the problem here seems to be "AV plays bad players more than good ones" so... the rags GM should do something about the bad players then?

ImplicitAssembler
Jan 24, 2013

Levitate posted:

I think people especially Vancouver fans miss the point of why people are complaining about AV. Just because your team went and hired some lovely coaches doesn't mean AV is without fault. I'd rather he magically learn to fix his mistakes but I feel comfortable saying some of his decisions probably cost the Rangers that series. It's an issue. It needs to be addressed one way or another.

It also seems like some of the Canucks fan have forgotten how terrible he was in the last year and a bit.

Jamwad Hilder
Apr 18, 2007

surfin usa

ImplicitAssembler posted:

It also seems like some of the Canucks fan have forgotten how terrible he was in the last year and a bit.

would that be the season where he coached them to a 1st place finish in the Northwest and the President's trophy or the slightly shortened season when he coached them to a 1st place finish in the Northwest and 8th overall in the league?

flakeloaf
Feb 26, 2003

Still better than android clock

JawKnee posted:

if you fire AV he is instantly the best available coach on the market by a long shot

e: honestly, the problem here seems to be "AV plays bad players more than good ones" so... the rags GM should do something about the bad players then?

If the Senators had been eliminated, would people seriously be calling for Boucher to be fired because he gave all that ice time to Ceci and Phaneuf? I wouldn't think so.

a false
Mar 5, 2009

I DECIDE
WHO LIVES
AND WHO DIES

grack posted:

Seriously, what coach on the market today is a better choice? Sutter? Keenan? Marc Crawford?

yeah i'd take sutter.

DJExile
Jun 28, 2007


Actually yeah how has Sutter not been hired somewhere yet?

E: or do coaching hires largely wait until after the playoffs?

JawKnee
Mar 24, 2007





You'll take the ride to leave this town along that yellow line

ImplicitAssembler posted:

It also seems like some of the Canucks fan have forgotten how terrible he was in the last year and a bit.

he's the best coach we've had in a while, and all the ones since have been trash - I'm well aware of your opinion on this, and it's garbage

DJExile posted:

Actually yeah how has Sutter not been hired somewhere yet?

E: or do coaching hires largely wait until after the playoffs?

I think Sutter's on the record somewhere as saying that he doesn't go out looking for a job but waits for teams to come to him

Levitate
Sep 30, 2005

randy newman voice

YOU'VE GOT A LAFRENIÈRE IN ME
I'm not even saying fire AV at this point but the way Canucks fans seem to be programmed to respond to any complaints about AV with "well who are you going to replace him with god you're so stupid see all his faults are things every coach does quit bitching about this amazing coach" would be funny if it wasn't annoying.

He's a good coach but he has hosed up pretty bad in some ways in the past couple of years and could probably be argued that he was part of the reason Staal was given a big contract and Stralman was let go. I wish he'd fix some of his obvious flaws instead of being so loving stubborn about it.

whatis
Jun 6, 2012

it should be at least twice as long, but it's very good nonetheless

JawKnee
Mar 24, 2007





You'll take the ride to leave this town along that yellow line

Levitate posted:

and could probably be argued that he was part of the reason Staal was given a big contract and Stralman was let go

Oh? How so?

grack
Jan 10, 2012

COACH TOTORO SAY REFEREE CAN BANISH WHISTLE TO LAND OF WIND AND GHOSTS!

Levitate posted:

He's a good coach but he has hosed up pretty bad in some ways in the past couple of years and could probably be argued that he was part of the reason Staal was given a big contract and Stralman was let go. I wish he'd fix some of his obvious flaws instead of being so loving stubborn about it.

This is the dumbest thing you've said so far and that's saying a lot.

a false
Mar 5, 2009

I DECIDE
WHO LIVES
AND WHO DIES

grack posted:

This is the dumbest thing you've said so far and that's saying a lot.

you sure are worked up about people having the gall to suggest that alain vigneault has made significant mistakes as coach of the rangers

Levitate
Sep 30, 2005

randy newman voice

YOU'VE GOT A LAFRENIÈRE IN ME

JawKnee posted:

Oh? How so?

Call it bullshit or not but the Rangers have always talked about how the coach and GM get together to evaluate the roster and make decisions about it. AV obviously likes Staal and Girardi and the Rangers let Stralman when he was obviously their second best defenseman

Basically, I think AV is kinda bad at evaluating defensemen and he was happy with Girardi and Staal but wanted to ditch Stralman in an attempt to upgrade their scoring from the blueline instead of letting Girardi walk (or trading him at the 2014 deadline as I recall was a rumored possibility) or trading Staal instead.

Just my opinion. I think Sather also liked those guys a lot (especially Girardi) and so yeah maybe AV doesn't factor into it that much but I personally think it's clear he likes those guys and relies upon them to the detriment of the team

Levitate
Sep 30, 2005

randy newman voice

YOU'VE GOT A LAFRENIÈRE IN ME

a false posted:

you sure are worked up about people having the gall to suggest that alain vigneault has made significant mistakes as coach of the rangers

No loving poo poo. I haven't seen Grack make a single post in these threads that isn't being a gigantic rear end in a top hat to someone

a false
Mar 5, 2009

I DECIDE
WHO LIVES
AND WHO DIES
is it really that outlandish to imagine that a coach has influence on a team's personnel decisions, or do you actually believe that all decisions about signing players happen strictly in a vacuum containing the general manager, player, and player's agent? do you think tanner glass is brought to the new york rangers (on a 3 year deal, no less) if vigneault is not coach?

