|
Rageaholic Monkey posted:I wasn't even aware there was a new King Arthur movie out until yesterday, so that sounds about right. I didn't even see a trailer until last week.
|
# ? May 15, 2017 15:28 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 09:52 |
|
I really liked it but I felt it was a bit more generic than Guy usually has his influence in. More conventional than his early stuff which is always awesome. Snatch, RocknRolla, etc.
|
# ? May 15, 2017 15:31 |
|
Macarius Wrench posted:Justified because it was an awful film, thoroughly awful. Not bad in an entertaining way, not terrible in an unexpected way, just completely pointless and dull and poorly made. Granted I'm not an anime nerd, i saw about half the 95 original when I was a kid, and the only real draw for me was ScarJo but doesn't change how loving god awful that film was. Really? drat, I enjoyed the hell out of it.
|
# ? May 15, 2017 15:37 |
|
There will be people who enjoyed it, sure, but if you really pushed them to explain what they enjoyed about they would crumble. I maybe enjoyed it in the way my dumb brain would sit and "enjoy" Will and Grace or the Big Bang Theory or The Fast Show but under any critical analysis or serious analytical discussion you would be left speechless. Its a loving shitebag of a film that makes me genuinely angry that I spent 90 minutes of my life on it in a way that no other movie has for me apart from maybe North? Pixels was loving awful but at least it had a personality albeit a hated one. Ghost in the Shell, fittingly didn't even have that.
|
# ? May 15, 2017 15:47 |
Macarius Wrench posted:Just thinking back to my time in the cinema I am reminded of the uncomfortable, restrictive, choking feeling I had when I looked at my watch and realised only 25 minutes had passed since the trailers ended. Surprise, this was my reaction to the anime. Certainly not gonna check out the live action movie at this rate.
|
|
# ? May 15, 2017 17:04 |
|
Macarius Wrench posted:
I know, the Internet is all about stupid exaggeration, but holy poo poo, did the director sleep with your mom or something? It was a okayish movie at best with some nice ideas and a tremendous look and art direction (much stolen from the Anime). It was nowhere near as good as the Anime, and it was unexciting outside of the design, but "worst movie"? Worse than Pixels? It wasn't even the worst big budget movie this year. Or of the weekend it started on. Not having the classic opening song was the biggest mistake of the movie (since the whole whitewashing thing was at least justified in-story I don't dock it on it too much). Decius fucked around with this message at 17:26 on May 15, 2017 |
# ? May 15, 2017 17:23 |
|
Decius posted:I know, the Internet is all about stupid exaggeration, but holy poo poo, did the director sleep with your mom or something? Well he did have a history with women.
|
# ? May 15, 2017 17:39 |
|
Decius posted:(since the whole whitewashing thing was at least justified in-story I don't dock it on it too much). Haha what that just makes it worse.
|
# ? May 15, 2017 17:43 |
|
Decius posted:I know, the Internet is all about stupid exaggeration, but holy poo poo, did the director sleep with your mom or something? It was a okayish movie at best with some nice ideas and a tremendous look and art direction (much stolen from the Anime). It was nowhere near as good as the Anime, and it was unexciting outside of the design, but "worst movie"? Worse than Pixels? It wasn't even the worst big budget movie this year. Or of the weekend it started on. Didn't they use a dubstep remix of the classic song
|
# ? May 15, 2017 19:16 |
|
Gatts posted:I like Hunnam, better than Worthington, Alexander Skarsgard and Jai Courtney but they're all sorta bland except Charlie's getting there and some traction going. Don't forget our other extremely bland Swede Joel Kinnaman, who people for some reason also think should be a action star. I have seen both Alexander Skarsgård and Joel Kinnaman in a lot of Swedish movies and never understood how they got to Hollywood. At least Alicia Vikander is good though.
|
# ? May 15, 2017 19:16 |
|
I kinda like Skarsgard. I thought he was pretty good in Generation Kill as a total weirdo, anyway. Guy Ritchie's next movie is the live action Aladdin. Hopefully with an all Arabic or Chinese cast.
|
# ? May 15, 2017 19:23 |
|
Alicia Vikander is really good.
|
# ? May 15, 2017 19:57 |
|
Decius posted:I know, the Internet is all about stupid exaggeration, but holy poo poo, did the director sleep with your mom or something? It was a okayish movie at best with some nice ideas and a tremendous look and art direction (much stolen from the Anime). It was nowhere near as good as the Anime, and it was unexciting outside of the design, but "worst movie"? Worse than Pixels? It wasn't even the worst big budget movie this year. Or of the weekend it started on. Ghost in the Shell is real bad actually. It has more establishing shots than plot.
|
# ? May 15, 2017 21:19 |
|
I've never looked at a movie and wished it had less evocative imagery but more plot.
|
# ? May 15, 2017 21:30 |
|
Fried Watermelon posted:Didn't they use a dubstep remix of the classic song They used it over the end credits which always feels more of a "gently caress you fanboys, here's your drat theme song" move rather than a respectful homage to the original text
|
# ? May 15, 2017 21:36 |
|
Pump it up! Do it! posted:Don't forget our other extremely bland Swede Joel Kinnaman, who people for some reason also think should be a action star. I have seen both Alexander Skarsgård and Joel Kinnaman in a lot of Swedish movies and never understood how they got to Hollywood. At least Alicia Vikander is good though. It's me, I'm the guy who likes Joel Kinnaman and would love to see him in more stuff. I felt really sorry for him in RoboCop, he sold the existential dread of being reduced to a brain and half a lung in a jar extremely well.