Jordan7hm
Feb 17, 2011




Lipstick Apathy

DJExile posted:

Actually yeah how has Sutter not been hired somewhere yet?

E: or do coaching hires largely wait until after the playoffs?

It's too early. Some GMs will probably fall and coaches will follow.

Jamwad Hilder
Apr 18, 2007

surfin usa
I think after the playoffs, but before the draft/free agency is where we start to see GMs and coaches fired.

JawKnee
Mar 24, 2007





You'll take the ride to leave this town along that yellow line

Levitate posted:

Call it bullshit or not but the Rangers have always talked about how the coach and GM get together to evaluate the roster and make decisions about it. AV obviously likes Staal and Girardi and the Rangers let Stralman when he was obviously their second best defenseman

Basically, I think AV is kinda bad at evaluating defensemen and he was happy with Girardi and Staal but wanted to ditch Stralman in an attempt to upgrade their scoring from the blueline instead of letting Girardi walk (or trading him at the 2014 deadline as I recall was a rumored possibility) or trading Staal instead.

Just my opinion. I think Sather also liked those guys a lot (especially Girardi) and so yeah maybe AV doesn't factor into it that much but I personally think it's clear he likes those guys and relies upon them to the detriment of the team

a false posted:

is it really that outlandish to imagine that a coach has influence on a team's personnel decisions, or do you actually believe that all decisions about signing players happen strictly in a vacuum containing the general manager, player, and player's agent? do you think tanner glass is brought to the new york rangers (on a 3 year deal, no less) if vigneault is not coach?

The Glass thing is probably AV's influence, and I'll take your word on the Stralman thing - but here's the thing about both of those: those are ultimately moves the GM wears, not the coach. Your GM should not be beholden to the coach, no matter how much input the coach has into the process - if you have, and continue to have bad players on the roster, its your GMs job to fix it.

DJExile
Jun 28, 2007


Yeah I don't doubt coaches have at least some say with the rest of the front office but those decisions are ultimately Gorton's, not AV's.

a false
Mar 5, 2009

I DECIDE
WHO LIVES
AND WHO DIES

JawKnee posted:

The Glass thing is probably AV's influence, and I'll take your word on the Stralman thing - but here's the thing about both of those: those are ultimately moves the GM wears, not the coach. Your GM should not be beholden to the coach, no matter how much input the coach has into the process - if you have, and continue to have bad players on the roster, its your GMs job to fix it.

well, the gm who made those moves is no longer the gm, but the coach that influenced them is still here, so,

grack
Jan 10, 2012

COACH TOTORO SAY REFEREE CAN BANISH WHISTLE TO LAND OF WIND AND GHOSTS!

a false posted:

you sure are worked up about people having the gall to suggest that alain vigneault has made significant mistakes as coach of the rangers

I've never once said this?

JawKnee
Mar 24, 2007





You'll take the ride to leave this town along that yellow line
so why isn't Gorton fixing the issue if Sather was the problem?

a false
Mar 5, 2009

I DECIDE
WHO LIVES
AND WHO DIES

DJExile posted:

Yeah I don't doubt coaches have at least some say with the rest of the front office but those decisions are ultimately Gorton's, not AV's.

they are not. sather was gm at the time.

DJExile
Jun 28, 2007


a false posted:

they are not. sather was gm at the time.

oh whoops, that's my bad then

grack
Jan 10, 2012

COACH TOTORO SAY REFEREE CAN BANISH WHISTLE TO LAND OF WIND AND GHOSTS!

Levitate posted:

No loving poo poo. I haven't seen Grack make a single post in these threads that isn't being a gigantic rear end in a top hat to someone

Feel free to check my post history.

bunnyofdoom
Mar 29, 2008

I've been here the whole time, and you're not my real Dad! :emo:

grack posted:

Feel free to check my post history.

Asking if Harriet has murdered me does not count as rear end in a top hat behavior. It is checking on my safety.

a false
Mar 5, 2009

I DECIDE
WHO LIVES
AND WHO DIES

JawKnee posted:

so why isn't Gorton fixing the issue if Sather was the problem?

fixing the issue where sather gave bad and poorly-aging defensemen long and lucrative contracts that it would be unfeasible to buy out and the other one where better players who we could have had for the same money or less were allowed to walk? how do you suggest he fixes those issues, with a time machine?

e: don't get me wrong i have problems with some things gorton has done (the eric staal deadline trade last year, for example) but this is a poorly thought out question

a false fucked around with this message at 20:48 on May 10, 2017

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

JawKnee
Mar 24, 2007





You'll take the ride to leave this town along that yellow line
Well I mean, I'm not a GM of a team - but it seems like other GMs have found ways to get out from under lousy contracts? That's part of their job? The point I'm trying to make here, is that there doesn't seem to be (yet) an indication that Gorton considers them lousy - the way that you, and others of RAS at least do (I don't really interact with rags fans anywhere else).

I would think that would be a more realistic solution to that problem than firing the coach though.

  • Locked thread