|
# ? May 15, 2017 22:18 |
|
Sir Kodiak posted:I've never looked at a movie and wished it had less evocative imagery but more plot. I mean when it's the same cgi shot of the same city in the same lighting 19 times you might. It's like Scooby-Doo cartoons.
|
# ? May 15, 2017 22:25 |
|
Was the Ghost in the Shell old man Smithers?
|
# ? May 15, 2017 22:28 |
|
Does the GitS live action film really reuse establishing shots? That's surprisingly stingy.
|
# ? May 15, 2017 22:28 |
|
Sir Kodiak posted:Does the GitS live action film really reuse establishing shots? That's surprisingly stingy. To be fair, no. It just feels the same after an hour.
|
# ? May 15, 2017 22:30 |
|
Ah, okay. I hadn't recalled anything like that. Thought it looked great, myself.
|
# ? May 15, 2017 22:34 |
|
GonSmithe posted:Hercules was only bad because Because they got The Rock to play Hercules and then went with some de-mythed story.
|
# ? May 16, 2017 00:02 |
|
But it's okay because The Rock played a fully mythic Hercules in F8 this year.
|
# ? May 16, 2017 00:03 |
|
Peanut President posted:Ghost in the Shell is real bad actually. It has more establishing shots than plot. To be fair, unless if we are talking about SAC, there is always going to be more anything than plot in Ghost in the Shell
|
# ? May 16, 2017 00:17 |
|
Byzantine posted:Because they got The Rock to play Hercules and then went with some de-mythed story. He made the movie with a pulled groin and got 3 hernias, or something like that. He's Herc irl I own the blue, its a good movie
|
# ? May 16, 2017 00:33 |
|
Byzantine posted:Because they got The Rock to play Hercules and then went with some de-mythed story. No actually those are good things
|
# ? May 16, 2017 01:11 |
|
The Rock's Hercules wasn't even the best Hercules movie that year.
|
# ? May 16, 2017 01:23 |
|
In a spot of irony, the new Pirates movie is being held hostage by internet hackers: http://gizmodo.com/report-new-pirates-of-the-caribbean-being-held-for-ran-1795240158 Maybe this is a good time to get the McAfee people to help since Depp is going to star in a movie about their founder.
|
# ? May 16, 2017 01:43 |
|
Eh just pay up. Pay the ransom. It's in the spirit of piracy.
|
# ? May 16, 2017 01:56 |
|
The MSJ posted:In a spot of irony, the new Pirates movie is being held hostage by internet hackers: http://gizmodo.com/report-new-pirates-of-the-caribbean-being-held-for-ran-1795240158 Yikes. I think it's extremely likely that the movie will, in fact, be leaked. If the hackers have any brains at all, they'll have it hooked up to some kind of dead man's switch to remove the option of "prevent it from getting leaked by throwing law enforcement at the problem". Can you imagine the shitstorm if it was The Last Jedi instead? That'd be historic.
|
# ? May 16, 2017 01:57 |
|
They can keep it.
|
# ? May 16, 2017 01:58 |
|
Al Borland Corp. posted:Eh just pay up. Pay the ransom. It's in the spirit of piracy. I'm going to go ahead and disagree with this. You refuse, you let it get leaked, you try to recoup your money anyway, then you hunt down the hackers. Anything else encourages more ransoms.
|
# ? May 16, 2017 02:00 |
|
GonSmithe posted:No actually those are good things For clarity, the bad part is the de-mything.
|
# ? May 16, 2017 02:00 |
|
kiimo posted:I'm going to go ahead and disagree with this. You refuse, you let it get leaked, you try to recoup your money anyway, then you hunt down the hackers. Anything else encourages more ransoms. Yes, this is good for consumers.
|
# ? May 16, 2017 02:05 |
|
Al Borland Corp. posted:Eh just pay up. Pay the ransom. It's in the spirit of piracy. Remember OitNB season 5? Yeah you do. You saw Trevor Noah make a tongue in cheek joke about how bad people shouldn't be on twitter (I can't think of any who are) and rushed to pirate it because that was a cliffhanger and it's the mark of a good show that you want to know how that resolves so you did it. You broke internet law and you watched the whole mess in two days. https://www.wired.com/2017/05/orange-is-the-new-black-leak/
|
# ? May 16, 2017 02:06 |
|
syscall girl posted:Remember OitNB season 5? I remember they didn't pay the ransom.
|
# ? May 16, 2017 02:08 |
|
Fewer Pirates of the Carribean movie is good
|
# ? May 16, 2017 02:19 |
|
Sir Kodiak posted:Does the GitS live action film really reuse establishing shots? That's surprisingly stingy. I don't remember most of them establishing anything. They were very high shots of the city's tops and its advertising, like Bladerunner. So more like transitions. But they weren't literally reused. But after seeing one, you've seen them all.
|
# ? May 16, 2017 02:36 |
|
kiimo posted:I'm going to go ahead and disagree with this. You refuse, you let it get leaked, you try to recoup your money anyway, then you hunt down the hackers. Anything else encourages more ransoms. I think he was just talking about the poetry of a studio paying ransom for a movie about pirates. I doubt the leak will affect the box office much, I also doubt the movie will do that well.
|
# ? May 16, 2017 02:53 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 09:52 |
|
Sir Kodiak posted:I've never looked at a movie and wished it had less evocative imagery but more plot. so basically like GITS Innoncence
|
# ? May 16, 2017 03:01 |